Ample physical evidence shows that carbon dioxide (CO2) is the single most
important climate-relevant greenhouse gas in Earth¡¯s atmosphere
First phrase, first lie. The single most important climate-relevant blah
blah blah is water vapour, not CO2 by a great margin. It makes about 90%
of the
Can we stop talking about religion?
2013/6/18 Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com
Ample physical evidence shows that carbon dioxide (CO2) is the single
most important climate-relevant greenhouse gas in Earth¡¯s atmosphere
First phrase, first lie. The single most important climate-relevant
On 6/18/2013 4:21 AM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
Ample physical evidence shows that carbon dioxide (CO2) is the single most important
climate-relevant greenhouse gas in Earth¡¯s atmosphere
First phrase, first lie. The single most important climate-relevant blah blah blah is
water vapour, not CO2
On 17 Jun 2013, at 01:30, Jason Resch wrote:
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
snip
That people can initiate law is nice, though.
I would like to initiate the prohibition of prohibition. Oops :)
:-)
What is freedom of speech without freedom
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 16 Jun 2013, at 15:08, spudboy...@aol.com wrote:
I think Dyson is correct. My resentment is from the suspcion that it has
been a generated 'rush to judgement.
OK. I can understand. But, locally, we have only one
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 16 Jun 2013, at 17:28, Jason Resch wrote:
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 16 Jun 2013, at 15:08, spudboy...@aol.com wrote:
I think Dyson is correct. My resentment is
Not assumed to be caused, but known to be caused. The science is clear,
it's only that the vast majority of the population is science
illiterate to the point that many people with university degrees in
economics, engineering etc. don't know much about physics and are
susceptible to the same
On 15 Jun 2013, at 16:43, smi...@zonnet.nl wrote:
Not assumed to be caused, but known to be caused.
Hmm I agree with the spirit of your post. But we never known for
sure, it is still a belief even with serious evidences pointing on
some truth there.
In science we know nothing as
It's amazing how much damage the Anthropogenic CO2 can do to the Solar
Photosphere. ;-)
-Original Message-
From: smitra smi...@zonnet.nl
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sat, Jun 15, 2013 10:43 am
Subject: Re: On Global WarmingThe sun is getting a little
On 6/15/2013 3:24 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
Coincidentally I came across this wikipage of Freeman Dyson quotes today:
* My first heresy says that all the fuss about global warming is grossly
exaggerated.
Here I am opposing the holy brotherhood of climate model experts and the
crowd of
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 6:01 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 6/15/2013 3:24 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
Coincidentally I came across this wikipage of Freeman Dyson quotes today:
- My first heresy says that all the fuss about global warming is
grossly exaggerated. Here I am
On 6/15/2013 5:15 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
The point of this calculation is the very favorable rate of exchange between carbon in
the atmosphere and carbon in the soil. To stop the carbon in the atmosphere from
increasing, we only need to grow the biomass in the soil by a hundredth of an inch per
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 08:44:12PM -0700, meekerdb wrote:
On 6/15/2013 5:15 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
The point of this calculation is the very favorable rate of
exchange between carbon in the atmosphere and carbon in the soil.
To stop the carbon in the atmosphere from increasing, we only need
On 6/15/2013 10:16 PM, Russell Standish wrote:
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 08:44:12PM -0700, meekerdb wrote:
On 6/15/2013 5:15 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
The point of this calculation is the very favorable rate of
exchange between carbon in the atmosphere and carbon in the soil.
To stop the carbon in
14 matches
Mail list logo
