On 02 Aug 2012, at 00:27, RMahoney wrote:
Bruno wrote:
And my (older) definition asks for one more thing: it is that the
subject know (is aware or is conscious) about that inability and
that he can still make the decision. There is a reflexion on the
possibilities. If not, all non
If this universe has zero net energy charge and angular momemtum, I see no
problem being created via a chaotic inflation scenario.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
Hi Ronald,
I have a severe problem with this entire thread!
What exactly determines the particular properties, such as charge,
angular momentum, mass, etc., of this universe? Why are we assuming that
the choice of what went into the zero net sum is a prior definite and
constrained.
Alberto,
I have one more question.
On 31.07.2012 11:08 Alberto G. Corona said the following:
Evgenii, great questions
2012/7/30 Evgenii Rudnyiuse...@rudnyi.ru
On 30.07.2012 11:19 Alberto G. Corona said the following:
...
Let us say that there is some conglomerate of atoms. When it
I do not want to suggest a definition, but have a question concerning comp
frame. When I improvise, often in Jazz or Rock context the free will
question becomes fuzzy in this way:
Sometimes you hit a point where all the patterns/formulas you've learned;
i.e. the kind of stuff you can play in your
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
The problem is I have no conception of free will and neither do you nor
does anybody else, at least not a consistent coherent one that has any
depth.
This contradicts your own definition of free will that you already find
much
On 8/2/2012 12:18 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
Hi Ronald,
I have a severe problem with this entire thread!
What exactly determines the particular properties, such as charge, angular momentum,
mass, etc., of this universe?
They are conserved quantities, so if they are zero now it
I came across this today, which I thought others on this list might enjoy
http://www.rudyrucker.com/blog/2012/08/01/memories-of-kurt-godel/
Among other things Godel mentions a belief in the illusion of time,
compatibilist free will, Platonism, oneness of reality and mind.
Jason
--
You
Evgenn
I have not much time this week. I just added a paragraph below. I will ask
this with more detail later:
2012/8/2 Evgenii Rudnyi use...@rudnyi.ru
Alberto,
I have one more question.
On 31.07.2012 11:08 Alberto G. Corona said the following:
Evgenii, great questions
2012/7/30
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 01:24:59PM -0400, John Clark wrote:
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Russell Standish li...@hpcoders.com.auwrote:
Flipping a coin is never rational, although it may well be the best thing
to do.
I don't know what to make of that. If X is the best way to achieve a
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 09:17:00AM -0700, meekerdb wrote:
From the responses I've received on this list, I don't think people
are using the term rational in the same way it is used in
economics. Flipping a coin is never rational, although it may well be
the best thing to do.
Random moves are
On 8/2/2012 3:38 PM, Russell Standish wrote:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 01:24:59PM -0400, John Clark wrote:
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Russell Standishli...@hpcoders.com.auwrote:
Flipping a coin is never rational, although it may well be the best thing
to do.
I don't know what to make of
Evgnii,. The question is that the mind is not the brain in the same way
that Microsoft Word running in a computer ins not the computer. The
intuitive notion of location of our self, our mind behind de eyes and thus
inside the skull is not a mere derivation of the fact that the brain is
located
On 8/2/2012 3:55 PM, Russell Standish wrote:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 09:17:00AM -0700, meekerdb wrote:
From the responses I've received on this list, I don't think people
are using the term rational in the same way it is used in
economics. Flipping a coin is never rational, although it may
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 04:46:07PM -0700, meekerdb wrote:
But then to compete with other agents it may well be optimum to
adopt a random policy and flip a coin.
Of course. But rationality is not just about doing the optimal thing,
its about knowing what is the optimal thing to do, and then
On 8/2/2012 5:06 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 8/2/2012 12:18 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
Hi Ronald,
I have a severe problem with this entire thread!
What exactly determines the particular properties, such as
charge, angular momentum, mass, etc., of this universe?
They are conserved
On 8/2/2012 5:26 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
I came across this today, which I thought others on this list might enjoy
http://www.rudyrucker.com/blog/2012/08/01/memories-of-kurt-godel/
Among other things Godel mentions a belief in the illusion of time,
compatibilist free will, Platonism, oneness
On 8/2/2012 4:43 PM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
We think thar our self is in the head because in this way we control better ourselves
and we can react to inmediate dangers better.( That is why fighter pilots, that need
heavy feedback and agile movements fly with their machines, while the spy and
18 matches
Mail list logo
