On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:32 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 December 2014 at 23:02, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com
wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 9:24 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
They also failed to foresee that hand-held weapons would become so
powerful.
Are you
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 11:12 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
Why didn't Churchill revolt?
Well...
He was a Tory and born into the nobility, part of an illustrious family,
as well as being the Prime Minister who led the UK to victory against the
Nazis. That probably made him feel
Somebody said that they didn't want to sign up for Cryonics because they
were worried about ending up as a brain in a vat, and in any case they
believed in Everett's Many Worlds so it is unnecessary. Well, if Everett is
correct then you've already signed up for Cryonics in some universe and you
In depth article in Nature warning against the current unfounded euphoric
optimism regarding the scale of the future supply of shale gas (oil). This is
a long in depth article based on a Texas study that has taken a much finer
grained look at reserves than the EIA did and based on their much
On Friday, December 12, 2014 5:45:04 PM UTC, John Clark wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 2:33 AM, zibble...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
I apologize for this unreadable drivel
But with a real flare for writing unreadable drivel you could go far in
the psychology or philosophy
John Clark wrote:
Somebody said that they didn't want to sign up for Cryonics because they
were worried about ending up as a brain in a vat, and in any case they
believed in Everett's Many Worlds so it is unnecessary. Well, if Everett
is correct then you've already signed up for Cryonics in
On Friday, December 19, 2014 11:48:34 AM UTC, Pierz wrote:
So a close friend of mine is a novelist whose latest book has a supernova
in it. It's not a sci fi novel and the supernova is really quite secondary
but provides a nice backdrop to the literary main fare. I've read the
manuscript
On Saturday, December 20, 2014 5:36:08 AM UTC, Jason wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:24 PM, meekerdb meek...@verizon.net
javascript: wrote:
On 12/19/2014 4:58 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 3:32 PM, LizR liz...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
On 19 December
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 Bruce Kellett bhkell...@optusnet.com.au wrote:
What's wrong with oblivion?
It's just not my cup of tea, but if you feel differently that's fine, there
is no disputing maters of taste.
John K Clark
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 3:07 PM, zibblequib...@gmail.com wrote:
Part of how you sum up your core insight: that consciousness has no
detectable objective reality
No, I'm saying that consciousness DOES have a detectable objective reality
if and only if it's a brute fact that consciousness is
On 21-Dec-2014, at 6:30 am, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 Bruce Kellett bhkell...@optusnet.com.au wrote:
What's wrong with oblivion?
It's just not my cup of tea, but if you feel differently that's fine, there
is no disputing maters of taste.
On Sunday, December 21, 2014, Bruce Kellett bhkell...@optusnet.com.au
wrote:
John Clark wrote:
Somebody said that they didn't want to sign up for Cryonics because they
were worried about ending up as a brain in a vat, and in any case they
believed in Everett's Many Worlds so it is
On 12/20/2014 6:19 PM, John Clark wrote:
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 3:07 PM, zibblequib...@gmail.com
mailto:zibblequib...@gmail.com wrote:
Part of how you sum up your core insight: that consciousness has no
detectable
objective reality
No, I'm saying that consciousness DOES have a
As with split brain patients and other humans, if some part of the brain
isn't connected to the part of the brain that talks, we really can't
conclude those other parts doing other processing are unconscious. It's
like me concluding your not conscious because I don't know what your
thinking. It's
On Saturday, December 20, 2014 3:03:45 AM UTC+5:45, Liz R wrote:
Well I happen to know someone with a bachelor degree in astrophysics if
that's any help. And the first and most crucial question is, how close is the
SN to Earth?
Right. I've been looking into that and decided around 150ly
On Sunday, December 21, 2014 3:17:15 AM UTC+5:45, zibble...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, December 19, 2014 11:48:34 AM UTC, Pierz wrote:So a close friend
of mine is a novelist whose latest book has a supernova in it. It's not a sci
fi novel and the supernova is really quite secondary but
John Clark wrote:
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 Bruce Kellett bhkell...@optusnet.com.au
What's wrong with oblivion?
It's just not my cup of tea, but if you feel differently that's fine,
there is no disputing maters of taste.
If you are made total oblivious -- enter oblivion -- you are no
Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On Sunday, December 21, 2014, Bruce Kellett bhkell...@optusnet.com.au
wrote:
John Clark wrote:
Somebody said that they didn't want to sign up for Cryonics
because they were worried about ending up as a brain in a vat,
and in any case
18 matches
Mail list logo
