Le 26-avr.-05, à 21:36, John M a écrit :
Russell wrote:
Ah John, if only I could understand what you're saying...
*
Sorry, Russell, I fell back into my wholitic lingo with several
items that
are not identical to the 'general usage'.
I wish you could point out 'some' which I should try to
Did accepting and understanding the MWI drastically alter your
philosophical worldview? If so, how?
I cannot answer this question myself because I do not truly understand
many parts of it.
Thanks
--
Mark Fancey
Anti-Bushite Bullshite
Dear Bruno,
again a post from you with your wits. I will post my reply (if I get the
relevant points from Russell and - if I can - ) onlist.
However your expression:
... I think we can progress
only by understanding misunderstandings ...
(what I assume as 'the list's understanding of 'my' mis...)
Mark Fancey writes:
Did accepting and understanding the MWI drastically alter your
philosophical worldview? If so, how?
I don't know if I would describe it as a drastic alteration, but I do
tend to think of my actions as provoking a continuum of results rather
than a single result. For
Hal:
You say that you are more careful now (and everyone should always be
more careful!); but is it not, in fact, irrelevant? This is because
the worlds in which you cause great tragedy exist even before you
arrive at a branch point that could take you to them.
I am taking this from the saying:
Mark Fancey writes:
Did accepting and understanding the MWI drastically alter your
philosophical worldview? If so, how?
Hal: I don't know if I would describe it as a drastic alteration,
but I do tend to think of my actions as provoking a continuum
of results rather than a single result.
http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0504200
Quantum Behavior of Deterministic Systems with Information Loss. Path
Integral ApproachAuthors: M.
Blasone, P. Jizba,
H.
KleinertComments: 11 pages, RevTeXSubj-class: Quantum
Physics; Mathematical Physics
't Hooft's derivation of quantum from
Mark,
What does happening right now mean in the MWI concept? Einstein showed
that there is no universal right now. Are you confusing this with a
saying that I've seen attributed to C. A. Pickover, in his book Keys to
Infinity? It goes In infinite time and infinite space, whatever can
Norman wrote:
If it is true that In infinite time and infinite space,
whatever can happen, must happen, not only once but an
infinite number of times, then what does probability mean?
In your example below, there must be an infinity of worlds
where Colin Powell is president and an infinity
9 matches
Mail list logo
