Get more traffic by submitting Articles

2007-04-19 Thread anil vij
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 00:54:12 -0500 (CDT) Get more traffic by submitting Articles Article submission is perhaps one of the best ways to give weight to your products and services on the Internetthat is, if done correctly, but like link exchange, it is also

Re: RSSA / ASSA / Single Mind Theory

2007-04-19 Thread Stathis Papaioannou
On 4/20/07, Jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: With ASSA/RSSA there is the assumption that there is a sampling, that > of all observers (or observer moments) one is selected and > experienced. Consider momentarily, that no sampling was taking > place? Is this view consistent and valid? > > Note th

Re: RSSA / ASSA / Single Mind Theory

2007-04-19 Thread Russell Standish
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 11:16:16PM -, Jason wrote: > > What if you were simultaneously experiencing every OM? Would any > individual OM be able to tell? Individual OMs do not "tell" anything. Only persons (or minds or observers) do. If I were simultaneously experiencing all OMs, "I" could

Re: RSSA / ASSA / Single Mind Theory

2007-04-19 Thread Jason
On Apr 19, 6:27 am, Russell Standish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 06:48:06PM -, Jason wrote: > > > With ASSA/RSSA there is the assumption that there is a sampling, that > > of all observers (or observer moments) one is selected and > > experienced. Consider momentari

Re: RSSA / ASSA / Single Mind Theory

2007-04-19 Thread Russell Standish
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 06:48:06PM -, Jason wrote: > > With ASSA/RSSA there is the assumption that there is a sampling, that > of all observers (or observer moments) one is selected and > experienced. Consider momentarily, that no sampling was taking > place? Is this view consistent and val

Re: RSSA / ASSA / Single Mind Theory

2007-04-19 Thread John M
Jason: your idea sounds sound. I wonder if it is not a variation of the situation according to which "in facto" there is only ONE outcome under given circumstances of the actual OM, but we have the creativity of imagining more than just the one that occurs? I formulated this when I did not like

RSSA / ASSA / Single Mind Theory

2007-04-19 Thread Jason
With ASSA/RSSA there is the assumption that there is a sampling, that of all observers (or observer moments) one is selected and experienced. Consider momentarily, that no sampling was taking place? Is this view consistent and valid? Note that by "no sampling" I mean no discrimination. Instead

Re: Evidence for the simulation argument

2007-04-19 Thread Bruno Marchal
Le 07-mars-07, à 04:40, Jesse Mazer wrote : > http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list/browse_thread/thread/ > 0d5915764b7f3e08/fc56caf79ce58750?#fc56caf79ce58750 > > Jesse That is: 14 Mar 2001: Jesse wrote (in part): > A lot of people have a lot of different ideas about TOE's on this