Le 07-mars-07, à 04:40, Jesse Mazer wrote : > http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list/browse_thread/thread/ > 0d5915764b7f3e08/fc56caf79ce58750?#fc56caf79ce58750 > > Jesse
That is: 14 Mar 2001: Jesse wrote (in part): > A lot of people have a lot of different ideas about TOE's on this > list, so > maybe the global measure issue could help clarify where we all stand > in > relation to each other...do people have specific proposals about > this? I > guess the other relevant question is, what is the set of "everything" > that > you're putting the measure on...all computations? All mathematical > structures? All observer-moments? John M asked also: > BTW: > what do you mean by "interviewing the L-machine? Jesse's question is *the* important question in the list. I just recall it. But also, I will take the opportunity of John's question to explain a bit more the interview of the Lobian machine, and what that is, and how it helps to provide answers to Jesse's questions, when we assume explicitly the comp hyp. Asap, because I'm busy. I will try to give answers without too much technical details, but that is really what makes that exercise difficult. I hope I can do that already this week. Of course everyone can use the question of Jesse to make a bit more precise where they stand from the others indeed, I'm interested too. Bruno http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
