Le 07-mars-07, à 04:40, Jesse Mazer wrote :

> http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list/browse_thread/thread/ 
> 0d5915764b7f3e08/fc56caf79ce58750?#fc56caf79ce58750
> Jesse

That is: 14 Mar 2001: Jesse wrote (in part):

> A lot of people have a lot of different ideas about TOE's on this  
> list, so
>  maybe the global measure issue could help clarify where we all stand  
> in
>  relation to each other...do people have specific proposals about  
> this?  I
>  guess the other relevant question is, what is the set of "everything"  
> that
>  you're putting the measure on...all computations?  All mathematical
>  structures?  All observer-moments?

John M asked also:

> BTW:
> what do you mean by "interviewing the L-machine?

Jesse's question is *the* important question in the list. I just recall  
it. But also, I will take the opportunity of John's question to explain  
a bit more the interview of the Lobian machine, and what that is, and  
how it helps to provide answers to Jesse's questions, when we assume  
explicitly the comp hyp. Asap, because I'm busy. I will try to give  
answers without too much technical details, but that is really what  
makes that exercise difficult. I hope I can do that already this week.   
Of course everyone can use the question of Jesse to make a bit more  
precise where they stand from the others indeed, I'm interested too.



You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to