Re: Lost and not lost?

2008-11-28 Thread Kim Jones
On 28/11/2008, at 3:12 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: I have just finished the explanation of an argument (the movie graph argument, MGA) showing that Mechanism (the idea that I am machine) is incompatible with Materialism, the idea that there is some primitive stuffy universe from which

MGA for DUMMIES

2008-11-28 Thread Kim Jones
A representation of a thing (say MGA) is as good (ie as authentic) as the thing being represented. Yes? Autrement dit: there is no especial difference between the movie and the subject (of the movie) - where the movie is a more or less complete (whatever that means) representation of

Re: MGA 1

2008-11-28 Thread John Mikes
Thanks, Brent, at least you read through my blurb. Of course I am vague - besides I wrote the post in a jiffy - not premeditatedly, I am sorry. Also there is no adequate language to those things I want to refer to, not even 'in situ', the ideas and terms about interefficient totality (IMO more

Re: Lost and not lost?

2008-11-28 Thread Bruno Marchal
Hi Kim, On 28 Nov 2008, at 09:54, Kim Jones wrote: On 28/11/2008, at 3:12 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: I have just finished the explanation of an argument (the movie graph argument, MGA) showing that Mechanism (the idea that I am machine) is incompatible with Materialism, the idea that

Re: MGA 3

2008-11-28 Thread Abram Demski
Hi Bruno, So, basically, you are saying that I'm offering an alternative argument against materialism, correct? It seems to me you were going in that direction, yes. Well, *I* was suggesting that we run up against the problem of time in *either* direction (physical reality / mathematical

Re: join post

2008-11-28 Thread Russell Standish
I guess I haven't read those papers, so sorry if I was leading you up the garden path re GTMs. It sounds interesting that the universal prior could work for generalisation of the Turing machine, although I'm not sure what the implications would be. Anyway, it sounds like you've got a research

Re: MGA 3

2008-11-28 Thread Abram Demski
Bruno, I have done some thinking, and decided that I don't think this last step of the argument works for me. You provided two arguments, and so I provide two refutations. 1. (argument by removal of unnecessary parts): Suppose Alice lives in a cave all her life, with bread and water tossed down