Nick Prince wrote:
Hi Brent
Perhaps Bruno could give some clarification here. Just prior to his
conclusion on the sane paper I quoted from was this:
"So if we keep comp at this stage, we are forced to relate the inner
experience only to
the type of computation involved. The reason is that
Hi Brent
Perhaps Bruno could give some clarification here. Just prior to his
conclusion on the sane paper I quoted from was this:
"So if we keep comp at this stage, we are forced to relate the inner
experience only to
the type of computation involved. The reason is that only those types
are univ
Nick Prince wrote:
OOps sorry I sent an empty post by accident.
I agree with you here. But I am new to this field so I am uncertain
about so many things. However, I don't understand why it is that a
UD would know how to generate these law like sequences of states. It
may well generate all pos
OOps sorry I sent an empty post by accident.
I agree with you here. But I am new to this field so I am uncertain
about so many things. However, I don't understand why it is that a
UD would know how to generate these law like sequences of states. It
may well generate all possible programs that g
On Jan 5, 6:59 pm, Brent Meeker wrote:
> Nick Prince wrote:
> > Is this because you think of your stream of consciousness as somehow
> > like a reel of film? All the individual pictures could be cut from
> > the reel and laid out any which way but the implicit order is always
> > there. I can
Nick Prince wrote:
Is this because you think of your stream of consciousness as somehow
like a reel of film? All the individual pictures could be cut from
the reel and laid out any which way but the implicit order is always
there. I can understand this because all the spatio temporal
relationsh
Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
2010/1/4 Brent Meeker :
I think you give an excellent explication of the problem, Stathis. However,
one thing about it that still worries me is the role of time. You say the
mapping need not be consistent even moment to moment, and yet the mapping is
a timeless Pl
Quentin Anciaux wrote:
Le mercredi 06 janvier 2010 à 00:29 +1100, Stathis Papaioannou a écrit :
2010/1/5 Quentin Anciaux :
Consider a set of three one minute intervals of experience, {S1, S2,
S3}, which belong to a person S. S2 remembers S1 and remembers no gap
or intervening experienc
On 05 Jan 2010, at 15:09, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
2010/1/6 Quentin Anciaux :
It seems to me that it depends if the computation is iterative or
not... in
other words, to compute step N you must have computed step N-1
before that.
If you can directly compute step N without computing pri
As I understand it the UD generates all possible programs and as it
generates each one it runs one step of it before generating the next.
Does that not mean that eventually it will generate the program which
is generating what we understand to be some observer moments for us at
this particular time
Thank you Stathis, That does make sense to me.
On Jan 5, 12:22 pm, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
> 2010/1/5 Nick Prince :
>
> > Is this because you think of your stream of consciousness as somehow
> > like a reel of film? All the individual pictures could be cut from
> > the reel and laid out any
2010/1/6 Quentin Anciaux :
>> > It seems to me that it depends if the computation is iterative or not... in
>> > other words, to compute step N you must have computed step N-1 before that.
>> >
>> > If you can directly compute step N without computing prior step, S2/S1/S3
>> > is
>> > possible. I
Le mercredi 06 janvier 2010 à 00:29 +1100, Stathis Papaioannou a écrit :
> 2010/1/5 Quentin Anciaux :
>
> >> Consider a set of three one minute intervals of experience, {S1, S2,
> >> S3}, which belong to a person S. S2 remembers S1 and remembers no gap
> >> or intervening experiences between S2 an
2010/1/5 Quentin Anciaux :
>> Consider a set of three one minute intervals of experience, {S1, S2,
>> S3}, which belong to a person S. S2 remembers S1 and remembers no gap
>> or intervening experiences between S2 and S1; S3 remembers S1 and S2
>> and remembers that S1 preceded S2; and S3 also reme
2010/1/5 Stathis Papaioannou
> 2010/1/5 Nick Prince :
> > Is this because you think of your stream of consciousness as somehow
> > like a reel of film? All the individual pictures could be cut from
> > the reel and laid out any which way but the implicit order is always
> > there. I can underst
2010/1/5 Nick Prince :
> Is this because you think of your stream of consciousness as somehow
> like a reel of film? All the individual pictures could be cut from
> the reel and laid out any which way but the implicit order is always
> there. I can understand this because all the spatio temporal
16 matches
Mail list logo