On Sep 13, 2014 1:49 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
Yes, I agree that there's bound to be some anthropic selection, although
I'm not sure why a Newtonian universe is ruled out by that. Quantum
physics, as we've formulated it depends on a continuum.
Brent,
Can you elaborate on why
On 9/13/2014 6:12 AM, Terren Suydam wrote:
On Sep 13, 2014 1:49 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net mailto:meeke...@verizon.net
wrote:
Yes, I agree that there's bound to be some anthropic selection, although I'm not sure
why a Newtonian universe is ruled out by that. Quantum physics, as
Well, me neither, but it includes infinities - atoms would probably
collapse - etc. But just a guess hence the provisos. Personally I would
imagine most mathematical universes wouldn't support life though.
On 13 September 2014 17:49, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 9/12/2014 10:25 PM,
Hi Liz, Mike, et.al.
It's time for the nature/descriptions of it/math relationship to undergo
some formal attention by science.
Discussions of the options we have in how we humans behave when describing
the universe, in any other human social context, would be the job of a
*governing
On 9/13/2014 1:10 PM, LizR wrote:
Well, me neither, but it includes infinities - atoms would probably collapse -
etc.
The Hilbert space for an atom, even a hydrogen atom, is infinite dimensional.
But just a guess hence the provisos. Personally I would imagine most mathematical
universes
Colin,
I very strongly disagree with your intentions even though I believe in a
dual-aspect reality.
Science does very well right now based on experimental confirmation of
hypothesis.
Your first step should be to establish how a dual-aspect science can be
experimentally verified.
Frankly you have
On 13 Sep 2014, at 4:57 am, Platonist Guitar Cowboy
multiplecit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Platonist Guitar Cowboy
multiplecit...@gmail.com wrote:
Zero, even though they were all superstars and doing quite well for
themselves. Sure, there are examples
On 14 Sep 2014, at 8:33 am, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com wrote:
I am going to have a go at establishing a forum for the first act of science
self-governance in the modern era.
Nothing governs itself. Everything is in the clutches of some agenda or other
for better or worse -
Thanks Brent. If you could prove it would be impossible to formulate a
quantum theory without continuous values and probabilities, that would be
ironic.
Terren
On Sep 13, 2014 12:05 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 9/13/2014 6:12 AM, Terren Suydam wrote:
On Sep 13, 2014 1:49 AM,
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 1:46 AM, Kim Jones kimjo...@ozemail.com.au wrote:
It's not really that profound methinks, though I enjoy greatly your
detailing of the fascinating love/hate between Gus and Arnie. Actually they
were a couple of Jewish intellectuals competing with each other in the way
On 14 September 2014 10:32, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 9/13/2014 1:10 PM, LizR wrote:
Well, me neither, but it includes infinities - atoms would probably
collapse - etc.
The Hilbert space for an atom, even a hydrogen atom, is infinite
dimensional.
Of course, but Newtonian
11 matches
Mail list logo
