On 2/12/2019 5:34 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
If we could knew which machine we are, we could define consciousness, or at
least our personal current consciousness, as it would be defined by the
combinator realising us. But that is impossible, and it defines only mechanism
and the choice we mig
Two fascinating (and very different) approaches are presented to derive Quantim
Mechanics main practical tool (e.g. Born's rule). Wonder what some of the
physicists on here think about this research?
I find the argument that no laws is the fundamental law... and that the
universe and its laws ar
If we are algorithms executed by duplicated brains in a multiverse, is it
possible that algorithm splitting is the reason for quantum mechanics. It seems
like a simple explaination. If so then quantum interference takes place within
a duplicated algorithm. Does this make any sense?
--
You rece
> On 11 Feb 2019, at 19:13, Brent Meeker wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/11/2019 7:34 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>> On 11 Feb 2019, at 01:24, Brent Meeker wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2/10/2019 3:34 PM, Philip Thrift wrote:
Two recent books:
The First Minds: Caterpillars, Karyotes,
> On 11 Feb 2019, at 19:31, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, February 11, 2019 at 9:24:18 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>> On 11 Feb 2019, at 00:34, Philip Thrift >
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Two recent books:
>>
>> The First Minds: Caterpillars, Karyotes, and Consciousness
>> Arthu
> On 11 Feb 2019, at 19:47, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, February 11, 2019 at 9:56:12 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>> On 11 Feb 2019, at 01:42, Lawrence Crowell > > wrote:
>>
>> I do not hold to the idea of panpsychism
>
> Nor do I.
>
>
>
> Panpsychism
>
> https://pl
> On 9 Feb 2019, at 10:22, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, February 8, 2019 at 5:53:01 PM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>> On 4 Feb 2019, at 19:09, Philip Thrift >
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> As I have said, I am language-oriented. What this means is that I say that
>> science (from that p
7 matches
Mail list logo