On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 1:48 PM Dylan Distasio wrote:
> I'd point out that the large majority of people in the US now have
> concerns over these particular vaccines based on how public health policy
> has been conducted over the last 2+ years. You may be disappointed to
> find out that it's
On 12/20/2022 4:08 PM, Dylan Distasio wrote:
You can stay in the bubble if you'd like, and ignore the shift in
public perception, but it's clearly real, and is not just a fringe
when only 14% of the US population has gotten the latest booster. If
people actually had a large amount of
On Wed, 21 Dec 2022 at 11:57, spudboy100 via Everything List <
everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> I have had the Pfizer shots and advocate these for most of our population.
> On the other hand, if some people have allergic reactions to these shots
> causing clotting and cardiomyopathy,
I have had the Pfizer shots and advocate these for most of our population. On
the other hand, if some people have allergic reactions to these shots causing
clotting and cardiomyopathy, why would anyone sane demand that they take
medicine that will surely kill them? What kind of people demand
I am willing to investigate to see if there are any problems with mRNA
vaccines. If not, excellent. If there are, I want to know? You don't wish to
know is your thing. What you started as a dem-loyalty post back-fired as it
does outside the venue of this wee mailing list, thinking that people
You can stay in the bubble if you'd like, and ignore the shift in public
perception, but it's clearly real, and is not just a fringe when only 14%
of the US population has gotten the latest booster. If people actually
had a large amount of confidence in public authorities and actually
believed
On 12/20/2022 10:47 AM, Dylan Distasio wrote:
I'd point out that the large majority of people in the US now have
concerns over these particular vaccines based on how public health
policy has been conducted over the last 2+ years. You may be
disappointed to find out that it's not just
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 1:48 PM Dylan Distasio wrote:
> *I'd point out that the large majority of people in the US now have
> concerns over these particular vaccines*
>
If they do it's because of constant scaremongering about the safety of the
mRNA vaccine from right wing anti-science religious
I'd point out that the large majority of people in the US now have concerns
over these particular vaccines based on how public health policy has been
conducted over the last 2+ years. You may be disappointed to find out
that it's not just righty wingnuts who are questioning the reliability and
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 11:39 AM spudboy100 via Everything List <
everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
> * > Statically we are looking at 1/100 of vaccine recipients. That a lot
> of people sick and then dead.*
*BULLSHIT! *And it is people just like you spreading this sort of quack
I like the idea of people getting vaccinated. I oppose coercion, to ensure
people who receive that vaccinations don't die of adverse reactions. I oppose
those who appear to demand the vaccinations as a loyalty oath. It's simply a
matter of identifying whether there is any true to the death rate
Your medical commentary also points out the efficacy of a 100K carrier being
taken down by a 100K PLA missile.
To the point, you are always continually caviling about the stupid, white,
Trumpies avoiding the vax and threatening your personal wellbeing. Well, it now
appears vaccine aversion is
Yeah, it was over the top, but it's the best I could find in a quick moment.
It begs the question why rush to defend big pharma if it does sloppy work and
insufficiently warned people about adverse reactions? There seems a strong
likelihood that screening for adverse reactions could be put
There's also Makary at Johns Hopkins. I am more concerned that people get
coerced into taking a vax they medically shouldn't.Your medical speculation
isn't any better or worse than any other member of the public. I see a increase
in the death toll of athletes who shouldn't be keeling over.
Such a nice little proggie puppet!
Delightfully cheering.
It looks great for DeSantis. If people oppose him, it won't be for have a grand
jury look at the malpractices of the Dem party funder$.
Back to the science article, and we are talking about 2 things. Statically we
are looking at 1/100 of
This tee-shirt is nauseating.
LC
On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 1:08:56 AM UTC-6 spudb...@aol.com wrote:
> The language is Hindi I believe.
> There are others looking at the vaccines more carefully than you and John.
> Advocacy journalism follows:
>
>
On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 5:05:26 AM UTC-6 johnk...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 9:12 PM wrote:
>
> *>People who from an epidemiological point of view, get suppressed by
>> ideologists such as you, John. What are going for, Covid reduction or
>> obedience to the Democratic
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 9:12 PM wrote:
*>People who from an epidemiological point of view, get suppressed by
> ideologists such as you, John. What are going for, Covid reduction or
> obedience to the Democratic Party? *
>
I'm for not knocking a 100,000 ton nuclear aircraft carrier out of
18 matches
Mail list logo
