On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 7:42 AM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 2:58 AM, Pilar Morales
> wrote:
> > Does Comp address "ego" little or not, or super human powers, or theory
> > brewing? How about miracles, and temporarily apparent,
> > and
Does Comp address "ego" little or not, or super human powers, or theory
brewing? How about miracles, and temporarily apparent,
and non-repeatable, break down of laws of physics?
For example, in the early 1900s, there was a man walking through the woods
and found himself staring at someone, just as
Craig, I'm wondering what would make my internal processes come up with not
identical, but similar conclusions to what your theory seems to suggest. I
went through your page and could relate to the questions you posed and saw a
reflection of my own tendencies to integrate absolutely everything I
ob
I agree that math should probably not be taught in school, but algebra. In
elementary school. But, all the student's questions would lead to math...
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 11:33 AM, John Mikes wrote:
> After a resounding "NO" the question: "who's math?" I find it absolutely
> inevitable to incl
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 9:55 PM, meekerdb wrote:
> On 8/12/2011 5:28 PM, Pilar Morales wrote:
>
>> or a magnetron, which to me, gravitation and magnetism are manifestations
>> of the same force, just different reactions to interactions.
>>
>
> Andre Sakharov wrot
2011 at 5:13 PM, meekerdb wrote:
> **
> On 8/12/2011 2:08 PM, Pilar Morales wrote:
>
> I see you take it for granted that "the Universe was born". Was it
>> indeed? Maybe "OUR" universe was, but I speak about the "World" (Multiverse,
>> none of
is a 'poosible state' - I don't mix it up with
> 'zero' or 'null', just think about the meaningless meaning of it. No this,
> no that - MAYBE. I would not 'negate' ideas (states, as you call them) we
> don't know about. And we have lots bey
Roger,
Sorry to butt in, but I was also thoroughly confused. It seems to me that
you are re-discovering zero "0", as representing a concept of the absence
of any thing.
If you mean that zero is our concept of non existence, and that zero is
defined, not by its attributes, but by the absence of th
Hello Rex, thank you for generating this tread. Nice subject title. My
comments below
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Rex Allen wrote:
> If evolution by natural selection were correct, then it seems to me that if
> the overall environment remained relatively stable for an extended period of
> t
9 matches
Mail list logo
