-
From: Bruno Marchal
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-08, 13:05:33
Subject: Re: Is Sheldrake credible ? I personally think so.
On 08 Jan 2013, at 15:37, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Bruno Marchal
IMHO It doesn't matter what type of field. According to the
definition below,
a field
: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-08, 11:07:17
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Is Sheldrake credible ? I personally think so.
Hi Roger,
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Platonist Guitar Cowboy
?
Better data connected to opinion than opinion alone.
?
How is opinion
the chair.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
1/9/2013
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. - Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: meekerdb
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-08, 12:40:25
Subject: Re: Is Sheldrake credible ? I personally think so
: meekerdb
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-07, 17:58:06
Subject: Re: Is Sheldrake credible ? I personally think so.
On 1/7/2013 4:16 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
But natural selection implies some form of intelligence,
You don't understand evolution.
Brent
--
You received
: 2013-01-07, 18:04:22
Subject: Re: Is Sheldrake credible ? I personally think so.
On 1/7/2013 4:46 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi meekerdb
Quantum fields are nonphysical, since they do not exist in spacetime.
?? Where did you learn quantum field theory (I want to be sure not to hire any
Time: 2013-01-08, 08:36:24
Subject: Re: Is Sheldrake credible ? I personally think so.
On 07 Jan 2013, at 17:26, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Bruno Marchal
Yes, the theories are nonphysical, and in addition, quantum theories
quantum theory applies to quantum fields, which are nonphysical
Hi Roger,
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Platonist Guitar Cowboy
Better data connected to opinion than opinion alone.
How is opinion not connected to data? Have you found a way of neatly
separating the information and data from opinion and
the following content -
From: Platonist Guitar Cowboy
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-05, 07:15:28
Subject: Re: Is Sheldrake credible ? I personally think so.
Hi Everythingsters,
When things get a little fringe, I want the best bang for my buck (time
reading/listening in this case). Here
. - Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Alberto G. Corona
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-07, 07:05:29
Subject: Re: Re: Is Sheldrake credible ? I personally think so.
it is perfectly possible to accept natural selection with all the implication
in genetics
Time: 2013-01-06, 16:34:51
Subject: Re: Is Sheldrake credible ? I personally think so.
On 1/6/2013 3:52 PM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Stephen P. King
I think what was meant was the inverse, namely that
no consistent materialist can believe in quantum mechanics.
Ah. OK. I would like to see
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. - Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Stephen P. King
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-06, 15:31:01
Subject: Re: Is Sheldrake credible ? I personally think so.
On 1/6/2013 3:14 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 1/6/2013 11
-06, 16:23:37
Subject: Re: Is Sheldrake credible ? I personally think so.
On 1/6/2013 12:59 PM, Roger Clough wrote:
quantum physics, which is nonphysical
A new record. You've contradicted yourself in only five words.
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Platonist Guitar Cowboy
You're allowed to have that opinion, or any opinion.
We're different. I am a retired laboratory scientist and
a pragmatist to boot. So to me, data trumnps everything.
So I will believe
Time: 2013-01-07, 08:33:45
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Is Sheldrake credible ? I personally think so.
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Platonist Guitar Cowboy
?
You're allowed to have that opinion, or any opinion.
?
We're different. I am a retired
content -
From: Bruno Marchal
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-07, 11:17:56
Subject: Re: Is Sheldrake credible ? I personally think so.
On 06 Jan 2013, at 21:59, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi meekerdb
Not all physicists are materialists, or if they are, they are
inconsistent
content -
From: meekerdb
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-05, 15:37:09
Subject: Re: Is Sheldrake credible ? I personally think so.
On 1/5/2013 6:26 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Richard Ruquist
Empirical data, to my way of thinking, trumps scientific dogma
(such as materialism) any
content -
From: meekerdb
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-06, 14:17:42
Subject: Re: Is Sheldrake credible ? I personally think so.
On 1/6/2013 5:30 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi meekerdb
Materialists can't consistently accept inextended structures and
functions such as quantum
credible ? I personally think so.
Hi Everythingsters,
When things get a little fringe, I want the best bang for my buck (time
reading/listening in this case). Here Sheldrake only delivers when held in
check by McKenna and Abraham, even if not stunning.
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Roger
: Is Sheldrake credible ? I personally think so.
Hi Everythingsters,
When things get a little fringe, I want the best bang for my buck (time
reading/listening in this case). Here Sheldrake only delivers when held in
check by McKenna and Abraham, even if not stunning.
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 4:44 PM
-list
Time: 2013-01-04, 16:49:55
Subject: Re: Is Sheldrake credible ? I personally think so.
On 1/4/2013 8:38 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi meekerdb
1) Materialists don't have any dogmas. Just ask one of them.
Theists have nothing but dogmas and you don't have to ask them, they tell you,
e.g. one
Ruquist
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-04, 08:31:56
Subject: Re: Is Sheldrake credible ? I personally think so.
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 1/4/2013 7:26 AM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 1/4/2013 7:07 AM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
I wrote a review
: 2013-01-03, 11:57:45
Subject: Re: Is Sheldrake credible ? I personally think so.
On Thursday, January 3, 2013 10:44:17 AM UTC-5, rclough wrote:
Hi Telmo Menezes
Sheldrake's been criticized in such a fashion for many of his results
(there are a huge number of other types of observations
-
From: Telmo Menezes
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-03, 11:17:59
Subject: Re: Is Sheldrake credible ? I personally think so.
Thanks Roger! I'm intrigued and will investigate further when time permits.
Another more mundane explanation might be related to the effect of knowing
...@verizon.net]
1/4/2013
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. - Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Stephen P. King
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-04, 04:24:57
Subject: Re: Is Sheldrake credible ? I personally think so.
On 1/4/2013 3:24 AM, meekerdb
]
1/4/2013
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. - Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Richard Ruquist
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-03, 13:46:20
Subject: Re: Is Sheldrake credible ? I personally think so.
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:57 AM
: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-04, 07:26:21
Subject: Re: Is Sheldrake credible ? I personally think so.
On 1/4/2013 7:07 AM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
I wrote a review paper for the Quantum Mind 2003 Tuscan, AZ Conference
a decade ago that upon rereading could have well been about morphic
fields
- Receiving the following content -
From: meekerdb
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-04, 03:14:17
Subject: Re: Is Sheldrake credible ? I personally think so.
On 1/3/2013 11:47 PM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Russell Standish
Most scientific publications are based on the 19th
the following content -
From: Richard Ruquist
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-03, 13:46:20
Subject: Re: Is Sheldrake credible ? I personally think so.
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Thursday, January 3, 2013 10:44:17 AM UTC-5, rclough wrote:
Hi
]
1/4/2013
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. - Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Russell Standish
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-03, 18:32:37
Subject: Re: Is Sheldrake credible ? I personally think so.
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 01:46
29 matches
Mail list logo
