RE: So, a new kind of non-boolean, non-digital, computer architecture

2014-05-27 Thread 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of meekerdb Sent: Monday, May 26, 2014 6:32 PM To: everything-list@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: So, a new kind of non-boolean, non-digital, computer architecture On 5/26/2014 4:24 PM, 'Chris de

Re: So, a new kind of non-boolean, non-digital, computer architecture

2014-05-27 Thread LizR
On 27 May 2014 19:02, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List everything-list@googlegroups.com wrote: Yeah, I already have some genes shared with a sponge. That doesn't mean I can mate with one. In fact I can't even mate with Cameron Diaz. Yes… nor would I advise trying to mate with a

Re: So, a new kind of non-boolean, non-digital, computer architecture

2014-05-27 Thread Kim Jones
http://youtu.be/p6nGwg0jCcA This is an interview with the director of an award winning documentary about alien incursion on Earth called The Hidden Hand. I have seen the full documentary and I would rate it as one of the best around. Anyone who has already made up their mind that this is a

Re: So, a new kind of non-boolean, non-digital, computer architecture

2014-05-27 Thread Kim Jones
And here is the link to the full doco. Its a syndicated link to a newsstand site so the content may not play in all regions which is pretty damn annoying, I know. Anyway, you may be able to pull it up on YT or iTunes for a couple of bucks.

Re: So, a new kind of non-boolean, non-digital, computer architecture

2014-05-27 Thread LizR
I'm downloading it for possible future viewing, although I suspect my other half will find the Danish thriller Forbrydelsen (The Killing) more enticing... On 27 May 2014 20:27, Kim Jones kimjo...@ozemail.com.au wrote: And here is the link to the full doco. Its a syndicated link to a newsstand

RE: TRONNIES

2014-05-27 Thread John Ross
Amazing! From: everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR Sent: Monday, May 26, 2014 2:34 PM To: everything-list@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: TRONNIES On 27 May 2014 05:56, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote: Are the

RE: TRONNIES

2014-05-27 Thread John Ross
Thank you, whoever it was that wrote the long paragraph. It reminds me of the only lawyer joke that I can remember. “Why do they bury Lawyers 8 feet deep.” “Because down deep they are not too bad.” I did learn the Law of Sines and I re-learned it over the weekend. My new knowledge has

Re: TRONNIES

2014-05-27 Thread Quentin Anciaux
2014-05-27 23:46 GMT+02:00 John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com: Thank you, whoever it was that wrote the long paragraph. It reminds me of the only lawyer joke that I can remember. “Why do they bury Lawyers 8 feet deep.” “Because down deep they are not too bad.” I did learn the Law of

Re: So, a new kind of non-boolean, non-digital, computer architecture

2014-05-27 Thread ghibbsa
On Tuesday, May 27, 2014 2:27:24 AM UTC+1, cdemorsella wrote: *From:* everyth...@googlegroups.com javascript: [mailto: everyth...@googlegroups.com javascript:] *On Behalf Of *LizR *Sent:* Monday, May 26, 2014 5:41 PM *To:* everyth...@googlegroups.com javascript: *Subject:* Re: So,

Re: So, a new kind of non-boolean, non-digital, computer architecture

2014-05-27 Thread ghibbsa
On Tuesday, May 27, 2014 2:32:07 AM UTC+1, Brent wrote: On 5/26/2014 4:24 PM, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List wrote: *From:* everyth...@googlegroups.com javascript: [ mailto:ever...@googlegroups.com javascript:] *On Behalf Of *LizR *Sent:* Monday, May 26, 2014 4:00 PM

RE: TRONNIES

2014-05-27 Thread John Ross
Some of you seem to think the relativity theories and the Standard Model are fact. Last time I looked they were still regarded as theories. I know there is lots of evidence that support these theories. There is just as much (maybe more) evidence to support my theory. A lot has been learned

Re: So, a new kind of non-boolean, non-digital, computer architecture

2014-05-27 Thread LizR
On 28 May 2014 11:55, ghib...@gmail.com wrote: the sponge point seems fair, but hybridization is misconstrued in popular knowledge. In scientific terms the best theory of human origins by a mile, is a hyrbidization event involving apes and pigs. The only reason it's ignored is because a lot

Re: Is Consciousness Computable?

2014-05-27 Thread ghibbsa
On Monday, May 26, 2014 12:45:50 AM UTC+1, Russell Standish wrote: On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 10:02:37AM -0700, ghi...@gmail.com javascript:wrote: qualify for forgiving :O). I mean.I don't know about you but I agree with Russel Standish's moderation philosophy on this list...or how it

Re: Is Consciousness Computable?

2014-05-27 Thread ghibbsa
On Monday, May 26, 2014 8:19:01 AM UTC+1, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 25 May 2014, at 19:02, ghi...@gmail.com javascript: wrote: On Friday, May 23, 2014 6:46:47 PM UTC+1, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 23 May 2014, at 15:52, ghi...@gmail.com wrote: On Thursday, May 22, 2014 8:12:59 AM

Re: TRONNIES

2014-05-27 Thread LizR
On 28 May 2014 12:03, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote: Some of you seem to think the relativity theories and the Standard Model are fact. Last time I looked they were still regarded as theories. I know there is lots of evidence that support these theories. There is just as much

Pluto bounces back!

2014-05-27 Thread LizR
Pluto Bids To Get Back Planetary Status Pluto has at least five moons, an atmosphere and now a new analysis places its diameter as bigger than its outer solar system rival Eris.

Re: So, a new kind of non-boolean, non-digital, computer architecture

2014-05-27 Thread Russell Standish
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 12:04:32PM +1200, LizR wrote: Yes I've heard the pig idea. It's supported by the fact that our immune systems are apparently very similar to pigs', which I assume is why we use bits of pig to repair our faulty heart valves, and quite a few religions have taboos against

Re: Is Consciousness Computable?

2014-05-27 Thread ghibbsa
On Wednesday, May 28, 2014 1:13:38 AM UTC+1, ghi...@gmail.com wrote: On Monday, May 26, 2014 8:19:01 AM UTC+1, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 25 May 2014, at 19:02, ghi...@gmail.com wrote: On Friday, May 23, 2014 6:46:47 PM UTC+1, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 23 May 2014, at 15:52,

Re: So, a new kind of non-boolean, non-digital, computer architecture

2014-05-27 Thread LizR
On 28 May 2014 12:56, Russell Standish li...@hpcoders.com.au wrote: On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 12:04:32PM +1200, LizR wrote: Yes I've heard the pig idea. It's supported by the fact that our immune systems are apparently very similar to pigs', which I assume is why we use bits of pig to

Re: So, a new kind of non-boolean, non-digital, computer architecture

2014-05-27 Thread ghibbsa
On Wednesday, May 28, 2014 1:04:34 AM UTC+1, Liz R wrote: On 28 May 2014 11:55, ghi...@gmail.com javascript: wrote: the sponge point seems fair, but hybridization is misconstrued in popular knowledge. In scientific terms the best theory of human origins by a mile, is a hyrbidization

Re: Is Consciousness Computable?

2014-05-27 Thread LizR
As far as I can see Bruno has a logical argument which happens to segue into a theory of physics. To disprove it, one merely needs to show that either his premises or his argument is wrong... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Everything List group. To

Re: So, a new kind of non-boolean, non-digital, computer architecture

2014-05-27 Thread LizR
I'm pretty sure I already read a very long article on this subject... I can't recall all the evidence though. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Everything List group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: So, a new kind of non-boolean, non-digital, computer architecture

2014-05-27 Thread meekerdb
On 5/27/2014 6:26 PM, LizR wrote: I'm pretty sure I already read a very long article on this subject... I can't recall all the evidence though. Sometimes I read your posts and wonder what they are referring too? Brent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: So, a new kind of non-boolean, non-digital, computer architecture

2014-05-27 Thread meekerdb
On 5/27/2014 6:12 PM, LizR wrote: On 28 May 2014 12:56, Russell Standish li...@hpcoders.com.au mailto:li...@hpcoders.com.au wrote: On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 12:04:32PM +1200, LizR wrote: Yes I've heard the pig idea. It's supported by the fact that our immune systems are apparently

Re: So, a new kind of non-boolean, non-digital, computer architecture

2014-05-27 Thread ghibbsa
On Wednesday, May 28, 2014 2:19:32 AM UTC+1, ghi...@gmail.com wrote: On Wednesday, May 28, 2014 1:04:34 AM UTC+1, Liz R wrote: On 28 May 2014 11:55, ghi...@gmail.com wrote: the sponge point seems fair, but hybridization is misconstrued in popular knowledge. In scientific terms the

Re: So, a new kind of non-boolean, non-digital, computer architecture

2014-05-27 Thread ghibbsa
On Wednesday, May 28, 2014 2:26:32 AM UTC+1, Liz R wrote: I'm pretty sure I already read a very long article on this subject... I can't recall all the evidence though. well it's not good enough liz.. you must love and worship the ape/pig theory as I do. come, let us kneel together and

Re: So, a new kind of non-boolean, non-digital, computer architecture

2014-05-27 Thread LizR
On 28 May 2014 13:48, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote: On 5/27/2014 6:26 PM, LizR wrote: I'm pretty sure I already read a very long article on this subject... I can't recall all the evidence though. Sometimes I read your posts and wonder what they are referring too? Sorry, that is

Re: So, a new kind of non-boolean, non-digital, computer architecture

2014-05-27 Thread LizR
I like pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals. --- Winston Churchill Indeed. Some animals are more equal than others. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Everything List group. To unsubscribe from this group

Re: So, a new kind of non-boolean, non-digital, computer architecture

2014-05-27 Thread LizR
On 28 May 2014 13:54, ghib...@gmail.com wrote: On Wednesday, May 28, 2014 2:26:32 AM UTC+1, Liz R wrote: I'm pretty sure I already read a very long article on this subject... I can't recall all the evidence though. well it's not good enough liz.. you must love and worship the ape/pig

Re: Is Consciousness Computable?

2014-05-27 Thread ghibbsa
On Wednesday, May 28, 2014 2:24:39 AM UTC+1, Liz R wrote: As far as I can see Bruno has a logical argument which happens to segue into a theory of physics. To disprove it, one merely needs to show that either his premises or his argument is wrong... I don't agree with you about that, but

Re: So, a new kind of non-boolean, non-digital, computer architecture

2014-05-27 Thread Stephen Paul King
To detect someone with Down's syndrome, sequence data is completely useless. Please elaborate! I do know of other ways that data can be organized... On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 9:52 PM, ghib...@gmail.com wrote: On Wednesday, May 28, 2014 2:19:32 AM UTC+1, ghi...@gmail.com wrote: On

Re: Is Consciousness Computable?

2014-05-27 Thread LizR
On 28 May 2014 14:12, ghib...@gmail.com wrote: On Wednesday, May 28, 2014 2:24:39 AM UTC+1, Liz R wrote: As far as I can see Bruno has a logical argument which happens to segue into a theory of physics. To disprove it, one merely needs to show that either his premises or his argument is

Re: Pluto bounces back!

2014-05-27 Thread Samiya Illias
I won't be surprised if they eventually discover that there are a total of 11 or 12 planets in the solar system. [Al-Qur'an 12:4, Translator: Pickthall] When Joseph said unto his father: O my father! Lo! I saw in a dream eleven planets and the sun and the moon, I saw them prostrating themselves

Re: Pluto bounces back!

2014-05-27 Thread LizR
Does it also explain how planets prostrate themselves? On 28 May 2014 15:51, Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com wrote: I won't be surprised if they eventually discover that there are a total of 11 or 12 planets in the solar system. [Al-Qur'an 12:4, Translator: Pickthall] When Joseph said

Re: Pluto bounces back!

2014-05-27 Thread Samiya Illias
There is a debate between the interpretation of the word s-j-d. I assume it also means to become lowly, humble, submissive, and not only physical prostration. [http://www.tyndalearchive.com/tabs/lane/ Book 1 Page 1307 ] Summary of why is can't only mean physical prostration:

Re: Is Consciousness Computable?

2014-05-27 Thread meekerdb
On 5/27/2014 7:36 PM, LizR wrote: On 28 May 2014 14:12, ghib...@gmail.com mailto:ghib...@gmail.com wrote: On Wednesday, May 28, 2014 2:24:39 AM UTC+1, Liz R wrote: As far as I can see Bruno has a logical argument which happens to segue into a theory of physics. To disprove