If IGUS or ETI exist elsewhere, I would argue that probably there are
scaling limits to the powers such beings are able to control. The universe
has matter in it, but it has an average density of 10^{-29}g/cm^3, and the
overwhelming percentage of matter in dense configurations is in stars that
On Monday, February 12, 2018 at 4:58:41 AM UTC-7, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
>
> If IGUS or ETI exist elsewhere, I would argue that probably there are
> scaling limits to the powers such beings are able to control. The universe
> has matter in it, but it has an average density of 10^{-29}g/cm^3, a
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 6:58 AM, Lawrence Crowell <
goldenfieldquaterni...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> *If IGUS or ETI exist elsewhere, I would argue that probably there are
> scaling limits to the powers such beings are able to control. The universe
> has matter in it, but it has an average density
No interpretation is really physics. These are more in a way metaphysics.
They are not consistent with each other and yet they are commensurate with
quantum mechanics. This means they are auxiliary. They generally can be
lumped into two categories, those that are ψ-epistemic and those that are
On Monday, February 12, 2018 at 11:18:37 AM UTC-6, John Clark wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 6:58 AM, Lawrence Crowell <
> goldenfield...@gmail.com > wrote:
>
> >
>> *If IGUS or ETI exist elsewhere, I would argue that probably there are
>> scaling limits to the powers such beings are able t
> On 11 Feb 2018, at 23:29, Bruce Kellett wrote:
>
> Scott Aaronson has an interesting blog entry on quantum interpretations:
>
> https://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=3628
>
> He seems somewhat conflicted over which interpretation to believe.
> "Anyway, as I said, MWI is the best interpre
On Monday, February 12, 2018 at 11:36:36 AM UTC-7, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
>
> On Monday, February 12, 2018 at 11:18:37 AM UTC-6, John Clark wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 6:58 AM, Lawrence Crowell <
>> goldenfield...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>>> *If IGUS or ETI exist elsewhere, I would
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 1:36 PM, Lawrence Crowell <
goldenfieldquaterni...@gmail.com> wrote:
*> We are faced with a number of prospects. The first is there is some
> limit to complexity that any intelligent being can manage.*
>
The smarter something is the more complexity it can handle
,
so
On Monday, February 12, 2018 at 5:08:46 PM UTC-6, John Clark wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 1:36 PM, Lawrence Crowell <
> goldenfield...@gmail.com > wrote:
>
> *> We are faced with a number of prospects. The first is there is some
>> limit to complexity that any intelligent being can manage.
9 matches
Mail list logo