On Monday, July 9, 2018 at 11:55:45 PM UTC-6, scerir wrote:
>
>
> Il 9 luglio 2018 alle 22.46 agrays...@gmail.com ha scritto:
>
>
>
> On Saturday, July 7, 2018 at 4:48:51 PM UTC-6, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> On Saturday, July 7, 2018 at 12:19:23 PM UTC-6, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
On 7/10/2018 3:30 PM, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote:
*More and more, Dirac's claim seems to be an illusion that most
everyone has fallen in love with. Consider the example of a vector in
a plane decomposed as a superposition of unit vectors in some
orthogonal basis, Not an exact analogy to
On Tuesday, July 10, 2018 at 4:01:02 PM UTC-6, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, July 9, 2018 at 11:55:45 PM UTC-6, scerir wrote:
>>
>>
>> Il 9 luglio 2018 alle 22.46 agrays...@gmail.com ha scritto:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, July 7, 2018 at 4:48:51 PM UTC-6, agrays...@gmail.com
On 7/10/2018 3:01 PM, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote:
*IIRC, the above quote is also in the Wiki article. It's not a
coherent argument; not even an argument but an ASSERTION. Let's raise
the level of discourse. It says we always get a or b, no intermediate
result when the system is in a
On 7/10/2018 6:50 PM, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, July 10, 2018 at 4:42:44 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
On 7/10/2018 3:01 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
*IIRC, the above quote is also in the Wiki article. It's not a
coherent argument; not even an argument but an
On Tuesday, July 10, 2018 at 8:28:51 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
>
>
>
> On 7/10/2018 7:04 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, July 10, 2018 at 5:08:30 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 7/10/2018 3:30 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> *More and more, Dirac's claim seems to be
On Tuesday, July 10, 2018 at 8:24:38 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
>
>
>
> On 7/10/2018 6:50 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, July 10, 2018 at 4:42:44 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 7/10/2018 3:01 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> *IIRC, the above quote is also in the Wiki
> Il 11 luglio 2018 alle 0.01 agrayson2...@gmail.com ha scritto:
>
>
>
> On Monday, July 9, 2018 at 11:55:45 PM UTC-6, scerir wrote:
>
> > >
> >
> > > > > Il 9 luglio 2018 alle 22.46 agrays...@gmail.com ha
> > scritto:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On
On Tuesday, July 10, 2018 at 4:42:44 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
>
>
>
> On 7/10/2018 3:01 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> *IIRC, the above quote is also in the Wiki article. It's not a coherent
> argument; not even an argument but an ASSERTION. Let's raise the level of
> discourse. It says we
On Tuesday, July 10, 2018 at 5:08:30 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
>
>
>
> On 7/10/2018 3:30 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> *More and more, Dirac's claim seems to be an illusion that most everyone
> has fallen in love with. Consider the example of a vector in a plane
> decomposed as a
On 7/10/2018 7:04 PM, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, July 10, 2018 at 5:08:30 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
On 7/10/2018 3:30 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
*More and more, Dirac's claim seems to be an illusion that most
everyone has fallen in love with. Consider the
On Tuesday, July 10, 2018 at 5:08:30 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
>
>
>
> On 7/10/2018 3:30 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> *More and more, Dirac's claim seems to be an illusion that most everyone
> has fallen in love with. Consider the example of a vector in a plane
> decomposed as a
On 7/10/2018 6:34 PM, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, July 10, 2018 at 5:08:30 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
On 7/10/2018 3:30 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
*More and more, Dirac's claim seems to be an illusion that most
everyone has fallen in love with. Consider the
On Tuesday, July 10, 2018 at 8:17:14 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
>
>
>
> On 7/10/2018 6:34 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, July 10, 2018 at 5:08:30 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 7/10/2018 3:30 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> *More and more, Dirac's claim seems to be
14 matches
Mail list logo
