Re: Do we live within a Diophantine equation?

On 8/2/2018 2:07 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 1 Aug 2018, at 23:36, Brent Meeker > wrote: *If the cat is always in a mixed state, discussing decoherence times in the context of this wf make no sense, at least to me. But if you insist on this, mustn't the

Re: Do we live within a Diophantine equation?

On 8/2/2018 1:31 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: Not necessarily. The WM-duplication, like Everett QM,  illustrates that sometimes two events can be realised from a third person pod, yet only one event is realised from the observer’s pov, and that brings back a notion of first person

Re: Do we live within a Diophantine equation?

On 8/2/2018 1:53 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 1 Aug 2018, at 21:12, Brent Meeker > wrote: On 8/1/2018 8:46 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 1 Aug 2018, at 15:51, John Clark > wrote: On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 3:00 PM, Jason Resch

Re: Do we live within a Diophantine equation?

On 8/2/2018 7:38 AM, John Clark wrote: / > but with the "many-world” we are back at a Bertlmann socks case. The same for the Bell’s inequality violation. They are not violated in the wave, but the wave explains that in each branch the Bell’s inequality is violated, and

Re: Do we live within a Diophantine equation?

From: *Brent Meeker* mailto:meeke...@verizon.net>> On 8/2/2018 1:53 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 1 Aug 2018, at 21:12, Brent Meeker > wrote: Indeed.  But the common-cause explanation doesn't work for all choices of measurement angle. It does. Well, it does not

Re: Do we live within a Diophantine equation?

On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 11:46 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >> If a unmeasured electron or any particle (the exparament was originally >> done with silver atoms) passes through a Stern Gerlach magnet the particle >> will be deflected up (relative to the orientation angle chosen to set the >> magnet

Re: On natural selection of the laws of nature, Occam's razor and The Simplest Model

In Peirce's *Evolutionary love *there were also *anancasticism*, and *agapasticism*. "Three modes of evolution have thus been brought before us: evolution by fortuitous variation, evolution by mechanical necessity, and evolution by creative love. We may term them *tychastic* evolution, or

Re: Do we live within a Diophantine equation?

On Wednesday, August 1, 2018 at 10:39:52 PM UTC, Brent wrote: > > > > On 8/1/2018 2:57 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, August 1, 2018 at 9:36:18 PM UTC, Brent wrote: >> >> >> >> On 8/1/2018 1:50 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> >> >> On Wednesday, August 1, 2018 at

Re: Do we live within a Diophantine equation?

> On 1 Aug 2018, at 20:52, Brent Meeker wrote: > > > > On 8/1/2018 4:07 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >>> On 1 Aug 2018, at 02:11, Brent Meeker >> > wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 7/31/2018 2:43 PM, agrayson2...@gmail.com >>> wrote:

Re: Do we live within a Diophantine equation?

> On 1 Aug 2018, at 22:50, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, August 1, 2018 at 4:41:02 AM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: > > > On Wednesday, August 1, 2018 at 2:09:45 AM UTC, Brent wrote: > > > On 7/31/2018 6:22 PM, agrays...@gmail.com <> wrote: > > > On Wednesday,

Re: Do we live within a Diophantine equation?

> On 1 Aug 2018, at 23:36, Brent Meeker wrote: > > > > >> If the cat is always in a mixed state, discussing decoherence times in the >> context of this wf make no sense, at least to me. But if you insist on this, >> mustn't the overall wf be a mixed state, making the radioactive source,

Re: Do we live within a Diophantine equation?

> On 1 Aug 2018, at 20:39, Brent Meeker wrote: > > > > On 8/1/2018 3:51 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >>> On 31 Jul 2018, at 21:46, Brent Meeker >> > wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 7/31/2018 9:11 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: > On 30 Jul 2018, at 22:27, Brent

Re: Do we live within a Diophantine equation?

> On 1 Aug 2018, at 20:49, Brent Meeker wrote: > > > > On 8/1/2018 4:03 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >>> On 31 Jul 2018, at 22:02, Brent Meeker >> > wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 7/31/2018 9:58 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: > On 31 Jul 2018, at 02:57, Brent

Re: Do we live within a Diophantine equation?

> On 1 Aug 2018, at 20:59, Brent Meeker wrote: > > > > On 8/1/2018 4:49 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >>> On 1 Aug 2018, at 07:49, Brent Meeker >> > wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 7/31/2018 10:19 PM, Jason Resch wrote: On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 4:52 PM

Re: Do we live within a Diophantine equation?

> On 1 Aug 2018, at 21:12, Brent Meeker wrote: > > > > On 8/1/2018 8:46 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >>> On 1 Aug 2018, at 15:51, John Clark >> > wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 3:00 PM, Jason Resch >> > wrote: >>> >>>

Re: Do we live within a Diophantine equation?

From: *Bruno Marchal* mailto:marc...@ulb.ac.be>> On 1 Aug 2018, at 21:12, Brent Meeker > wrote: Indeed.  But the common-cause explanation doesn't work for all choices of measurement angle. It does. Well, it does not if you assume only one Bob and Alice, but the

Re: Do we live within a Diophantine equation?

> On 2 Aug 2018, at 01:32, Bruce Kellett wrote: > > From: Bruno Marchal mailto:marc...@ulb.ac.be>> >>> On 1 Aug 2018, at 06:19, Bruce Kellett >> > wrote: >>> >>> >>> No, there are not any infinities of anything. You simply confuse yourself >>> by continuing

Re: Do we live within a Diophantine equation?

From: *Bruno Marchal* mailto:marc...@ulb.ac.be>> On 2 Aug 2018, at 01:32, Bruce Kellett > wrote: From: *Bruno Marchal* mailto:marc...@ulb.ac.be>> On 1 Aug 2018, at 06:19, Bruce Kellett > wrote: No, there are not any

Re: Do we live within a Diophantine equation?

On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 12:38 AM Brent Meeker wrote: > > > On 8/1/2018 10:22 PM, Jason Resch wrote: > > > > On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 11:34 PM Brent Meeker wrote: > >> >> >> On 8/1/2018 3:46 PM, Jason Resch wrote: >> >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 1:39 PM Brent Meeker wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On