Hi Roger,
On 01 Oct 2012, at 19:28, Roger Clough wrote:
BRUNO: OK. But the ability to selct does not require intelligence,
just interaction and some memory.
$$ ROGER: No, that's where you keep missing the absolutely
critical issue of self.
Choice is exclusive to the autonomous
On 02 Oct 2012, at 07:14, William R. Buckley wrote:
$$$ 1) Well it's an indeterminantcy, but which path is chosen is
done by the geometry of the location
or test probe, not the same I would think as logical choice (?)
So I would say no.
...
Note that intelligence requires the
Hi Bruno Marchal
My understanding of personal or subjective or 1p filtering
has little to do with where the person is (Washington or Moscow).
it has to do (if I might say it this way) with where the person has been.
Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net
10/2/2012
Forever is a long time,
Hi Stephen P. King
I appreciate criticisms of Leibniz.
Not sure what computational complexity or universality means
although I suppose that it has something to do with the whole is
greater than its parts.
That being so, if we take the parts to be monads, each
part knows everything (all of
On 10/1/2012 1:28 PM, Roger Clough wrote:
ROGER: Objects can be physical and also infinitely divisible,
but L considered this infinite divisibility to disqualify an object to be real
because
there's no end to the process, one wouldn't end up with something
to refer to.
Hi Roger,
This
$$$ 1) Well it's an indeterminantcy, but which path is chosen is
done by the geometry of the location
or test probe, not the same I would think as logical choice (?)
So I would say no.
...
Note that intelligence requires the ability to select.
BRUNO: OK. But the ability
6 matches
Mail list logo
