Re: Re: Re: Numbers in Space

2012-09-22 Thread Roger Clough
. Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net 9/22/2012 Forever is a long time, especially near the end. -Woody Allen - Receiving the following content - From: Craig Weinberg Receiver: everything-list Time: 2012-09-21, 12:58:41 Subject: Re: Re: Numbers in Space On Friday, September 21

Re: Re: Numbers in Space

2012-09-21 Thread Roger Clough
Subject: Re: Numbers in Space On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.net wrote: On 9/20/2012 11:48 AM, Jason Resch wrote: On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote: Here's another reductio ad absurdum illustration of comp

Re: Re: Numbers in Space

2012-09-21 Thread Roger Clough
- From: Stephen P. King Receiver: everything-list Time: 2012-09-20, 20:50:22 Subject: Re: Numbers in Space On 9/20/2012 11:02 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote: Here's another reductio ad absurdum illustration of comp. If the version of comp we are discussing here is independent of physics

Re: Re: Numbers in Space

2012-09-21 Thread Roger Clough
Subject: Re: Numbers in Space On 9/20/2012 12:14 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Thursday, September 20, 2012 11:48:15 AM UTC-4, Jason wrote: On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote: Here's another reductio ad absurdum illustration of comp. If the version of comp we

Re: Re: Numbers in Space

2012-09-21 Thread Roger Clough
Subject: Re: Numbers in Space On Friday, September 21, 2012 4:18:47 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 20 Sep 2012, at 19:16, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Thursday, September 20, 2012 12:26:07 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 20 Sep 2012, at 17:02, Craig Weinberg wrote: Here's another reductio

Re: Re: Numbers in Space

2012-09-21 Thread Craig Weinberg
- Receiving the following content - *From:* Craig Weinberg javascript: *Receiver:* everything-list javascript: *Time:* 2012-09-21, 11:27:56 *Subject:* Re: Numbers in Space On Friday, September 21, 2012 4:18:47 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 20 Sep 2012, at 19:16, Craig