On Tuesday, January 22, 2013 7:12:10 AM UTC-5, rclough wrote:
>
> Hi Craig Weinberg
>
> That's quite a stretch. You really expect me to believe
> that a rock in the path of a blind man walking would
> be detected by him ? Of course he could detect it with his cane,
> but what if he had none ?
Hi Craig Weinberg
That's quite a stretch. You really expect me to believe
that a rock in the path of a blind man walking would
be detected by him ? Of course he could detect it with his cane,
but what if he had none ?
- Receiving the following content -
From: Craig Weinberg
Receiver: e
ing content -
> *From:* Craig Weinberg
> *Receiver:* everything-list
> *Time:* 2013-01-20, 15:00:34
> *Subject:* Re: Re: Re: Re: A God-limited God - My Theodicy
>
>
>
> On Sunday, January 20, 2013 2:43:42 PM UTC-5, rclough wrote:
>>
>> Hi Craig Weinberg
>&g
e: Re: Re: A God-limited God - My Theodicy
On Sunday, January 20, 2013 2:43:42 PM UTC-5, rclough wrote:
Hi Craig Weinberg
So you belong to the liberal thought police then.
Haha of course. How could it be possible for anyone to see the contradiction
of the concept of God without 'belong
On Sunday, January 20, 2013 2:43:42 PM UTC-5, rclough wrote:
>
> Hi Craig Weinberg
>
> So you belong to the liberal thought police then.
>
Haha of course. How could it be possible for anyone to see the
contradiction of the concept of God without 'belonging to the liberal
thought police'?
Hi Craig Weinberg
So you belong to the liberal thought police then.
Not only can one not have freedom of speech, one cannot
have freedom of beliefs. Liberalism is fascism, it seems.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Craig Weinberg
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-20, 1
6 matches
Mail list logo
