On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> On 20 Jan 2012, at 07:17, Joseph Knight wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>> Stephen, Ronald,
>>
>> The paper is very interesting, on physics, but succumbs directly from the
>> argument that any digita
On 20 Jan 2012, at 07:17, Joseph Knight wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Bruno Marchal
wrote:
Stephen, Ronald,
The paper is very interesting, on physics, but succumbs directly
from the argument that any digital physics is bound to be
unsuccessful on the mind-body problem by be
On 20 Jan 2012, at 07:17, Joseph Knight wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Bruno Marchal
wrote:
Stephen, Ronald,
The paper is very interesting, on physics, but succumbs directly
from the argument that any digital physics is bound to be
unsuccessful on the mind-body problem by be
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> Stephen, Ronald,
>
> The paper is very interesting, on physics, but succumbs directly from the
> argument that any digital physics is bound to be unsuccessful on the
> mind-body problem by being still physicalist. The body problem is a probl
Stephen, Ronald,
The paper is very interesting, on physics, but succumbs directly from
the argument that any digital physics is bound to be unsuccessful on
the mind-body problem by being still physicalist. The body problem is
a problem of computer science, that is arithmetic, once we bet th
Dear Friends,
I recommend the following paper for your comment:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1201.3398v1
The Computing Spacetime
Fotini Markopoulou
<http://arxiv.org/find/gr-qc/1/au:+Markopoulou_F/0/1/0/all/0/1>
(Submitted on 17 Jan 2012)
The idea that the Universe is a program in a
I found this at arXiv:1201.3398v1 [gr-qc] 17 Jan 2012. Any comments?
I have just started to read it.,
Ronald
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googleg
7 matches
Mail list logo
