Re: [Evolution-hackers] Move IMAPX back to a module library for 3.12

2013-08-19 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Matthew Barnes wrote: > The IMAPX classes were moved into Camel's public API to serve as base > classes for evolution-kolab. But since Christian has parted ways with > us it would appear the evolution-kolab project is no longer active. > > I'm planning a good deal

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Reconsidering our release cycle

2013-07-24 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 3:28 PM, David Woodhouse wrote: > I don't think that makes sense. As Fabiano points out, Evo and EDS are > *very* closely tied. Even in the *stable* branch in 3.8.4 there are > fixes for EDS/EWS which require corresponding fixes in Evo. > > Breaking the close version ties w

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Reconsidering our release cycle

2013-07-24 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Hi Fabiano, On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > Srini, > > >> I really wouldn't want EDS to be part of this, if we ever want it to >> be a proper platform/core material. Just Evolution would be better fit >> for this model IMHO. > > Could I ask you why? > If you check our g

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Reconsidering our release cycle

2013-07-23 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 7:40 PM, Matthew Barnes wrote: > I've been kicking around this idea for awhile now, but haven't said > anything until now. I'm putting it out there as food for thought. > > Increasingly I'm feeling like the traditional 6-month release cycle is > just too short for Evolutio

Re: [Evolution-hackers] What happened to email-factory?

2013-01-09 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
[Sorry, I was away on a family emergengy and just back to work] On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Matthew Barnes wrote: > On Fri, 2013-01-04 at 20:58 +0200, Mehmet Giritli wrote: > > I was looking forward to have the email backend moved into EDS so that I > > can write a proper mail notification

Re: [Evolution-hackers] WebKit branch is ready

2012-03-28 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Daniel Vratil wrote: > Hello everyone! > > WebKitGtk+ 1.8.0 with the important patch has been released last night, and > so everything is in place now and I'm ready to break^W merge to master. The > branch has been rebased two days ago, I will only bump the webki

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Rethinking account management

2012-03-01 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Matthew Barnes wrote: > I added a page to our wiki about the upcoming file format for account > data.  It focuses more on the nuts and bolts of the file format itself > rather than the APIs used to access the data.  In particular, I wanted > to get the mail account

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Compile Evolution Mail as .so file with API for other GUI on ARM device

2012-02-09 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Hi Michal, On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Michal G. wrote: > Hi, > >> If you are looking to get eds/evo rid of gtk, you are proned to be >> lost. Instead, use the dbus api and write a email client in qt. You >> can glance it https://meego.gitorious.org/meego-ux/meego-app-email. I >> worked on a

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Compile Evolution Mail as .so file with API for other GUI on ARM device

2012-02-06 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Michal G. wrote: > Hi, > > I need more support as Evolution is huge project and I feel that I am lost. > Last days, I just went through code and I compiled EDS but on X86 without > Gtk+. > Thus, I modified some configuration files and main makefile to be able to > c

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Compile Evolution Mail as .so file with API for other GUI on ARM device

2012-02-02 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
; six months, so around September 2012. Does evolution follows GNOME schedules > (new stable version every six months)? Yes. Evo follows GNOME schedules. -Srini > > Michal > > > > On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Srinivasa Ragavan > wrote: >> >> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Compile Evolution Mail as .so file with API for other GUI on ARM device

2012-02-02 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
s could be added to my system, but not all (for >> instance gtk+). >> Do you think that I will be able to compile EDS without gtk+? >> >> BTW, does 3.6 cycle should be release around September of 2012 or later? >> >> Michal >> >> >> On Tue, J

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Compile Evolution Mail as .so file with API for other GUI on ARM device

2012-01-31 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
is, what ever you find could be obsolete in some form I fear. -Srini > > Michal > > > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Srinivasa Ragavan > wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Michal G. >> wrote: >> > Hi, >>

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Compile Evolution Mail as .so file with API for other GUI on ARM device

2012-01-30 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
/browse/evolution > > And could you tell where to start, or what should I read some to > - build mail engine library (http://mad-scientist.us/evolution.html - should > I follow this process) > - API of DBUS > > Michal > > > On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Sriniva

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Compile Evolution Mail as .so file with API for other GUI on ARM device

2012-01-27 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Hi Michal, On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Michal G. wrote: > Hi, > > I've been investigating a possibility of Evolution Mail cross-compilation > for Linux X-less device (ARM) and use it as dynamic library that will > provide me possibility to expose API that could be utilize by HMI layer. > > 1

Re: [Evolution-hackers] wip/settings branch is merged

2011-11-24 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Matthew Barnes wrote: > On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 16:05 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: >> I rebased email-factory-3-4 branch of evolution on top of gsettings >> merge. I'm away for a week in Finland, hopefully you get time to merge >> this a

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Camel no longer depends on libedataserver

2011-11-14 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Matthew Barnes wrote: > I have severed all of Camel's remaining dependencies on libedataserver, > mostly by way of code duplication.  In particular, all of Camel's search > and filtering code now uses CamelSExp, which is a clone of ESExp. > > libcamel now builds f

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Move evolution-alarm-notify to E-D-S?

2011-10-18 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:22 PM, Matthew Barnes wrote: > Here's a crazy idea... > > What do you guys think about moving evolution-alarm-notify to E-D-S as a > simple D-Bus service?  It could live in the new "services" directory: > >    evolution-data-server/services/evolution-alarm-notify/ > > ev

Re: [Evolution-hackers] WebKit port progress update

2011-08-28 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 11:38 PM, Matthew Barnes wrote: > On Sat, 2011-08-27 at 09:26 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: >> One thing I can say is that, this will be faster than the earlier >> method, for reason that even when we expand one attachment/mail, we >> rerende

Re: [Evolution-hackers] WebKit port progress update

2011-08-26 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Matthew Barnes wrote: > On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 17:20 +0200, Dan Vratil wrote: >> as I already mentioned on the IRC meeting, embedding widgets into WebKit >> is broken and I was told that WebKit-Gtk developers intend to drop this >> functionality sooner or later. >

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Rethinking Camel settings

2011-06-10 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Hi Matthew, On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Matthew Barnes wrote: > I'm at the point now with the account-mgmt branch where I have to deal > with the settings that trickle down into the various Camel providers. > The way the settings are managed now is to embed them into the Camel > service's UR

Re: [Evolution-hackers] CamelService changes

2011-04-25 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Matthew Barnes wrote: > On Fri, 2011-04-22 at 11:02 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: >> Mostly sounds fine to me as a  complete picture, but do remember of >> the email-factory branch that I'm working on to run mail on EDS. >> >&g

Re: [Evolution-hackers] CamelService changes

2011-04-21 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Hey Matt, On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 10:13 PM, Matthew Barnes wrote: > To help smooth the way for the account-mgmt I've made a few improvements > to the CamelSession and CamelService APIs in 3.1.  It's not necessarily > the *final* APIs that will wind up in 3.2, but more like the first round > of ch

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [Fwd: [MeeGo-dev] migration (back) to EDS]

2011-03-21 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 2:14 AM, Matthew Barnes wrote: > On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 15:50 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: >> If you see some increased interest in EDS soon, then it might be because >> MeeGo is currently investigating how to use EDS as the main PIM and >> email system again. >> >> Attached a

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [Reminder] Evolution community meeting at #evolution-meet channel - Aug 18 - 3:30 PM UTC

2010-08-16 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 6:54 PM, chen wrote: > On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 18:20 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 6:00 PM, chen wrote: >> > Hi, >> >  This is first meeting after our GUADEC 2010! There would be some >> > interesting updates

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [Reminder] Evolution community meeting at #evolution-meet channel - July 18 - 3:30 PM UTC

2010-08-16 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 6:00 PM, chen wrote: > Hi, >  This is first meeting after our GUADEC 2010! There would be some > interesting updates during meeting. The meeting goes as follows, It probably should be Aug 18 :-) -Srini. > > * Project updates > * Discussion on queries/decisions > * Indivi

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [Reminder] Evolution community meeting at #evolution-meet channel - July 14 - 3:30 PM UTC

2010-07-12 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 11:07 AM, chen wrote: > Hi all, >     Our this month's community meeting happens on July 14th. This would > be the community meeting before GUADEC 2011!! Isn't this supposed to be GUADEC 2010? ;-) -Srini. > > Post any queries to the list today if you want them to be answe

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evo and Kolab2 - a fresh attempt

2010-05-26 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Christian Hilberg wrote: > Hi Matthew, > > On Tuesday, 25 May 2010, you wrote: >> Hi Christian, >> This sounds pretty cool and would be a welcome addition to the Evolution >> suite. > > Good. :) > >> On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 19:29 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote: >> >

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Access Contacts information from Remote Machine with Python

2010-01-04 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Michael Pilgermann wrote: > Dear List Members, > > for a PIM synchronization program called PISI, which we mainly develop for > the Linux Phone Freerunner, I am currently trying to implement Evolution > connectivity - starting up with the contacts domain. > > The

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Moving from the single mbox file format for the local folders

2009-12-16 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Patrick Ohly wrote: > On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 18:55 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: >> Maildir is good, none denies it. But maildir is already there, but not >> sure how many use it. > > I do, and I know several other people who do. The q

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Moving from the single mbox file format for the local folders

2009-12-16 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Patrick Ohly wrote: > On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 16:54 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Patrick Ohly wrote: >> > On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 09:19 +0530, Chenthill wrote: >> >> On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 15

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Moving from the single mbox file format for the local folders

2009-12-16 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Ross Burton wrote: > On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 16:54 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: >> > I definitely won't switch away from maildir as my format of choice >> > because it integrates nicely with offlineimap. >> >> Sure, I think u

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Moving from the single mbox file format for the local folders

2009-12-16 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Patrick Ohly wrote: > On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 09:19 +0530, Chenthill wrote: >> On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 15:09 -0500, Reid Thompson wrote: >> > On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 01:16 +0530, Chenthill wrote: >> > > * Not able to create subfolders under INBOX - >> > > https://bugzill

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Moving from the single mbox file format for the local folders

2009-12-15 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Matthew Barnes wrote: > On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 01:25 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: >> It should be rocket fast!. Expunge is just unlink one file. Change of >> flags etc rewrites just that file when upsync happens. No rewrite 2gb >> of a file

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Moving from the single mbox file format for the local folders

2009-12-15 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Hello everyone, On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 1:16 AM, Chenthill wrote: > Hi fellow hackers!! >    I have been working for a while during last week on one the blockers > in evolution - https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=550414 - > 'Folder and summary mismatch error'(old one - > https://bugzilla

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Filtering and mail split

2009-12-07 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 9:19 PM, Jonathon Jongsma wrote: > On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 20:35 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 3:48 AM, Jonathon Jongsma >> wrote: >> > As some of you may know, I've been looking into moving mail down to the >> &

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Filtering and mail split

2009-12-03 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 3:48 AM, Jonathon Jongsma wrote: > As some of you may know, I've been looking into moving mail down to the > e-d-s level.  As a first step, I'm figuring out where to draw the line > between the front end and backend.  At the moment, I'm focusing on > filtering.  I think that

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Where in the code is the autocompletion for To: field done?

2009-10-25 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Florian K wrote: > > Hello Evolution developers, > > first of all thank you for making such a great tool! > > I have built Evolution  2.26.1 from source on Ubuntu 9.04. I would like to > explore the code that handles the autocompletion of email addresses in > rece

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Branching for Evolution 2.28 on Aug 11

2009-08-04 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 10:17 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: > I would also like to ask the Evolution -and- Anjal developers to be very > conservative about committing to the Evolution and Evolution-Data-Server > 'master' branch after we create the 'gnome-2-28' branch. I wouldn't commit to mail/ any m

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Index on sqlite database

2009-08-02 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Sat, 2009-08-01 at 13:45 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: > On Sat, 2009-08-01 at 11:37 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: > > Have any of the Evo hackers looked at this email from Romuald? This > > seems like a simple change that should be made. > > > > Maybe a bugzilla entry is needed? > > I commented in

[Evolution-hackers] Evolution maintainership

2009-07-01 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Hello guys, This mail is to announce some of the role changes in the Evolution project. I have been thinking about this for a long time, and I feel that this is the best time to implement them. I am proud to announce Chenthill P (chen) as the new Evolution maintainer. He is a long time contrib

[Evolution-hackers] GNOME 3.0 - Evolution plans & IRC team meeting

2009-06-23 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Guys, We have made some proposals to the release-team on GNOME 3.0 plans for Evolution. Specially release/scheduling specifics. Read through the thread. http://mail.gnome.org/archives/release-team/2009-June/msg00018.html We'll probably workout the exact schedule/decision. I wanted to discuss th

Re: [Evolution-hackers] How to get information that there is some unsent mails pending with evolution??

2009-04-03 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 10:57 +0530, sandeep gupta wrote: > Hi all, > > I want to write a script that will check any unsent mail in Outbox > before shutting down system, if yes than it will popup a message of > unsent mail and ask user to continue shutdown. > sqlite3 ~/.evolution/mail/local/folde

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Own project / idea for Google summer of code 2009

2009-03-27 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 12:32 +0100, Pavol Srna wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to discuss my own project / idea for Google summer of > code 2009 and if you are interested in, then I would like to find a > potential mentor for this project. > I am a daily user of GNOME desktop environment and I am

Re: [Evolution-hackers] IMAP4 Camel Provider.

2009-03-25 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 17:54 -0400, Pat Suwalski wrote: > Hello, > > I was wondering if anyone knew of any plans or quick fixes to get e-d-s' > IMAP4 provider building again (--enable-imap4=yes). With the 2.24.5 > release it breaks with the following: IMAP4 wasn't a supported provider since 2.8.

Re: [Evolution-hackers] EPlugin events

2009-03-25 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Nick, IIRC, there was a plugin for the same. Don't remember the name. But it wasn't approved to be in upstream. -Srini. On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 08:14 +1100, Nick Cronin wrote: > Hi, > I was thinking I'd have a go at writing a very small plugin for > evolution and I thought a good place to start wa

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [Evolution] Evolution 2.26 released

2009-03-18 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 16:42 +0800, Daniel.Li wrote: > Excellent work!!! > > > But I have a simple question here.As u know, I have lots of e-mails. And > it takes a lot of time compiling the souce code, maybe there will be > some configuration issues. > > So, is there any simple way to upgrade 2

[Evolution-hackers] Evolution 2.26 released

2009-03-18 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Hello Everyone, The Evolution Team is pleased to announce the release of * Evolution 2.26.0 * Evolution-Data-Server 2.26.0 * GtkHTML 3.26.0 * Evolution Exchange 2.26.0 * Evolution MAPI 0.26.0 You can download th

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Interface Spec for PIM component interoperability

2009-02-22 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
if you agree that this is a good idea. Hopefully > there'll be some around. Would give us all a chance to discuss the > state of things and how we can best interoperate and cooperate, in the > future. > > > > Game? > > > > Till > > > > On Thur

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Error Reporting in libebook

2009-01-18 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 12:22 +, Ross Burton wrote: > On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 13:13 +0100, Matthias Braun wrote: > > I think it would be a good idea to have an additional API to report more > > details along the error messages. Do you agree with this? It's probably > > not optimal as you don't want

[Evolution-hackers] Evolution 2.24.3 and beyond

2009-01-12 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Hello guys, Today I released Evolution (and friends) 2.24.3. This is the last stable release in the GNOME stable cycle. But given the issues that 2.24.x series introduced, we would be releasing Evolution 2.24.4 and 2.24.5 and there will be full support till the release of Evolution 2.26.0 [March 1

Re: [Evolution-hackers] A Camel API to get the filename of the cache, also a proposal to have one format to rule them all

2009-01-07 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
The Exchange patch looks fine to me. -Srini. On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 12:28 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote: > On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 00:42 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 13:25 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote: > > > Hi there evos, > > &g

Re: [Evolution-hackers] A Camel API to get the filename of the cache, also a proposal to have one format to rule them all

2009-01-04 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Hey Philip, [Im lagging in my mail-replies, still a lot to go, due to my 3 week vacation.] On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 13:25 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote: > Hi there evos, > > For an EPlugin that I'm working on I will need a Camel API to get the > filename of the cache. Sure and the patch seems fine

Re: [Evolution-hackers] State of the Bonobo removal effort for Evolution

2008-11-16 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 01:36 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote: > Hi folks, > > One of the goals for Evolution 2.26 is to finally remove the use of > Bonobo and BonoboUI from Evolution [1] in favor of equivalent > functionality now provided by the GTK+ stack. This is happening in > parallel with Ross Bu

Re: [Evolution-hackers] GObject-based Camel

2008-11-10 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Hey Matt, On Sun, 2008-11-09 at 12:52 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote: > Over the weekend I hit a milestone with a science experiment I started > earlier in the year to turn Camel into a GObject-based library with > minimal API breakage. The short-term goal of this effort is to make it > easier to gen

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Does evolution source still contains GPLv2 code?

2008-10-16 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Jeff, The COPYING (GPLv2) old license, COPYING.LGPLv2 COPYING.LGPLv3 are present in the tarballs. Evolution still has some files left & not moved to LGPLv2/LGPLv3. NEWs files might have been saying that some license changes code went in. Sorry for the confusion. -Srini. On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 11:

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Too many open files for folders.db

2008-10-12 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Jeff, This should be fixed in stable as of last wednesday or so. -Srini. On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 11:45 +0800, Jeff Cai wrote: > > Whenever you click a folder, the folders.db will be opened once. So if > you run Evolution for > a while, you will find dozens of file handles of folders.db. Is this

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Getting rid of shipped libdb

2008-10-06 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
ul for distros (hanging on to a specific version) though so we moved it inside e-d-s eventually. That way we always had a known quantity. === Ross, if we have an answer for this, we can close on this immediately. -Srini. On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 08:46 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: > Ross, > >

Re: [Evolution-hackers] EDS ABI changes in 2.24?!

2008-10-05 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 10:57 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > Can such ABI changes please be discussed on this list? I'm interested to > hear about them beforehand and won't notice them if they are only > discussed on IRC or in a bug tracker entry; there may be others in the > same position. Thanks! >

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [evolution-patches] FreeBSD7 timezone symbol incompatibility - widgets/e-timezone-dialog/e-timezone-dialog.c

2008-09-25 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
In future, create a bug in Bugzilla and post your patch against the bug. It helps us to track every incoming patch, in case something gets missed out on emails. Also, where do you have 'char * timezone(int zone, int dst);' declared? -Srini. On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 18:54 +0400, Roman Rybalko wrote:

[Evolution-hackers] Evolution 2.24 released

2008-09-25 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Hello Everyone, The Evolution Team is pleased to announce the release of * Evolution 2.24.0 * Evolution-Data-Server 2.24.0 * GtkHTML 3.24.0 * Evolution Exchange 2.24.0 * Evolution-sharp 0.18.0 You can download the follow

Re: [Evolution-hackers] MAPI Exchange Connector will replace current Exchange connector?

2008-09-24 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 16:26 +0800, Jeff Cai wrote: > Hi, > > I have two questions on MAPI Exchange connector. > > 1. When will MAPI connector officially become one part of > Evolution? > By 2.26 it should become official. We are working out the lic

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [opensuse-gnome] Evolution 2.22 for Factory

2008-09-24 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 01:38 -0500, Hans Petter Jansson wrote: > On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 13:31 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: > > > > Wouldn't it be possible to use a different directory, e.g. > > > "mail/local-index/folders.db"? That would avoid both problems

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [opensuse-gnome] Evolution 2.22 for Factory

2008-09-22 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
HPJ, > > HPJ, the summary can't be named like this, since, its possible that > > something like this already exists. .ibex.index has a traditional > > meaning and would be more of abusing it in the newer versions. > > Wouldn't it be possible to use a different directory, e.g. > "mail/local-index/

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [opensuse-gnome] Evolution 2.22 for Factory

2008-09-19 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Hello Guys, On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 22:14 -0500, Hans Petter Jansson wrote: > [ Adding evolution-hackers to Cc since this contains potentially useful > feedback and some questions ] > > On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 18:06 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 00:40 -0500, Hans Petter Jansso

Re: [Evolution-hackers] bug fixing in stable 2.22.x branch

2008-09-03 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 09:18 +0200, Frederic Crozat wrote: > Le mardi 02 septembre 2008 à 14:43 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit : > > On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 09:23 +0200, Frederic Crozat wrote: > > > Le lundi 01 septembre 2008 à 19:55 +0200, Patrick Ohly a écrit : > > > &g

Re: [Evolution-hackers] bug fixing in stable 2.22.x branch

2008-09-02 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 09:23 +0200, Frederic Crozat wrote: > Le lundi 01 septembre 2008 à 19:55 +0200, Patrick Ohly a écrit : > > On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 12:37 +0530, Chenthill wrote: > > > Thanks, I will send out a mail to the list mentioning the critical > > > fixes which have gone in recently in

Re: [Evolution-hackers] MAPI backend

2008-09-02 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 19:47 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 20:22 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > I don't have root access, therefore I compiled all the required > > components (Samba, libmapi, EDS, Evolution) from source. I haven't tried > > to run it yet. > > I'm on Exchange 20

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Interface Spec for PIM component interoperability

2008-08-21 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 14:14 +0200, Holger Berndt wrote: > Hello Evolution hackers, > > I just subscribed to the list, and browsing the archives this message > may or may not have an overlap with the recent thread about EDS D-Bus > interface in "Future of eds bindings". > > I am a supporter of th

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Future of eds bindings

2008-08-19 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Ross, > In the case of getChanges(), this is a local operation so just needs to > be fixed. It shouldn't take more than the timeout, even with 10k > contacts. > 10K? I have seen multiple enterprise users books with 100K contacts. I remember some bug where the user had close to a million contacts

Re: [Evolution-hackers] bug fixing in stable 2.22.x branch

2008-08-19 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Patrick Evolution follows GNOME release cycles, which has just three dot releases on the stable branch (2.22.3). And after that only for DoS/Vulnerability fixes there will be dot releases. Distros shipping 2.22.x will pick patches from trunk/2.22.x and apply as and when required. (Atleast for Open

Re: [Evolution-hackers] make dist error in evolution-data-server

2008-07-29 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
intltoolize (GNU intltool) 0.40.0 -Srini. PS: I didn't release 2.23.5 (I was on some training), and Johnny did it. On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 12:05 +0800, Jeff Cai wrote: > Which version of intltoolize did you use? > > Jeff > > Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-

Re: [Evolution-hackers] make dist error in evolution-data-server

2008-07-29 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 10:49 +0800, Jeff Cai wrote: > Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: > > Le mardi 29 juillet 2008 à 14:09 +0800, Jeff Cai a écrit : > > > >> $make dist > >> make: *** No rule to make target `intltool-merge.in', needed by > >> `distdir'. Stop. > >> > >> I'm curious about how you ma

Re: [Evolution-hackers] how to send emails from the terminal?

2008-07-24 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
command line since > the list-name irvings not appear underlined > > thanks. > > 2008/7/20 Srinivasa Ragavan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I dont think it is possible to send it to a evolution specific > contact > list. The TO

[Evolution-hackers] Evolution 2.23.5 , Evolution-Data-Server 2.23.5 , GtkHTML3.23.5 and Evolution-Exchange 2.23.5 released

2008-07-23 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
s etc. Evolution: == New in 2.23.5 Camel DB Summary support. (Srinivasa Ragavan & Sankar P) New EPlugin for message templates. (Bharath Acharya & Diego Escalante Urrelo) Google Contacts support (Jörgen Scheibengruber) Bug Fixes: #543753: Addressbook error

Re: [Evolution-hackers] how to send emails from the terminal?

2008-07-20 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
I dont think it is possible to send it to a evolution specific contact list. The TO/CC/BCC is expected to be exact. -Srini. On Sat, 2008-07-19 at 17:41 -0500, irving vladimir wrote: > Hi, when I try to send a message from the comand line I do: > > > evolution > "mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]&subjec

Re: [Evolution-hackers] camel-db-summary changes merged to Trunk

2008-07-18 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Jules, We would bump the camel version numbers, not sure why e-d-s. pc. Also, I might take some time to do it, things broken and me/sankar are really busy. -Srini. On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 16:12 +0200, Jules Colding wrote: > On 16/07/2008, at 20.33, Sankar wrote: > > > Hi , > > > > As many of you

[Evolution-hackers] Evolution: Taking forward...

2008-07-11 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Hello guys, We have had a set of problems that we are carrying around for some time like : * Copyright assignments, which is not the best way looking for the future of Evolution. It sucks and sort of limits contributions to Evolution and we wanted to drop it. * The current licensing

Re: [Evolution-hackers] today's evolution userdocs update.

2008-06-30 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Updated tarball at http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/evolution/2.22/evolution-2.22.3.1.tar.gz Unfortunately, this passed my make distcheck and our QA's build sanity test won't capture this, which sort of made it difficult to catch it before the release. -Srini. On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 15:29 +

Re: [Evolution-hackers] MAPI branch status?

2008-06-17 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 08:50 +0530, Suman Manjunath wrote: > On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Srinivasa Ragavan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Andre, the development is on track and we are moving inline with the > > libmapi-0.7. Some things are pending/in-progress are >

Re: [Evolution-hackers] MAPI branch status?

2008-06-16 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
[Removing r-t list as it may not be right continue including them on user queries ] On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 14:09 +0100, William John Murray wrote: > Hello Srini, > I could just point out that I cannot read my email with it. > Only half the folders are shown, and these happen not to inclu

Re: [Evolution-hackers] MAPI branch status?

2008-06-16 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 12:45 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: > Hi Evolution team, > > can somebody please update me/us about the current state and plans for > the Evolution MAPI branch? Andre, the development is on track and we are moving inline with the libmapi-0.7. Some things are pending/in-progr

Re: [Evolution-hackers] time zone problem: extending API in stable branch?

2008-06-12 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Patrick, Can you just point us to the right patch, that extends API ? I seem to hit the wrong patch. I dont see any .h changes also. Is there a way, we can work around for stable branch alone? We may need release team approval, if we have to update API (I guess so, though EDS isn't part of platf

Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution and ldap contacts

2008-06-09 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 11:17 +0200, Thomas Vander Stichele wrote: > Hi, > > I've been trying in my spare time to dip my feet in the LDAP contacts > backend because, well, there's lots of stuff that it does wrong for me > to the point where it's close to unusable in my real life use. > > I'm starti

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Crasher in evolution-exchange

2008-06-03 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 10:19 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: > Hi all; can someone take a look at this bug: > > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=532844 Done. Thanks to Bharath. -Srini ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http

Re: [Evolution-hackers] 2.23.3.1 no delete shortcut?

2008-06-03 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
; > accel="*Control*d" > > > from ui/evolution-mail-message.xml entirely. This is just a guess, tho. > > > > > > Dan > > > > > > On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 08:32 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: > > > > No, It shouldn't. Did I

Re: [Evolution-hackers] 2.23.3.1 no delete shortcut?

2008-06-02 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
t a guess, tho. > > Dan > > On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 08:32 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: > > No, It shouldn't. Did I broke something? I definitely hacked some code > > around delete, but sure that it worked well. > > > > -Srini > > On Mon, 2008-06-02

Re: [Evolution-hackers] 2.23.3.1 no delete shortcut?

2008-06-02 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
No, It shouldn't. Did I broke something? I definitely hacked some code around delete, but sure that it worked well. -Srini On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 21:56 -0400, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: > Is it my imagination, or does 2.23.3.1 not have any keyboard shortcut > for delete? Ctrl-D seems to open a save

Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution-data-server 2.23.2 build error: e_file_cache_get_type is not defined

2008-05-29 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=533780 ? -Srini. On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 12:28 +0800, Jeff Cai wrote: > evolution-data-server-2.23.2/docs/reference/calendar/libedata-cal > cc -i -xO4 -xspace -xstrconst -xpentium -mr -xregs=no%frameptr -i -xO4 > -xspace -xstrconst -xpentium -mr -xregs=no%f

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Switching the current folder from a plugin

2008-05-28 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
You need to look at em-folder-tree.c. That holds the code. -Srini. On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 14:58 -0700, Paarvai Naai wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm hoping that somebody on this list will have a quick answer to this > question. I am currently writing a plugin that manipulates folders in > Evolution. I

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution Calendar / memeos/ tasks summary windows appear black in colour at startup!!

2008-05-28 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 14:51 +0530, svalbard colaco wrote: > Hi all; > > I have evolution on DirectFB and in my calendar view / memo view / > task view/ windows ; > The side bar for the calendar /memos/ tasks summary window appears > black in color at first; > But when i click on them it appears w

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Query

2008-05-21 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Amit, Send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] He shares most of the NOSIP load now-a-days. -Srini. On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 18:20 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote: > Hi Amit > > Forwarding your mail to the evo-hackers list, where you'll get a better > answer > > cheers > > On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 15:53 +0530, a

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution LDAP backend

2008-05-16 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 08:55 +0200, Free Ekanayaka wrote: > > Evo ldap backend was nothing but, openldap patched ntlm. But there was > > no update to it, as most distros patch OpenLDAP with ntlm and ship it. > > > Thanks, do you know of any documentation about using evolution with > ntlm? > What

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution LDAP backend

2008-05-15 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Evo ldap backend was nothing but, openldap patched ntlm. But there was no update to it, as most distros patch OpenLDAP with ntlm and ship it. On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 17:12 +0200, Free Ekanayaka wrote: > Hi all, > > has anybody used the evoldap backend to set up a default LDAP > address book? > > 

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Loading of Icons in Evolution

2008-05-13 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 18:16 +0530, svalbard colaco wrote: > Hi all; > > > Can any one tell me where are the various icons (i.e. .png files ) > located in the code? > i could find some icons in the following path What icons are n't appearing. Name a few, I can tell you where they reside. -Srini >

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Error storing summary.

2008-05-12 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Sankar, Yet another solution for this problem will be to (re)write the local backend using the camel-offline-folder model, where every mail in the folder is stored in a distributed fashion, avoiding one huge mbox or huge files in a directory and also solves issues like unlink the file to delete a

Re: [Evolution-hackers] HOW TO HANDLE: Glib-GObject-WARNING :Invalid cast from GdkPixmap to GdkWindow.

2008-05-12 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
I think it was due to some code issues and I remember some one else complained it on a normal case also. See if you have the icons loaded at the right place. -Srini. On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 11:01 +0530, svalbard colaco wrote: > > > Hi all, > > I've ported my application on DirectFb backend ; It g

Re: [Evolution-hackers] default bug handling policy

2008-05-06 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Hello Patrick, On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 20:25 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > Hello, > > are bugs discovered on the trunk also fixed on the latest maintenance > branch by default or only if someone asks for it? Different projects > handle this differently. We backport to stable branch, if they don't br

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Removing libdb from EDS source

2008-05-04 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
ur co-operation. Thanks. This proved quite painful for distros (hanging on to a specific version) though so we moved it inside e-d-s eventually. That way we always had a known quantity. === Ross, if we have an answer for this, we can close on this immediately. -Srini. On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 08

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Event handling in Evolution.... Need urgent help

2008-04-29 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Mon, 2008-04-28 at 18:41 +0530, svalbard colaco wrote: > Hi all; > > Can any one explain to me how events are handled in Evolution? Do > they make use of the libbonoboui wrappers to handle the button events? Sort of: yes. We add the menu items through the xml file and attach call backs to the

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Removing libdb from EDS source

2008-04-24 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Ross, IIRC, it was done because, every libdb update broke Evolution or libdb wasn't so stable release over release. Also OpenSUSE uses statically linked libdb. But most of the hackers I know, dynamically link libdb. I'm favor of the change. But lemme ping some old evolution hackers who were part o

  1   2   3   4   >