Re: [Evolution-hackers] UI interaction from book/calendar backends

2012-12-07 Thread Milan Crha
On Thu, 2012-11-22 at 09:13 +0100, Milan Crha wrote: the book/calendar backends are currently designed to not have any direct UI interaction with user, they basically serve for data only. While it works, it has its caveats, like when user tries to access server using SSL with self-signed

Re: [Evolution-hackers] UI interaction from book/calendar backends

2012-11-27 Thread Matthew Barnes
Yes, the gtk_init() issue occurred to me after posting that suggestion.  I agree a separate process is the better idea.  Then gtk3 won't taint evolution-source-registry. (Apologies for top-posting.  I'm trying out Dan's webkit-composer branch and it seems to have some kinks yet to be worked

Re: [Evolution-hackers] UI interaction from book/calendar backends

2012-11-26 Thread Christian Hilberg
Hi everyone, Am Donnerstag 22 November 2012, um 09:13:16 schrieb Milan Crha: Hi, the book/calendar backends are currently designed to not have any direct UI interaction with user, they basically serve for data only. While it works, it has its caveats, like when user tries to access

Re: [Evolution-hackers] UI interaction from book/calendar backends

2012-11-26 Thread Milan Crha
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 10:08 +0100, Christian Hilberg wrote: Thanks Milan for bringing that up again. Yes, some infrastructure to request for user input from within the backends would be very helpful. We have a dialog ready [0] in evolution-kolab to ask for a user selection from several options

Re: [Evolution-hackers] UI interaction from book/calendar backends

2012-11-25 Thread Milan Crha
On Thu, 2012-11-22 at 13:04 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote: 1) Write this as a ESourceRegistryServer extension, and just link to GTK+ from the extension module. That way it's easily removable if the Tizen folks don't want it, or they want to implement their own version using Qt.

Re: [Evolution-hackers] UI interaction from book/calendar backends

2012-11-23 Thread Milan Crha
On Thu, 2012-11-22 at 13:04 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote: Actually I don't think evolution-source-registry requires GTK+. If it's the password dialog you're thinking of, we only link to gcr-base-3 which speaks via D-Bus to the process actually showing the password dialog. Hi, yes, I

Re: [Evolution-hackers] UI interaction from book/calendar backends

2012-11-23 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Thu, 2012-11-22 at 13:04 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote: Actually I don't think evolution-source-registry requires GTK+. If it's the password dialog you're thinking of, we only link to gcr-base-3 which speaks via D-Bus to the process actually showing the password dialog. I'm not sure if