On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 11:49 -0400, Martin Owens wrote:
> > * Cached Camel provider data moves to ~/.cache/evolution/mail. This
> > includes folders.db. Files for local accounts will be divided up:
> > index files for searching would go in ~/.cache, whereas actual mail
> > content (mbox/Mail
Hey Matthew,
I welcome the move to XDG at last but...
On Sun, 2010-06-06 at 12:34 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> .local/
> +-- share/
> +-- evolution/
> +-- addressbook/
> | +-- <>
> +-- calendar/
> | +-- <>
>
Le dimanche 06 juin 2010 à 12:34 -0400, Matthew Barnes a écrit :
> Once thing I'd like to get done before Evolution 3.0 is dismantling
> ~/.evolution and moving user-specific data to relocatable XDG base
> directories [1]. I have an initial proposal of what should go where.
>
> Migration should j
On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 19:23 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 18:08 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> > I now have all the migration routines written and I'm fairly happy with
> > them. A few more cases to test and I think I may commit this over the
> > weekend.
>
> I decided to d
On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 08:24 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> does this mean that one would be able to keep .evolution folder as is,
> with some XDG foo? You know, sometimes is useful to run 2.30.x while
> developing 2.31.x on the same machine, where your change makes it
> impossible.
>
> But if it's pos
On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 18:08 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> For those following the master branch of git, that means that with any
> luck your ~/.evolution directory will soon be gone and you'll have far
> more control over where Evolution writes files.
Hi,
does this mean that one would be
On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 18:08 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> I now have all the migration routines written and I'm fairly happy with
> them. A few more cases to test and I think I may commit this over the
> weekend.
I decided to defer this until at least Tuesday, so that those developers
who aren't
Heya :-)
On 24.07.2010 13:16, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> Are you suggesting we copy the data instead of moving it? That could be
> a -lot- of data.
Hm. You could probably hardlink it.
Cheers,
Tobi
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
On Sat, 2010-07-24 at 07:48 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> An an evolution user and a packager, is this really a good idea?
> Shouldn't it be safer to keep it “as a backup” but mark it as already
> migrated. This way, another attempt can be tried should the first one
> fail, and we don't touch u
On ven., 2010-07-23 at 18:08 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> * Don't downgrade! Once you cross this threshold, it's going to
> be
> fairly painful to revert data files back to a state that
> earlier
> Evolution versions can understand.
>
> Each of the th
On Sun, 2010-06-06 at 12:34 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> Once thing I'd like to get done before Evolution 3.0 is dismantling
> ~/.evolution and moving user-specific data to relocatable XDG base
> directories [1].
...
> [1] http://standards.freedesktop.org/basedir-spec/basedir-spec-latest.html
I
11 matches
Mail list logo
