On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 08:33 +0200, Jules Colding wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 10:07 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 14:34 +0200, Jules Colding wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 08:23 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 12:11 +0530, Srinivasa Raga
On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 10:07 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 14:34 +0200, Jules Colding wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 08:23 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 12:11 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
> > > > This also would do. But normally we would bump
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 08:23 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 12:11 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
> > This also would do. But normally we would bump it during the next dot
> > release. Anyways is fine IMO.
>
> Hi Srini,
>
> I think we still have a misunderstanding here. The
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 14:34 +0200, Jules Colding wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 08:23 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 12:11 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
> > > This also would do. But normally we would bump it during the next dot
> > > release. Anyways is fine IMO.
> >
>
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 08:23 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 12:11 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
> > This also would do. But normally we would bump it during the next dot
> > release. Anyways is fine IMO.
>
> Hi Srini,
>
> I think we still have a misunderstanding here. The
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 12:11 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
> This also would do. But normally we would bump it during the next dot
> release. Anyways is fine IMO.
Hi Srini,
I think we still have a misunderstanding here. The latest revision of
Subversion trunk still has the version in configure.
Matthew,
This also would do. But normally we would bump it during the next dot
release. Anyways is fine IMO.
-Srini.
On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 14:10 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 23:03 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
> > The version bump normally happens during the first unsta
On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 23:03 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
> The version bump normally happens during the first unstable release in
> the trunk. I'm wondering how is it that it is requesting for > 3.14.
>
> Ah, I remember, I approved a patch for gnome-2-20 branch and asked to
> commit to head al
The version bump normally happens during the first unstable release in
the trunk. I'm wondering how is it that it is requesting for > 3.14.
Ah, I remember, I approved a patch for gnome-2-20 branch and asked to
commit to head also (I think so). For now I can revert till the first
unstable release/
