[Evolution] Up to date exchange-Server-Backend info requested

2011-01-20 Thread David Sampson
Hey Folks, After months of putting up with bothersum evolution behaviour and looking through gnome and ubuntu bug logs I was hoping the list may point me to updated info on the current status of: * Evolution-exchange-storage * Evolution-data-server My situation * Personal computer at home

[Evolution] Freeze on restore.

2011-01-17 Thread David Chernoff
I recently upgraded from Fedora 10 to 14 and have run into problems restoring my email. 1. Backup under evolution 2.24.5 - evolution-backup.tar.gz in Fedora 10; 2. Restore under evolution 2.32.1 in Fedora 14 - freeze. To be more specific in step 2: 2a. The data directories were successfully

[Evolution] Evolution and Exchange 2010 [MAPI]

2010-11-23 Thread David BERCOT
. David. ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Re: [Evolution] Evolution stops responding whenretrievingmessagesfrom imap.qq.com

2010-11-21 Thread David Woodhouse
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 12:12 +0800, heyan wrote: Thanks for your help. I just tried evolution CAMEL_DEBUG=imapx, which showed EI: MAIL PREFS immediately. Then nothing happened,even the evolution window did not appear. The version of Evolution is 2.30.3, and the protocol setting is confirmed to

Re: [Evolution] Evolution stops responding when retrievingmessagesfrom imap.qq.com

2010-11-13 Thread David Woodhouse
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 09:20 +0800, heyan wrote: Yeah I have tried several mail clients: Thunderbird, Kmail and Sylpheed. They all works properly. So there must be some problem between evolution and imap.qq.com. Whatever mail client you *are* using is also broken -- it's not correctly

Re: [Evolution] CalDAV problem

2010-11-12 Thread David Woodhouse
On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 08:06 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 11:34 -0300, Dennis Drapeau wrote: The problem is when I try to import an *.ics file within Evolution to the CalDAV calendar --- it appears to work without any warnings but then only every other event successfully

[Evolution] Newbie : many questions...

2010-11-05 Thread David BERCOT
zone) ? - is it possible to change the font size in the folder list ? I'm sure I will have other questions soon ;-) Thank you very much. David. ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit

Re: [Evolution] Newbie : many questions...

2010-11-05 Thread David BERCOT
Hello, Le Thu, 04 Nov 2010 15:16:17 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan p...@usb.ve a écrit : On 11/4/10 2:28 PM, David BERCOT wrote: Hello, I'm a new user of Evolution. Before, I used Claws-mail. So, I have many questions in order to have Evolution more... usable ;-) - is it possible to have

[Evolution] Newbie : many questions...

2010-11-04 Thread David BERCOT
zone) ? - is it possible to change the font size in the folder list ? I'm sure I will have other questions soon ;-) Thank you very much. David. ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit

Re: [Evolution] PKCS11 in evolution

2010-10-31 Thread David Woodhouse
debugging the certificate availability with nss-gui and the NSS command line tools first. If it's working in NSS then we'll look at Evolution. -- David WoodhouseOpen Source Technology Centre david.woodho...@intel.com Intel Corporation

[Evolution] Evolution For Windows

2010-10-29 Thread Torregiante, David M (Dave)
Have been using Evolution in Ubuntu, but recently had to go back to Windows 7 :-(. Downloaded the Evolution Windows version to Windows 7 desktop 64bit but after working at first, now crashes. Getting error: cannot load Evolution.exe Will Evolution for windows run on Windows7 64bit ? Would like

[Evolution] Control+L

2010-09-24 Thread David Oxland
one by one with an image viewer. What's going on and what to do here? Thanks David ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Re: [Evolution] sometimes can't get mail

2010-09-20 Thread David Woodhouse
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 08:39 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: or there was a password failure, or Evo connected but didn't download/upload anything, or what? Evo's error reporting is pretty 'lite', IMO. If you find specific cases where Evolution's error reporting is insufficient to

Re: [Evolution] help with English top post msg

2010-09-16 Thread David Woodhouse
On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 15:53 +0900, nomnex wrote: What would be correct way to explain in a top post msg. Find my answer in the message below? I have seen the correct sentence quoted in few msg. on the list, about email-list etiquette, but unfortunately I haven't save the msg. for reference.

[Evolution] Lost eMails from INBOX

2010-09-07 Thread David Starr
, calendars, sent, tasks are all OK. search box is clear, view hide deleted is not selected, show All Messages is set. Where is the mail stored in 2.28.1? I'm digging through docs now, please help shortcut my searching! Thanks, David Ubuntu 9.10 evolution 2.28.1 recieve via POP send via SMTP

Re: [Evolution] GUI question: clearing Inbox messages

2010-09-01 Thread David Woodhouse
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 21:06 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: Disappeared. As others already mentioned, be sure there is no search active, menu Search / Clear, and the quicksearch bar says All Messages are shown. That's not good enough. Sometimes a search is active even though it doesn't

Re: [Evolution] Script to search mails

2010-08-14 Thread David Woodhouse
On Sat, 2010-08-14 at 16:32 +0200, Chris Blake wrote: Greetings community, I have a specific folder in my Inbox which I need to search for emails and manipulate the results. I need to do this on the command line, something like : SELEECT * from the Inbox/Folder_To_Search WHERE Subject

Re: [Evolution] Google calendar issue...

2010-08-01 Thread David Woodhouse
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 09:44 -0500, Eric Lorenz wrote: I am a new Evolution user (v. 2.28.3, came from Thunderbird) on Ubuntu 10.04. It has been working great, and I love the integration with GNOME/Ubuntu. I have my calendars pulling from Google (mine, my wife's and my daughter's) and all has

Re: [Evolution] questions from new user

2010-07-19 Thread David Woodhouse
box (you may have to scroll it down). Select the 'Display' tab. Disable the 'Compress weekends in month view' option. -- David WoodhouseOpen Source Technology Centre david.woodho...@intel.com Intel Corporation

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-16 Thread David Woodhouse
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 09:15 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: And I think it extremely rude for someone to effectively say I want to say something but I can't be arsed to find out what anyone else has to say. My time is more important than yours so please send the messages directly to me to save me the

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-16 Thread David Woodhouse
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 16:46 +1000, Andrew Cowie wrote: On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 10:14 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: An obvious solution to this is to do what Kmail does. When the message being replied to contains a List-Post header, Ctrl-R should do the same as Ctrl-L. There should also be

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-16 Thread David Woodhouse
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 11:09 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: Remember, the existing reply-to-list operation *already* falls back to replying to all if it can't find a List-Post: header. No it doesn't. The operation *does*. You're getting confused by the fact that the current menu

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-16 Thread David Woodhouse
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 12:44 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: OK. So it's not just any List-*: header, there's a specific list of headers it needs (with specific formats in some cases). Fine, that explains why my test didn't work. Thanks for explaining it. Arguably we should fix things so that it's

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-16 Thread David Woodhouse
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 15:12 +, Pete Biggs wrote: What I would like is for the Reply-to-List to be more prominent to encourage people to use that rather than just blindly replying to the user. Certainly I'm with you on the 'rather than just blindly replying to the user' bit

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-16 Thread David Woodhouse
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 11:45 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: OT: This is just to note that David's last reply has now fallen off the right-hand edge of my (landscape-mode) screen, i.e. I can't see even the first character of the Subject. Do you mean the 'R' for 'Reply' which is the first

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-16 Thread David Woodhouse
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 12:12 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: Perhaps the reply to all nag could have a configurable threshold, but it's no big deal. Yeah, I thought about that too, but couldn't be bothered. It's only a prompt to make you think; it doesn't have to be precise. Besides, the kind

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-15 Thread David Woodhouse
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 09:15 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: Let's not argue about that too much -- we won't make any progress. Let's just recognise that this 'DTRT' thing that you suggest is hard when we can't agree on what TRT is. Yes, but all your solutions seem to implement it the way *you*

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-15 Thread David Woodhouse
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 13:24 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: And it's *already* simple for the user to choose if they're using the keyboard shortcuts or the menu; it's only the toolbar that really needs attention, as you say. Fine. So what's the point of all this discussion then? Just change

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-15 Thread David Woodhouse
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 11:15 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 16:09 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 18:42 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: And there are probably an equal number who believe the contrary, like me, but let's not argue about it. I

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-15 Thread David Woodhouse
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 18:22 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: because even though your normal preference is to reply-to-list on list messages, you might *sometimes* want to reply-to-all on a list message instead? No, I need to reply all for normal messages - life isn't just about lists :-) That

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-15 Thread David Woodhouse
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 21:28 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: Remember, the existing reply-to-list operation *already* falls back to replying to all if it can't find a List-Post: header. No it doesn't. The operation *does*. You're getting confused by the fact that the current menu items get

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-14 Thread David Woodhouse
that anyway just because it changes the size of the button. With the are you sure you want to reply privately? autonag, perhaps it isn't really necessary anyway. -- David WoodhouseOpen Source Technology Centre david.woodho...@intel.com Intel

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-14 Thread David Woodhouse
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 13:36 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: [ ] Reply button invokes mailing list reply This doesn't make a lot of sense to me. The user can *already* express a preference, by moving their hand an inch or two to the left or right and hitting a different (key|menu

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-14 Thread David Woodhouse
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 09:02 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 13:05 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: Then we can debate an appropriate default for the preference. If we're exposing it in the UI *instead* of the existing 'Reply' action, then it really *has* to be private

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-14 Thread David Woodhouse
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 14:18 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: GRRR - reply-to-list doesn't even work on the reply you sent because you did a reply-to-all and I never got the list version of the message, only the direct message. Hence the Reply to all is NO SUBSTITUTE for Reply to list. This

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-14 Thread David Woodhouse
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 09:05 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: Experienced users do make mistakes, and may well have disabled the nag pop-up which saves the novice users. But still this is a *much* better failure mode than accidentally sending stuff to the list which should have been

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-14 Thread David Woodhouse
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 09:01 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 13:05 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: In general, those who are sophisticated enough to preconfigure anything are perfectly capable of hitting the right buttons in the first place. There doesn't seem

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-14 Thread David Woodhouse
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 09:30 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 14:40 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: I thought we were past that. So did I, but we are *still* seeing proposals which would replace the existing private Reply button with a new Reply button

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-14 Thread David Woodhouse
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 10:47 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: 1. Nag popup for you are replying privately to a mailing list message 2. Nag popup for you are replying to all, to many recipients Both of these are OK, as long as the usual conditions apply, i.e. the state is represented

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-14 Thread David Woodhouse
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 11:15 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 16:32 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: In fact I think mostly you don't, but when you do (on munged lists) you really do. The current option, if enabled, *only* takes effect on munged lists

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-14 Thread David Woodhouse
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 12:25 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: OK, let's summarize (RT = Reply-To address, LP = List-Post address, SA = Sender or From Address, CC = CC addresses): Personal Reply Non-Munged List Munged List w/o Option Munged List with

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-14 Thread David Woodhouse
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 14:51 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: How is that different from the table (with your amendments)? It's not. It's just a simpler way of saying it. An even simpler way is: - Ctrl-R replies privately to the sender, using their Reply-To: or From: - Ctrl-Shift-R replies to

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-14 Thread David Woodhouse
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 17:15 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: What I'm suggesting is that we retarget Reply to All (Shift-Ctrl-R) and the button to be, instead Reply Publicly (or you can keep it named Reply to All for all I care). OK, I can agree with that. This button would DTRT based on the

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-14 Thread David Woodhouse
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 17:15 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: What I'm suggesting is that we retarget Reply to All (Shift-Ctrl-R) and the button to be, instead Reply Publicly (or you can keep it named Reply to All for all I care). This button would DTRT based on the message, to send a public reply.

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-13 Thread David Woodhouse
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 10:14 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: Note: this is a comment on Evo itself, rather than the Evo list. As someone who posts quite a lot on this list, I'm forever having to deal with people replying to my personal address rather than the list address. Of course they

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-13 Thread David Woodhouse
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 09:07 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: Well, no. I'm advocating: - Reply To Author to reply to you alone. - Reply To All to CC the author and reply to the list (the reverse of the current situation). Ah -- so a purely cosmetic change, just moving recipients

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-13 Thread David Woodhouse
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 14:46 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 09:07 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: Well, no. I'm advocating: - Reply To Author to reply to you alone. - Reply To All to CC the author and reply to the list (the reverse of the current situation

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-13 Thread David Woodhouse
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 09:31 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: Note that I'm sending this to you, CC the list (using Shift-Ctrl-R). How are you receiving it? One copy came straight to me, and landed in my inbox (intact). Another copy came to me via the list, and because it arrived with

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-13 Thread David Woodhouse
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 09:34 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 14:46 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 09:07 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: Well, no. I'm advocating: - Reply To Author to reply to you alone. - Reply To All to CC

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-13 Thread David Woodhouse
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 10:12 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: For some bizarre reason, the copy that came back to me through mailman had stripped you from Cc. Yay for munging. :) I think that's because Mailman removes duplicates. If you weren't on the list you would have received the CC,

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-13 Thread David Woodhouse
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 10:12 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: No no no. Reply To Author is a reply to the author (sender) of the message, i.e. what you get currently with Ctrl-R, and what you'll still get with Ctrl-R when it's not a list message. This is very explicit in the original proposal.

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-13 Thread David Woodhouse
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 10:49 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 15:50 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 10:12 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: No no no. Reply To Author is a reply to the author (sender) of the message, i.e. what you get currently

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-13 Thread David Woodhouse
); + widget = e_builder_get_widget (prefs-builder, chkAutoSmileys); e_mutual_binding_new ( shell_settings, composer-magic-smileys, -- David WoodhouseOpen Source Technology Centre david.woodho...@intel.com Intel Corporation

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-13 Thread David Woodhouse
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 12:01 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: When the message being replied to is *not* a list message (i.e. the List-* headers -- specifically List-Post -- are not present), then everything works as now, except that Reply To List (Ctrl-L) has the same effect as Reply To All

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-13 Thread David Woodhouse
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 13:03 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: But if you want a key-combo which does this reply to all or list thing, then I suspect you'd do better to use Ctrl-Shift-R and the patch in https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=624204#c8 for that. That's different.

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-13 Thread David Woodhouse
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 18:06 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 16:01 -0600, Bart wrote: How about a little piece of code that looks at the message and, if it's going to a list, nags you if you've top posted? /humor It's tempting ... :-) (: ˙˙˙uʍop-ǝpısdn ʇxǝʇ ɹıǝɥʇ

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-13 Thread David Woodhouse
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 20:48 +0200, Kåre Fiedler Christiansen wrote: It seems to me that people are split in two camps: * Those who want full control over who to reply to when, and same short-cuts always * Those who want Evolution to try to be intelligent about where to reply to, by somehow

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-13 Thread David Woodhouse
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 17:34 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: And this one to say are you sure you want to reply to all? when you reply to a message with lots of recipients. Unless it's a mailing list message. Definitely against this. There's no such thing as a right number of recipients

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-13 Thread David Woodhouse
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 18:31 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 23:10 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: I thought we were going the other way now, as you proposed I.e. turning Reply To List into Reply To All when no list headers are detected. Remember, there are three

Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

2010-07-13 Thread David Woodhouse
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 19:01 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: If it does what we've been saying then I guess so. I've not been reading code or recompiling Evo to check. I guess it's up to Matthew if he wants to accept the patch. I'm still holding out for the Reply To Author action of course

[Evolution] Server Deletes Mail

2010-07-04 Thread David Jones
to not delete the mail from the server on one PC, but it still does. Anybody else seen this? I presume the option to leave the mail on the server is a standard option and not just something that microsoft dreamed up? Thank you, David. ___ evolution-list

[Evolution] [PATCH] Return formatted address in e_destination_get_address

2010-05-24 Thread David Ayers
in e_destination_export_to_vcard_attribute instead. Please point me to the documentation on what else I need to do to get this patch committed (or the issue fixed in another way) See also: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/229187 Cheers, David PS: Please keep be CC'ed as I'm not subscribed

Re: [Evolution] Building Evolution

2010-05-10 Thread David Ayers
Am Mittwoch, den 05.05.2010, 20:03 +0200 schrieb Thomas Novin: On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 15:36 +0200, David Ayers wrote: Hello Folks, I just confirmed a bug I've confirmed on Lucid RC which is based on Evolution 2.28 and wanted to see if this bug still exists in 2.30. https

[Evolution] Building Evolution

2010-04-28 Thread David Ayers
the instructions on how to build evolution from scratch, but the link to Compiling From CVS is dead. If someone finds the time to write that up, I'd appreciate a ping. Thanks a lot! David Ayers PS: Please keep me CC: as I'm currently not subscribed. -- David Ayers - Team Austria Free Software Foundation

[Evolution] handling multiple mail accounts

2010-03-19 Thread david
set of folders I already have defined. I have a lot of rules defined for the previous folders. Any help is appreciated. Thanks, David Ransier ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

[Evolution] cursos online download de video aulas

2010-03-04 Thread David
video aula em dvd palestra em video: http://www.cursoemvideoaulas.com cursos online download de video aulas, video aula em dvd palestra em video, aula musica aulas em videos, como fazer montagens video dança do ventre, video aula direito aulas música, video aula dança aprenda espanhol, aula

[Evolution] cursos online cursos em video

2010-03-01 Thread David
video aula em dvd downloads de video aulas: Visite: http://www.cursoemvideoaulas.com cursos online cursos em video, video aula em dvd downloads de video aulas, aula musica aulas bateria, como fazer montagens video bateria, video aula direito aulas em video, como fazer video como fazer sushi,

[Evolution] Bug 579185

2009-12-14 Thread David
use Evolution since they are limited to IMAP email access. I love Linux and Evolution, but my job requires full access to Exchange Server. I really want to dump Windows. Does anyone know if there is any plan to fix this problem, and how it can be elevated to a critical issue? -- David

Re: [Evolution] SMTP TLS Port 587?

2009-11-02 Thread David Ransier
I had the same problem and solved it by adding the port to the smtp url. For example smtp.MyDomain.com:587 Good luck, David R -Original Message- From: R. A. Bilonick r...@consolidated.net To: evolution-list evolution-list@gnome.org Subject: [Evolution] SMTP TLS Port 587? Date: Mon, 02

[Evolution] REGX in Message Filters

2009-10-27 Thread david
, the original text value seems to be the filter value (even though the rule shows the wildcard.) Is there something special about the REGX chars that can be used for message filters? Does this feature really work? I'm running Evo on Ubuntu 9.04. Thanks, David R

Re: [Evolution] REGX in Message Filters

2009-10-27 Thread david
I tried that first and that didn't seem to work either. It made me wonder if I was doing something wrong. Fully qualified matches work ok. David R ---Original Message--- From: Patrick O'Callaghan p...@usb.ve Subject: Re: [Evolution] REGX in Message Filters Sent: 27 Oct '09 11:53

[Evolution] cannot send email

2009-10-25 Thread david
and tried the suggestion to delete my outgoing mail and create a fresh one. The assumption being the outgoing mail may have been malformed. No change. Thanks for any help, David Ransier ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http

Re: [Evolution] cannot send email

2009-10-25 Thread David Ransier
Not using Comcast, but it turns out that my SMTP port was 587. That discovery fixed my problem. Thanks, all, for the help. David R -Original Message- From: Leonard Evens l...@math.northwestern.edu Reply-to: l...@math.northwestern.edu To: david da...@ransier.com Cc: evolution-list

[Evolution] cannot send email

2009-10-24 Thread david
list and tried the suggestion to delete my outgoing mail and create a fresh one. The assumption being the outgoing mail may have been malformed. No change. Thanks for any help, David Ransier ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org

Re: [Evolution] stability/Jewett

2009-10-08 Thread David L
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 8:28 AM, Reid Thompson wrote: On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 09:22 -0600, Charles J Killian wrote: The day that how one formats a response to an email is some measure of the quality of the individual writing it and the value of that response is the day I go back to a yellow pad

Re: [Evolution] stability

2009-10-08 Thread David L
their own questions. How do I fix that? I bet I have to reconfigure evolution. ;) This only happens with certain emails... these emails get a little dotted box around the text of the original message whenever I click anywhere in the message. Any ideas? thanks, David

Re: [Evolution] Evolution Crashes frequently

2009-09-10 Thread David L
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 6:41 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan p...@usb.ve wrote: On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 21:23 -0700, David L wrote: On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 7:26 AM, David L wrote: snip evolution crashes for me all the time.  I send the bug buddy reports but they seem to go into a black hole recently

Re: [Evolution] Evolution Crashes frequently

2009-09-09 Thread David L
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 7:26 AM, David L wrote: snip evolution crashes for me all the time.  I send the bug buddy reports but they seem to go into a black hole recently in fedora... I get links to some gnome bug page that doesn't exist. For example, I just tried to report my semi-daily

Re: [Evolution] Evolution Crashes frequently

2009-09-08 Thread David L
would have abandoned it long ago, but it's still better than Outlook under wine. Good luck, David ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Re: [Evolution] Hiden emails

2009-09-08 Thread David Jones
Dear Milan, Thank you for the advice, it worked. Only downside, as you indicated, the address book was lost, but I can soon get that back from the OE original. regards, David. - Original Message - From: Milan Crha mc...@redhat.com To: evolution-list@gnome.org Sent: Monday

[Evolution] Hiden emails

2009-09-06 Thread David Jones
but 26 values were supplied. If anybody can help me correct this problem I would like to hear from them. Thank you, David. attachment: evolution error-1.jpg___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: [Evolution] Hiden emails

2009-09-06 Thread David Jones
itself. Looking at the error report, hence I think the problem is with the 28 values Evolution was expecting, but only 26 were supplied. regards, David. - Original Message - From: Jo-Erlend Schinstad joerlend.schins...@gmail.com To: evolution-list@gnome.org Sent: Sunday, September 06

[Evolution] Evolution CTL/+ select problem

2009-09-06 Thread David Oxland
Shift+select areas still works but CRL+click does not. Any thoughts ? Thanks David ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Re: [Evolution] suggestion for evolution

2009-09-03 Thread David L
a banner to find out which current state might be resulting in the button that you want to push being greyed out. Cheers... David ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] Links not clickable in Evolution

2009-08-17 Thread David Oxland
On checking the post I see that the link is clickable but this is not the case for sending to others. As I said any disturbance will make it clickable; even going enter at either end of the link. David ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list

Re: [Evolution] Links not clickable in Evolution

2009-08-16 Thread David Oxland
seems to make it clickable but unless it's done before sending it is received as unclick-able. Haven't found any settings to help so far. Thanks David ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] suggest

2009-05-26 Thread David L
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Art Alexion wrote: On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 19:02 -0400, David L wrote: Since we have an exchange server, from scratch is basically the same thing as deleting my indexes.  It takes me about 30 seconds to set up evolution for a blank account to connect to my

Re: [Evolution] using skype

2009-05-25 Thread David L
for Windows didn't work too well. Although I'd love to switch to ekiga, I can't. Cheers David ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Re: [Evolution] suggest

2009-05-25 Thread David L
-has-several-longstanding-bugs-that-require-me-to-do-it-every-other-day? ;) Cheers... David ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Re: [Evolution] suggest

2009-05-25 Thread David L
... David What evo version is Novell now distributing with SLED? Is it fairly stable the way 2.6 was with SLED 10.1? -- Art Alexion MIS/Central Office Support Resources for Human Development - Original Message - From: evolution-list-boun...@gnome.org evolution-list-boun

[Evolution] mailing list

2009-04-27 Thread David Lehr
Please remove my name from Evolution mailing list. dleh...@hwy.39.net Thank you David Lehr ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Re: [Evolution] Two major bugs with evolution-mapi, workarounds anyone?

2009-04-21 Thread David L
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Paul Smith wrote: snip Consider yourself lucky: I can't even connect.  I removed all my old Evo files, upgraded one of my systems to the latest Jaunty files, and started evo. It asked me to create a new account so I chose Exchange MAPI.  I entered my

Re: [Evolution] MAPI speed

2009-04-14 Thread David L
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Johnny Jacob wrote: On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 06:46 -0700, David L wrote: I've been looking forward to MAPI support for some time due to speed and stability problems I've had with exchange connector. I installed MAPI on fedora 11 alpha recently and did get

[Evolution] MAPI speed

2009-03-30 Thread David L
-10 seconds to display a small text email. Is this to be expected with this early implementation of MAPI? If not, how would I investigate the cause of the slowness? Thanks, David ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list

Re: [Evolution] Testing evolution-mapi

2009-03-30 Thread David L
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 6:08 AM, Mark Intyre wrote: Hello, I am trying to test evolution-mapi against Exchange 2007 server but I'm stuck in the very beginning, I can't even make a connection to the server. I found out that the setup wizard crashes with incorrect connection information

Re: [Evolution] Google Calendars

2009-02-04 Thread David Weintraub
replaced my Windows desktop with Fedora, I can't do this any more. -- David Weintraub qazw...@gmail.com ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

[Evolution] Evolution 2.24.2 on Fedora 10 - Global Contact List Error

2009-01-15 Thread David Weintraub
with Ubuntu, and installed Evolution because other people at my company used it without problems. -- David Weintraub qazw...@gmail.com ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Re: [Evolution] Evo crashes on start after today's Ubuntu updates

2009-01-13 Thread David L
it, but I can't remember it off the top of my head. Cheers... David ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

[Evolution] Can I get an IMAP folder update up in here!

2008-12-17 Thread David Graves
is doing wrong. Pretty please, with sugar on top, update the fscking folder once in a while Very respectfully yours, David Graves ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Re: [Evolution] Can I get an IMAP folder update up in here!

2008-12-17 Thread David Graves
messages that I already read. -dg On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 14:25 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 10:35 -0800, David Graves wrote: I leave evolution open on my home machine and head to work. I read and delete emails all day at work. I come home to find all my messages unread

<    1   2   3   4   5   >