Hi Paul Smith :)
Im using your http://mad-scientist.us/Makefile to build Evolution from
git for the audio distro 64 Studio 3.3 alpha amd64, based on Ubuntu
Karmic.
And perhaps hi list :), maybe my request is allowed to get through the
list, without being subscribed.
All optional packages are
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 22:44 +0200, Thomas Mittelstaedt wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 12.09.2010, 12:16 +0200 schrieb Ralf Mardorf:
Hi Paul Smith :)
Im using your http://mad-scientist.us/Makefile to build Evolution from
git for the audio distro 64 Studio 3.3 alpha amd64, based on Ubuntu
Karmic
Thank you all :)
On Mi, 2013-05-15 at 22:48 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
Is there any error message? I think version 2.28 still had something
under Help or so that should some debug info. My wild guess would be
https://help.gnome.org/users/evolution/3.2/mail-error-folder-mismatch.html
You're
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 18:53 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
POP means the expunge is on a local folder, so the problem is internal
to this version of Evo, or perhaps to Windows, or to some interaction
between them. Since I know nothing about Evo on Windows I can't really
say more than that.
On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 09:29 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
Note, if I go to the
folder /root/.local/share/evolution/mail/local/folder name/cur
and open the mail file,
You're running evolution as root!!
Not for sure. The OP could use this path for a user too.
I agree that some solutions are
On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 11:08 +0200, mario chiari wrote:
[root@localhost ~]# evolution
My apologies, the OP does run Evolution as root. Mario, do yourself a
favour, not only for security reasons, run Evolution as user. Some GNOME
stuff by some distros default often can't be launched by root, resp.
On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 11:08 +0200, mario chiari wrote:
[root@localhost ~]# evolution
My apologies, the OP does run Evolution as root. Mario, do yourself a
favour, not only for security reasons, run Evolution as user. Some GNOME
stuff by some distros default often can't be launched by root, resp.
On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 09:29 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
Note, if I go to the
folder /root/.local/share/evolution/mail/local/folder name/cur
and open the mail file,
You're running evolution as root!!
Not for sure. The OP could use this path for a user too.
I agree that some solutions are
On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 09:54 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
It would require dark arts to make a non-root user with a home
directory of /root.
It's not what the user needs to do, it's enough to give the user
permission to use the path and only to tell Evolution to use this path,
simply make
On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 09:54 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
It would require dark arts to make a non-root user with a home
directory of /root.
It's not what the user needs to do, it's enough to give the user
permission to use the path and only to tell Evolution to use this path,
simply make
On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 13:10 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
That's absolutely true. Just don't expect anyone else to be able to give
you useful advice if you do it. There has to be a minimum common ground
for people to be able to talk to each other, and that common ground is
embodied in a
On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 17:14 +0100, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
I think you can tell when people are extremely happy because they join
this list to lurk and find new interesting things. When they are even
happier or just know enough then they start helping people.
Also Friends argue.
On Sat, 2013-05-18 at 01:55 -0600, Bart wrote:
On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 23:07 -0500, Eugene wrote:
http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/2322/evolution_automatically_create_address_book_entries/
I can't find this feature anymore. Was it dropped?
evolution-3.6.4
Eugene.
On Sun, 2013-05-19 at 19:33 -0400, Mark Filipak wrote:
Black helicopters are on their way to you.
What are you smoking? Those helicopters are pink.
However, the output the OP gets is bad, it should be like this one, I
get:
[rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ evolution
** (evolution:859): WARNING **:
On Thu, 2013-05-23 at 15:47 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 11:37 -0400, Bob Fleming wrote:
I recently installed a newer version of Centos after a drive began failing.
Although I have a copy of all files from the old drive, I foolishly did
not go through the Evolution
I'm using 3 completely independent accounts with Evolution, so you at
least could set up new accounts for each of the aliases you use for
your one account.
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or
On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 14:29 -0400, Bill West wrote:
Trying to paste text after the signature block seems impossible
Correct, but that's good, so nobody can write bad emails, regarding to
signature issues.
The signature is the last thing in an email and when replying to an
email with signature,
Sometimes simply closing and opening Evolution does help to get rid of
bugs. Cut, Copy and paste should work as usual, sometimes it doesn't
then I close and open it and it does work again.
OTOH if I have to transcribe an email address that can't be copied, e.g.
because it's a jpg and not ASCII,
On Sun, 2013-06-23 at 12:47 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
First, if you have comments about Evolution, then you really need to
tell us what version of it you are using.
The OP replied using Evolution 3.4.4-2 ;).
Sorry, I won't close and open Evolution again, so I can't mark following
quotes to
On Sun, 2013-06-23 at 07:33 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
HTML messages -
then sometimes it is very difficult to delete blank lines from the
quoted part of the reply.
Today I needed to close and open Evolution [1] again and again, because
I often can't mark text to delete it. I'm using
On Sun, 2013-06-23 at 08:29 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
I am looking for a server-centric mail client to replace evolution,
so
that I don't need to rebuild my address book, signatures, etc. every
time I use a different computer, but have not yet found one that is
acceptable.
Try
?
Finally, I am surprised and gratified by the response I have received to
my somewhat grumpy email (Ralf Mardorf also responded),
Why surprised? This mailing list is exactly for that sort of thing -
you have a query or comment about evolution: people here will help you.
P.
We all
Hi :)
it's not only that I often need to close and open Evolution again to
mark text, right now I had to do it, because when I tried to click the
File menu, it didn't open the menu, but did mark the folder On This
Computer.
A raw search says that I at least used 3.8.2 until 01 Jun 2013 and 3.8.3
On Sun, 2013-06-23 at 06:51 -0700, Brewster Gillett wrote:
On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 11:19 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
snip
FWIW we had a blackout while I was writing this mail and Evolution
recovered it :).
bg:
FYI there's this gadget called an uninterruptible power supply, widely
pass list moderation. Reporting issues with Arch
Linux usually is rejected by the list moderator, many other list users
already were banned :D.
From: Ralf Mardorf
To: General Discussion about Arch Linux arch-gene...@archlinux.org
Subject: Broken mouse behaviour for Evolution
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013
Andre, it's better, if we don't reply to spam, to enable easier and more
secure filtering of junk mails. This btw. is the reason that I reply by
a new mail, IOW with a new thread inside the mail's header.
Regards,
Ralf
___
evolution-list mailing list
On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 10:34 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 01:39 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Andre, it's better, if we don't reply to spam, to enable easier and more
secure filtering of junk mails.
I think it's not better per se, and I missed the implementation details
On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 10:49 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
Andre, it's better, if we don't reply to spam, to enable easier and more
secure filtering of junk mails.
I think it's not better per se, and I missed the implementation details
of enabling easier and more secure filtering
On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 06:25 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 10:49 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
Andre, it's better, if we don't reply to spam, to enable easier and
more
secure filtering of junk mails.
I think it's not better per se, and I missed the
Hi,
when I work much using xfce4-terminal, Evolution becomes unresponsive
and I need to reboot. Nothing else but Evolution is effected. This also
happens, if I don't run xfce4-terminal, but not that often.
$ pacman -Q evolution xfce4-terminal
evolution 3.8.3-1
xfce4-terminal 0.6.2-1
$ uname -rm
Perhaps
mv ~/.cache ~/.cache.bak
does the trick.
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 12:07 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
when I work much using xfce4-terminal, Evolution becomes unresponsive
and I need to reboot. Nothing else but Evolution is effected. This also
happens, if I don't run xfce4-terminal, but not that often.
$ pacman -Q evolution xfce4
I never tested evolution --force-shutdown, however sometimes it anyway
closes automatically, sometimes it can be closed by closing the Window,
sometimes killall is needed and sometimes killall -9, but to use
Evolution again always a reboot is needed, deleting the cache and or log
out the session
Forwarded Message
From: Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@rocketmail.com
To: evolution-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evo settings are not preserved across sessions
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 12:07:27 +0200
Perhaps
mv ~/.cache ~/.cache.bak
does the trick
Forwarded Message
From: Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@rocketmail.com
To: evolution-list@gnome.org
Subject: Evolution becomes unresponsive
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 12:07:31 +0200
Hi,
when I work much using xfce4-terminal, Evolution becomes unresponsive
and I need to reboot. Nothing
Wrong account for the reply, one of the other issues I still experience
with Evolution ;).
Forwarded Message
From: Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net
To: evolution-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evolution becomes unresponsive
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 13:56:38 +0200
Sometimes Evolution does use the correct account to reply and sometimes
it doesn't :(, seems to be an issue with mailing lists, when I'm missing
as recipient?!
Forwarded Message
From: Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net
To: evolution-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Evolution
On Wed, 2013-07-17 at 18:12 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
On Wed, 2013-07-17 at 22:12 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
My wireless mouse scroll wheel works everywhere except in the Evo
folders pane, i.e. everywhere else in my desktop (KDE), and in the Evo
message pane and preview pane.
On Thu, 2013-07-18 at 00:33 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Furthermore, I just noticed that the same problem (non-scrolling
wheel) occurs in the message compose widget.
On Thu, 2013-07-18 at 00:44 +0200, I wrote:
I'm using a wired USB mouse and sometimes I can't scroll the text
inside
My apologies for the OT. Bart, I agree that Evolution shouldn't nanny
us, IOW if you want to use HTML and everything is set up to do so, then
Evolution shouldn't bother you by asking, if you're really sure.
However, reconsider to write plain text mails only and use Evolutions
Performatted
Does anybody get the same alarm notification?
Forwarded Message
From: Ralf Mardorf
To: General Discussion about Arch Linux
Subject: evolution-alarm-notify:744 Permission denied. dconf will not
work properly.
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 15:36:25 +0200
Hi :)
regarding to googling
On Fri, 2013-07-19 at 17:10 -0600, Bart Hollis wrote:
Heh, heh, heh... You're preaching to the choir! I agree.
But! If I can't insert pictures in the middle of a message, and put
little moving cuties in my sig line, and make the text different colors
and sizes, then I can't be part of the
It's a pity that Evolution usually does miss to automatically use the
wanted account :(.
Forwarded Message
On Sun, 2013-07-21 at 07:13 -0700, erenoglu wrote:
I work at a multi-national and Outlook is the norm.
Sure, if a multinational does something idiotic it's automatically
One of the annoying features. There's no way to tell evolution that it
should use a special account, when replying to this list.
Original message
From: Ralf Mardorf _but from the wrong account_
To: evolution-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evolution on 64 bits Linux
jauch.conta...@gmail.com
To: Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@rocketmail.com
Cc: evolution-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evolution on 64 bits Linux system
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 16:28:00 +0100
I need an option that allows Evolution to tell, that if I reply to
evolution-list@gnome.org, it always
On Sat, 2013-07-27 at 11:51 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Sat, 2013-07-27 at 17:44 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Eduardo, please don't top post.
+1
On Sat, 2013-07-27 at 16:28 +0100, Eduardo Jauch wrote:
What do you mean by special account?
Sorry it's my broken English. I've got
On Sat, 2013-07-27 at 11:51 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Sat, 2013-07-27 at 17:44 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Eduardo, please don't top post.
+1
On Sat, 2013-07-27 at 16:28 +0100, Eduardo Jauch wrote:
What do you mean by special account?
Sorry it's my broken English. I've got
On Sun, 2013-07-21 at 07:13 -0700, erenoglu wrote:
I work at a multi-national and Outlook is the norm.
Sure, if a multinational does something idiotic it's automatically a
norm. That's ridiculous.
The American Standard Code for Information Interchange is a kind of norm
at least close to real
On Sat, 2013-07-27 at 11:58 +0100, Eduardo Jauch wrote:
I run an Arch Linux 64 bits and I use evolution without problems.
I run it on Arch too, since it's open source it can be compiled for 64
bit architecture. The compiling for x86_64 doesn't cause an issue, but I
anyway can't confirm that
Hi Eduardo,
JFTR your last mail was sent two times, I at least received it two
times. Strange, even if I'm in the lists of recipients this doesn't
happen for my Arch's Evolution, I'm now using an Ubuntu's Evolution. I
thought it depends to the settings chosen by the mailman account.
However,
On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 18:13 +0100, Tom Davies wrote:
It's just another blocker that prevents normal office workers from
potentially using this office program.
Can you send me a link to a mailing list for the office software those
normal office workers use, where top-posting is ok?
TIA,
Ralf
On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 19:29 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 18:13 +0100, Tom Davies wrote:
It's just another blocker that prevents normal office workers from
potentially using this office program.
Can you send me a link to a mailing list for the office software those
Forwarded Message
From: Ralf Mardorf
To: evolution-list
Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evolution on 64 bits Linux system
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 21:52:07 +0200
On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 19:26 +0100, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
See any forums or mailing lists for MS products.
It's only
disc u ssio n.
On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 22:29 +0100, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
Look, this whole argument is tired. This list clearly
of this
wants to make it difficult for people to join in. It doesn't want to
deal with people that might have just 1 or 2 questions. It's quite
happy
On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 11:00 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
All types of communities on the net have their traditions or norms -
posting to a forum is very different to posting to a mailing list
Sorry, now I have to opt in again. The OP claimed that top-posting in
forums is common practise. I never
On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 12:43 +0200, I wrote:
The OP claimed
Oops, I guess it wasn't the OP of the original thread :D, pardon.
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 11:00 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
All types of communities on the net have their traditions or norms -
posting to a forum is very different to posting to a mailing list
Sorry, now I have to opt in again. The OP claimed that top-posting in
forums is common practise. I never
Hi,
I don't like the policy of Amazone, but I needed to order something by
Amazone, I had no other choice.
To read Amazon's plain text mails, I have to scroll sideways. Is there a
way to force line breaks by Evolution 3.8.4?
Regards,
Ralf
___
On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 06:35 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 21:19 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
To read Amazon's plain text mails, I have to scroll sideways. Is there a
way to force line breaks by Evolution 3.8.4?
If you know CSS, then you can try to tweak
/usr/share
On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 06:04 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
gtkhtml3-4.6.6
One user said it breaks after selecting a text in the new
message body, which part the workaround in 4.6.6 fixes. At least for me.
$ pacman -Qi evolution | grep Depends
Depends On : gnome-desktop evolution-data-server
Still the old issue. Here it sometimes does work and sometimes it
doesn't work, for several versions of Evo, current is 3.8.4.
Take a look at ~/.xsession-errors, most of the times when Evo runs into
trouble or another app run into trouble only when Evo is running, access
to dconf is broken. I
Hi,
is there a way to prevent Evolution from marking Emails as read, after
switching from one folder to another only?
Evolution should mark mails as read after a while, but not after
switching from one to another folder, they should be marked as read
after a while only, if I switch from one mail
Forwarded Message
From: Ralf Mardorf not my day today :D, same mistake again
To: evolution-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Evolution] Mark emails as read annoyance
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 16:24:13 +0200
On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 15:08 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
I would say
Sorry for breaking the thread, by accident I didn't take care about the
used account.
Forwarded Message
From: Ralf Mardorf wrong email account for this list
To: evolution-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Evolution] Mark emails as read annoyance
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 16:14:56 +0200
On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 15:58 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On 19 August 2013 15:25, Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@rocketmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 15:08 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
I would say that it's a matter of opinion whether this is
correct
On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 19:44 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Just to be sure I understand you, this is what I'm imagining:
1) You have the preview pane closed.
If the preview pane is what I guess that it is, than how can it be
closed? No, it's open, I could read the marked email by what
I flagged Andre's mail with the link that shows the names of the main
window's parts, it might be useful in the future.
On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 00:21 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
If it's open, it *is* being displayed, meaning that in Evo' s view, it
is being read.
So for Evolution preview
On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 19:42 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
Bullshit.
You've had time enough to post about this issue 5 times now
This is _troubleshooting_ and it already takes time and strange things
could happen and in this case did happen, so making a sane bug report is
to time consuming for
On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 16:05 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 15:56 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
is there a way to prevent Evolution from marking Emails as read, after
switching from one folder to another only?
Way more information is welcome, for example Evolution version
On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 15:08 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
I would say that it's a matter of opinion whether this is correct
behaviour or not. I don't know of a precise specification of what the
timeout semantics are supposed to be (other than the code) so you might
need to propose it as a
Arch Linux does use a real rolling release model, not such a pseudo
thingy as Debian calls rolling release, so it's always the current
release, resp. too keep Arch stable, stuff first is in a testing
repository, so there might be a short delay. I don't know if apps like
Evolution are in testing
On Fri, 2013-08-23 at 12:19 -0700, N B Day wrote:
I've never had the slightest problem using PPAs hosted on well known
places
While I'm an Arch user, I try to contribute to Ubuntu Studio, when ever
possible (this tend to be nothing, my apologies). PPAs are a risk, but
I agree, that what you
On Sat, 2013-08-24 at 16:50 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
What they, hopefully, aim for is to produce good quality software that
people find useful and would *prefer* to use. If this, or any other
software, doesn't meet your needs, or even if the (free) mailing list
annoys you, then people are
On Sat, 2013-08-24 at 13:02 -0300, Betti Ann and Preston Smith wrote:
Good afternoon,
You refer to this as a technical list. I see this as a users' list.
Here is the heading from evolution-list@gnome.org
evolution-list -- General discussion and user queries of Evolution
If this list is
Forwarded Message
From: Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net
To: evolution-list@gnome.org
Cc: Preston Smith prbasm...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Evolution] List Formats and such (wa Re: PPAs and Postings
(was Re: downloads page))
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 18:55:17 +0200
On Sat
On Sat, 2013-08-24 at 18:08 +0100, Tom Davies wrote:
This is a last remaining refugee for people that want to use
bottom-posting.
You're mistaken, top posting isn't wanted for quasi all mailing lists
that have to do with computers and even for most mailing lists that have
completely nothing to
On Sat, 2013-08-24 at 19:20 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Sat, 2013-08-24 at 18:08 +0100, Tom Davies wrote:
This is a last remaining refugee for people that want to use
bottom-posting.
You're mistaken, top posting isn't wanted for quasi all mailing lists
that have to do with computers
On Mon, 2013-08-26 at 10:38 +0100, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
It is part of the same question. I'm just having to reach a lot
further back than i expected.
Lets look at another tack. Why is Evo having to drop from a 6 monthly
to a 1/year release? Does it lack personnel? Do the devs often
On Mon, 2013-08-26 at 19:39 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Mon, 2013-08-26 at 11:57 +0100, Tom Davies wrote:
The question would then be how do we increase the teams 'man'power.
However it is becoming clearer and clearer that the opposite is true.
This project seems keen to exclude outsider
JFTR every distro is free to have it's own policy and usually they've
got reasons for doing things the way they do it. FWIW I'm an Arch Linux
user and AFAIK it always supports the latest version of Evolution
available as binary by a package, this at least s the policy, while the
default packages
On Mon, 2013-08-26 at 20:15 +0100, Tom Davies wrote:
If users will never compile anything then why are we expected to do
so?
Users very often compile by their own, this is common practise for *nix
systems.
So how are users expected to get the latest versions of Evo? Just
wait until
On Mon, 2013-08-26 at 15:50 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
You tell me to write to a 3rd party but then fail to give me an
address of someone that will respond to my request.
You do not know what distribution you are using? Since they
DISTRIBUTED the software to you...
JFTR
$ cat
On Mon, 2013-08-26 at 20:54 +0100, Tom Davies wrote:
Do you have a list of distros i can use Evolution on?
You can do some work on your own. Perhaps Linux isn't what fits to your
needs. Take a look at distrowatch and then check the policy and
repositories of different distros.
On Mon, 2013-08-26 at 22:33 +0200, Mark Elkins wrote:
Remember, (1) download, (2) unpackage (tar -xvzf package.tgz)
(around here - explore what you have just unpacked, read the README's
and other files like INSTALL and look for 'configure'.
(3) ./configure (with options), (4) make, (5)
On Mon, 2013-08-26 at 22:29 +0100, Tom Davies wrote:
So each time Evolution produces a new release then we all just change
distro (except those using a rolling release, if it's one that has
upgraded).
I for example don't report each minor bug to a bug tracker. I'm using
latest version of
On Mon, 2013-08-26 at 23:22 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
What is the downloads page for?
It's for pointing people at the source code - remember, this is FOSS,
one of the requirements is that the source code is freely and easily
available.
The distro, or anybody who distribute FLOSS has to make
On Mon, 2013-08-26 at 23:48 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
Were do you get the information from, that not most users compile from
source? Is there a link to this information available?
Sorry, I used my experience, I apologise that the statement isn't backed
up by a research project.
I guess
From: Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net
To: evolution-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Evolution] Idealism face plants against asphalt [Was:
downloads page]
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 01:23:44 +0200
On Mon, 2013-08-26 at 23:55 +0100, Tom Davies wrote:
Is that why people are getting so
On Tue, 2013-08-27 at 01:29 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Tue, 2013-08-27 at 00:25 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On 26 August 2013 23:55, Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
I won the impression that most of those who continue to discuss with you
have another opinion than you've
On Tue, 2013-08-27 at 01:45 +0200, Pascal Hasko Bernhard wrote:
If you rather into Debian use apt-pinning and take the Evo packages
from the experimental branch, that should be pretty cutting edge!
Sorry, I dislike to chime in again, but don't recommend something like
this. Experimental
Could you guys please use
Re: evolution v3.4.4: Message scrolling with mouse sometimes broken
for messages that are about this subject and e.g.
OT: evolution v3.4.4: Message scrolling with mouse sometimes broken
for your off-topic?
This makes it easy to sort mails for those who are interested in
the user
can set up, that for a recipient the wanted account is used, when
sending an email. [/OT]
Forwarded Message
From: Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net
To: evolution-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evolution password changes
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 22:46:41 +0200
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 06:38 +, evolution-list-ow...@gnome.org wrote:
[snip] rejected by the list moderator. The moderator gave the
following reason for rejecting your request:
Already resent from other account, hence rejecting. [snip]
Hi,
I changed the used account for the list from
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 09:37 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
Evolution really, really is missing a feature for POP/SMTP usage, that
allows to allocate a mailing list/recipient to one of the available
accounts.
In my experience Evolution does a fairly good job of picking the correct
account to
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 10:44 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 09:37 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
Evolution really, really is missing a feature for POP/SMTP usage, that
allows to allocate a mailing list/recipient to one of the available
accounts.
In my experience
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 11:25 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 11:03 +0200, Patryk Benderz wrote:
If you put a feature request, please share link to it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213863#c17
I'm not sure if it is really a good place, since it is about IMAP
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 13:35 +0200, Patryk Benderz wrote:
I think this bug is not quite about what we are discussing here, it is
about specify multiple aliases functionality. We want evo to select
email account based on some criteria. You should create new one, as you
described in your initial
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 08:03 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
But as soon as that is implemented someone will say but i want to
reply to this list with account A and that list with account B and
this other list with
That's why I ask to add it to the contact editor. I've got different
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 08:04 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 11:10 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
If the thread was broken by me, then there must be a bug for Evolution.
I sent many mails each days without breaking the thread and I'm always
using reply to list.
PS: I
On Thu, 2013-09-26 at 12:01 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
The choose the right account by default is even complicated,
especially when you send to more recipients, and each has set
different account to be used. Dividing an email into set of emails is
not what your really want to do.
Good point.
1 - 100 of 1096 matches
Mail list logo
