Thanks for your reply Peter - I'll give that a try.
Kind regards,
Dan.
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 January 2002 17:01
Subject: RE: IMSext / Mail Relaying
What you need to do is use the registry method of setting up imsext.dll, as
opposed
Typically where I see this is that your AV scanner hasn't had enough time to
scan the attahcment due to it's size. By trying to open it up several times
you give it the necessary time to complete it's scan.We have one customer
who uses NAV and this is most common with this scanner. Other
Where I have seen this is when the text you are searching for is too long or
more accurately contains too many words. Try shortening the string search
to less than five words and you should be good to go.
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
-Original Message-
From: MSExchange [mailto:[EMAIL
StIcK 2.0 or the StIcK 2.2 (comes with 9 nail add-on package and mop-up
set) will solve your problem veeery quickly.
Alternatively, since he's not very bright, you can leave a large fork on his
table with a large label on it that reads Don't poke your eye with this.
S.
-Original
2 Ex2k SP2 servers both seeing the other as remote. Messages to mailbox
on other server stick in queue, e.g.
S2.dom.co.uk (Remote delivery) in SMTP queues on S1.
S1.dom.co.uk + S2.dom.co.uk
Both boxes on same subnet, both can ping the other using netbios name or
FQDN.
Any ideas why this
Title: RE: Global Address Book
As already mentioned Outlook 2002 has resizeable columns. But you can do it in 2000 too. Needs some change in the registry of each and every pc though.
OL2000: (CW) How to Control the Width of Address Book Columns (Q222878)
-Original Message-
From:
Anyone with Trend ScanMail experience or perhaps you just know the
difference . . . the latest version of ScanMail comes in 2 flavors:
ESE API or
MAPI/VAPI
Can anyone nutshell the differences and which is recommended?
Much Thanks!
Chris
This site has a wealth of information on that subject:
http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
S.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 8:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ScanMail
Anyone with Trend ScanMail
All,
I'm trying to setup Auto Reply's to the internet. I've unchecked the box
Disable Auto-Replies to the internet Now when I go into Outlook to setup
this Rule. I have the rule to check messages when they arrive that was sent
to my name. Then I have server send reply using basically an email
Did you restart the IMS?
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Network Support Analyst
Exchange Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 January 2002 14:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: FW: Outlook Rules Problem
All,
I'm
Actually that is incorrect. The latest version of SM does ESE based scanning
only. That would be version 3.8
Version 3.52 was the last to do AVAPI. They still keep it up on their site.
There are some other significant improvements in 3.8 as well. Such as you
can no longer change the extension on
And what happens to you when someone auto-replies to your auto-reply???
BAD IDEA!
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 January
Yea I know this is a bad idea. But they want to use this for 30 days
because someone important left the company and they want everyone sending
him email to know that he no longer works here. Not my idea! I already
told them I don't like it. So if that happens, I'll just sit back here
laughing
And the great thing about IM is that it does not fill up our lovely exchange
servers with trivia! He'd only be abusing emails otherwise.
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 January 2002 22:46
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Restriciting use
Yes, sorry forgot to add that.
___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:24 AM
I still cannot get send on behalf to work. The delegates have owner rights
on the mailbox, the exch admin delivery options tab is set on.
It just doesn't work. Please any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Is it sending it, just not as another person, or not sending it at all?
J
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: cannot send the message on behalf
I still cannot get send on behalf
What errors or NDR's are you getting?
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Network Support Analyst
Exchange Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 January 2002 14:43
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: cannot send the
OT I know but oh how close to the truth!
PS Don't read if you are easily offended. Also, link may wrap.
http://www.microsoft.com[EMAIL PROTECTED]/nyheter/feb01/Q209354%20-%
20HOWTO.htm
Dom.
_
List posting FAQ:
Since you've done everything else, have you checked your DNS setup ?
Specifically, what are the entries for your preferred DNS servers ?
What entries do you have for forwarders ?
Are you forwarding to an ISP or other internet DNS service ?
Wouldn't it make more sense to forward the e-mails to the correct person and
let them answer it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bowles, John L.
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 7:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules
I am getting the little yellow box saying you do not have permission to
send on behalf of this user
-Original Message-
From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: cannot send the message on behalf
What
How about giving mailbox rights to someone else, who can then make a
cookie-cutter response if need be, and handle REALLY IMPORTANT emails
with a personal response, rather than putting the onus back onto the
sender? And then if it takes 37 days or 64 days or 42 days for the
important email to
HR just wants an Auto Reply. I told them the consequences and they seem
alright with that, so I'm going to give it to them. And when the system
crashes from a mail loop. Then maybe they will start listening to me a bit
more.
But what I explained earlier should work? I don't need to do
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules Problem
HR just wants an Auto Reply. I told them the consequences and they seem
alright with that, so I'm going to
All
We are experiencing some issues with opening emails containing attachments
with the size of attachment not appearing to make a difference. When a user
clicks on the message to open it or even preview it on machines that we
allow preview pane, it can take 5 seconds or more to actually bring
Ok whenever you enter a web address into a composed message in Outlook it
automatically turns into a hyperlink. I know there is a way to keep it from
doing this, but don't remember how. Would anyone be able to refresh my
memory.
Chris
I'm having issues with Mac clients that can't open a mailbox that was
moved from an old 5.5 to a new 5.5 server. Here are the questions:
We apparently overlooked File Services for Mac in the setup... that has
now been corrected. Do we need to restart the Exchange services so they
will use
Use plain text for you messages instead of rich text... that should work.
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Hyperlinks
Ok whenever you enter a web address into a composed message
Plain text still converts it to a hyperlink.
-Original Message-
From: Wynkoop, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hyperlinks
Use plain text for you messages instead of rich text... that should work.
Got a weird one here.
Client : Win2k
Outlook 2000
Server: Exchange 5.5
NT 4 SP 6a
I have exchange and some clients sitting in one subnet (say
10.0.0.whatever) and clients sitting in another (say
192.168.20.whatever). Clients in the exchange subnet get their mail
just fine, however
I have the same problem, and have always thought it was becasue of the
extra load on the mailbox due to NAV for Exchange's VAPI MAPI scanning as
well as the file extension filtering.
Jim Helfer
-Original Message-
From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday,
We have a problem with our Exchange server that's happened now twice in the
last month - we discover that the Exchange server has quit and the cluster
failed over to the other server. In checking the event log we find to ID's -
12800 and 4182 just before both failure's, and a search of KB brings
As long as someone hasn't provided the dim-bulb with an Electro-magnetic
hat...
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 7:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Restriciting use of MSN Messenger
StIcK 2.0 or the StIcK
Scenario...
I have an NT4sp6a Exc 5.5sp4 site with a FQDN and fixed IP address. I have
some pop3 mailboxes that collect their mail from this Server using the said
FQDN.
I have a W2k Exc 2000 site at a different location, its dial up with an ISDN
TA. It gets a different IP each time when
Tom,
We have had the same problem here and we have not been able to figure it
out. Seems like if they click in outlook all of the sudden several messages
appear at once. ??? Let me know if you figure it out.
Regards,
LaCretia Sandoval
-Original Message-
From: Tom [mailto:[EMAIL
Do your Mac clients also have access to TCPIP? If so, this would be better
for all people concerned.
I have a Mac hooked up, but I use TCPIP and haven't when being moved from
one server to another (which has happened several times).
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
-Original Message-
From:
Do you have the Outlook clients setup as Internet Mail? Or Corporate
Workgroup?
___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US
In my environment we are setup in a Corporate environment.
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Outlook won't bring in mail
Do you have the Outlook clients
After a fashion. For the remote users, you would not configure mailboxes,
but rather Custom Recipients. The Custom Recipient would have a primary
SMTP address of the remote system ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and would have a
secondary SMTP address of [EMAIL PROTECTED] That way external mail gets sent
If that's the case they shouldn't be downloading email at all. They should
just be getting their email when it comes in. You said that they are
Pulling their mail in. If it's setup in the Corporate environment then
they should receive their mail in real time. Maybe i'm not reading
something
In our environment they do not pull the e-mail. What happens is when you
startup in the morning mail comes in fine. Throughout the day, Outlook will
be running in the background and you will not get any mail. As soon as you
click on something in Outlook... BAM! 3-4 messages arrive all at once.
Sounds like it is more like the New Mail notification message does not get
processed by the client. I would be on a network problem. Have you checked
the NIC settings? If it is on a switch try setting to 100mb/full duplex.
Make sure that the Exchange server is on a switch and can be set to
I'm going to address this question to Ed Missy primarily, since I'm
assuming that working at Compaq, they have a lot of experience with e-mail
over an iPaq. But if anyone else knows the answer to this question, feel
free to respond.
Everyone in our Operations group has an iPaq, Model 3670 with
We are having a host of issues similar to yours. If you have background
scanning enabled, my suggestion would be to disable it. The 5 seconds time
laps is the default setting when background scanning.
If you have any questions or if you have a revelation, I would enjoy hearing
from you. The
You just need to select which additional folders you want to sync in
ActiveSync. No magic involved. Did you look at the options?
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 8:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E-mail and
Do the Mac clients have hosts files that need to be changed to reflect a new IP
address?
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 7:57
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mac - Ex 5.5 mailbox move issue
Do your Mac
Nate,
Thanks for the reply. The search string is only '*research-q*'. Isn't this
only one word? I didn't think that the matching algorithm for the rules
interpreted the '*' as a wildcard. Am I wrong?
--
Leema
-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
We had suspicions that it was the UDP packets however, this occurs randomly
and in my case it's throughout the company. Not just on one subnet. There
is no router or firewall just a switch. Considering it happens randomly, I
think the switch isn't the problem here. We used a product from
I thought it was fast, good, cheap...
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 5:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Change email dates
Fast, easy, cheap. Pick two.
- Original Message -
From: Chris Scharff
Does anyone know of a company that can program outlook to our companys need?
RGDS
Rich
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To
Under what? :)
-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 8:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E-mail and Compaq iPaq's
You just need to select which additional folders you want to sync in
ActiveSync. No magic involved.
To do what?
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 11:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: outlook programming
Does anyone know of a company that can program outlook to our companys need?
RGDS
Rich
Exactly what I'm seeing here.
Also not blocking UDP packets.
Tom
Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US wrote:
In our environment they do not pull the e-mail. What happens is when you
startup in the morning mail comes in fine. Throughout the day, Outlook will
be running in the background and you
Im trying to set up a file system for outlook messages. Say if you recieve
a message and you want to put it on a file server I would like to just drag
and drop that file into outlook. I know you can do this now with the
outlook shortcut bar but the problem is when you click on a folder that
http://www.mail-resources.com/modules.php?op=modloadname=Sectionsfile=inde
xreq=viewarticleartid=1
(line wrap)
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL
In ActiveSync - Tools, Options, select Inbox and click the Settings button.
Check the boxes of folders you want to sync. [1]
[1] I typed this slowly so you boys in Orange County can follow along.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday,
Joyce,
Does microsoft do custom programming for companys?
Thanks
Rich
-Original Message-
From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 11:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: outlook programming
Microsoft.
You may of heard of them.
Don't you think it's a bit optimistic to be able to pick two ?
Sometimes only ONE is available.
Brian J. Meline, MCSE, 2000MCP
Network Support, Exchange Administrator
Resolution, Inc.
I didn't know what I was looking for until I found it. Peter Davison
Doug,
I hate to argue with someone as knowledgeable as you are, but I am not
getting the same options you are, evidently.
I was doing exactly the steps you suggested, but don't have the ability to
select individual folders underneath the Inbox. All I have are connectivity
settings, in the
Brilliant ... I wonder how long that's been there !
-Original Message-
From: Olds, Dominic [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 2:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Check this out
OT I know but oh how close to the truth!
PS Don't read if you are
Thanks for the article however, we do not have a router in the middle.
These are users that are sitting locally on the LAN. I have had no reports
of users having this from remote as described in this article. I have also,
searched Tech Net with no success.
-Original Message-
From:
I don't know of anyone who can write you something, but you could just use
personal folders to store the messages in. The only problem with that is
that all the messages are in one big file.
J
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January
That was just hurtful.
-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 8:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E-mail and Compaq iPaq's
In ActiveSync - Tools, Options, select Inbox and click the Settings button.
Check the boxes
I still would suspect network issues. Check your DNS, check your NIC's,
check the ports on the switch, etc. etc. Hardcore the port on the switch
the server is on to 100mb/full as well as on the server. Replace cables.
What brand of switch do you have? Have you checked the wiring back to the
Ever since someone at hardware.no posted it.
-Original Message-
From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Check this out
Brilliant ... I wonder how long that's been there !
-Original Message-
Tener,
With enough funding, i would of thought so.
Use the batphone.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Network Support Analyst
Exchange Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 January 2002 17:03
To: Exchange Discussions
Anything is available, for a price.
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: outlook programming
Joyce,
Does microsoft do custom programming for companys?
Thanks
Rich
Go to www.slipstick.com. Lots of products listed, and therefore companies
that program.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tener, Richard
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: outlook programming
I believe Veritas has this very type of product
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: outlook programming
Im trying to set up a file system for outlook messages. Say if you
He meant Orange County in NY.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E-mail and Compaq iPaq's
That was just hurtful.
-Original Message-
I shant give in!
I still have my pride!
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Network Support Analyst
Exchange Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 January 2002 17:07
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: outlook
Does your Domino server have a different address space than your
Exchange server?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Its ok to argue with Doug. I do it all the time.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E-mail and Compaq iPaq's
Doug,
I hate to argue with someone as knowledgeable as
Frank Miller has answered my question...I am running PocketPC 2000.
PocketPC 2002 has been on order from Compaq for the last month and a half.
Guess since ours was a free upgrade, we go to the back of the line.
=
PocketPC 2002 has this capability. PocketPC 2000 does not...
Frank
Darren,
It was newer on microsoft.com :)
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/nyheter/feb01/Q209354%20-%20HOWTO.htm
It is on yours.
/Peter
- Original Message -
From: Darren Ash [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:19 PM
Subject: RE: Check
Someone with too much free time on their hands.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys!
-Original Message-
From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
And clustering is supposed to improve availability.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Smits
Sent:
Back in the ol' days (Outlook 98 and earlier), using Word or HTML
automatically converts (for example) http://www.lakers3peat.com and
www.lakers3peat.com to live links, while using RTF or plain text only
converts http://lakers.three.peat. See
Did you stop and restart the IMS after making the change?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bowles, John
Actually the hyperlink is in the viewer. It doesn't change the sent
message, just how you see it. It's still just a plain text string going
out.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original
Is there anything in the event log?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul
Christopher
Sent: Thursday,
No he doesn't.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E-mail and Compaq iPaq's
Its ok to argue with Doug. I do it all the time.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H
Would you follow the request if HR said it was OK to put the server on the
Internet to ease remote access problems?.
Tell them it's a human resource issue, they either pay for your over time to
fix the server when it breaks [1] and for the loss to the rest of the
company during the server outage
Ah ha, I always assume that if the poster doesn't supply the version info in
the request, that they are running A) the latest version or B) whatever I'm
running (since it's all about me). :-)
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday,
That's just hurtful...
-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E-mail and Compaq iPaq's
Ah ha, I always assume that if the poster doesn't supply the version info in
the request,
Who cares what HR wants. They never care what we want! :)
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 7:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules Problem
HR just wants an Auto Reply. I told them the consequences
Ha!
Naw, we Orange County, NY residents are sharp as tacks. Of course, you would
know that since you used to be one.
-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E-mail and Compaq iPaq's
fwiw- so has my 3870 :(
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E-mail and Compaq iPaq's
Frank Miller has answered my question...I am running PocketPC 2000.
PocketPC 2002
I may be mistaken here, but at least with the cluster in place we're down
for only a minute until the failover kicks in. Are you suggesting the
cluster is the cause of the problem? If so, why?
ED (not Crowley or MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I etc)
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley
Ed / Missy...
You wouldn't be able to speed up the shipping process for Byron and myself
would you? :::wink, wink::: :O)
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Byron Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E-mail and
Good memory! Anyway, I had to leave. Failed all the tack tests.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E-mail and Compaq iPaq's
Ha!
Naw, we Orange
I'm not going to sit here and argue on why this isn't the right thing to do.
My manager and HR want it done, so it has to be done. How can I get this to
work?
Thanks,
___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
That's just hurtful
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Rules Problem
Who cares what HR wants. They never care what we want! :)
-Original Message-
I've already told them how I didn't approve. But it doesn't matter what I
think obviously. But when the Son of a bitch crashes I'm going to look at
my boss w/my $hit eating grin and say Told you so That's it.
___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support
try using all messages instead of just ones sent to your name
in other words...
1. Check messages when they arrive and
2. Forward to people or distribution list
Outlook will squawk about this rule firing for all incoming messages but
that's what you want right?
J
-Original
Talk to your many local Microsoft Solution Providers.
Also contact Siegfried Weber at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maybe the green
stuff could convince him to write you what you want.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and
I would have to agree. What happens is that some interruption in the
network occurs and Outlook becomes disconnected, if you will. When the
user pokes Outlook, it wakes up and messages appear. I see this all the
time, especially over my VPN connection to my employer. I think you
have two
It seems to me that if the server fails over unnecessarily, that reduces
your availability.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
They won't buy me an iPaq.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Blunt, James H
(Jim)
Sent: Thursday, January
1 - 100 of 183 matches
Mail list logo
