I must work Monday
Britain has no president
Prime Minister Blair.
-
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday
From: James Winzenz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 09:18:11 -0800
We have all the trusts already in place (and verified) ... All the
permisiions are verified between the 5.5 servers and the 2000 server ...
Does the CA need to be global? We have a few two way CA's, but they are only
between specific Containers ... we still can't move a mailbox (from one of
the
Are all these users in the same subnet 10.0.0.0 ?
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 February 2002 20:23
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Relay blues
I know this is fairly easy issue and discussed before but I don't
understand why some users are
Hi,
Can't find any info on this in the MS KB.
Server error:
Event ID: 8277
Source MSExchangeFBPublish
'Error while getting sorted message table for duplicate message deletion
on virtual machine MY-SERVER. The error number is 0x80004005'
The error immediately follows info event 8273 - '
Yes. I am thinking that I have to turn off Integrated Windows Authentication
on the Access tab of the SMTP virtual server. Not 100% sure until I get in
Tuesday to see all of the NDRs and test.
- Original Message -
From: Adam Romain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL
Does anybody know how many people you can view at a time in group calendars.
I have one customer that has more that 8 and it's ugly do try and view in
Outlook 2000. The group feature in 2002 looks great.
_
List posting FAQ:
I could always make them the same machine
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 3:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Moving out of a Domain
Exchange cannot stand alone; Ex55 requires a domain, Ex2K requires AD.
I used to know a reg hack for Outlook 2002 that would allow you to minimize
it to the sys tray. I cannot find it anymore. Anyone know a link?
Much Thanks!
Destiny...is not a matter of chance, it is a matter of choice;
it is not a thing to be waited for, it is a thing to be achieved.
http://www.tweakers.net/meuktracker/1362
Came up on google, but I can't read Dutch :)
-Original Message-
From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 8:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Reg Hack to Minimize Outlook XP
I used to know a reg
what do you want to know?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 February, 2002 2:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Reg Hack to Minimize Outlook XP
http://www.tweakers.net/meuktracker/1362
Came up on google, but I can't read Dutch :)
Kim,
Chris wanted a hack to minimize OL2002 to the systray- I searched on Google
and found the link. My statement was kind of a disclaimer; I couldn't tell
by the conversation if the hack worked or not.
Here's the bit I was looking at-
[quote[ Heel mooi die Outlook functie... Ik had al een
Do feel too bad.
If you were in America you would probably be working today also.
Unfortunately, this is one of those holidays that gets overlooked on many
corporate calendars. Those goverment employees, bless their hearts, don't
miss a single one. ;)
Joseph Smith
Network Administrator
I know what you mean. My company is owned by a Japanese company and all 4000
of them can at least speak passable english. I know about 3 Japanese words.
Makes me feel really lazy sometimes!
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
basically the conversation says that this is a program (proggie = slang)
that actually works, and thet he's tried others before...
This is only the translation, don't know the tool...
Cheers
-Original Message-
From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 February, 2002 3:19 PM
don't feel lazy
remember many of the asia languages have over 26000 characters in their
alphabet. Then remember the Tonal inflection can completely change the word
you have said.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 9:19 AM
I finally found it in English
http://www.windowplanet.net/articles/default.asp?article=78
Thanks for all of your help!!
- Original Message -
From: Kim Schotanus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 9:31 AM
Subject: RE: Reg Hack
You are using the AD tools to move the mailbox, right? You can't do it from
the MSX 5.5 admin tool.
-Original Message-
From: Wohlgemuth, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 7:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: last try? ex 5.5 ex 2k
We have all
Hallo,
I am hoping someone has experience with non-Outlook clients. When my Exchange
(2000) users send an appointment to my non-Exchange users, only the code I
pasted below is viewable by the user. I have tried with Netscape 4.x and
Netscape 6.x. The user prefers to use Netscape. I've already
Then you're putting a domain and/or AD in the DMZ. Don't do that.
- Original Message -
From: Vincent Avallone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 7:19 AM
Subject: RE: Moving out of a Domain
I could always make them the same
Ex 5.5sp4 NT sp6
Hi Guys,
Can anyone point me to some good whitepapers about introducing/joining a 5.5
server into an existing site. I am trying to join a new 5.5 server to my
existing test site and am getting an error when trying to replicate with the
existing server. The error happens during
Does anyone know where to get the CeMail client that allows PDA's to access
OWA without frames and lower graphics for Exchange v5.5?
LaCretia
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
Everyone should have a minion. Preferrably one with an attendance record
higher than 30% and doesn't lick walls.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 10:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: WTF
How did you mange
Have you made sure of all the account rights? (NT and Exch)
Are the servers on the same Exch service pack (including hot fixes)?
Are there any good or interesting errors in event viewer on any of the
servers?
Did you try creating a new site (with the exact same information as the
existing
I ran into this once. As Ali stated make sure the accounts have rights. My
problem was with PF's not replicating. Are you using x.400 connectors for
this?
- Original Message -
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 18,
I tried at one site. Could not find anything really easy for the users to
use. Outlook is the answer.
- Original Message -
From: Allison Wittstock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 9:23 AM
Subject: OT(?) Exchange appointments
I made sure that all of the account rights are the same for both NT and
Exch. Both servers are on the same NT service pack (6a) but I cant put
service pack 4 on to the new server yet because I cant fully complete the
install of exchange because it fails during setup. I havent 'tried' creating
a
Im not using x400 connectors yet because setup fails whilst trying to
replicate with the original server in the site. So I don't have chance to
add any connectors.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Network Support Analyst
Exchange Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From:
Is the new server your trying to add to your existing email domain in the
same network domain? Maybe if you explain better exactly the current setup.
Maybe exporting via exmerge then importing to the existing setup. Hard to
tell with the info given.
- Original Message -
From: Joyce,
Its ok now. I found a 3161 error in the event log of the original server. To
do with the MTA. This pointed me to article Q247787. Turned out the original
server didn't have the service account properly configured for the
org/site/Connections properties.
FYI I had a single exchange server in a
We want to limit the amount of broadcasts on our internal network.
The DMZ is not wide open we would still be behind a PIX box
-Original Message-
From: Davis,Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 4:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving out of a
Hi,
Outlook isn't the answer since we are using Linux. In any case, if it is so
important, I will install Outlook onto a VMware Windows 98 VM, and create him
an Exchange user just for these appointments. I was just wondering how someone
else handled this problem.
Thanks,
Allison
On Mon, 18
Oh please. Who's genius idea is this?
-Original Message-
From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 8:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving out of a Domain
We want to limit the amount of broadcasts on our internal network. The DMZ
is
Our IS manager.
Out of all the things I do at my company computer security is my
weakest.
Sounds like you are not a big fan of PIX.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 12:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving
No, PIX is great. I just don't understand this limit the amount of
broadcasts thing. What is he hoping to gain from this? It just sounds like
a bunch of BS busy work.
-Original Message-
From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 9:25 AM
To:
yeah .. we are using the AD tools
we don't have a two way AD connection at the top level of our site though
we are thinking about attaching our PDC from the NT 5.5 domain to our 2000
domain ... thereby sidesteping the whole AD/trust issue ...
oh well .we will see ...
Our engineers tend to complain about network speed, so I figure he wants
to eliminate as much s possible. This is part of a much bigger plan.
We are also putting in faster switches, more subnetting etc?
I'm just not sure where to put the exchange box.
-Original Message-
From: Martin
I would leave it where it is. Focus on upgrading your HW, and then see where
you are.
PS: Engineers always complain! :)
-Original Message-
From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 9:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving out of a
I just read an article about this client. I don't know if they
specifically solve your problem, but worth a look.
www.ximian.com
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Allison Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 11:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Hello!
I've run into a problem I don't quite understand. I am wondering if
anyone has run into the same problem and have a better explanation...
Environment:
Exchange 5.5 SP4 with CDO update
Outlook 2000 with SP1
Problem: When I forward a recurring appointment (Single occurrence) to
my
Put the engineers within their own high speed network and also tell them it
will come out of their budget. That usually quiets the room.
- Original Message -
From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 1:00 PM
Thank you Jim. Their Connector product seems to be what I am looking for.
Allison
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, you wrote:
I just read an article about this client. I don't know if they
specifically solve your problem, but worth a look.
www.ximian.com
Jim
-Original Message-
I think you oughta buy Attachment Options (www.slovaktech.com) - at least 300
copies should suffice. Or you could be a cheapskate and edit the registry
yourself...
http://www.poremsky.com/minimize_tray.htm
[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\10.0\Outlook\Preferences]
Funny, your page was one of the first hits (of MANY) that came up when
typing minimize outlook 2002 to system tray in Google.
But I suppose only /advanced/ administrators would use such an arcane
unwieldy tool as Google. :)
-Original Message-
From: Diane Poremsky [mailto:[EMAIL
It's not really surprising since the two are essentially the same meeting.
Outlook 2002 doesn't even allow you to forward a single instance of a
meeting. Instead of forwarding, why not open the item and choose invite
attendees? That works fine.
S.
-Original Message-
From: Brian Ko
How about OWA then?
-Original Message-
From: Allison Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 11:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: OT(?) Exchange appointments viewed with Non-Outlook client
Hi,
Outlook isn't the answer since we are using Linux.
That is also a good idea. I've only ever tested our OWA from IE and not a
Linux client with Opera/Netscape/etc, however. Guess I will do that now.
I'm going to leave the decision up to the user.
Thank you everyone for the suggestions.
Allison W.
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, you wrote:
How about OWA
I would think that a more appropriate project would be to determine the
nature of these broadcasts and whether or not they are really a problem.
- Original Message -
From: Vincent Avallone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 11:55
Is there a way to have a mailbox in Exchange 2000 to receive mail for a
entire domain regardless of what is before the @domain.com.
There is a good reason for this. I have a very good friend of mine that
had a company. The company is going out of business, believe that or not.
I have moved his
I am in the middle of an Exchange 5.5 to 2000 upgrade and have a few
problems.
1. I have an ADC on the Domain Controller that holds all Master Roles. I can
view Exchange attributes for all users in Active Directory Users and
Computers. But if I look in Active Directory Users and
Dear all,
Current OS = NT4 with SP5
Current Exchange version = Exchange 5.5 with SP4
In order to avoid receiving all junk mails that belonging to staff who
have left the organisation, I have setup a server-based rule on a public
folder that will receive delete those junk mails.
However, this
How can I fix/repair an corrupted database?
Some results from the commands that I used.
---
esefile /s priv1.edb
49682 pages seen
0 bad checksums
51 uninitialized pages
0 wrong page numbers
esefile completes successfully after 24 seconds
---
---
eseutil /g priv1.edb
Initiating INTEGRITY
Call PSS right now. If you haven't done this before, you want the help
-Original Message-
From: Roberto Glavich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 9:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Database corrupted
How can I fix/repair an corrupted database?
Some
EXMERGE!!!
-Original Message-
From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 1:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Personal Folder File Migration
How about importing them using the Import command in Outlook? It's
pretty
simple-- you should be
Grab one of his Windows 9x boxes and install Mercury Mail on it. It can
do that, and it's free. Exchange can't, without more work than it's
worth.
Unless you export to his CSV, massage, and reimport, which really isn't
much work at all.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
exchange svr 5.5 sp 4, standalone owa on nt4 sp6 with iis 4. sometimes it
takes a few days, sometimes a few minutes, but it invariably stops and
needs to be restarted (the service.) any ideas on what to check for?
thanks,
doug
_
Run HFNetcheck. Be sure you are fully patched.
-Original Message-
From: doug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 7:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: owa stops intermittently
exchange svr 5.5 sp 4, standalone owa on nt4 sp6 with iis 4. sometimes it
takes a
If we are running an Intranet site on a Win2k Machine (IIS 5.0) that
requires NTLM authentication, is there a way to make a client browser
remember that it's already logged in properly when accessing a link on
the intranet to OWA 2000 (running on a separate machine - the E2k
server)? It's
This weekend I completed an upgrade to Exchange 2000 using Exmerge. Everything worked
pretty smoothly. However I am encountering a problem with rules. I did select the
options to bring over associate folder properties (not sure of exact name in exmerge)
but now am having problems storing or
Good Afternoon to you all:
I've searched the archives and have downloaded Compaq server
configuration tool for use with Exchange 2000, but I seem to be futzing the
configuration somehow. When I generate a configuration for what I have
currently (850 users, 65 Gbyte Private information
IMHO one box is certainly not enough, but 4 is probably too many.
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 12:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange Configuration Tools
Good Afternoon to you all:
I've searched
Does any know if a good (up to date) list that contains attachments that I
should be blocking from coming into my Exchange 5.5 server? We are using
Norton AV for Exchange, which only allows manual blocking (I have to
populate the list by hand).
I'm already blocking about 22 types of extensions,
Maybe I should have made myself more clear.
I have one server for mailboxes. I have another that serves as the
bridgehead for the site. I'm willing to split the functions (connections and
mailboxes) the same way, but would like to keep all the mailboxes on one
server, if at all possible.
I'm
I agree. More than one. But also you might want to have multiple Priv
databases.
- Original Message -
From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 3:43 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange Configuration Tools
IMHO one box is
One important factor to think about is restore time.
How are you backing up? How long does it take to do a test DR? Are these
times and numbers acceptable to you and more importantly management? That
may drive how you setup your servers. I'm sure that you can find a single
box out there to run
Make sure that you aren't overwhelming your IIS server with OWA requests.
-Original Message-
From: doug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 10:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: owa stops intermittently
exchange svr 5.5 sp 4, standalone owa on nt4 sp6
You may want to look at SharePoint Server.
Alternatively MCS probably can provide a custom solution for a price.
S.
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 3:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA + Intranet = portal?
Umm... If these people have already left your organization why are you
maintaining their addresses? If you don't do anything and delete the
aliases that you currently have, those junk mails will NDR on their own. Am
I missing something here?
S.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
John,
Check out the ex server config tool at Dell. I just run it with your config
and came back with two dual pro 2550 in FE/BE config, but I would take it
with some salt.
/Peter
- Original Message -
From: John Matteson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
I agree whole heartedly, that backup and restore times are of great concern.
However, backups complete in about three hours and a restore can be
completed in about 4 and one-half hours, starting from loading Exchange (I
keep a DR server in hot stand-by mode). We run HP's OmniBack II over a
Or, if you don't want to deal with the NDR's, create a DL with no members
and add the smpt addrs of the departed /terminated employees to it. I call
mine TheBlackHole.
I look at their stuff for a while to see if it can be legitimately
unsubscribed and do so if practical; then add the smtp addr
Atleast a set of mirrored disks for the logs for each storage group...
The rest is upto you and the finance committee...
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 19 February 2002 8:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Configuration
So Daniel,
Why is it that you choose to suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous
questions from a rabble of poor players strutting about the stage of
Exchange Server operations? Do you imagine yourself to be in the role of
old Prospero, playing whatever role the scene requires, largely for
Hello everyone,
Current setup..
One site, with Exchange 5.5 and Exchange 2000 server.
Public folders are replicated across both servers but all are homed on
Exchange 2000 server.
Exchange 2000 is in a child domain that is native for DL reasons.
We have a public folder called [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Forsooth but thou hast challenged me hither! All the world is but a stage,
and all that occurs happens upon that one stage. Does it not follow then,
Sir John, that the player mayest only play that role for which he is
destined upon the only stage writ large for his playacting? There is yet
Why couldn't you just set up the admin mailbox to retrieve any errors.
I would think if exchange couldn't find a recipient it would default to
the admin box.
Director of IT,
Ronald Mazzotta
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, February
When you say internal users what do you mean?
The way you laid out the problem, it rather sounds like these users are not
using Exchange, but some other SMTP mailer and then relying on your internal
DNS to point it toward Exchange - yes?
If this be the case, did your true DNS domain names and/
Sorry, but internal I mean our normal outlook users in the domain that
connect to the Exchange servers. All the other email works, I can send to
other users fine.
I didn't do any MX record changes since the site was still the same, we
still have the 5.5 server as our primary until all the
from the Archives - 3 days ago. It's not that hard to look things up.
And make sure you get Martin his copyright royalites.
--- Start Quote ---
From: Martin Blackstone
Subject:RE: NAV for Exchange: blocked extensions
The Martin Blackstone Blocked Files List. Copyright 1999-2002 - Martin
Hurrah and perhaps harrumph. I bow to your wit and rhyme. But upon this
stage I fear that thou hast been bound upon a wheel of fire, and suffer from
the knowledge that all that you are is of your own making: as Henry, you are
not so poor a Yorrick now, but surely worms' meat later. True, it is
Perhaps. Are you then also saying that your Outlook users are using the
external form of address ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) and thus
forcing it out through you SMTP gateway for routing by your relay host, and
then back in again?
You see, I am convinced that if they were
Hmm.. users do type in [EMAIL PROTECTED] which resolves to same name. So it
might be going out and trying to come back in. Our MX record at the ISP
points to our firewall which forwards emails to our Exchange 5.5 server. Is
there a setting where I can tell it that all internal emails to
that would be defined in your address space.
E55 Admin-Connections-IMS-Address Space.
-Original Message-
From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 4:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help with mail enabled Public folder
Hmm.. users
While I appreciate the help, I did search the list, both using Outlook's
Find, and from the web site, didn't find anything. Maybe I'm looking for, or
using the wrong keywords to search
I used both block attachments attachments, didn't seem to find
anything
Nor do I see anything related to
Remember, all (well most) SMTP addresses are relative. It's not that there
is no such thing as a FQN or FQA, it's just that the combination of MX
records and relay host pointers can move mail with identical addresses via
numerous routes. There is a difference between saying that a specific
Thanks Craig. I need to sit down with those guys and go through this also.
Just wish they weren't so damn defensive whenever you ask them a question..
Just an FYI, when you type in the address and do a ctrl+K in your outlook
(internal users) you get the public folder icon next to the name in
Thou art quite faire with thy scribblings harkening to a year long since
gone by.
- Original Message -
From: Dupler, Craig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 4:24 PM
Subject: RE: My Salary(exchange)
Hurrah and perhaps harrumph.
Each mailbox is limited to 32K of rules, and this isn't something you can
change. I don't know why the space that the rules are occupying would have
changed, but it sounds like you're at the limit...
Can you incorporate a couple of your rules into one rule?
Missy Koslosky
- Original
Hello,
I was wanting to know if you can some way hide or
masquerade the internal domain in the email headers. For
example I have an E2k server (domain controller) w/2 NICS (1 NIC to the
LAN and the other to the Internet) and am using split DNS (company.local
and company.com). I can send and
Not sure if this helps, but you should try to make sure that all of the
users have their primary email address set to @company.com. That way,
when the user sends an email, it will come through as being from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] You can do this for all your users using a
recipient policy.
Regarding
I weareth not pants.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 7:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: My Salary(exchange)
Thou art quite faire with thy scribblings harkening to a year long since
gone by.
- Original
Hi all,
Murpthy's Law
I originally submitted this email and the subject line read 'Out of Office'.
Not surprisingly, I had a message back, saying the email had been filtered.
Read on to find my original question ... /Murphy's Law
I recently configured our Exchange server to allow forwarding
Disable Out of Office to the Internet in the IMC. Then only internal users
will see it.
-Original Message-
From: Tim John - Domainz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 6:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Enabling Internet Email
Hi all,
Murpthy's Law
I
Just block everything.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dennis Rasey
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002
Netscape Mail using LDAP makes a capable mail client. If users augment
it with OWA for calendar work, you pretty much have the entire core
feature set.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
CORRECTION: Netscape Mail using IMAP and LDAP makes a capable mail
client. If users augment it with OWA for calendar work, you pretty much
have the entire core feature set.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and
Your thinking would be faulty. You can set up a postmaster mailbox to
receive copies of NDRs, but not to act as a black hole.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From:
Yes, you can remove everything, and there's a KB article to tell you
how. But I don't know what the number is.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A, then why do they make the walls so tasty?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Soysal, Serdar
Sent:
Free-busy information is published in a system public folder. Does that
public folder in your site?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sounds like the number is eight then.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Monday,
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
