Yes, they're cumulative.
Neigh.
- KC
:-)
-Original Message-
From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 9:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
ok, i'm suffering from a bit of mental fatigue here so can
someone help me out...
I'd be correct in
That disk you're taking home with you provides the redundancy in your RAID5 system.
Think about what would happen if one of the remaining disks failed! And I'd like to
see you try to recover data from one disk in a RAID5 array! Clearly this backup
strategy has not been tested and all the
You should be able to *view* contacts from Outlook as long as Use
microsoft rich text format is checked on the IMAP virtual server
properties. You won't be able to make updates to them or add new ones
however. It will still display as an email folder, but once the items in
it are fully
I was assuming the best... that the spare drive they were taking home was
an extra drive assigned the role of hot spare in the array. Maybe hot
spares aren't mirrors of anything, I don't know. Jeez you guys are
nitpicky...
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL
Do you have OWA, if yes this might be your OWA. Do you recognize the user
name appeared in the error inside your domain ?
-Original Message-
From: kanee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, August 10, 2002 1:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: W3SVC message in event viewer
list dead or unsubscribed?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:
just quiet
-Original Message-
From: Exchange.ListServe
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 September, 2002 1:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: TEST
list dead or unsubscribed?
_
List posting FAQ:
1- Easiest way I can think of is send a message to al users and see which
one's send back Out of Office replies. If a tool exists, it's either at
www.cdolive.com, www.mail-resources.com [1], or www.slipstick.com.
2- OWA could be used, but it amounts to the same thing as logging into the
user's
We have 500 pagers setup as custom recipients on our Exchange 5.5 server.
When trying to
add a new custom recipient for a particular pager, I receive an error
message that the address already exist.
Is there any way to do a search on SMTP addresses, so I can find out who is
using this address,
Enter it into a new mail message and let the name resolve or hit Alt + K
and it will resolve to the owner.
Judi McLane
-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 8:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Custom Recipient /
You could run a directory export and then search the output file.
Alternatively you could run an ldap search against the directory with a
search filter like this:
(|(rfc822Mailbox=smtpaddr)(otherMailbox=smtpaddr))
Tony
-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL
Enter the SMTP address, Ctrl-K to resolve it.
-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 8:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Custom Recipient / Pagers
We have 500 pagers setup as custom recipients on our Exchange 5.5
Holy easy. That worked great. Thanks ma'am.
Robert
-Original Message-
From: Judi McLane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 8:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Custom Recipient / Pagers
Enter it into a new mail message and let the name resolve or
It's not dead, it's just resting.
-Original Message-
From: Exchange.ListServe
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 September 2002 12:28
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: TEST
list dead or unsubscribed?
_
List posting FAQ:
www.ecora.com has a reporting tool that digs all the way down to mailbox
container, but not sure if it will show the OOA setting. You might want to
give them a call.
-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 3:30 PM
To: Exchange
Julian, you beat me to it. But you are 5 hours ahead :)
-Original Message-
From: Julian Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 9:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Directory Access
Depending on if you have your users split into separate OU's,
:)
Yours,
Julian Stone
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Directory Access
Julian, you beat me to it. But you are 5 hours ahead :)
-Original Message-
From:
I have a related question.
In Exchange 2000, when I make someone an owner of a DL (actually a Global Distribution
Group OR Global Security Group with e-mail address), it does not work.
When the DL's properties are opened in Outlook, the owner is correctly displayed. But
that person is not
If it is a spare then it is blank!
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Kleinsinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 3:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup Hardware
I was assuming the best... that the spare drive they were taking home was
an extra
Missy still talks to anyone who will listen about our first in person
meeting.
-Original Message-
From: Murray Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 11:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Multiple updaters for a DL
I'm not quite sure
Yeah they need an additonal right set on the permissions tab of the DL
object, I think there's a technet article on this.
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 8:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Multiple
Is it that complicated?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 September 2002 12:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA 2000 Logon field..
I know a couple of talented developers who'd likely have time to work on
such a project after MEC.
Not sure if you want to do this but OWA 5.5 lives with E2K, but you will
lose all the cool fixes in OWA 2000. But at least you will get your login
displayed as you like it.
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 8:31 AM
To:
Read the message once again.NOT ME
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sakti
Chakravarty (Senteq)
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 5:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup Hardware
That disk you're taking home with you
Ok so a 3rd party tool is needed.
1- Maybe it's easy, but it's not a very efficient method. But thanks, I'll
check those sites.
2- OWA would work best when user is away and has no access to his/her
computer.
Maybe I'm wrong but doesn't turning off the auto-replies disables
generating
Anyone here know how to configure Exchange to block email that originates
from a domain that fails a forward and reverse DNS lookup? Any help would
be appreciate. Thanks all.
Config:
Exchange Server 5.5 SP4
Winnt 4.0 SP6a
_
List
When an appointment is scheduled for a user (harveye), I receive
the following error message saying that harvey1 could not be reached.
Harvey1 was a second mailbox for the user which has been deleted.
If I click on the properties of the harveye mailbox, it is associated
with the primary windows
hi,
can someone please point me to information on when microsoft will stop
supporting versions of a product (specifically Exchange 5.5)?
thanks,
mike
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
Why not post a question?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Exchange.ListServe
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 07:28
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: TEST
list dead or unsubscribed?
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=fh;en-us;lifecycle
Typically MS offers support for current product + one previous version.
-Original Message-
From: Herb, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 12:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
He did.didn't you see the question mark. On a side not let's change
things up today and post answers. Then everyone has to respond in the
form of a question.we'll make Tuesday jeopardy Day for the list
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
RAID 1, RAID 1, RAID 5
for 100 points
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 1:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: TEST
He did.didn't you see the question mark. On a side not let's change
things up
os, logs, store
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: TEST - Answer
RAID 1, RAID 1, RAID 5
for 100 points
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert
Biotch.
- Original Message -
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 9:20 AM
Subject: RE: Multiple updaters for a DL
Missy still talks to anyone who will listen about our first in person
meeting.
Maybe we should get a little more specific on the answersWhat
are various level of data storage?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: TEST
Heck, I'm 9 months pregnant, and, apparently I've lost my mind. I guess
Chris is right and I'm wrong. My bad.
M
- Original Message -
From: Murray Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 12:39 AM
Subject: Re: Multiple
Ahhas to be in the form of a question
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Waters, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: TEST - Answer
os, logs, store
-Original Message-
From:
No, that would be the answer for
RAID1, RAID1, RAID 0+1
-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: TEST - Answer
os, logs, store
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill
sorry but your answer reference is incorrect for the answer.
For Bonus...100points...
the correct reference would be what? fro this list?
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Well, then:
I am new to exchange, how do I setup my hardware?
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: TEST - Answer
Ahhas to be in the form of a question
-Original
No no no.
You have to give the answer, the answer has to be in the form of a
question...
-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 12:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: TEST - Answer
Well, then:
I am new to
Sorry that is a question..and I though we where doing answers with the other
parties stating the question...
So far Jeff Waters has a 100point for the right question to the answer...
will he risk it and go for the bonus?
-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
only if you will hum the theme song
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: TEST - Answer
Sorry that is a question..and I though we where doing answers with the other
parties
shut up Shut Up SHUT UP!
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: TEST - Answer
No no no.
You have to give the answer, the answer has to be in the form of a
Ok.. Let me try this...
A peircing beeping noise coming from your Exchange server when you come in
tomorrow morning.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:20 PM
To:
What is turning around and going back home?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brian Dugas
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: TEST - Answer
Ok.. Let me try this...
A peircing beeping noise
What is Exchange Hell?
- Original Message -
From: Brian Dugas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 13:23
Subject: RE: TEST - Answer
Ok.. Let me try this...
A peircing beeping noise coming from your Exchange server when you
This thread.
-Original Message-
From: Steven A. Christensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: TEST - Answer
What is Exchange Hell?
- Original Message -
From: Brian Dugas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange
it is almost as bad as taco Fridays
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 17 September, 2002 1:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: TEST - Answer
This thread.
-Original Message-
From: Steven A. Christensen [mailto:[EMAIL
I'm sure it could get worse. New answer. A boss that thinks he knows
something about computers and tries to tell you how to do things yet he
has a hard time with the right clicking concept
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent:
Exchange 2000, answering questions, and fish tacos
- Original Message -
From: Mellott, Bill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:18 AM
Subject: RE: TEST - Answer
Sorry that is a question..and I though we where doing answers
What is a PHB?
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 3:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: TEST - Answer
I'm sure it could get worse. New answer. A boss that thinks he knows
something about computers and tries
What is My Boss Too?
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 3:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: TEST - Answer
I'm sure it could get worse. New answer. A boss that thinks he knows
something about computers and
We are starting to move our MSX5.5 mailboxes to an E2K server. Oddly, we are
seeing eventlog warnings (not the old event 1016) whenever someone other
than the owner accesses the calendar of someone who's mailbox is on the E2K
server.
The eventlog entry claims the operation failed, but users are
Ding dingyou win. Let's start with the person that gets the answer
right gets to ask the next question.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bubba G
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 12:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: TEST -
But I can't. I thought this thread was a waste of bandwidth... until I
knew the answer anyway. Then I thought it was worthwhile for at least my
email (no double standard here). I will pass on a follow-up question.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
IIRC, turning off auto-replies to the internet kills both to the internet.
You are correct that it would have no effect internally.
Then again, my memory isn't what it once was, and I'm not in a position [1]
to double check right now.
Mike Morrison
Staff System Engineer
Fletcher Allen Health
Harvey1 was probably given delegate permissions to harveye's mailbox. Log on
to Harveye's mailbox, right click on the calendar and select permissions.
See if harvey1 is granted permission there and remove him. Might be worth
checking the other containers in the mailbox as well.
Mike Morrison
Go have that baby already, will ya! :)
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Multiple updaters for a DL
Heck, I'm 9 months pregnant, and, apparently I've lost my mind. I
Certainly someone in that hospital of yours can help you get in the right
position.
-Original Message-
From: Morrison, Mike L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 3:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOA questions
IIRC, turning off auto-replies to
You, Mr. David, were included in the peanut gallery! :)
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 4:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOA questions
Certainly someone in that hospital of yours can help you get in
Foiled again.
-Original Message-
From: Morrison, Mike L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 4:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOA questions
You, Mr. David, were included in the peanut gallery! :)
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Andy
Need some help interpreting this
MSEXCH:IMS:Fiji Government:Suva:EXCHANGE01 3553 (000B09AA) 553 sorry, your
envelope sender is in my badmailfrom list (#5.7.1)
Have scowered thru TechNet and is does not provide any explanation,
appreciate the help
Ravisa
Sounds like the recipient doesnt want you relaying off of or sending mail to
them based upon their badmailfrom list.
-Original Message-
From: Ravisa K. Daunivuka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 4:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: BadMailFrom
Need
They're saying you fit their definition of someone that they don't want
to talk to. QMAIL uses a badmailfrom file, add a domain to that and
they won't spam you any more. Many domains now have taken to blocking
all Asian top-level domains, since it's proven impossible to get (a
large portion of)
Well Mr. Morrison, you are indeed correct. He was a delegate, and it did
correct the problem.
Thanks sir!
-Original Message-
From: Morrison, Mike L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 4:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recipient Name not
PerlMX ??? ok for your desktop and small setups I guess, but if you are
serious about performance etc. then you need to use Sendmail's in-built
(if you build it to use this feature that is) MILTER (if you think of smtp
event sinks in Exchange 2000 then its _sort_ of the same thing) and then
the
All,
I'm trying to migrate public folders from my 5.5 server to my E2K server.
I'm doing this through the Exchange 5.5 Admin. Removing the home server
from the replicas and adding the E2K server so that forces it to make the
E2K server the new home server. When I do attemp this by hitting
I quite agree, you seem to be missing the point that the backup strategy is crap, and
it's not due to hard disk transportation issues. I think you have the ammo you were
after, now use it!
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, 14 September
Back to the original question ...
The account you are using to back up Exchange mailboxes needs to have Mailbox Owner
rights to all mailboxes that you wish to back up.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, 14 September 2002 6:02 AM
To: Exchange
My setup:
Single box / Win2k Server (PDC), Exchange 2000, ISA and RAS.
All my users VPN into this box to connect Outlook 2000 to Exchange.
Currently all my users connect fine through VPN.
My XP users get server unavailable when they start Outlook. They can
press retry and sometimes after
Did the sink get regsitered correctly? is it enabled? an easy way to chec
this is by using the event sink admin utility found on the e-nspect web
site.
mike
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
PerlMX ??? ok for your desktop and small setups I guess, but if you are
serious about performance etc. then you need to use Sendmail's in-built (if
you build it to use this feature that is) MILTER (if you think of smtp event
sinks in Exchange 2000 then its _sort_ of the same thing) and then the
I am considering moving away from Norton on my Exchange server and am
interested in GFI's Mail Security and Mail Essentials tools. Does anyone
have any experiences with these products that they would like to share
before I plunk down thousands?
Jeff Hague
Network Manager
Randolph-Macon College
check it with the event sink administration module from www.e-nspect.co.uk
you can register, edit and delete sinks using this MMC snap-in
mike
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
ok, i'm suffering from a bit of mental fatigue here so can someone help
me out...
I'd be correct in thinking that sp are cumulative so I can hop from exch
2000 sp1 to sp3 without a worry yes?
I know that ms state that they are cumulative but would like to hear it
'from the horse's mouth'
Hi List,
apologies if this has been asked before, but I couldn't find anything in the archive.
Here's the problem: A newsfeed was set up in Exchange 2000 with the default
configuration, feeding from all newsgroups (*). Exchange d'loaded all group folders
and set up the folder structure in the
check it with the event sink administration module from e-nspect.co.uk you
can register, edit, and delete event sinks using this MMC snap-in
mike
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
See I already knew the backup strategy was crap. Yet my boss thought it
was a great idea. So the easiest way to win the argument was to show the
failure of the physical device instead of talking strategy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
You could go in and fail the server and that will prove his/her backup
strategy is no good.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 5:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
I've been using Mail Essentials on a gateway machine for a couple of
years and have been pretty happy with it. Between the attachment
blocking and virus checking, it does an excellent job of stopping
viruses (I'm still using the last version before they split it into two
on the gateway). It also
Not for my talented developers.
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 8:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA 2000 Logon field..
Is it that complicated?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff
You don't. However I'm sure there are a number of 3rd party gateway products
which can be configured to do this. www.mail-resources.com has a list of
potential candidates. That'll block a fair amount of potentially legitimate
mail as well.
-Original Message-
From: Jason Coleman
No such information is currently publicly available.
-Original Message-
From: Herb, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: end of life / support from Microsoft
hi,
can someone please point me to
The recipient doesn't want mail from your domain and or IP address for some
reason. Possibly you are an open relay or your IP block is suspect or one of
your users has really pissed of their mail admin.
-Original Message-
From: Ravisa K. Daunivuka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
You have name resolution issues (all of your users have a problem if they
have to hit retry).
-Original Message-
From: Guy Swartwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 11:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2000 - Exchange 2000 - VPN problem
Eh? What are you replying to?
-Original Message-
From: mike dilworth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 5:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink.
Did the sink get regsitered correctly? is it enabled? an
Eh? What are you replying to?
-Original Message-
From: Mike Dilworth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 2:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink.
check it with the event sink administration module from
Eh? What are you replying to?
-Original Message-
From: Mike Dilworth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 7:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Email Disclaimer using SMTP event sink.
check it with the event sink administration module from
Dear All,
We have an MS Connector for Lotus Notes installed
connecting an Exchange 5.5 SP4 server to a Lotus Notes 4.6
server. Currently we are experiencing problems with the
directory synchronization.
Every night during the Dirsync process the following
messages are logged:
Severity:
90 matches
Mail list logo
