I didn't make it at all clear - the backup I'll be taking is an online
Exchange backup which will go to file which then get dumped to tape.
What I wasn't sure about was the merits of also having a job to backup the
server that backs up the whole thing, as the only way to exclude specific
Hi,
I have E2K SP3 and I am getting complaints that users can't see the members
of DLs.
If they double click a DL they get empty dialogue screen showing now
members.
I tried with a few users made them owners of the DLs and they still can't
see the members.
Is there something that I overlooked. We
We are, but we aren't seeing anything yet. You can go to
www.answermonkey.net or the new Unity support and Error Forums for any
questions you might have.
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 10:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
I think I'm either misunderstanding you, or you're misunderstanding
NTBackup2000 or whatever we're calling it.
If you want to back up SystemState and drive C: and E: but exclude
C:\winnt\system32 and e:\foo\bar you can just edit your *.bks file and
make sure it says
C:
C:\winnt\system32\
I'm misunderstanding it - didn't know you could do that!
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 19 February 2003 12:47
As a second suggestion, ensure the PST's (If they MUST be used) are not
part of the roaming profile, also ensure the profiles are as small as
possible.
-Jorge
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003
Is anyone successfully using Team folders with E2K and OL2002? When we
migrated from EX5.5 and OL2K, part of them appear to have broke. The
administration folder gives the following message:
Error code: 1213: Failure to retrieve reference to current MAPI session.
I get this even though I am
If the users have internet access - check the size of their profiles (in
particular the 'temp internet files' folder. In addition, if you are using
NAV on the desktops then make sure that network drives aren;t being
scanned - i have seen these to factors slow down logins dramatically.
Thanks Missy. Looks like you are correct. Dumping roaming profiles and using
offline and redirected folders seems to be the better solution.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Missy Koslosky
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 11:22 AM
To:
It was mentioned on this list but I do not remember. When you use setup to
use ForestPrep and DomainPrep option, it was mentioned that you use the
version from the latest SP for Exchange 2000. Is this true? If so is more
for the Forest Prep or Domain Prep?
I always use the Exchange CD for the preps and then install the SP. No
troubles.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 7:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Forestprep Domain Prep
It was
You will also want to use the latest service pack CD to install the ADC
service (if you have to).
-Matt
Matthew Bailey
LAN Engineer
CSK Auto, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office: (602) 631-7486
Fax: (602) 294-7486
Chaos reigns within.
Reflect, repent, and
That's what I thought. But I heard it somewhere about using the SP version
just wanted to know if so why?
I always use the Exchange CD for the preps and then install the SP. No
troubles.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Its that Missy-ometry that she uses.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday,
Hi all,
I am new to this group! I have a question.
I am running a SBS2000 system with Exchange 2000 in operation. What I
would like to do is keep a copy of all outgoing mails and all incoming
mails for all of my users. I would also like it so that only my account
(or a dedicated account) has
Just checked and found I'd overlooked a couple of post-sp4 hotfixes -
Q326322 seems problem free from Google, however Q304062 seems to have a lot
of posts where MTAs have suddenly refused to start, and things have
generally just stopped working.
I appreciate most people don't post when the they
With Exchange 2000, you can turn on Message Journaling as per:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;q261173
I create a separate account specifically for this so my mailbox doesn't
get bombarded. Not sure if this is different for SBS2000 though.
-Original Message-
Our corporate policy is to disable an employee's account for 30 days
after they are no longer employed. This seems to be giving my Exchange
2000 SP3 servers a headache. The disabled accounts are causing Event Id
9548 in the application log.
Is there a best practice for how to handle accounts
Why would want to do this?
With Exchange 2000, you can turn on Message Journaling as per:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;q261173
I create a separate account specifically for this so my mailbox doesn't
get bombarded. Not sure if this is different for SBS2000
I'd guess company policy, not sure if there any legal requirements for
certain types of business to do this - I can't imagine anyone would want to
do it for the hell of it, would they?
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378
Depends on circumstances of the employee leaving. Either you still want to
recieve mail or not.
Our corporate policy is to disable an employee's account for 30 days
after they are no longer employed. This seems to be giving my Exchange
2000 SP3 servers a headache. The disabled accounts
I guess the questions I am asking are:
Should I be concerned with the 9548's?
Is there a better method to disable the accounts?
-Matt
Matthew Bailey
LAN Engineer
CSK Auto, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office: (602) 631-7486
Fax: (602) 294-7486
Chaos reigns
You can also use the Black Hole method.
I guess the questions I am asking are:
Should I be concerned with the 9548's?
Is there a better method to disable the accounts?
-Matt
Matthew Bailey
LAN Engineer
CSK Auto, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office: (602) 631-7486
Fax: (602) 294-7486
NT 4 SP6 (I think)
Ex 5.5 SP4 - single org, site, server
One problem led to many others. Drive with the log files (also the system
drive) ran low on space, so the MTA stopped. I cleared some stuff off the
drive to get up to 150MB. MTA started, and it's working.
The disk space problem also caused
Pat,
You need to check the header info (/mk) to see up to which log files have
been committed and remove the ones before only.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours
-Original Message-
From: Pat Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 19
Verify that you are doing a full backup.
If you cant get it to work with BE, try doing a full online backup with
NTBACKUP.
- Original Message -
From: Pat Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 11:02 AM
Subject: Flusing log
If a full BU is not removing the logs you need to find out why. ? BU
software ? Exchange aware?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pat Richard
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 9:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Flusing log files -
Have a look at KB 259751.
Also, a full successful backup will clear the logs, but maybe you should
think about having BE on a different drive - its logs can get mighty big.
Along with the store, the transaction log drive is the ultimate in Exchange
- you should protect both of these drives from
You should run:
update /ForestPrep
update /DomainPrep
from Exchange 2000 SP3 CD.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
We are having the same problem. When you disable the account do you delete
the mailbox? Deleting the mailbox may very well solve your problems and you
can recover deleted mailboxes now in Exchange 2000.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday,
If you stopped the Exchange services cleanly then the transaction logs are
committed to the database. That does not solve the problem with a backup
not purging the logs.
- Original Message -
From: Pat Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday,
This doesn't work at all for this..
A few things that I noticed:
I can sign onto her account and everything is screwed up. Every meeting goes
to the top of her calendar like it's an all day meeting. There is a clock
on the left hand side of those meetings on the top. After scheduling a
meeting
Each DL has a property that determines whether members are displayed in
the global address list.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
Hey thanks! That worked for us... How annoying that single IP's won't work
for this but the range will. We're behind a firewall and are using NAT, but
still... I don't like my whole network being able to relay...
-Original Message-
From: Jim Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Yep. BENT 8.x with the Exchange agent. But it appears it was only flushing
the logs on Fridays. Well, last Friday's job didn't finish because it
couldn't write the catalog to the drive (due to space). BENT shows the job
as successful, but there's an entry in the app log about the catalog
failure.
Answered yesterday.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Stephens, Tara
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 5:42 AM
To: Exchange
Paranoia?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul Hutchings
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 7:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
That's the first thing I did, it was 6.0. In checking further, I think
my 'Plus Pack' install from Messageware may have had something to do
with it. I'll advise if I track it down.
David
-Original Message-
From: Mark Rotman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003
I know this has been addressed but couldn't find the relevant results so
I apologize in advance. Does anyone have a suggestion as to the best
product to use so that a user can sync his PocketPC (we're not using MIS
at this time) with a public folder calendar? The Blackberry uses
Intellisync and
This might be what your looking for:
http://www.handango.com/PlatformProductDetail.jsp?siteId=1jid=629FBC88D
EE7966733ADFA79C4E656E9productId=27375optionId=1_2_2productType=2cat
alog=30txtSearch=public+folderssectionId=0platformId=2
Here's the developers website:
http://lookout.vonken.com/
Do a full backup using NTBACKUP to flush the log files.
-kevin
-Original Message-
From: Pat Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 8:03 AM
Posted To: Exchange
Conversation: Flusing log files - almost out of space
Subject: Flusing log files -
Ed
Can you point to a article on that. I am working with a consultant from MS
and he says he never heard of that. He looked for a reference to that
procedure, but could not find anything.
You should run:
update /ForestPrep
update /DomainPrep
from Exchange 2000 SP3 CD.
Ed Crowley
We have been sending e-mails from a distro list on exchange 5.5 to a linux
server that is currently tracking events. Below is the error I am getting.
hqalert-maia is the address on the exchange server that sends mail to a
mailbox on the linux server. What restriction is this? There is no
Can anyone receive e-mail on the Linux box? If not is it a Red
Hat/sendmail install? If so did you edit the config file to receive mail
from the outside?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jerry J.
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 9:58 AM
...if you configure it properly! Be sure of that before deleting it!
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Clemens, Rick
Sent:
How exactly did you set the logs to flush in BE?
Verify that job method for Exchange (Tools/Options) and the job itself is
set for a full online backup.
- Original Message -
From: Pat Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003
Sorry if this shows twice.
Ed,
Where is this documented. Working withj a consultant with MS. He never heard
of this and could find anything on the Knowledge base. Also looked on the
release notes for the SP's
You should run:
update /ForestPrep
update /DomainPrep
from Exchange 2000 SP3
Will destroy ya...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 12:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message Question
Paranoia?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Hi,
In ESM on Exchange 2k I want to propagate permission changes to multiple
public folders and sub-folders. I thought there was a way to do this
and propagate the permissions versus going through each Public Folder
and manually changing the permissioning.
If this propagation does exist will
Um...if your consultant works for MS, shouldn't he have the resources to
find out? And shouldn't that be his responsibility and not yours?
-Matt
Matthew Bailey
LAN Engineer
CSK Auto, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office: (602) 631-7486
Fax: (602) 294-7486
Chaos
Does anyone know of an active SMS list like this exchange list. The
swynk SMS list may have only one email a day.
Thanks
Matt
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
We are exploring the possibility of using a secondary IMC.
Anyone attempt to configure concurrent IMC services?
Doesn't seem to be any MSWP on the subject, little relevant in MSKB, and
some dead threads on the MSNGs..
Tim.
(championing the use arbitrary acronyms since TWCACS)
Search TechNet for the exact phrase update /ForestPrep.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Wednesday, February
Just because I'm paranoid doesn't mean everyone's not out to get me.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Dubyn
Sent:
--Oops... hit Ctrl-Enter by accident on that last one! Anyway, I got
this message from a user today:
Several times over the past couple of weeks, mayvbe longer, I've
noticed a weird anomaly on remote access to Outlook, through Insider.
When I reply to a message, a Windows Office 2000 Installer
That's just it. He couldn't find any reference to it. Just wondering where
Ed got the info?
Um...if your consultant works for MS, shouldn't he have the resources to
find out? And shouldn't that be his responsibility and not yours?
-Matt
Matthew Bailey
LAN Engineer
CSK Auto, Inc.
In ESM, make the permission changes on the properties page of the top
folder in the hierarchy you would like modify and close the properties
page. Right-click on the public folder and choose Propagate Settings
under All Tasks, choose which setting you would like to force down the
hierarchy (in
Hello Matt,
A friend I work with suggests:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is the www.myitforum.com SMS email group.
Hope it helps,
Tony
-Original Message-
From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 1:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT SMS
Does
In ESM, if you right click on a folder, choose All Tasks -- Propogate settings then
choose the Folder Rights checkbox. This would override the permissions for the
subfolders and copy the permissions down.
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Erik L. Vesneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Permissions will be replaced. Look into PFINFO and PFADMIN to add
permissions to public folders.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
SMS just isn't as interesting.
You might try the SMS newsgroups at news.microsoft.com.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt
What are you trying to accomplish?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tim Ault
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 12:23 PM
To:
It was published under Q297921 from what I am finding.
Provided this was the problem as I am missing that part of this thread.
While you are running Setup or Setup /forestprep to join an existing Microsoft
Exchange Server 5.5 organization, you may experience the following behavior on
the Service
I decide I would try searching the KB for update /forestprep then
further refined it to update.exe /forestprep and came across the
following exert from Q325316
Download the latest Exchange 2000 Service Pack. From a command prompt
at the I386\Setup folder of the service pack, run the update.exe
(Exch5.5sp4 W2Ksp3)
An error occurred.
Function name or description of problem: FEqEntryId
Error: 0x80040107
Anyone have any ideas on what this error is? All I can really find is a
MAPI error MAPI_E_INVALID_ENTRYID on Google. This looks like it might be
related (VB HEX error code matches)
And you're sure he's using OWA?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Levis
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 12:50 PM
To:
If Ed remembers correctly, Ed ran into the problem described in the
article.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
What you're doing wrong is expecting a computer to babysit your
employees.
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From:
Yeah I know that but I have been asked by upper management to see if this
can be fixed.
Thank You,
Robert Williams
Senior Network Administrator
Raypak, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone - 805-278-5363
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February
It can be fixed. Tell management to issue a directive and punish the
offenders. That ought to fix it.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Existing will be wiped and the folders will get the permissions that are set
on the top level folder where you are propagating from.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Erik L. Vesneski
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 11:04 AM
To: Exchange
Hi,
When applying SP3 for Exchange 2000 do you require schema admin permissions?
Thanks,
Erik Vesneski
Sr. Systems Specialist
ISO Intel Systems
Phone: 925-658-6161
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL
no.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Erik L.
Vesneski
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 9:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Service Pack and Schema Permissions
Hi,
When applying SP3 for Exchange 2000 do you
You can set your system to keep deleted mailboxes for 30 days then it will
be deleted automactically. If you are only disabling accounts you can
remove the Alias and remove the email address from the user object
properties to prevent the mailbox from receiving mail.
-Original Message-
all,
is it good idea to have Two deffirent Internet address that point to diffirent ISP for
an email server? one address is a backup just incase my link to one ISP goes
down.please see sample below:
mycompany.com.ph mail exchange=5 myserver.mycompany.com.ph
mycompany.com.ph mail exchange=10
I guess that could offer you some fault tolerance, and I've seen it done
that way. I found that one of my customers had three MX records, the
lowest cost one pointed to the IMS server, but the other two pointed to
an ISP that they no longer used. Had the Exchange server gone down,
mail wouldn't
Thanks a lot Ed!
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 2:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: two Internet address?
I guess that could offer you some fault tolerance, and I've seen it done
that way. I found that one of
77 matches
Mail list logo
