A customer asks me if it is possible to export outlook mail (connected
with a exchange server) with ldif or something else so it can be imported
in netscape. You have to know that netscape is not my kind of friend, but
the customer is king
Many thanks
Kurt
You can export to a delimited text file. I assume Netscape will import
that. Check your text file and make sure that all of the relevent data,
especially the dates, appear before you proceed.
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
They will continue to work fine. You will need to update your MX records for
the IMS as well as any X.400 connector configurations (if you have any).
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original
Exmerge
From: Berepoot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: export from outlook/exchange to netscape
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 01:21:03 -0800
A customer asks me if it is possible to export outlook mail (connected
I'm looking for a book that talks about how to setup and use Outlook,
and all of it's features, in a way that maximizes time management and
personal productivity. Does anyone know if such a book exists?
Jason
_
List posting FAQ:
I found this to be fairly useful...
http://www.davidco.com/products.php
http://www.davidco.com/productDetail.php?id=43IDoption=9SID=55ce07dfb7c781
2cb4303fac4fdae315
Of course like any system, working it is the most important component.
On 3/4/03 8:25, Clishe, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Been asked to look at this for someone
Server is Exch 5.5 SP3 running on NT4 SP6a
Upon examining logs routinely, it seems outbound internet mail is going via
another IMS at another company
The Edu.TW domain is nothing to do with us, and mail should go direct from
ourdomain.co.uk to
Hello everyone. I know that with the standard edition of Exchange there
is a limit on the size of your information store. First question is
what is the limit for the size of your information store under Exchange
2000 Standard edition? Is there an easy way to find out how close you
are to that
16GB for the Private Store and 16GB for the public store.
Standard only supports one private store. As for the size, look at the size
of the priv.edb file.
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 7:08 AM
To: Exchange
Post one that hasn't been modified.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 9:59 AM
To:
My priv.edb file is approx. 5.2 Gig. So I still have 10 Gig or so? At
one point I heard that it was a combination of a couple files. What is
the priv.stm file? Does it effect the size of my store? It is 4.5
Gig...
Thanks
Greg Householder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From:
Upon examining logs routinely, it seems outbound internet mail is going
via
another IMS at another company
Which logs are these?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
Wow, thanks. That's a great site.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 9:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: OT: Looking for Outlook productivity book
I found this to be fairly useful...
Chris,
They're the event viewer application logs on the sending exchange server
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 March 2003 15:34
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Internet mail taking an obscure extra step?
Upon examining logs
What do the event logs say?
On 3/4/03 9:38, Niki Blowfield - Exchange [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Chris,
They're the event viewer application logs on the sending exchange server
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 March 2003 15:34
To:
Roger
Sorry about that, just sent another email and generated the following, you
Can see the erroneuos .edu.tw domain here
===
This is the Outlook Options as viewed by the recipient
===
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is the event just recorded on an outgoing message;
Delivery of message
[EMAIL PROTECTED] from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] in temporary file G259C6KT was attempted to host(s)
212.23.8.69 (for zen.co.uk) with 1 recipients delivered and 0 undliverable
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff
Assuming zero whitespace, you have roughly a 9.5 gig priv store. It's roughly additive.
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 9:28 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Exchange 2000 Standard Store Limits
I think I'm on to something
The network here is a privately addressed LAN, mailgate.partition.co.uk
resolves to the firewall, which forwards port 25 to the exchange server
The LAN network address is 192.192.192.0/255.255.255.0 set up before I
arrived, I was a good engineer and gave the other
So I really only have about 6.5 Gig free for my store?
Greg Householder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 11:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Standard Store Limits
Assuming zero
I agree with Chris, using Outlook will make you more productive.
Here's a book I've found to be very useful:
Outlook 2000 in a Nutshell by Tom Syroid and Bo Leuf .
Mike Strock
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.myhomeoffice.org/ - New pictures of my kids here!
-Original
No, no it isn't a private range.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 11:07 AM
To:
That looks like your Exchange box thinks it's a different hostname.
Check the network settings on your Exchange box to make sure its not the
cultprit. Also check your client config - it almost looks like this is being
sent from Outlook Express or Outlook via SMTP.
192.192.192.0 isn't a private range
RFC1918 states:
The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) has reserved the
following three blocks of the IP address space for private internets:
10.0.0.0- 10.255.255.255 (10/8 prefix)
172.16.0.0 - 172.31.255.255
So I guess the best thing to do is, as quick as possible, move over to a
192.168 address range
-Original Message-
From: Michel Erdmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 March 2003 16:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Internet mail taking an obscure extra step?
192.192.192.0
Remember that you must stop the Information Store service before you can
be sure that the file size is accurately reported.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I got no hits on the Sunbelt list with this, let me try it here:
I'm trying to narrow down a problem w/ OWA permissions:
User A has permissions (publishing editor) to User B's calendar. When
using regular Outlook, she can view, edit create on User B's calendar.
But when she switches to OWA,
Hopefully this will give a better description of my problem:
Heres the situation:
I have 1 Domain (Windows 2000 Native Mode)
I have 2 Exchange 2000 Servers both in separate sites
The 2nd Exchange Server is a new install on the Domain Controller in a
remote Office. The 2 servers appear to see each
XADM: Cannot Move Servers Between Administrative Groups in Exchange 2000 Server
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=261170
Is there any tricks or workaround to move an exchange server 2000 to a
different admin group ?
By mistake our ex2k server has been installed in the wrong admin
group.
The
Yes, or you'll never be able to send mail to tajen.edu.tw!
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Niki Blowfield
- Exchange
Sent:
I think he could send mail to the tajen.edu.tw domain, as long as his
mail server IP address doesn't match the tajen.edu.tw MX IP itself.
He's using WINS only and uses external DNS servers.
I see options for keeping the address AND mailing tajen.edu.tw
;-)
Seriously: I would change IP ranges
Hello everyone!
Can some one tell me where I can find a step by step instruction on how to
connect my Exchange 5.5 SP4 server to my new Active Directory? I am
primarily looking fot the Active Directory Connector and where to find and
how to install it and how to make the two work together. Any
Changing IP range is okay compared to my fears the network had been hacked
by a taiwanese student !
Thanks for all the replies
Nik
-Original Message-
From: Michel Erdmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 March 2003 16:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Internet mail taking an
Lets see you deployed AD already? Is this a additional server or did you
upgarde an exsisting NT 4.0 Controller. Not enough info. Sounds like you
didn't plan well.
From: Rama Arumugam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL
Hi (THANKS FOR YOUR HELP )
My customer want to buy a PocketPc or Cell/PocketPC (Audiovox Thera
Cell/Pocket
http://www.audiovox.com/cgi-bin/ncommerce3/ExecMacro/catalog_pocketPC.d2w/in
put?cat=874323) to access his MS exchange eMail from everywhere (vpn, web,
messenger etc)
Our phone company
I actuall installed a new BDC on the network. Pulled the BDC off of the
network and upgraded the newer BDC to PDC.
Once I promoted the BDC to PDC, I then installed Windows 2000 and ran
DCPROMO to installed Active Directory. Installed DNS and configured
properly. I ran the tests and its working
You should find it packaged along with the Windows 2000 CD and/or
Exchange 2000 CD.Installing it on your DC is straight forward. It is
essentally used to migrate Ex 5.5 to ex 2000. It is not clear as to why
you need to connect Exchange 5.5 to Active Directory, maybe I am missing
something, never
Hi,
We recently changed our IP address on our PDC and several other servers on
our corporate office. When I try to ping the new servers by their NetBios
name from a remote BDC, it times out. When it tries to ping, it is pinging
the older IP address and not the newer ones. I have checked and
Why didn't you just upgrade the domain controller to 2000 and go from there.
Didn't you like the preferred procedures from MS.
From: Rama Arumugam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Active
Are you using host files by chance?
From: Rama Arumugam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Simple NT 4.0 server Question?
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 08:36:48 -0800
Hi,
We recently changed our IP address on our
The reason why I didn't upgrade the current DC (PDC) to Win2K is because it
is a very old box and this way I get to install it in a brand new box.
Either way, the new box that I installed as a BDC gets the full SAM database
since I have replicated with the PDC before I unplugged it from the
I even deleted the lmhost file and it still does the same thing.
Rama Arumugam
Network Administrator
Wire DynamiX
(253) 395-4527
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 9:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Simple NT 4.0
That's just it. You didn't have to unplug it. You could have promoted it to
the new PDC. Then load Server 2000.
From: Rama Arumugam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Active Directory
None that I know of. Assuming you're in native mode, bring up a new
server in the correct administrative group and move the objects to that
server.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From:
Our CIO would like us to upgrade one thing at a time and that's the reason
why we are just upgrading to Active Directory first with out upgrading our
Exchange 5.5
We will be eventually migrating from 5.5 to 2000 once the Active Directory
is up and running for a while. Hope this helps.
Thanks for
I'm not a network expert, but it seems to me that that packets would not
route to that subnet because it's local.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
You are right!
Rama Arumugam
Network Administrator
Wire DynamiX
(253) 395-4527
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 9:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Active Directory Connector
That's just it. You
Using OWA, delegates get read only permissions to Calendar by design.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;306830
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 10:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
If you insist on moving to Windows 2000 that way, you will make your
migration to Exchange 2000 all the more difficult.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WINS is your problem by the sound of things. If it was set up properly in
the first place there will be static mappings in WINS which reference the
MAC address and old IP address of the box in question. Delete these entries
and It'll probably fix it. Any dynamic entries need to be tombstoned.
What connectors do you have established? Where are they established?
Nate Couch
EDS messaging
--
From: Joshua R. Morgan
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: Tuesday, March 4, 2003 10:32
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mutliple Servers not passing
Is there a better way to do this? Please advice.
Rama Arumugam
Network Administrator
Wire DynamiX
(253) 395-4527
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 9:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Active Directory
Um, no.
Exchange does an MX lookup for tajen.edu.tw, and gets 192.192.192.x back,
and then sees that its pointing to itself. Message is then NDRed
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original
Are you using WINS? Be sure that your WINS servers are replicating with
each other and that each server is using a correct WINS server.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Yes. Do as Mr. Hlabse advises you and upgrade the PDC of your NT domain
to Active Directory. Promote a better box to PDC if necessary first.
But please be sure your DNS is in ship-shape before doing that.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs
Yes everything with the exception of Exchnage seems to be working
fine
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 11:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mutliple Servers not passing e-mail between each other ::
Was Moved
You might want to check out slipstick.com and some of the papers and stuff
there.
-Original Message-
From: Clishe, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 Mar 2003 09:26
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:OT: Looking for Outlook productivity book
I'm looking for a book
Are they in different routing groups? Is there a Routing Group
Connector?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua R.
Morgan
Are they in different routing groups? No
Is there a Routing Group Connector? Their do appear to be 2 routing
connectors IMS and another one for a different external Domain
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 12:40 PM
To: Exchange
IMS? Why not just a plain old Routing Group Connector?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua R.
Morgan
Sent: Tuesday, March
Oops. Disregard my previous post. You said they're not in separate
routing groups, so no connector between them should be necessary. What
is the IMS used for? You're still in a mixed-mode organization and have
an IMS on a 5.5 box?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Not sure I have inherited this Design so I will check into it,
however we are in Native mode and there are no Exchange 5.5 Servers in
the Domain.
Joshua
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 12:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
If the servers are separated by a WAN link, it may be a good idea for
them to be in separate routing groups connected by a routing group
connector. But that's a generalization; I don't have all the
information to say that that's a requirement.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail
They are across a WAN os I will attempt Separate Routing Groups.
Also I have a Test Domain Set up that works perfectly, when I go into
System Manager it is presented like this:
+ Global Settings
+ Recipients
+ Servers
+ Connectors
+ Tools
+ Folders
Now when I go into Production It displays like
I believe you've gained additional information for the 'things not to do in
Exchange' list. Sorry. :(
On 3/3/03 22:43, Jean-Francois Bourdeau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
XADM: Cannot Move Servers Between Administrative Groups in Exchange 2000
Server
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=261170
Means you setup System Manager the view/display option to show
Administrative Groups I think.
From: Joshua R. Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Mutliple Servers not passing e-mail between each
Right-click the organization object, select properties, and check the
boxes.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua R.
Morgan
Cool thanks,
Ok the IMS from what I can tell is for Internet e-mail (Does that Sound
Right?) The other is for Internet based e-mail being routed from an old
Domain.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 1:17 PM
To: Exchange
Does anyone have a preferred software for handling attachments on their
blackberries?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To
Yeah, Blackberry Enterprise Server 3.5 attachment service.
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Beeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 1:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: blackberry attachment handling
Does anyone have a preferred software for handling
It's an SMTP Connector, then?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua R.
Morgan
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 10:28 AM
To:
Yes
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 1:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mutliple Servers not passing e-mail between each other ::
Was Moved Mailboxes not acting right
It's an SMTP Connector, then?
Ed Crowley
1. Thera phone does work. Work well??? I think so.
2. You need an Expansion pack for HP IPaq in order to use the AirCard.
I think Thera might be a better option since you may not be very happy
with IPaq battery life.
3. VPN - Tried it but did not pursue it. You can use MIS 2002,
Infowave
Hello Brian,
Tuesday, March 4, 2003, 3:11:00 PM, you wrote:
BK 1. Thera phone does work. Work well??? I think so.
BK 2. You need an Expansion pack for HP IPaq in order to use the AirCard.
BK I think Thera might be a better option since you may not be very happy
BK with IPaq battery life.
Thanks everyone for your input. I fixed the problem. It was the host file
that was causing the problem. I had modified the lmhost file and that wasn't
enough. Thanks again for every one's help. I couldn't have fixed it without
you folks. Thanks!
Rama
-Original Message-
From: Rama
Remember Host and LMhost files are used differently. Learn when and how they
are accessed.
From: Rama Arumugam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Simple NT 4.0 server Question?
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003
I will do so. Thanks for your help.
Rama Arumugam
Network Administrator
Wire DynamiX
(253) 395-4527
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 12:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Simple NT 4.0 server Question?
Remember
Better, properly deploy DNS and WINS.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 12:54 PM
To:
Well I wish that were the case in most places I go. If it wasn't for Hosts
and LMhost files I don't think have of the things would work. When I mention
that a good DNS and WINS setup should eliminate Host files I get a real
dirty look
From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange
I use t-mobile vpn imap to exchange works like a champ. T-mobile pocket
pc
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 3:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re[2]: IPAQ (PocketPC ) access to exchange Mail
Hello Brian,
Give 'em a dirty look back.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 2:13 PM
To: Exchange
Can you also run Activesync thru t-mobile?
-Original Message-
From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 3:18 PM
Posted To: MS Exchange Discussions
Conversation: Re[2]: IPAQ (PocketPC ) access to exchange Mail
Subject: RE: Re[2]: IPAQ (PocketPC ) access to
I know this has caused havoc on e-mail systems in the past. Is this still
frowned on and if so, are there any best-practices available out there on
how to enable a firm to provide this service effectively with exchange 2000,
outlook 2000/xp and avoid pitfalls in the past?
How do others
I strongly discourage it in our firm. Usually the most effective argument
against for me has been spam -- we all know that it's a bad idea to reply to
spammers confirming that your address is legitimate. Throw OOO on
somebody's account and I suspect that their spam load will significantly
The risk of a mail loop with OOO is small. However, consider the
following:
Byron Kennedy is out of the office vacationing in the south of France
until the end of the summer. Please feel free to drop by his house at
123 Any Street, Anytown, USA, and help yourself to whatever is left. If
you
Humm... Seems like we could mitigate that risk with verbiage in the
acceptable use policy on what is acceptable content to put into an OOO. No?
I do recall your standard disclaimer on this behavioral approach. :)
Granted, enforcing that portion of the policy would be a chore. Though
someone would
Exchange 2k Standard sp3
Windows 2k sp3
Due to the looming 16GB limit I am starting to setup storage limits on
my server. I wanted to start the testing by enabling the warning on one
account (my account). I set my warning limit to 10k, which is less than
the 5k that my mailbox currently
I can't seem to get it to work it keeps telling me:
SetRepl needs to have a scope, add/delete/replace, and a public store.
Not sure what I am doing wring
I run pfadmin on the server I want to change the replica (Server1)
server1 setreplicas All add server2
then I get: SetRepl needs to have a
Dear list,
I have single forest in which one root domain and 2 DC each one is running e2k, the 2
DC's are spread geographically, we have 128K of bandwidth which connects our DC's to
the root domain. As we have a limited bandwidth my management wants that users belongs
to DC1 site should
I don't see the Propagate function. I know it from Exchange 5.5 but can't
see it in E2K.
- Original Message -
From: Schwartz, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 7:50 PM
Subject: RE: Bulk Public Folder Replication?
You can use
Ok, so here goes my OOO horror story. First off, this is not straight on
point because it involved an older Outlook client, Exchange 5.5, and a quick
hack for a user that I shouldn't have done -- but I didn't know it at the
time.
1. We upgraded to Exchange 5.5 and got some complaints because
You're also taking the risk of loosing legit mail when companies start
to block unwanted OOO replies on their machines. Our company puts any
unwanted OOO sender on our internal blacklist which kills such messages
on the incoming SMTP server.
Cheers:Siegfried runat=server /
-Original
92 matches
Mail list logo
