yes. you would do it, then deny it.
:P
-Original Message-
From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 June 2003 11:32
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 11
Me?
Les Bessant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IT Manager
Sanderson Townend Gilbert
22-24 Grey Street
Newcastle upon Tyne
Well, I'll start with my standard response to this topic:
SMTP != POP3
SMTP POP3
SMTP .ne. POP3
Now that that's out of the way, you don't let inbound POP access, you're
allowing access to your mail server via POP3. Personally, I think that's not
appropriate for most organizations, but for some
Make sure Mr. Sojka sends a cashier's check, not a personal check. The
personal check would require being held for 2 weeks prior to releasing the
vowel into his posession.
Roger
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems
All jokes aside about this topic... what do you mean well-documented
inaccuracies? Is there something in a KB doc that talks about this?
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 2:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
What are white
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;[LN];813880
To be fair, the well-documented part mostly comes from several
discussions of the issue on the Yahoogroups E2k list. A problem doesn't
have to be documented in a qarticle to exist, after all.
-Original Message-
From:
Acknowledged that the M drive is special, can't say it is non existent as it
appears in the folder tree. The question is more about how to avoid the
interactions that cause the hanging behaviour.
Knowing the mechanism of the lockup would be useful. Setting the exclusion
on an anti virus product
It seems that if all mail comes initially through the BSD box, then that's
where the AV should occur. I realize that it's not necessarily your box or
jurisdiction, but it seems negligent of the staff who manage that box to not
have any AV protection.
Mayhaps you can ask someone here to send
Sigh.
I don't want to pull a Precht and act as the list mommy, but I hope you two
don't turn this into a pointless 800 message thread consisting of just the
two of you.
Please don't.
-Original Message-
From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 June 2003 11:32
To:
Doesn't count, you won't do anything.
-Original Message-
From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 2:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 11
Me?
Les Bessant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IT Manager
Sanderson Townend Gilbert
22-24 Grey Street
Newcastle
#3 My bag ripped again.
Walt
-Original Message-
From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 4:11 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion
Conversation: Top 10 things overheard at TechEd
Subject: Top 10 things overheard at TechEd
10 Is an 8-node
#2: Where the hell is the Arena?
- Original Message -
From: Walt Brannon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 9:34 AM
Subject: RE: Top 10 things overheard at TechEd
#3 My bag ripped again.
Walt
-Original Message-
From:
All I have a question about the installation of a windows 2000 server that
will be my new exchange server in a Windows 2003 forest. Before I do a
dcpromo on this box to join it to the 2003 forest and domain do I need to
run any ADprep tools so that the schema and all is updated to the new 2003
Now #2 really made me laugh!!!
That was so TRUE!
Nice job Andy
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 9:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Top 10 things overheard at TechEd
#2: Where the hell is the Arena?
- Original
I didn't get to attend because of the Kansas Budget Crisis, but I can
still bet that the #1 thing overheard was:'
Where's the Beer?
Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
WAN/Internet Specialist
913-339-6700 x194
-Original Message-
From: Mark Rotman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
It's the big round room Andy.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 9:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Top 10 things overheard at TechEd
#2: Where the hell is the Arena?
- Original Message -
From: Walt Brannon
Do you like gladiator films?
-Original Message-
From: Van Hooser, Chuck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 10:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
It's the big round room Andy.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
I've setup OWA (5.5/6a) and I now want to secure it with SSL. I have a
stand alone 2000 server where IIS and OWA are installed in an NT 4.0
domain. Do I have to install Certificate Services on the 2000 server or
can I use one from a third party (ie VeriSign) vendor?
Either.
- Original Message -
From: Scott Force [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 10:31 AM
Subject: Kinda OT: OWA and SSL
I've setup OWA (5.5/6a) and I now want to secure it with SSL. I have a
stand alone 2000 server where IIS
In the ether?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 8:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Either.
- Original Message -
From: Scott Force [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003
Both will work. What you get with a third party cert is the assertion that
the server to which your clients are connecting is truly part of your domain
(i.e. traffic isn't being hijacked to a rogue server in order to steal
passwords, etc.)
With a cert from a homegrown server, your users will
We have 9 exchange 5.5 sp4 nt4 6a servers and 1 exchange server 5.5 sp4 nt
6a running owa and every time we have to take one server offline owa hangs
for us. How are you all handling this? Below is the technet article that I
found that says this is by design. I don't believe it...
john
San Diego
On a side note, how about those ihatespam shirts? :-)
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 11:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Thanks Bob...this is exactly why I would never install a 3rd party
product on the e2k server itself
Thanks for the response, Stu.
I'd like to add something. There are some other staff at my company who got
the same message I refer to below (mentioning the IHS product, and requesting
them to stop by at the MecEd conference). These people did *not* attend
MecEd and should *not* have been on
Overheard at TechEd from a non-MS Weasel...
Exchange 2003 RC1 is more stable than Exchange 2000 SP3
HP will back that sentiment up as well...
Think of Exchange 2003 as a patch to Exchange 2000 as Exchange 5.5 was for
Exchange 5.0...
-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL
Depends on who was wearing them.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hutchins, Mike
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 8:13 AM
To:
You could (1) not take servers offline, and/or (2) upgrade to Exchange 2000
or 2003.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John
You don't need to do anything until you want to install Exchange 2000, at
which point you must run the usual setup /forestprep and setup /domainprep.
Actually, I've seen it recommended that you run update /forestprep and
update /domainprep from the Exchange 2000 SP3 CD. I don't believe you need
Okay, so now I understand. But I don't see how you have any choice here
since the mail to which you are referring doesn't ever pass through your
Exchange Server. If you're asking whether it should, and your users should
be allowed to pull it using POP from outside locations, then, given the
There's a reg hack that will hide the M: and put that part of the issue to
bed for good.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
I am not sure about SBS but standard Exchange supports POP and IMAP (which I
would recommend above POP) clients, but do realize that neither supports
full Outlook function. Just set them up. Refer to the FAQ referenced below
for information on how to set up authentication.
Ed Crowley
More of a script than a reg hack...
It's a part of my standard E2k server build!
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=305145
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: 13 June 2003 17:08
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: E2K machine services
Thanks Ed you have confirmed my thoughts about this. I have had another
admin from another site tell me that you don't want to install AD on the
exchange server, but my anwser to him was why do we have AD if you aren't
going to use it.
Thanks Much
Ronk
You don't need to do anything until you
Forwarded to the list at Stu's request:
-Original Message-
From: Stu Sjouwerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 11:26 AM
To: Erik Sojka; Exchange Discussions
Cc: Mailing company CC addresses deleted
Importance: High
Eric,
You are ABSOLUTELY right, and I'm asking
Spam-by-proxy is still spam.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 9:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Importance: High
Forwarded to the list at Stu's request:
-Original
Well, if you're planning to install Exchange 2000 in a Windows 2003 domain
you cannot install it on a domain controller. There are two good reasons,
in my opinion, to avoid installing Exchange on a domain controller. First,
it complicates disaster recovery because there will be extra steps in
Agreed
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William
Lefkovics
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 9:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SpamBelt
Spam-by-proxy is still spam.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Thanks for the reply Ed, so this is how you handle the situation. There has
to be a work around...or am I being to hopeful.. Does anybody know why this
is by design? It does not make sense to me.
john
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13,
Does this break OWA? OWA seems to use M:
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 11:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E2K machine services hanging on starting
More of a script than a reg hack...
It's a part of my standard
2 weeks is a long time. I prefer to release my vowels daily.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 4:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Make sure Mr. Sojka sends a cashier's check, not a personal
Hi Matt,
If I am reading this right, the OpenBSD servers selectively (dependant upon
account) forward some of the mail to your Exchange system and retain the
rest for POP collection?
The users with POP email programs then bypass any perimeter security you
have implemented by collecting direct from
I just gave you two. Frankly, you shouldn't be taking Exchange servers
offline routinely.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
I have a strange situation. The Public Store has disappeared from my
server. The only reference to the database is oldpub.edb. I notice this
when I try to run Performance Optimizer to move my databases to the new
drives that I have just installed on the server. I do not have any data in
the
Exchange 5.5 OWA is really MAPI, as I recall, the M: showing in IIS isn't
important.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken
OWA doesn't know that another Exchange server is unavailable until it tries
to connect to it (i.e. whan a user tries to logon). Like any other client
process, it will attempt to find and communicate with the server, and wait a
certain amount of time until either the connection is made or times
I'm talking about OWA2k.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 11:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E2K machine services hanging on starting
Exchange 5.5 OWA is really MAPI, as I recall, the M: showing in IIS
isn't
FWIW we use Geotrust certs from rackshack.net - no idea how they can do it
but they're $39 and work just fine and do up to 128bit.
As I see it certs do two things, encrypt, and prove you are who you claim to
be, and to me the extra that Verisign and the likes cost isn't worth it for
what you
Could it be related to the fact that the clock on the machine on which you
sent this message is over two years slow?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
I didn't say routinely, and I don't, but we've had to so they can upgrade
the power at one of the campus's. So what your telling me that is at PacBell
(where I'm assuming you work)when one of the exchange servers go offline for
what ever reason then users who are using owa just have to wait till
I don't know how a cert needs to cost more than $39, or even that much for
that matter.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul
Eric, thanks...so how do handle your users or do they just know that it will
be this way.
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 9:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How do You guys/gals handle this: OWA Hanging.
OWA doesn't
I don't want to speak for Ed but I understand him to say that normally,
servers shouldn't be disappearing during the times when user access them. If
you must do maintenance on them such that the machines must be shut down, you
should do so during off hours or during a negotiated maintenance
I'm running Ex2K which doesn't have this issue, and I try to avoid downtime
and maintenance during times when the users will use the system (Our messages
are crossing, but check the other message I just sent)
-Original Message-
From: John Strongosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Rick,
Thanks for that. I did indeed find a reference to the old server in that
object. There is also a CA object in the same container which also had a
reference to the same server. As I recall the 5.5 clean up instructions said
to delete the raw CA object. Any idea whether I should de the same
Previous versions of Outlook had an Archive command on the File menu
that would allow you to initiate an immediate archive, and you could
override folder-specific archive settings and instead archive all items
in all folders older than a given date.
Where'd that go? My File menu does not have an
We use our own certs for OWA. Since its just our employees hitting that
site (well lets say its our employees that should be hitting that site),
Im not so concerned that we are not endorsed by a 3rd party. We
prefer to pay the $700 (to Verisign) for the cert and use it on our
truly public sites.
It's under my File menu. Do you have Adaptive menus enabled? What happens
when you click on the double-chevron at the bottom of the menu?
-Original Message-
From: Clishe, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 12:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Previous
Tools/Mailbox Cleanup
- Original Message -
From: Clishe, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 12:49 PM
Subject: OT: Outlook 11: Where's the archive command?
Previous versions of Outlook had an Archive command on the File menu
Ah yes.
There as well.
- Original Message -
From: Erik Sojka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 12:52 PM
Subject: RE: Outlook 11: Where's the archive command?
It's under my File menu. Do you have Adaptive menus enabled? What
Is it possible to do the opposite and install Exchange 2003 in a Windows
2000 SP3 forest.
Ralph H. Elmerick
NT/Exchange Administrator
330-471-3409
**
This message and any attachments are intended for the
individual or entity
yes.
- Original Message -
From: Elmerick, Ralph H. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 12:58 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 in a 2000 Server forest
Is it possible to do the opposite and install Exchange 2003 in a Windows
2000 SP3
Yes as long as all of your DCs and GCs are SP3 as well.
-Original Message-
From: Elmerick, Ralph H. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 12:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Is it possible to do the opposite and install Exchange 2003 in a Windows
2000 SP3 forest.
Ralph
Ronk, I think you're confused.
You MUST have AD in place and operational before you can install
Exchange.
The Exchange server does NOT need to be, nor should it be, installed on
a domain controller.
JC
-Original Message-
From: Ronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June
Can the Exchange 2003 be running on a server running Windows 2003 in a
Windows 2000 forest.
Ralph H. Elmerick
NT/Exchange Administrator
330-471-3409
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 1:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Nope, no Adaptive menu's. My File menu reads:
New -
Open -
Close All Items
-
Save As
Save Attachments -
-
Folder -
-
Data File Management
-
Page Setup -
Print Preview
Print
-
Exit
JC
-Original Message-
Yes.
-Original Message-
From: Elmerick, Ralph H. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 1:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Can the Exchange 2003 be running on a server running Windows 2003 in a
Windows 2000 forest.
Ralph H. Elmerick
NT/Exchange Administrator
330-471-3409
Something's missing. Do you have an import/export command? Are you in the
main OL window and not looking at the File menu that you get when a message
is open?
-Original Message-
From: Clishe, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 1:12 PM
To: Exchange
Yes.
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/evaluation/ti/TiWin2003.doc
- Original Message -
From: Elmerick, Ralph H. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 1:08 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 in a 2000 Server forest
Can the Exchange 2003
Close the open message you are looking at.
You're looking at the wrong toolbar.
- Original Message -
From: Clishe, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 1:11 PM
Subject: RE: Outlook 11: Where's the archive command?
Nope, no
The open message toolbar doesn't have data file management.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 1:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Close the open message you are looking at.
You're looking at the wrong toolbar.
- Original
Doh. lol.
I just did the reverse.
- Original Message -
From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 1:18 PM
Subject: RE: Outlook 11: Where's the archive command?
The open message toolbar doesn't have data file
Dude, I'm not *that* big of a moron. Lol
JC
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 1:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Close the open message you are looking at.
You're looking at the wrong toolbar.
- Original Message
I get hazy around this time every Friday.
I guess its my turn to buy a vowel.
- Original Message -
From: Clishe, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 1:22 PM
Subject: RE: Outlook 11: Where's the archive command?
Dude, I'm not
No, no import/export command either (that's another thing that's been
bugging me)
I'm in the main OL window, and I've been doing from every folder
(Contacts, Inbox, OL Today, etc) and I get the same options each time.
And no Archive command.
JC
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka
Thanks for the input...something for me to investigate
-Original Message-
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 9:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Kinda OT: OWA and SSL
FWIW we use Geotrust certs from rackshack.net - no idea how they can
I don't remember during the custom install, but maybe the options have
changed? I doubt it though. I have a friend who is running the beta
also and every time he clicks on his deleted items folder it just says
items cannot be displayed.
-Original Message-
From: Clishe, Jason
Can you add those choices from Tools/Customize and rebuild/reset the
toolbars?
- Original Message -
From: Clishe, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 1:25 PM
Subject: RE: Outlook 11: Where's the archive command?
No, no
You assume incorrectly; PacBell, what the local phone company used to be
called, is my ISP. As to your assertion about what I'm telling you, it's
not me telling you that, it's the KB article you cited telling you that.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the
Here, see for yourselves:
http://www.tyvin.com/files/clip.jpg
JC
-Original Message-
From: Clishe, Jason
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 1:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
No, no import/export command either (that's another thing
that's been bugging me)
I'm in the main OL
I think that only affects toolbars, not menus. However it brings up an
interesting question. If you go to Tools, Customize, Commands. Do you
see Archive and Import/Export as selections in the File category? If so,
drag them to a toolbar.
Bottom line though is this is beta 2. Things happen. There
Same.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 9:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
Although the M: shows up in IIS, it isn't really used. It's just there to
fill the field.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken
Good call. I was able to add the Archive command to a toolbar from Tools
| Customize | Commands. Still would like to know WTF it isn't in my File
menu.
JC
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 1:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Isnt that what I just said? Rebuild/ Reset the Toolbar.
- Original Message -
From: Dan Bartley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 1:39 PM
Subject: RE: Outlook 11: Where's the archive command?
I think that only affects toolbars, not
Thank you Andy.
Sometimes with the numbers, I have to read it twice to make sure of what an
email says 2000 on 2003 in 2003? 2003 on 2000 in 2000? etc, but the
supported installation matrix in that document says it all.
That reference should be the answer to all these questions about
I havent see that.
I can however make Outlook crash on cue by simply trying to access the
Import and Export menu.
- Original Message -
From: Clishe, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 1:40 PM
Subject: RE: Outlook 11: Where's the
Sure, but I was addressing what he said too. He was trying to find it in
the menu. He needed to add it to the toolbar, if available, as a work
around to it missing from the menu, not reset the toolbar. :-)
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL
There are so many 2003's out there now, it makes your head spin!
- Original Message -
From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 1:52 PM
Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 in a 2000 Server forest
Thank you Andy.
Sometimes
Windows 2000 SP3
Exchange 2000 SP3
How do I query my Exchange server to see what or who has a specific SMTP
Address
Joshua Morgan
Method IQ
Senior Network Engineer
Main: (864) 272-1145
Mobile: (864) 449-9912
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I saw this with an ATI video chip. Latest driver fixed it. Not all O11
menu items just certain ones.
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 13:59
To: Exchange Discussions
I havent see that.
I can however
I agree with Ed myself, and it happens that way here as we are a educational
institution and students come first. But its the idea that this has affected
all of the campus's not just one group and I know I'm going to hear about it
Monday( its the summer and allot of Professor's are on break).
Mine only goes to 11.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 2:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
There are so many 2003's out there now, it makes your head spin!
- Original Message -
From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL
Ahh. Yea, I didnt mean the actual rebuild button or whatever its called. I
was using it in the generic sense! :)
- Original Message -
From: Dan Bartley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 2:04 PM
Subject: RE: Outlook 11: Where's the
Interesting.
I'll try that.
- Original Message -
From: Dan Bartley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 2:15 PM
Subject: RE: Outlook 11: Where's the archive command?
I saw this with an ATI video chip. Latest driver fixed it. Not all
Yeah, that was me...
-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 10:12
To: Exchange Discussions
I didn't get to attend because of the Kansas Budget Crisis, but I can still
bet that the #1 thing overheard was:'
Where's the Beer?
Bob
Hello Group.
I have an inconsistent issue.
Sometimes, when one replies to an Email sent from my Domain, it will reply to the
display name. i.e.
John Doe [EMAIL PROTECTED] my ndr's show that it is trying to reply to John Doe
instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am at a loss as to why this is
Does anyone know the solution to this? If Im a domain admin how can I get
Full Exchange 2000 admin privs?
Thanks
Jim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 2000 Admin
Yup I'm a
You mean access to all the mailboxes?
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb%3Ben-us%3B262054
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 1:48 PM
Subject: RE: 2000 Admin
Does anyone know the solution
Just to throw in a few cents that might not help:
Could you schedule a stop services on the owa server when you take the server offline?
This doesn't solve much, but at least gives you control over the restart and limits
the down period. Especially if your routine maintenance is changed to say
Maybe you shouldn't
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 1:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 2000 Admin
Does anyone know the solution to this? If Im a domain admin how can I get
Full Exchange 2000 admin privs?
CSVDE.exe or LDIFDE.exe will help you. Dump AD to a text file and then
search it.
-Original Message-
From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 2:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SMTP Addresses
Windows 2000 SP3
Exchange 2000 SP3
How do I query
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
