Absolute madness last night.
I was making the new policys which include the legacy domain names, some
how EVERY single email address for EVERY single recipient in the whole
organisation had there email address wiped, all that remained was the
X400 addresses.
What gives?
Because you made a policy that actually applied to EVERY single
recipient that told it to do that. Any new policy you make will be
assigned a higher priority than your default policy, and will overwrite
it for the recipients that the query that it's based upon (General
screen, Modify, Find Now)
Exchange server 2000 SP3
These errors are popping up intermittently. The first came back in
November, then none until April, now, nearly one a day.
According to Q327334 I have a failing hard drive. This is on a RAID 5
system. Is there a chance it could be the RAID controller instead?
Has
last night we did a restore because we've been getting some database errors
in the event log. we restored from a good backup and played in the log files
as normal - everything worked great and we're up and running again, except
now our mac users with outlook 2001 take about 5 minutes to log in.
Some questions first.
1) Are we dealing with Exchange 5.5 or Exchange 2000? What service pack
level are you running?
2) How are the Macs connected to the network?
3) What rev of the MAC OS are they running?
4) Do the Macs have a HOSTS file and if so is it setup correctly?
5) For the restore
I have been bothered a bit by the way the names are sorted in the GAL,
so I came across this article
(http://msexchange.org/tutorials/MF023.html) that showed me how to set
up Exchange to sort by last name. Very simple to do and worked like a
charm, but... now I am noticing that many times when I
Hello..I am having problems posting on the list through OL..here is the
error:
Sorry, your stylized text, or HTML mail can not be distributed through the
Internet.Com discussion lists.
The only acceptable format for posting to exchange is ASCII Text.
Please, re-send your post to continue your
The answer to your question is in your message.
-Original Message-
From: Stevensmd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 8:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: trouble posting on the list
Hello..I am having problems posting on the list through OL..here is the
Okay, let me get this straight I think there is a problem with
terminology between us, mostly on my behalf because I'm a little bit
thick, but bear with me as I think I have it slightly sussed.
Policy applies to = Filter Rules.
i.e. in my default policy I have (mailnickname=*). Therefore what
It's ok, the restart fixed it, some gremlin or other...
Thanks anyway.
-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 June 2003 12:57
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: slow login with mac clients after restore.
Some questions first.
1) Are we
I have the same problem. It may have something to do with
the fact that my company allows OOF's. Don't remember the
full explanation, I just know that I have to go to the web
to participate...
Nikki
-Original Message-
From: Stevensmd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003
If you set up a public folder to allow anonymous access and set the default
permission to Author it should work.
Sandhya Pai
Manager of Server and Network Services
School of Business
University of Connecticut
-Original Message-
From: Reyes Balderas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
How about making it real easy: Add all the SMTP addresses to your default policy,
leave the check in the checkbox doodad that says this server's responsible for this
address space, and take the check out of the little checkbox doodad that applies it.
Delete any additional policy. Done.
-tom
Syllables are not
Haiku's be all and end all.
Sounds are not meanings.
A Tuesday morning
The week stretches out ahead.
Daydream time away.
London summer rain
Pollen washed to the tarmac.
Air flows through nostrils.
Seasonal setting
Portray an objective scene
With depths of insight.
Person at a
Forestprep was run on the root domain, Domainprep was
run on both domains. There are Exchange related
attributes, can you give me a specific attribute that
would ensure that RUS is working. I will compare with
an account in the child domain.
--- Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Was
I am trying to move the MTA database on a Exch2K machine. I have followed
the procedures documented in q259896. When I run the MTACHECK utility, I
get the following error:
Integrity checker was unable to create MTACHECK.OUT directory.
According to the article, the MTACHECK.OUT folder should be
I would like to share out a few users calendars, not just free/busy but the
true calendar to a few other users. I do not want those users to have full
mailbox rights to these mailboxes, just the calendar.
Is this possible in E2K?
Could you please provide a resource.
Thanks.
use Delegates
-Original Message-
From: The Geek Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 12:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Calendar/mailbox rights
I would like to share out a few users calendars, not just free/busy but the
true calendar to a few other
I seem to be having a problem attaching documents through OWA using SSL.
Without SSL, everything works fine but with SSL, whenever I try
attaching a document, it comes up with a 404 error. Has anyone had this
error before or seen something like this?
This is on an E2k front-end server with sp3.
Carmila,
Have you made any adjustments to the default OWA logon page? I.E., changed
it from https://servername/exchange to say...
https://servername/webmail/usa? If so, you could be having the same problem
with the ISAPI upload .DLL file that we did. Put a copy of that .DLL in the
new path and
James,
Yes we did change it to https://webmail/US. I'll give this a shot and
let you know.
Thanks,
Carmila
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 1:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Carmila,
Have you made any adjustments
http://www.computerworld.com/securitytopics/security/story/0,10801,82045,00.
html?SKC=security-82045
(Link may wrap)
Doesn't really surprise me...
-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: MS
We're in the exploring on the infrastructure on our Network to be ready for
Win2k. There are some area which is in question marks.
Email Scanning Gateway to be places on the DMZ. e.g. TrendMicro/Mailsweeper.
Should it be place in different box or should it be place in the same box
with the
I would advise to put your gateway on a separate box. I don't know how big
your network is, but for 100 users, the gateway could be a simple PC.
As for DNS, W2K/AD is all about DNS, DNS, DNS. Plan on having 2 DNS servers.
For that matter, plan on having 2 DC/GC's. So make each of those a DNS
Our Environment only have 275users internally, and another 50users access
from overseas using OWA or POP3. Do you have any reason why should the
gateway to be run on separate box?
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003
25 matches
Mail list logo
