?
-Original Message-
From: David Florea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, July 28, 2002 6:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA creates attachments?
I can't reply to most of the lists using OWA - Lyris rejects them as
having an attachment. Why
I can't reply to most of the lists using OWA - Lyris rejects them as having an
attachment. Why is that, and is there a workaround?
David
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
You won't have any conflict if you just ensure your client program doesn't touch the
Exchange store, drive M, or anything else to do with Exchange. On the other hand, I
usually don't run a client AV on my Exchange box. You can, however, if you wish.
-Original Message-
From: Jason
Only if your name is Jenny.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 1:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: The infamous Invalid data in message
867-5309
-Original Message-
From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL
Has someone turned on journaling? Anything going on with your public folders? Mail
loop?
David
-Original Message-
From: Denis Baldwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 9:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Information Store Overload
Strange thing has been
I'm not sure what you're saying that folder is labeled, but have a look at Q313911 and
Q313913, maybe working backwards you can see something that caused the problem.
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 12:16 PM
To: Exchange
Huh, they're 3 days behind on their webcam. And Nixon got nailed for a 17-minute
gap...
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 8:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Ask the Experts Booth Bullpen
More like this:
Apparently offline. Pings to them time out.
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 10:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Anonymous e-mail in Outbound Queue of Exchange 5.5
I'm having the same problems. I'm trying to access the
I mistakenly started multiple instances of Mailbox Manager in Exch2K SP2, all of which
run consecutively every week. The first does its task properly but the others run
anyway and just suck up resources. It's not a serious issue, but I can't find
anything in Technet, the archives, or Mitch
Subject: RE: Mailbox Manager in Exch2K
Are they anything other than AT jobs (asked he who doesn't use Mailbox
Manager)?
-Original Message-
From: David Florea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mailbox Manager in Exch2K
a night, try restricting the schedule when it can run to 15 or
30 minutes.
-Original Message-
From: David Florea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 11:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mailbox Manager in Exch2K
I mistakenly started multiple instances of Mailbox
During the learning curve on Exch2K, I started multiple instances of Mailbox Manager,
all of which run consecutively every week. The first does its task but the others run
anyway. It's not a serious issue, but I can't find anything in Technet or the
archives which would indicate where I
Just released by equiinet.com, pretty good reasoning too. So Bob, you can add this
link to your justifications...
http://www.equiinet.com/press/pressReleases/24_06_2002.htm
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 10:00 AM
To:
Using www.checkdns.org gives this response -- looks OK to the outside world. What
happens if they leave out the uconnvm part?
**
Domain uconn.edu has only one mail-server
Checking mail server (PRI=5) uconnvm.uconn.edu [137.99.26.3]
Mail server uconnvm.uconn.edu
3rd party tools. I use Antigen by Sybari, but there are others, such as Mailsweeper.
Exchange2K itself can block by address or domain, I think if you just look in 'Help'
you'll find the reference.
Did you think about checking the archives of this list as noted in the link below?
Also think
I see this occasionally, no particular reason why it starts or stops. Most of the
time, if I leave it for long enough it will go away. I blame it on the phase of the
moon.
-Original Message-
From: Anthony L. Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 12:43 PM
They have files in their deleted items or sent items, probably with huge attachments.
Make them set their options to Empty deleted items upon exiting, and get them to
delete those big attachments out of their sent items.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
I know not everyone can, but I block all Asian IP ranges. Keeps both my spam and hack
attempts way down.
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: APNIC Spam imitating
Did you check the 'view' setting yet?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM
Hi
I have checked the deleted items in his inbox and there is nothing
there,
Is the .htr file extention still on the list in IIS on the OWA web site? I've not
applied the patch either on my IIS 5 OWA box, so I'll wait w/ baited breath...
-Original Message-
From: David Stafford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 9:06 AM
To: Exchange
Nothing against your user, but in my org that would mean to me about a 93% probability
that there was in fact a problem with the addressing on somebody's part.
-Original Message-
From: Bashir Malekzada [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 3:19 PM
To: Exchange
Is Deleted Items Retention turned on? You can recover them easily from Deleted Items
for that period. For those older than that, you'll have to do a restore to a recovery
server. Lots of info about this in the archives for this list.
David
-Original Message-
From: David Stafford
I thought there *was* nothing greater than Day 0.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 10:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recovering Deleted Messages
Greater than Day0?
-Original Message-
From: Baker,
We have one of our business partners who cannot send mail to my domain, though we can
normally get mail to them. Their domain uses Merak Mail, I'm on Exch2K. Each of us
have no known problems with any other domain except each other. Using
www.checkdns.org, both domains' MX records appear to
Any chance this user hasn't been given the 'log on locally' permission? Are we
talking about 5.5 or 2000?
Does this only happen from one machine, that is have you tried that user from a
different box?
-Original Message-
From: Tony McCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday,
.
Regards
Tony
-Original Message-
From: David Florea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, 10 June 2002 11:03 a.m.
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA
Any chance this user hasn't been given the 'log on locally' permission? Are
we talking about 5.5 or 2000?
Does this only happen
That used to happen out around Brothers, in Eastern Oregon. I think though that they
may have had to phase that out due to the PETA folks. Note, I don't think there is a
similar protective organization for lawyers...
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL
Now would could have predicted this?
-Original Message-
From: Semiglia, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 12:40 PM
To: David Florea
Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: stupid disclaimers
This is a test OOF. I am really here
Who, not would. Fat fingers, dpttu.
-Original Message-
From: David Florea
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 12:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Now here's a different OOF
Now would could have predicted this?
-Original Message-
From: Semiglia, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL
Are you using Antigen's inherent capabilities to filter on sender, sender's domain,
and subject line? Seems to be as effective as any for that kind of filtering. I've
not tried some of the more exotic third-party solutions, many of them are too
expensive for my small organization.
If on your own network, I guess you could try ExMerge to pull out that message from
the store. If it went outside...I believe it's way beyond your control to do
anything about.
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 12:03
Welcome back, sir!
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 10:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Test
Because it is there.
Ed Crowley
hp Services
--- Dean Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
no, because they can..
Dependent on business needs, and for some companies on legal requirements. Some
financial institutions may have to hold some tapes for years. Officially, I don't
keep anything beyond 30 days. In the unfortunate event of a subpoena, my job is much
simpler.
-Original Message-
From:
with that.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: David Florea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 1:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Archive
Dependent on business needs, and for some companies on legal requirements.
Some financial institutions may have to hold
Users are always free to maintain whatever e-mails or files they want, and it's our
job to help them do just that. If they determine a file should be deleted, then we
help them do that too. That's not hiding anything, that's just good and efficient
practice. And I wouldn't think you're
Dunno, but fsck is a *nix command, isn't it? ;-}
-Original Message-
From: Mark Arnold () [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 1:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used
Kind of, but
Absotively, posilutely. Wouldn't have it any other way. Proud of it, in fact.
;-}
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 1:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Group Mail
BTW- I think most of you guys are a bunch of
Arch, just an FYI, it's absolutely impossible to make any sense of a message when the
prior history has all been deleted. We don't have time to look back down the list and
see what you're talking about!
-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Me kangaroo down. Sport.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 8:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Tasks in Exchange 5.5
What have you tied?
_
List
About the 3rd page I fell off the chair. It's gotta be someone he simply cannot
fire...
-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 12:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Only just a tiny bit off topic
Normally I wouldn't.
, May 15, 2002 1:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Tasks in Exchange 5.5
Tan me hide when I'm dead, Fred.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: David Florea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 11:44
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
In trying to troubleshoot an SMTP issue, I'm telnetting to an outside mail server
(they're running Merak Mail). Their mail server answers, but when I try to send an
HELO, with each character I hit I get a 502 5.5.1 command unrecognized -- after
about 8 tries I get a disconnect and a too many
it
From: David Florea [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2002/05/13 Mon PM 02:43:50 EDT
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Telnet troubleshooting
In trying to troubleshoot an SMTP issue, I'm telnetting to an outside mail server
(they're running Merak Mail). Their mail server answers
packet. I don't know if that's how Merak server
is supposed to work or if they put some kind of restriction in there for a
false sense of security.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: David Florea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 4:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
I see that port 113 was one of those originally set up for Exchange on my firewall --
Exch2K/W2K doesn't require it? I'm happy to reject it if not needed.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 6:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Absolutely. Started out with 38. Up to 480 already.
-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 10:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun
890 What uppp
what is the worst score anyone has
1. History of the World, Part I
2. Star Wars Trilogy
3. J. S. Superstar
-Original Message-
From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Cerification question
1. Life of Brian
2. Crimson Tide
3. Boys
Poop. J. C., not J. S..
-Original Message-
From: David Florea
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 1:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cerification question
1. History of the World, Part I
2. Star Wars Trilogy
3. J. S. Superstar
-Original Message-
From: Martin
Cool. You should create a course and offer a cert in it...I'd sign up!
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cerification question
No shit. Most of these companies don't know that
the logon box; it doesn't matter whether there is an attachment or
not; there are no events logged in Event Logs; he has enabled my server requires
authentication in his settings (required for relaying).
Could this be related to my server setup?
David Florea, SysAdmin
Private Consulting Group Inc
I've hit the same problem but only after an upgrade to Exch2K. Worse, it doesn't seem
to be a consistent problem, sometimes the user is prompted to save the attachment, but
then gets an option to open it anyway.
I found info from Microsoft that indicates a setting in URLScan.ini may fix this,
I thought I'd seen this problem addressed but can't find it in the archives, nor
Technet, nor slipstick.com:
Exch2K, SP2 in AD network -- accesing OWA using IE, various flavors but mostly
IE5.5SP2.
Attachments get to/from their destinations fine. However, the process of opening
attachments
DFNA [3]
[3] Duplicate footnote numbering alert
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 3:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: News flash: Outlook still sucks
YASE[1] for Microsoft Outlook. And amazingly (like it hasn't been
I did an upgrade over the weekend from Exch5.5 to 2K, now I see in the headers of
received messages I get, for example,
Received: from host34.addmeat.com ([208.62.225.32]) by
pcgexch2.local.privateconsulting.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.2966)
Is this how the header should read for
I got a letter today from .NET magazine saying EO had been folded into .NET
magazine, and my remaining subscription would be converted to .NET unless I
wanted a refund. I guess I'll wait take a look...
David
-Original Message-
From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday,
One reason I'm wondering about on my own forthcoming upgrade is that for our
various outside offices who pick up their mail either by OWA or POP3, is
that I'll have to re-educate the users and have them change their settings.
Not a tremendous biggie, but just enough to give me a headache.
David
Your boss is a prime candidate for Ed C's maxim:
There are seldom good technological solutions for behavioral problems.
Help your boss out with some rules and folder management in his Outlook
client (assuming that's what he's using) so that the messages are manageable
and don't go away until he
I don't think there's anything wrong with your setup. When I dial in from
home the gateway under IPCONFIG typically comes up the same as the IP
address, and works fine. You didn't say whether the behaviour you observed
is keeping your users from somehow connecting properly.
David
I don't, but I see this note in a recent 'Exchange-Outlook News' from Sue
Mosher:
EASYRECOVERY FILEREPAIR
http://www.ontrack.com/filerepair/
The Microsoft Outlook component repairs both .pst and .ost files,
recovering data that Scanpst.exe may not be able to recover. Also repairs
files
I'm curious what software package you're using, Ben, and how difficult was
it to tune the filters.
David
-Original Message-
From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 3:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking spam
Not a solution in my
Usually hitting the delete key. There are other partial solutions, as I'm
sure some will explain, but the delete key is the most cost effective
solution if money is an issue. If I have the time and it's an open relay
problem I sometimes mail the offending domain and ask them to check their
mail
Is there actually a mailbox for the admin account? You did try an account
that has a real mailbox, right?
-Original Message-
From: Mike Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Need Help badly - Exchange 2000 / OWA
Can't get that link to work...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: URL as a malicius code.
Bad... very bad...
Double check your relaying settings in the IMC; sometimes when you change
things (like domains) the settings may have gotten off kilter and you may
have become an open relay.
David
-Original Message-
From: fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 12:06 PM
To:
Did you upgrade to XP or was it a fresh install? Seems like I read
somewhere about probs with PGP and XP but I don't see that I saved the
source for that. If PGP lived thru an upgrade, I'd do an
uninstall/reinstall and see if it even installs correctly. You might try
some of the other PGP
With appropriate software, yes. Selected antivirus or content management
software, though some packages won't give you selectability by user. Have
you looked back in the archives? I believe this has been beaten to death on
occasion.
Note, jpeg and gif extensions are the least of most folks'
www.conversay.com - voice-activated retrieval of your mail...
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 3:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA login issue.
Voice activation software?
-Original Message-
PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Florea
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 2:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DOmain name and exchange
Note, that O'Reilly book is only $27.96 on Amazon.com, instead of
$39.95.
David
-Original Message-
From: Byron Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Note, that O'Reilly book is only $27.96 on Amazon.com, instead of $39.95.
David
-Original Message-
From: Byron Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 11:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DOmain name and exchange
Yup-
hey everyone, btw, i
the freebusy for the whole site? Also should the
Freebusy be on a certain Ex Server in the site? It is currently not on our
main Exchange server and is not hidden.
W
-Original Message-
From: David Florea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 3:06 PM
To: Exchange
70 matches
Mail list logo
