IIRC I had a feeling that o2k3 does mess with the mailbox structure on e2k , which may
cause the problem you are having
Ask MS to fix the outlook version access problem before pointing the finger at
blackberry
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Understand better now.
Was it a typo that you said 4 Enterprise Blackberry Servers (2.6). did you mean 3.6
? and if so what service pack are you at?
Also FWIW a Exhange 5.x client will enable you to massage the calendar folder as well
as the GWClient.
cheers
Dean
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/01/2004
Might I suggest [EMAIL PROTECTED] That way you could make sure none of it hits the
exchange server.
This then frees you up to use some free smtp server and build a with a web front end
(nt domain authenticated access) to massage alias lists and alike and webmail
I would not do it in exchange
I didn't think I was that bad.
0 0
|
\_/
just kidding it wasn't me honest
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/12/2003 11:59:46 a.m.
He was an idiot. When started ordering dual-processor pro workstations for
secretaries, the handwirting was on the wall.
Eric Fretz
L-3 Communications
ComCept
First answer the questions of why you would think you would want to cluster.e.g
avoiding flood/famine/911/virus/missing meeting embarrasment..etcetcetc
That is - what is the business trying to achieve by clustering?
Clusters will not protect you from the above (except if you have them in
yah checked the FAQ? http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
i'm sure it is listed there
cheers
dean
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 14/11/2003 12:47:01 p.m.
I have an anti-spam program that I want to use, which is set up as a SMTP service. I
can specify the port that I want it to listen on, now I just
http://www.e-government.govt.nz/docs/see-mail-bus-req-2-2/chapter1.html
http://www.e-government.govt.nz/see/index.asp
The NZ government has been down this path and the first link gives some practical
requirements in regard to RFCs etc.
May be of some help
Mimesweeper has secrectsweeper and
How does that enable distant clients to see encrypted mail, where the destination
email client is not known?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 29/10/2003 9:44:35 a.m.
Have you looked into Exchange 2003 and Rights Management Server? We are
going forward with this most likely.
Anthony L. Sollars
Technology
their standard email client and Web browser.
tumbleweed has a a similar ability apparently
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 29/10/2003 10:02:39 a.m.
This is what I'm wondering.
There has to be a mechanism on the receiving end to unencrypt this stuff.
-Original Message-
From: Dean Cunningham [mailto
likely they are worried
about email falling into the wrong hands. So if I fat finger an email
address, the wrong recipient will still be able to read it, correct?
-Original Message-
From: Dean Cunningham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 1:16 PM
To: Exchange
Ah right then, Any of the vendors I mentioned should be able to give you that
functionality. In the case of the NZ Govt the button was a bit of VBA that prepended
the subject with a keyword and their target was between gateways in organisations.
Typically you would set the gateway up not allow
IIRC OL2003 has a different PST format to OL2002 or lower. All that means is that you
will probably have to use and exchange server to import the eudora emails into a
mailbox using OL2003 and use OL2000 to drag and drop the emails from the exchange
mailbox to a Local PST folder.
google search
Don't forget 47 while your at it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 23/10/2003 6:43:40 a.m.
How about a simple search on Technet for MS03-046? Worked for me. A
Google search would probably pull it up as well.
Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418
-Original Message-
In my clients defense there is no easy access to 46 and 47 from here
http://www.microsoft.com/security/security_bulletins/
which ya woulda thought wasa Good Idea(TM)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 23/10/2003 7:05:28 a.m.
Teach a man to fish...
Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner White
(317)
Short Answer = no.
Longer answer = No because the MX records only show a preference or cost and it is up
to the sender to decide which one to use to send.
Solution 1 = Manual Method - Block firewall for the exchange ip address and port. Yo
can turn this on quickly if you need the exchange
So long as the server there were homed on is not removed before *all* client profiles
on all machines have had outlook opened on them.
It goes like this
User logs in and runs up outlook (Outlook reads its configuration info
Oulook connects to old home server and asks to connect to mailbox
Old
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
select 2003 faq
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 26/09/2003 9:14:49 a.m.
Have a few questions:
We are currently about to start a Migration to AD. We have a Exchange 5.5
Server on a Windows NT 4 box. We are moving the Exchange 5.5 Server to a
Windows 2000 Box due
I can't get past the concept that if the SAN dies (ie FC card or Power Supplies) then
all teh servers you have attached to it are dead in the water.
Sounds like a quasi mainframe to me.
I still prefer many eggs and many baskets and take the disk hit.
Mind you I would be interested in SAN
I see the 10 to 12 looks like its gone, but I would be happy to accept your challenge
should you want a non-USA review of your book.
regards
Dean
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 20/09/2003 8:23:27 a.m.
Well, it appears that a number of individuals from this list have chosen
to engage in childish and
What happens when their hard drive fails, where is the backup.
You have already decided that keeping the emails is important, therefore:
1) storing the emails in a public folder is the way to go
2) Permissions can be set to only allow them to add messages and not delete. (no
different to file
and more importantly... GO the Warriors!! :-)
( http://fixtures.nzoom.com/league/nrl/2003/fixtures/finals.html )
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 22/09/2003 10:10:14 a.m.
Ditto from an Aussie...
themolk.
-Original Message-
From: Dean Cunningham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday
Oooo hard crowd tonight, anyone would think this was the Swnyk Exchange
list. hang on it is!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 19/09/2003 1:09:59 a.m.
yes
-Original Message-
From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 2:39 AM
To:
No that is S2S mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 17/09/2003 9:14:05 a.m.
It's that guy standing out on that little platform above the ship's
bridge waving those funny colored flags at the people standing on that
little platform above the other ship's bridge.
Oh.. Wait.. That's V-mail.
John Matteson
IMNSHO their logic is screwed. The MX records work as follows
Get me a list of MX records for the domain seanet.com [done]
Can I connect to highest priority MX record ?
Yes = try and send the email
No = try next MX record
Under Yes, if having trouble sending email , exchange server retries but
MailMarshall
MailSweeper
Trend - spam prevention services
spam assasin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/09/2003 5:36:40 a.m.
Hello Guys,
I know this probably has been asked before.
But
Any recommendations for some good, in house, Anti Email Spam software for
Exchange 2k?
IMHO Mailsweeper is not a SPAM product, it is a great content management tool
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 30/08/2003 2:47:56 a.m.
Karen, here you go...
john
We just purchased MailFrontier and I have to say this is the most
amazing Anti Spam product I have seen. Compared to Mailsweeper that we
were
http://www.historybuff.com/library/refbarnum.html
for the story.
w.c may of said it , but he was not the first :-)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 28/08/2003 5:28:35 a.m.
Actually it was David Hannum, not W.C. Fields and not P.T. Barnum who
said it. But who's really keeping track.
Just need to spoof a from address of a list subscriber and send it to the list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 28/08/2003 3:56:48 a.m.
We get hundreds of those every day. How did he get on this list? Did he
subscribe?
Kind regards,
Kim Schotanus
===
Kim Schotanus
Information Systems
I blame Ed for reappearing at this time :-)
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 29 May 2002 12:16 p.m.
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ASP example to view contacts in Exchange 2000
Oh boy. The SWYNK has hit the fan. Sorry Mike, it
I blame Ed for reappearing at this time :-)
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 29 May 2002 12:16 p.m.
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ASP example to view contacts in Exchange 2000
Oh boy. The SWYNK has hit the fan. Sorry Mike, it
I blame Ed for reappearing at this time :-)
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 29 May 2002 12:16 p.m.
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ASP example to view contacts in Exchange 2000
Oh boy. The SWYNK has hit the fan. Sorry Mike, it
I blame Ed for reappearing at this time :-)
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 29 May 2002 12:16 p.m.
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ASP example to view contacts in Exchange 2000
Oh boy. The SWYNK has hit the fan. Sorry Mike, it
I blame Ed for reappearing at this time :-)
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 29 May 2002 12:16 p.m.
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ASP example to view contacts in Exchange 2000
Oh boy. The SWYNK has hit the fan. Sorry Mike, it
I blame Ed for reappearing at this time :-)
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 29 May 2002 12:16 p.m.
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ASP example to view contacts in Exchange 2000
Oh boy. The SWYNK has hit the fan. Sorry Mike, it
I blame Ed for reappearing at this time :-)
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 29 May 2002 12:16 p.m.
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ASP example to view contacts in Exchange 2000
Oh boy. The SWYNK has hit the fan. Sorry Mike, it
I blame Ed for reappearing at this time :-)
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 29 May 2002 12:16 p.m.
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ASP example to view contacts in Exchange 2000
Oh boy. The SWYNK has hit the fan. Sorry Mike, it
Rubbish service from swynk, that was one of the reasons the majority of the
SMS list on swynk left for topica, (also other reasons) there is no need for
two or more lists as it dilutes they knowledge IMNSHO
-Original Message-
From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday,
Ed, as usual, is correct.
Depends what the risk is to people making binding commitments via email that
may cost the company $$$.
Email here is considered a public record (as indicated in our email policy).
Emails are easy to create/modify by the other party. Having an audit trail
of mails
ethically. I don't think
it makes sense to destroy all your evidence when those
with an axe to grind keep all theirs. Those with
nothing to hide shouldn't be hiding it.
Ed Crowley
hp Services
--- Dean Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Ed, as usual, is correct.
Depends what the risk
I blame Ed for reappearing at this time :-)
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 29 May 2002 12:16 p.m.
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ASP example to view contacts in Exchange 2000
Oh boy. The SWYNK has hit the fan. Sorry Mike, it
hurumph! lucky I am not sensitive about the choice of word the Great Cthulhu
used :-)
-Original Message-
From: Orr, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 23 May 2002 3:30 a.m.
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?
The Great Cthulhu used to delete
no, because they can..
-Original Message-
From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 28 May 2002 5:57 a.m.
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Test
Because they want to ?
--
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange2000 List owner
Would never disagree with you David :-) but the guy (like me) is also in New
Zealand and PSS does not exist here via an 0800 number.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?LN=EN-NZ is really only for
personal use. We have to go via a reseller.
As an aside what is also interesting is that the
Yeah, well Mcafee 4.5.1 (NO SP) would not detect badtrans with compressed
files set and scan default files (even tho PIF and SCR in the default file
scan) the 4176/4.1.60 combination fixes that. So don't quite blame the user
:-)
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL
Do you want to do anything past AV and content filtering?
Mimesweeper is another to look at www.mimesweeper.com
-Original Message-
From: Louanne Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 18 September 2001 7:40 a.m.
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange virus protection and
Your compaq vendor should be able to give you performance difference between
the raid configurations.
IIRC about 5 % slower using RADI5 than RAID 1 on write
see
http://www.compaq.com/products/storageworks/smartarray-controllers/SA5300ind
ex.html
46 matches
Mail list logo
