Yo.
-Original Message-
From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 9:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Internet Mail Issues
It's a disenheartening thought that for individual broadband
access most
people now have a choice between the
You're probably looking at list serv software then.
Google for ListServ, MajorDomo and other similar products.
-Original Message-
From: Holstrom, Don J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 9:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: multiple mailings
I
Nope. In cached mode the user always directly reads from the local store,
which is updated as needed when a network connection is connected.
If the design goal was to read from the server in all network situations and
go offline when the network was unavailable, they wouldn't have changed that
Dude? This particular topic was started by *you* on 12/18.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 12:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics
I HAVE tried to let it rest. Ed
Google for moving FSMO roles. It's somewhat simple, you just have to make
sure all of the roles have been moved.
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 12:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Upgrade from 2003
Apples and oranges.
Ed is not the IT director of Ohio (nor does he play any kind of similar role
in any of his consulting engagements, I'd imagine).
If Consolidated Widgets, Inc. hired Ed to do $vague_technical_work and the
IT director of CWI then received a leather jacket from a vendor, then
You seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding of the types of consulting
engagements.
One such type: I want to put in a new email system. Please tell me which
system from all of the major players would fit in my environment.
Another such type: I've already decided that Lotus Notes is the
You may be relay free (i.e. a spammer is *not* using your servers as a relay)
but said scumbag is using one of your addresses as a forged From: address.
1) spammer sends out messages appearing to come from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2) many many many recipients do not exist
3) receiving mail systems send
You should be OK, as long as your purchase records and paper license count
match up against your usage in the event of an audit.
I'll assume that you purchase your MS products from a reseller who
participates in one of the Volume programs - Select, OLP, Enterprise, etc. -
and that you got one
404 errors like that might be related to URLScan. Do you have that
installed? If so, the default settings on URLscan shouldn't clobber the
logoff.asp page though...
-Original Message-
From: Pat Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 9:37 AM
To: Exchange
No demonizing or personal attacks on the other side there, eh Greg? The same
stuff about which you were complaining?
::plonk::
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 10:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Greg's
My company, Consolidated Widgets, Inc., has previously decided to standardize
on MS software at all levels. When it comes time to make hiring decisions,
whether for FTEs or for conslutants, how should I proceed? Let's take the
example of an Exchange deployment project.
First thing to be
http://www.infonition.com/marathon.shtml
Interesting.
-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 2:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
As a Microsoft Partner, does your company get
You still haven't demonstrated that the Conflict of Interest exists.
Where's the conflict in me (an MS-leaning IT manager) hiring a
MS-knowledgeable person to implement MS-based technology in my MS-based
enterprise?
The MVP I'm hiring has not swayed me towards the decision to *use* MS
::dresses up like Abraham Lincoln and shoots Don::
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 3:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
I wanna be Issac!! :P
-Original Message-
From:
My cat's breath smells like cat food.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 11:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Day 2 Lessons Learned: GW6.5 to Exchange 2000
Tl;dr. Will everyone just drop this
Read the whitepaper I referred you to yesterday. Then read it again. Read
it a third time.
That should be your bible and spouse for the next few weeks. Seriously.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:27 AM
To:
Move towards the light, Carol Anne. Read the whitepaper, Carol Anne. All is
explained in the whitepaper, Carol Anne.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup rituals
You shouldn't need to buy anything to do proper backups now.
While you're figuring out the options in BE, do a backup using the W2K Backup
program.
2.5 years ago? Keerist! What are your log files like? Do you have Circular
Logging enabled?
-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz
Read, understand and read again the MS Exchange Backup and Disaster Recovery
Whitepaper. Link to it is in the FAQ or is google-able.
Then read it again.
If you need to recover a single mailbox (a relatively unlikely occurrence if
you follow the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method - also in the
Read the Ed Crowley method and the DR whitepaper and you will change your
line of reasoning.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 9:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5
The recovery
Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel: 972.772.7501
fax: 972.772.7510
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 10:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec
You can set up mailboxes to represent these meeting resources and then users
can invite the resource and reserve it.
Google for auto accept script to find out how to have the resource
automatically accept any invitations sent to it.
-Original Message-
From: Troels Majlandt
I'd continue to focus on purchasing the Enterprise version. What's the cost
of yo0ur labor in doing the offline defrag? What's the cost to the company
in the system downtime for you to do the defrag? What's the cost to the
company of the system downtime if you do hit the 16GB limit? Then
, TX 75032
tel: 972.772.7501
fax: 972.772.7510
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 8:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Private Store size problems.
I'd continue to focus on purchasing the Enterprise
Word 2003 clusters are a definite improvement.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 5:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Looking for anti-clustering arguments
Word is that Exchange 2003 clusters better
We had the same issue migrating from GroupWise to Exchange 5.5 a few years
back.
Outlook doesn't really cache anything in the sense that you're talking about.
It merely neglects to re-look-up the address in a reply. Normally, this
makes sense. If you send me a message and I reply, there's no
That's because Microsoft knows of the issue but does not have a fix yet.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 11:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?
I have not heard of it...
Ben
?
So you have seen this?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 8:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?
That's because Microsoft knows of the issue but does
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 11:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?
So you have seen this?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka
Sent: Friday, November 21
of this on any of the newsgroups
or anywhere
else. If it was this big of a flaw, I suspect there would be a big
stink about it.
Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted
not a
participate in that list. I just thought it was odd since
that would be
a huge flaw and Microsoft or anyone for that matter has said
nothing.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 11:18 AM
I wouldn't remove URLscan completely, it serves a valuable purpose in
protecting your environment.
Mebbe you can tweak the settings a bit?
-Original Message-
From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 10:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
OWA - free with the purchase of a CAL (which you need anyway) and provides a
pretty dang usable interface under Ex2000 and 2003
I've also heard good things about Ximian Evolution (google for the URL).
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy T. Slater [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday,
IIRC, Entourage needs an update pack for Exchange connectivity. The
originally released Entourage only did POP3 and IMAP. Native Exchange
features required remaining at Outlook 2001 (on OS9).
http://www.microsoft.com/mac/products/entouragex/entouragex.aspx?pid=entourag
ex
There's a
No issues with the Std -- Enterprise upgrade.
Put in CD
Run setup
Apply service packs.
You'll want to have good OS and Exchange backups as well, but you probably
won't need them.
-Original Message-
From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003
-
Lähettäjä: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lähetetty: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 6:01 PM
Vastaanottaja: Exchange Discussions
Aihe: RE: PST-file backup problem
You didn't mention what your overall system is like, but I'll
assume you're
using Exchange.
If you're concerned about
You didn't mention what your overall system is like, but I'll assume you're
using Exchange.
If you're concerned about storage space and the data contained in the PST
files is important enough to be backed up, you should keep that data managed
by Exchange in a Store. Backup is easier, and you
in a non dynamic range, and
rDNS records. It will better ensure you will have your email delivered.
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 4:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AOL is Blocking Mail from My Exchange Server 5.5
Martin Blackstone
Mail from My Exchange Server 5.5
It's, um, shall we say, a running inside joke?
Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Friday, November 07, 2003 9:00 AM
Posted
Martin Blackstone has an ISP you can use.
-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 3:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AOL is Blocking Mail from My Exchange Server 5.5
Mongo change ISP.
-Original
open relay option?
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 9:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AOL is Blocking Mail from My Exchange Server 5.5
Martin Blackstone has an ISP you can use.
-Original Message
1) OWA
2) VPN and OST file synchronization
3) RPC over HTTP (assuming you're running Exchange 2003/Outlook 2003)
You may also want to ensure that the downloaded messages weren't deleted from
the server (which might be the default with POP depending on the client in
use).
-Original
Just to clarify: Is it a single box that acts as both ADC and Exchange or is
it two boxes?
First thing is to isolate the server from the network and especially from the
Internet so that no further damage is done and that the virus is not spread
any further.
What virus? This will determine
Martin Blackstone has one you can use.
-Original Message-
From: Jim Underwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 4:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AOL is Blocking Mail from My Exchange Server 5.5
Well, I'm hoping to find an EMail Host that
Nope. Exchange CAL for 2000 lets you use Outlook 2002 (XP). You must
purchase an Exchange 2003 CAL in order to use Outlook 2003. (You can still
purchase Outlook or Office 2003 separately and use that with an Exchange 2000
CAL to connect to an Exchange 2000 server).
-Original Message-
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/howtobuy/LicensingFAQ.asp This may answer
some of your questions. I know it's confusing.
Check with your licensing rep to be sure (and for your own legal protection).
You must have the latest version of an Exchange CAL in order to use the
latest version of
Hello, Swynk? Anyone home?
-Original Message-
From: Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 11:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Vicodin, pain medication available
take off list
http://www.rxsuperstore.biz/a.html
::does a quick check of Ol's import/export list::
Hmmm. They have ACT but not Goldmine.
When we did our GroupWise to Exchange conversion a few years back there were
some custom address book files that people used outside of GW that we had to
convert. We ended up doing a custom conversion
Is there any export to ACT from Goldmine? And then from that to OL?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 2:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Goldmine
Just Act. I bailed on this project. Too much time,
Me Too from AOL.
-Original Message-
From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 4:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: A CHALLENGE to the List
Ditto from the United Kingdom
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone
They cannot log into the exchange servers via Outlook.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes
Any commonality that you can see among those
Cool! Maybe some enterprising student can log into both email accounts and
send messages to each spouse.
I hate you
you're fat
you're bald
I want a divorce
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 3:35 PM
To:
::Cue Ed::
These are all good technical solutions but I would personally work on
educating the new president on some security basics and on why it is not good
to have corporate passwords embedded in plaintext in an icon. I know she is
the president, but is there a policy on the spouse's access
I can read Martin's email via his open relay.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 12:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: auto BCC'ing all messages
I think that point is that it isn't for you to make
Maybe a new SMTP banner prevents thread hijacking...
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 4:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails
I never really understand why people want to
is no longer holding MEC conferences, they have integrated it with
Tech-ED, however, there is a separate Exchange Conference in
which you can
participate:
http://www.devconnections.com/exc/
Have fun.
Does anyone know where MEC is this year?
- Original Message -
From: Erik
Why yes. Yes he did.
-Original Message-
From: Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 11:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world.
Chris Scharff wrote:
Mailfrontier is the name of the company. They have two
Zerr vill be no deffeations from ze corporate polizee!!!
-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 1:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Locking down exchange
You might be able to accomplish some of them if you deployed
Is URLSCAN installed on any of the affected boxes?
-Original Message-
From: Mats Eriksson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 8:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Owa Not displaying mails with . in the end
We have several customers running Exchange
Without some coding? I don't think so. Do you have a new hire workflow?
Can this step be added to it? i.e. once the employee has had his/her
accounts created, have the CEO's admin add this person to the invitee list,
and then send an Update only to changed people.
You could import from a
Over dialup?
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 2:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend? (Was Exchange Services).
I'll second that.
-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville)
I didn't see anything on whitehouse.gov or ready.gov, but my counterpart in
Facilities just forwarded a BOMA memo mentioning such a warning coming from
DHS.
Hopefully we are all already on alert for this virus, and are already
protected. It's an old issue that should have been eliminated a
Microsoft's only way to
stop the tide without giving up their entire Mac offering.
Roger
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL
free/busy and and automatic
configuration of address book and other account settings to
support Exchange
qualifies, then maybe.
From: Erik Sojka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 15:29:57 -0400
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL
I haven't looked at it yet, but it wouldn't be Exchange-aware if it was,
right? When we looked at this for our lone Mac user ~18 months ago we had to
settle for the previous version of Outlook and the user had to switch between
OSX for Office and OS9 for Outlook since we didn't want to open up
MEC is dead. Long live MEC.
The Fall 2002 Conference in Anaheim was the last Exchange-centric conference.
MEC content has been rolled into TechEd.
TechEd 2004 will be in San Diego. Whether or not TechEd is a suitable
replacement for MEC is up to the longtime attendees to decide.
All of the Exchange sessions were in the teensy tiny rooms in the back ass
end of the basement of the conference center. Seating for 50.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
Yeah, but you don't got no 31337 hacker name in your email address, d00d!
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 8:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Notes vs. Exchange
Microsoft Exchange engineers are a dime a
If you want to back up that *file*, then yes you would have to close whatever
software is keeping the file open.
If you want to back up Exchange, however, use an Exchange-aware backup
solution like NTBACKUP and the services remain running and functional during
the backup.
-Original
You'll have to stop the services then. What's the utility that is pulling
from the PRIV? You can get messages and mailboxes pulled from the Exchange
stores using standard supported utilities like EXMERGE.
-Original Message-
From: Paul kondilys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Do you have AutoArchive set up? You may have PST files and not know it.
-Original Message-
From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 9:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Contacts issue
I am one who is having this issue and I do not
A Public Folder with appropriate permissions doesn't fit the bill?
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 3:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Creating a permanent folder in outlook/exchange
Greetings,
I have a need
-Original Message-
From: Adams, Kevin C. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 3:46 PM
To: Erik Sojka
Subject: RE: Creating a permanent folder in outlook/exchange
Nope, need one for each mailbox. Part of our spam fighting initiative
(cringe).
-K-
-Original
And know they love you.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 11:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: The spam that gets through
I usually shake my head then kind of sigh.
-Original Message-
From:
The RAM behavior is normal and intended. Exchange will use all available RAM
and will relinquish it to another process if needed. I suspect the two
things you report (RAM usage and spontaneous reboots) are unrelated.
Are there anything in the Event Logs from before/after the reboot? Can you
you two kiss and make up now.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2003 1:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Clustering... is it worth it?
You are totally right. Cochran's slides do say that. My
notes do
emails
I guess. I advised against it, but as usual the PHB's don't
want to hear
it.
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto
Are you the guy who always bounces messages 3 days after they are sent?
-Original Message-
From: internet.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2003 1:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Weird resolution problem
Good morning, we have an issue where normally
In addition to my echoing the use of #1 AND #2, do you have a tape rotation,
or are you using more than one tape for the backups? Does the backup during
the week take more than one tape that it regularly has to be swapped?
An alternative if you have the disk space on another server, is to have
Other than shiny things making managers happy, what is the business
thingamabob you're trying to solve with putting the logo?
-Original Message-
From: Mark Nold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 3:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on
-up links
and who pay for their bandwidth and connect time, too.
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
Is the XP machine on the domain? What are your IE security settings for the
zone (look at the bottom of the list for settings that say Log on using
current password, etc.)
-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 9:01 AM
Open them both up in your Outlook profile, right-drag and drop between the
two, select Move. You will have to do this for each folder.
-Original Message-
From: Sanjeev Sharma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 2:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Can the two
Turn on Message Tracking.
A quick look at the mailbox size in the 5.5 Admin tool may also give a clue
who the perps are (assuming the large messages are kept in their Sent Items
folder)
-Original Message-
From: Peter White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003
, because otherwise the normal attachment
stripping would occur. Clearly if you're just popping into
your regular Exchange mailbox, you're just as protected from
viruses as you are accessing it any other way.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Sigh.
I don't want to pull a Precht and act as the list mommy, but I hope you two
don't turn this into a pointless 800 message thread consisting of just the
two of you.
Please don't.
-Original Message-
From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 June 2003 11:32
To:
Do you like gladiator films?
-Original Message-
From: Van Hooser, Chuck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 10:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
It's the big round room Andy.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
the cert error.
In my opinion it's not as clean of an implementation and the $700 for a third
party cert is justified.
*
* Erik Sojka, MOS, MCSE *
* Asst. VP, Technology Services *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED
***
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 8:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SpamBelt
Not quite.
I'm merely pointing out the difference here ;)
If Tom's talking about the same message I
Forwarded to the list at Stu's request:
-Original Message-
From: Stu Sjouwerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 11:26 AM
To: Erik Sojka; Exchange Discussions
Cc: Mailing company CC addresses deleted
Importance: High
Eric,
You are ABSOLUTELY right, and I'm asking
OWA doesn't know that another Exchange server is unavailable until it tries
to connect to it (i.e. whan a user tries to logon). Like any other client
process, it will attempt to find and communicate with the server, and wait a
certain amount of time until either the connection is made or times
I don't want to speak for Ed but I understand him to say that normally,
servers shouldn't be disappearing during the times when user access them. If
you must do maintenance on them such that the machines must be shut down, you
should do so during off hours or during a negotiated maintenance
: Friday, June 13, 2003 12:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Eric, thanks...so how do handle your users or do they just
know that it will
be this way.
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 9:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
It's under my File menu. Do you have Adaptive menus enabled? What happens
when you click on the double-chevron at the bottom of the menu?
-Original Message-
From: Clishe, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 12:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Previous
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 12:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
It's under my File menu. Do you have Adaptive menus enabled?
What happens when you click on the double-chevron at the
bottom of the menu
Mine only goes to 11.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 2:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
There are so many 2003's out there now, it makes your head spin!
- Original Message -
From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL
Only the initial synchronization would take time. After that, only the
deltas are synched.
And 225MB? How much time would that take to transfer over a typical
corporate network? 100Mb/S?
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday,
. If you can disable it, then no worries.
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 9:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Only the initial synchronization would take time. After
that, only the
deltas are synched.
And 225MB? How
Mmmm. Man hours.
Presumably since you are posting to an Exchange list, you are running
Exchange. If you just want a POP server you have wasted your money.
If remote access is an issue, set up OWA. If virusesiises are an issue, run
AV software on your Exchange boxes.
-Original
1 - 100 of 340 matches
Mail list logo
