Try sending an e-mail to me. Our MX records are similar to
kpafilms.com, in that our primary MX will refuse connections, but our
secondary MX is fine. Send me a test message at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Finally!, we're getting somewhere. Steven, the message experienced the
same symptoms - it sits in
version and SP level?
Windows version and SP level?
Steven
---
Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Administrator
The Key School, Annapolis Maryland
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 8:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;303889
Short answer, install SP3 and all hot fixes. Test again.
Steven
---
Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Administrator
The Key School, Annapolis Maryland
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July
and all hot fixes. Test again.
Steven
---
Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Administrator
The Key School, Annapolis Maryland
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 8:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: misconfigured sender
, Annapolis Maryland
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 8:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: misconfigured sender
Windows 2000 SP3
Exchange 2000 SP2 - can remember I put on SP3 or not and I
forget where
to find out
addressed to kpafilms.com is going to
MI.kpafilms.com, which is not allowing connections on port 25. However,
when you send directly to mail.kpafilms.com, it allows the connection.
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 12:51 PM
to the next server).
This is why nothing addressed to @kpafilms.com is going thru but e-mail
addressed to @mail.kpafilms.com is.
Internal name vs. external name isn't going to matter. That's all
internal to their DNS stuff.
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
I should say, is able to receive mail form all other domains but ours.
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: misconfigured sender
That makes perfect sense James...thanks for the info
Kpafilms however does
-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 2:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: misconfigured sender
I should say, is able to receive mail form all other domains but ours.
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey
Sent: Thursday, July 17
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 3:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: misconfigured sender
Sorry Roger if I butchered the NDR...here's exactly what it says (very
unimformative)
I guess it would be more approiate to call
Greetings,
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Server is E2K
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
My company is having problems sending mail to another company (simply
put)
NDRs received state the following:
Deliver to the following recipient has been delayed.
The NDR is received days after being sent.
I've verified that I can
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 11:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: misconfigured sender
Greetings,
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Server is E2K
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
My company is having problems sending mail to another company
Can we get the full headers for that NDR?
Sure. Not sure how much of this you need but here it is in all of it's
glory:
Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 02:22:29 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type:
-
From: Friese, Casey
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 3:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: misconfigured sender
Can we get the full headers for that NDR?
Sure. Not sure how much of this you need but here it is in all of it's
glory:
Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0
From: [EMAIL
#4.3.2
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 3:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: misconfigured sender
For what it's worth - I think this is what you were looking for Roger.
Reporting-MTA: dns;mail1.penncolor.com
Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL
I have nothing to complain about! I've been evaling for about a month...only 3 false
positives thus far. Easy to configure, self maintainable whitelists if mail is
configured to route out through MailEssentials. 3 levels of detection that are
customizablebeautiful product
-Original
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 11:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
I have nothing to complain about! I've been evaling for about a
month...only 3 false positives thus far. Easy to configure, self
maintainable whitelists if mail
Interesting Bill, I haven't experienced these problem during my eval. I'm evaling
using GFI MailEssentials 8 in a gateway type setting which receives then relays mail
to my e2k sp3 server. My relay machine is a .net server configured as a standalone.
I've found no messages in my badmail
install GFI Mail Essentials:
http://kbase.gfi.com/showarticle.asp?id=KBID001683
Bob
Sunbelt Software
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 12:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: GFI MailEssentials
Interesting Bill, I
Vincent,
Where is the e2k server located with regards to your closest DC? What is your
replication schedule set to?
What GC is the outlook client pointing to? Is that the closest GC to your Exchange
server?
-Original Message-
From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
The E2K box is near a DC, but the root of my forest is in NJ and I am in MD. We are
connected via a T1. I gave it enough time (20 minutes) to replicate, I thought. How
do I tell which GC the exchange box is pointing to?
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
we're assuming a lot here with little information and perhaps pointing to the server
as the problem isn't corrent.
Have you witnessed this problem first hand?
What OS is the user running? 9x? Delete the PWL file?
When outlook prompts for a username and password does it also prompt for a domain?
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q815052
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:
The Exchange server isn't by chance behind an ISA server is it?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 4:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook on Win XP SP1 can't connect to Exchange server
Do the old PC's
make sure the user has admins rights to the local machine
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 1:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Needing help on mail format...
I guess you couldn't se that the mailformat box is
Just went through this with PSS.
Make sure your local domain name is in your LDT on the ISA. It has to
be in the form of domain.com, .or, .net or .whatever with the * in
front of it.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 4:11
After 3 weeks of hassel and 4 hours on the phone today with PSS it was discovered that
Windows XP and the Miscrosoft ISA firewall client don't play well together if not
correctly addressed.
In a setting, such as ours, where E2K is a SecureNAT client with the ISA and windows
XP clients have
on.
If
that is not the case, is there a router between the client and server?
Saul
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, November 14, 2002 8:31 AM
Posted To: Exchange Newsgroups
Conversation: Outlook Response Times
Subject: Outlook Response Times
Cut and cross posted from another list - some good ones to think about
Tom Meunier
I'm not in, but you have hit and now verified a live address. Please
put me on your A list for resale to other spammers.
I'm the president of the company, and obviously wealthy. Since I've
just told you I'm away
jewel... a wise Texan.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Friese, Casey
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cut and cross posted from another list - some good ones to think about
Tom Meunier
I'm
- Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:cfriese;penncolor.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 5:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook Response Times
Why then do other clients on the same network segment
Greetings,
I'm running Exchange 2000 SP2 in an native win2k network. I have a few
clients (mixed, some OLXP and some OL2000) that are seeing delays with
mail delivery.
For example, If I send a message to my boss the message doesn't appear
in his inbox until after he clicks on a different folder
=
inde
xreq=viewarticleartid=1 (link wrap and all that)
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:cfriese;penncolor.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 9:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Greetings,
I'm running Exchange 2000 SP2 in an native win2k network. I have a
few clients
ports (Not sure which
one) and you don't get the email until another folder is clicked on. If
that is not the case, is there a router between the client and server?
Saul
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:cfriese;penncolor.com]
Posted At: Thursday, November 14, 2002 8:31 AM
Firewall Connection was enabled?
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:cfriese;penncolor.com]
Posted At: Thursday, November 14, 2002 11:23 AM
Posted To: Exchange Newsgroups
Conversation: Outlook Response Times
Subject: RE: Outlook Response Times
I could buy that this was an issue
is the result of UDP packets not getting there for
reason x.
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:cfriese;penncolor.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 12:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
I could buy that this was an issue with UDP packets being blocked if
the clients weren't
Telnet to port 110, auth. As the user and see if you can list the
messages
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 2:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: The dreaded POP3
Can you manually retrieve mail via POP3? If
Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 2:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Win9x and Outlook/E2k
I have a windows 2000 domain running E2k SP2 with some 9x clients. The
9x clients act accordingly when logging in to the network, accessing
: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 8:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Win9x and Outlook/E2k
Are you serving lunch?
Whats your account lockout policy? What is the Logon Network Security
set to in Outlook?
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
I have a windows 2000 domain running E2k SP2 with some 9x clients. The
9x clients act accordingly when logging in to the network, accessing
shared network folders and browsing the internet. The moment I
introduce Outlook (doesn't matter which version, 97, 98 200 or XP)
configured in corporate
recipient policy. I can feel it.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Friese, Casey
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 9:11 PM
Working with E2k Sp2, Win2k SP2. I have a userbase of sales people on the road that
use POP3 to retreive their mail from the server. When they work with customers they
use Journal entries for each customer. Each interaction with a customer they create a
new entry. They then foward the
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Friese, Casey
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 9:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP Virtual Server queue
Thanks,
I can see them now. I'm having a fit with this company that I just
started working for. While
PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Friese, Casey
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2002 9:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2K, Relay and POP3
Greetings,
I'm having a fit with this problem. E2K Sp2, Win2k Sp2
I have internal POP3 clients, some of which are on outlook 2000 and some
on outlook 97
I have a wierd issue here that I never before had happen to me. I am running Exchange
2000 SP2 in an all Windows 2000 Domain. This is a one server, one site setup.
Exchange and DC are on different machines but on the same network segment and in the
same room.
When I create a new account in
Does anyone know if there is any danger in changing the name of an OU within Windows
2000 sp2 ad and if there are any chances of this screweing up the exchange 2k sp2
users which resided in that OU?
_
List posting FAQ:
Silly little problem with authenticating to my E2K server through a POP3 connection.
I have a user who can log into the network, check his mail through outlook when
connected to the network and can also log into his inbox through OWA. When I
configured his outlook client on his laptop to
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E2K - Pop3
Are you entering his username in the proper format?
(domain\nt_id\mailbox_alias)
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26
-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 3:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E2K - Pop3
Silly little problem with authenticating to my E2K server through a POP3
connection.
I have a user who can log into the network, check his mail through
Discussions
Subject: RE: E2K - Pop3
Exchange's POP3 will respond OK to a username of hubnlkjtenlkjbt.
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 3:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E2K - Pop3
haven't tried that, I don't
= Exchange alias ?
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E2K - Pop3
Silly little problem with authenticating to my E2K server through a POP3
connection.
I have a user who can log
, June 26, 2002 5:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E2K - Pop3
It should be domain\NT_ID\mailbox_alias
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 3:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E2K - Pop3
no...username
Exchange 5.5 SP4 on NT4 SP6a. User has a local exchange account but refuses
to use OWA to access it and the connection speed is to slow for his liking
when dialing in. He begged us to have his mail forwarded to his pop3 mail
account.
This problem has been going on for about a year. When I
I am about to install the Japanese language pack for OWA 5.5. The server is
a standalone, NT 4.0 SP6a machine running IIS 4.0. Exchange is not
installed on the server.
Anyway, I'm researching any problems that may arise when installing the
language pack. I am mainly concerned with what effect
What account is the batch file using to restart the service?
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 5:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Information Store fails to start
Dear All,
I have the following error on one of
We have a remote office in Japan and the users there have their exchange
accounts on our US-based mail server. When the users of Japan compose their
messages in Japanese the character sets looks correct. When they then send
the message to a user on the same mail server that is in our US office,
it.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 9:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
Can anyone help me out here? When one of our clients tries to send a
certain message she receives an undeliverable which states 500 Host server
does not support 8bitmime. While the undeliverable is pretty straight
forward, I;ve never seen it before an am a bit baffled since this has never
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Friese, Casey
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 6:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Help With NDR
Can anyone help me
Hello,
My setup is NT 4.0 SP6a, IIS 4.0 with latest hotfixes and Exchange 5.5 SP4
I need to here some opinions on hosting multiple web sites on the same IIS
4.0 box as OWA is installed. I'm concerned with OWA being installed under
the default web site right along side of other web sites under
Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4.0 SP6a
I have a second IMS that I use to send mail securley to clients. I've run
into an issue that I have never seen before. We are able to receive
messages from all of our clients without a problem however, they do not
receive any messages from us. This started
the *.DAT files into the
relevant \\Exchsrvr\Mtadata directory. Cut and pasted the remaining files
into the relevant \\Exchsrvr\Mtadata directory. Ran an MtaCheck /v 3 times.
Re-applied service pack 4 for Exchange and restarted the MTA and IMC.
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto
Ok, one other question as well. Myself as well as my boss wants to know how
the MTA becomes hosed like this...any ideas?
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 2:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMS woes
Ok...I
those exact steps.
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 2:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMS woes
Ok...I stopped and restarted the MTA and IMS. I didn't do everything that
you said Dave but I now see all
?
- Original Message -
From: Friese, Casey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 1:14 PM
Subject: RE: IMS woes
Ok, one other question as well. Myself as well as my boss wants to
know
how
the MTA becomes hosed like this...any ideas
Exchange 5.5 Sp4, NT4 SP6a
Consolidating one of our sites so I'm moving mailboxes from the site to our
parent site. Question is, how do I combat the issue with people replying to
messages that came from the old site? I've created X500 addresses but I
don't think I'm using the correct syntax.
by step) after you go to the e-mail addresses
tab of the mailbox.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:37 AM
To: Exchange
Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mailbox moves across site
The Server not actually coming here and the link
]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mailbox moves across site
Was that it? It's early and I may be a tad over medicated.
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:48 AM
I'm having a problem with my offline address book only displaying the
contents of one of my sites. My setup is Exchange 5.5 SP4 on NT 4.0 SP6a.
I have 12 sites total. Each site has the global address book slected in DS
Site Configuration, Offline Address Book Tab.
When remote users try to
Is there a way in Exchange 5.5 sp4 to change a mailbox's OBJ-Container after
it has already been applied to the generic recipients container? Is this
possible to do without a directory export/import?
_
List posting FAQ:
Seems to be OWA day so I'll through a question into the mix.
Exchange 5.5 SP4 on NT 4.0SP6a, IIS 4 on separate NT4 sp6a box.
Problem with OWA recognizing the alias of one user. User's alias is listed
as greene but OWA will only accept
Green, Edward. This is the only user that is having the
-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 3:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA 5.5
Seems to be OWA day so I'll through a question into the mix.
Exchange 5.5 SP4 on NT 4.0SP6a, IIS 4 on separate NT4 sp6a box.
Problem with OWA recognizing the alias
be prompted with a dialog that asks you which greene you want. The
only
thing you can do is to either change the alias or have the user keep
using
his display name (or SMTP address).
S.
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL
Internet Mail service stops processing mail and event id 9405 shows in the
eventviewer for MSExchangeMTA. The logs Give this information:
An unexpected error has occurred which may cause the MTA to terminate.
Error: DB Server ref memory unavailable. [BASE GATEWAY 44] (16)
An unexpected error
: MSExchangeMTA event errors
Try looking at www.eventid.net they may have alternative fixes to try other
than those from MS
- Original Message -
From: Friese, Casey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 7:12 AM
Subject: MSExchangeMTA event errors
at www.eventid.net they may have alternative fixes to try
other
than those from MS
- Original Message -
From: Friese, Casey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 7:12 AM
Subject: MSExchangeMTA event errors
Internet Mail service
What would be the cause of messages getting hung in the Internet mail,
Inbound Messages Awaiting Conversion queue? I've literrally got 2500
message stuck in that queue that have been there since the 10th. I cannot
find any error logs in eventviewer.
We have this problem periodically and the
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 December 2001 17:07
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Inbound Messages Awaiting Conversion
What would be the cause of messages getting hung in the Internet mail,
Inbound Messages Awaiting Conversion queue? I've literrally
scanner on the server which is scanning the
Exchange working directories by chance?
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 11
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 December 2001 17:17
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Inbound Messages Awaiting Conversion
I have 3 servers total, 2 of which have an IMS on them. The one that we are
having problems with is an IMS that is used only
as this behavious was a problem that wasn't
fully fixed until SP2.
Michael O'Toole
System Engineer
Vytek NJ, Inc.
- Original Message -
From: Friese, Casey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 12:06 PM
Subject: Inbound Messages
Anyone else think it's extremely funny that the guy writing this article has
all of that equipment in his house.
...as I sit in my home in the Blue Ridge Mountains, looking over my
NetScreen-10 Firewall Appliance log, I can see the number of attacks on my
network rise above twenty--and that's
83 matches
Mail list logo
