Just upgraded a domain from Windows NT to Windows 2003. Our next phase will
migrate Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000 with some users going to Exchange 2003
(so it can be proven as a viable endpoint for the migration) using the Move
Mailbox method.
If I use the ADC for Exchange 2003, does anyone
..
Why not just migrate directly to E2003 when you feel comfortable with it
after testing in the lab, and forget the E2k bit entirely?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Dubyn
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2003 7:49 AM
To: Exchange
I'm having trouble with routing emails within an Exchange organization using
a Smarthost.
Here's the situation:
Exchange 2000 is installed in 2 separate AD sites (1 Exchange org).
An eSafe box is installed in Site1 that is supposed to scan all SMTP
traffic.
There is an internal link between
Jason -
Thanks, Jason - or course it worked great. The answer to your question Why
are you messing with the SMTP Virtual Server properties? is that my brain
is not functioning very well today!
Have a good weekend.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Against my very loud protest, a customer insists on deploying OWA to users
on the Internet with no security in place. They nixed a front end server,
SSL, VPN solution or an ISA server.
My question is, what port(s), other than port 80, do I need to open up on
the firewall? This is Exchange
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Aaaaggg - What ports for OWA through only 1 firewall
(no DMZ) besides 80
Without SSL, it will be just port 80. Straight into the internal network?
WOW!
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey Dubyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: 04 April
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Dubyn
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 5:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Aaaaggg - What ports for OWA through only 1 firewall (no
DMZ) besides 80
Against my very loud protest, a customer insists on deploying
Ronald -
Addusers from the resource kit will work. For more info and other ideas you
can check out this link from Andrew S. Baker's website:
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/?File=/usermgr.txt
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
I'm not sure about the x.400 spec, but if you are upgrading from 5.5 to 2000
then you are correct. Since 2000 requires Active Directory, AD follows the
standard BIND DNS naming conventions. It only allows letters, numbers or a
hyphen. An underscore is allowed in a NetBIOS naming convention, but
In a test E2KSP3 environment, I removed the M drive following the directions
in Q305145.
OWA stopped working immediately. I rebooted the server with no change, so
looked in the ISM. Turns out the properties of the Public and Exchange
default web sites are no longer valid (they used to point to
How about those Phils this year...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dillon, Jeff
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 3:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Serbian premier assassinated
Didn't anyone here take Geometry ???
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Dubyn
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 8:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E2K Clustering advice
For those that have done this, I'm looking for some advice on clustering
E2K. I have a customer with an existing Exchange 5.5 site
For those that have done this, I'm looking for some advice on clustering
E2K. I have a customer with an existing Exchange 5.5 site (1 server)
who wants to setup 1 Exchange 2K Front-End server in the DMZ and then
have a single Exchange 2K cluster on the inside.
I'm trying to talk them out of
With Exchange 2000, you can turn on Message Journaling as per:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;q261173
I create a separate account specifically for this so my mailbox doesn't
get bombarded. Not sure if this is different for SBS2000 though.
-Original Message-
Will destroy ya...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 12:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message Question
Paranoia?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
I am turfing email from
optinforyou, optindeals, opt-inemail, optinllc, and about 30 other domains
with the word opt in them.
--
be - MOS
The use of money is all the advantage there is to having money.
-- B. Franklin
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey Dubyn [mailto:[EMAIL
I have an issue with an Exchange 2000 SP3 server where an email sent from
inside the Exchange organization is not getting to some recipients in a
specific domain. I have logging turned up, and found a strange message:
550+not+local+host+recipientdomain.com,+not+a+gateway
The 550 error maps to
is not a spammer, just a cable modem provider with a
lot of potentially abusable clients. So there is a small but existing
possiblity that you are being blocked due to your address.
--
be - MOS
Yow! I just went below the poverty line!
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey Dubyn [mailto
, but the SMTP server/relay actually claims to be a different
host name, then you can get a 550 error.
-Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey Dubyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 5:42 AM
Posted To: Exchange
Conversation: Strange 550 error
Subject
and the
basic SMTP commands in RFC821 will allow you to confirm this for yourself if
you'd like.[1]
[1] Essential skills to pick up, now is as good a time as any.
On 2/12/03 7:42, Jeffrey Dubyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have an issue with an Exchange 2000 SP3 server where an email sent from
inside
] Essential skills to pick up, now is as good a time as any.
On 2/12/03 7:42, Jeffrey Dubyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have an issue with an Exchange 2000 SP3 server where an email sent from
inside the Exchange organization is not getting to some recipients in a
specific domain. I have
at a time. The best way to ts SMTP issues imo.
(I am not Chris and not speaking for him)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeffrey Dubyn
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 12:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange 550 error
Michael -
Thank you very much for the assistance today. I finally found the
problem:
I was looking in the SMTP logs in %windir%\system32\logfiles, not in
correct place of
C:\Program Files\Exchsrv\server.log directory.
Once looking in the correct log, I found the outgoing email.
This of
Hello! I am trying to track down some missing emails that were sent
but
never received. Since it is has been more than just once or twice a day
to
many different domains, I have been able to rule out user error.
Looking through the Exchange logs, trying to synch up the times the
emails were
Ken -
Here's some info I found on google for you...
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;q318650
http://www.jsifaq.com/SUBH/tip3800/rh3891.htm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January
didn't receive the message til today, so where it was hung
up before is something for them to track... Are you having problems with
delayed messages from other domains?
On 1/16/03 21:34, Jeffrey Dubyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's the headers - can anyone read what was going on between 12/6/02
Trend tech support thought it had to do with Exchange 2000 default of
Limit number of messages per connection to 20 (Default SMTP
propertiesMessages). I'm not really buying that, but after enough time
spent, I took Trend out of the loop for Outgoing mail. It's just
scanning Incoming mail and the
I just received an email from a customer saying she was worried about
emails not arriving. This was sent on 12/6 and just arrived today -
1/16.
They have an Exchange 2000 SP3 box forwarding to a Trend InterScan Virus
Wall which is using DNS to send emails. I know both boxes have the
correct
Look at the headers of the message.
On 1/16/03 6:03, Jeffrey Dubyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just received an email from a customer saying she was worried about
emails not arriving. This was sent on 12/6 and just arrived today -
1/16.
They have an Exchange 2000 SP3 box forwarding
B - I did turn up the logging on the Trend server, but am only keeping
30 days worth. JD
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of B. van
Ouwerkerk
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 8:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: (Very) Delayed
I came across this Q article:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q305145sd=tech
Which explains ...Microsoft recommends that you remove the drive M
mapping to the IFS, unless you are using the IFS for specific
reasons...
I have never seen a reason to use this feature, and
Alex -
By default, NAVCE creates a network scan of the M drive - turn this off
in the Symantec System Center Console. This scan seemingly ignores any
exclusion settings set locally on the server. Unfortunately, the only
resort I found was to restore from backup.
Jeff
-Original
Upgrading a customer to a new AD domain from NT. They presently have 1
NT domain and 2 Exchange sites. They want to start fresh as there is a
lot of crap in the old domain, so they will have the new Windows
2000/Exchange 2000 environment running concurrently with the old
NT/Exchange 5.5
Customer wants to pull some hard drives out of the Exchange server. The
Database and Log files were moved to a NAS, so they want to reuse these
drives elsewhere. Trouble is, the Exchange program files are on these
drives they want to pull. Any suggestions on how do move the Exchange
program
]] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Dubyn
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 4:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Customer wants to pull some hard drives out of the Exchange server. The
Database and Log files were moved to a NAS, so they want to reuse these
drives elsewhere. Trouble is, the Exchange program files
not flow between
Exchange servers but does to the Internet
Q265293?
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey Dubyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 8:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Having trouble getting internal email flowing between
Exchange servers when we setup
Having trouble getting internal email flowing between Exchange servers
when we setup a smart host.
Here's the scenario:
A single AD Domain spanning 2 AD Sites. In each location there is at
least
1 DC working as a GC server and an Exchange 2000 Server. Replication is
working correctly as
Dot -
Make sure you are looking at the user properties in AD Users and
Computers, not at the users profiles on an NT box. Also make sure that
the Advanced Features are selected.
If there was a permissions issue with the account you used for the
schema update, it would have barked at you and
Upgrading a single NT4 Exchange 5.5 environment to a new W2K Exchange
2000 environment using a new AD Domain (1 server does it all in both
environments) .
Users are a mix of NT4, W2K and XP Pro workstations using Outlook 2000
or Outlook XP.
Using Exmerge on 5.5 to create a .PST file for
Andrey -
This goes under the category of It's not a bug, it's a feature. This
dialogue box can be supressed with a registry hack. See Q293650 at
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;en-us;q293650
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Alexander -
You are very fortunate as Symantec does not support the Corporate
Edition scanning Exchange. They require the actual NAV for Microsoft
Exchange. As per Document ID:2000110108382448 , they suggest excluding
the specific directories.
I had an instance where a customer did a network
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-211474;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Dubyn
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 3:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Troubleshooting POP3 Access to a Front-End server in a DMZ
Having trouble getting POP3 access to work using Front-End server
Having trouble getting POP3 access to work using Front-End server in a
DMZ.
Here's the environment:
PIX firewallDMZ that houses a Front-End Exchange SP3 serverPIX
FirewallLocal LAN with Back-End Exchange SP3 server.
Originally, POP3 was setup on the Back-End server and is presently
functioning
I have a customer using X2K, who wants to keep a copy of all sent
messages from each user. Is there a way to send ALL sent messages
automatically to a central mailbox? The idea is not to use a Client
side rule so the users have no way NOT to archive the email. Thanks!
It's Friday
I called in sick
Went golfing instead
Didn't shoot well
Didn't care
Am getting drunk now
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Allhiser
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 3:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Haiku Friday
Tom -
I found this to be a great post as I'll be doing the same exact thing in
about 3 weeks for a customer! Let us know how you make out.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tom.Gray
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 12:41 PM
To:
: RE: Determining Klez.H.Worm Origin
This has been answered within the last 48 hours.
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey Dubyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 10:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Determining Klez.H.Worm Origin
On an Exchange 5.5 SP4 box
File-level virus utility on the server is a good idea, but be sure
exclude the Exchange files. Symantec has a good knowledgebase article
on it - search for 2000110108382454 on their site.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tom Meunier
On an Exchange 5.5 SP4 box, NAVMSE antivirus is catching and
quarantining about 50 Klez emails/day. There are only 10 workstations
in the environment and all of them have checked out clean with NAVCE.
NAVMSE only says origin unknown on each of the emails. Any tricks to
find where the virus is
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Dubyn
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 5:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: 'Michael A. Brown'; Stan Martin
Subject: OWA Setup on a different
We are looking to configure OWA for use with our lone Exchange 2000
server (SP2). Are there any security benefits to configuring this on a
different machine than the Exchange server? Also, do we need to have
the Enterprise Edition of Exchange 2000 and configure it as a front-end
server to do
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Dubyn
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 5:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: 'Michael A. Brown'; Stan Martin
Subject: OWA Setup on a different machine on XCH2000 SP2
We are looking to configure OWA for use with our lone Exchange 2000
server
I have a brand new installation of a Forest, with two Domain Controllers in
the same lone domain. DNS is successfully configured on one of the servers
and I'm attempting to install Exchange 2000 on the other.
Running ForestPrep, gave me this error: Either you do not have permission
to update
: ForestPrep
Wait a few minutes and then try again.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Dubyn
Sent: Wednesday, June 05
54 matches
Mail list logo
