Why do you want to delete it from there?
-Original Message-
From: Carine Lim, Sr.SystEng, SCSM/NSB [mailto:carinelim;scs.com.my]
Sent: Monday, 21 October 2002 12:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: How to delete mailbox at the mailbox resources
Dear Everyone,
I have deleted one of
Last time I did this (and it WAS a while ago) we used a utility called PILGRIM to
change Exchange server organisation names. It worked a treat for us ...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 11 October 2002 5:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
.
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sakti
Chakravarty (Senteq)
Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 6:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing
If I recall correctly, using
If I recall correctly, using the Move Mailbox utility retains SIS.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, 30 September 2002 6:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IS 70GB and growing
Hi guys.
I have an exchange 5.5 on a strong machine. The
That disk you're taking home with you provides the redundancy in your RAID5 system.
Think about what would happen if one of the remaining disks failed! And I'd like to
see you try to recover data from one disk in a RAID5 array! Clearly this backup
strategy has not been tested and all the
I quite agree, you seem to be missing the point that the backup strategy is crap, and
it's not due to hard disk transportation issues. I think you have the ammo you were
after, now use it!
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, 14 September
Back to the original question ...
The account you are using to back up Exchange mailboxes needs to have Mailbox Owner
rights to all mailboxes that you wish to back up.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, 14 September 2002 6:02 AM
To: Exchange
When a message is sent from the Internet, does it bounce back with an NDR?
That might be useful in sorting out the issue. Or does the mail just queue
up and get delivered once the original connection is restored?
Sounds to me like it might be an MX record problem ... but you could post
this
Have you set up ISA server rules for the second IP address (interface)?
-Original Message-
From: Roger Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 7 February 2002 12:38
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: A Little Exchange and ISA problem
No MX record is pointing to the
Yeah I had problems getting MimeSweeper (v4.6? it was a while back) to
install on the same box ... eventually gave up!
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 6 February 2002 13:11
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Spec for New Server
Ya
What's a superbowl?
-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 5 February 2002 15:14
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: The day after superbowl
Best of the best. Kind of like hiring an Exchange admin as opposed to just
a network admin.
Also a user can only be reading someone else's mail if they have access to.
If you check permissions on the server and the client whose mail is being
read, you can narrow down who you're looking for ...
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday,
Yes, any sort of access to a mailbox by any account other than the Primary
NT Account (as listed in the General page of the mailbox Properties) will
generate an event of Type=Success Audit, Category=Logons (in Exchange 5.5 it
is event 1016 ... don't have a 2k box handy).
You can only access the
Unless you are desperately short of disk space, don't bother - it's a
hassle! Looking at those figures, the whitespace generally is not a
significant proportion of database size, so I would not imagine you'd get a
noticable performance boost either.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt,
Yikes! Just read that you want to run eseutil /p be very careful about
doing this Look on the MS Knowledge Base or TechNet and be aware of the
dangers!
You only need to run eseutil /d to defragment ... this is relatively safe
but you require as much free space as the actual database
15% of the total store size is what had me a little worried.
Thanks,
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Sakti Chakravarty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 5:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Excessive whitespace in Priv.edb and Pub.edb...Problem
: Sakti Chakravarty [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 12:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Excessive whitespace in Priv.edb and Pub.edb...Problem?
Jim,
Do you have any reason to believe there is corruption in the store? For
example, are you seeing any
So the PFs appear in the GAL in Outlook, users send by selecting it ... do
they get a non-delivery report? Is this a single server configuration or do
you have many sites/servers?
-Original Message-
From: Walt Brannon [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 1:42 PM
Well you have some Exchange 2000 servers, so you have an Active Directory.
All Exchange servers can be found in an OU with the same name in Active
Directory. You can view this manually using MMC. If you require this
information to be retrieved programatically, check the Resource Kit (can't
Well if I were posting questions on the site I wouldn't be using my real
name either, given the NDA. I took 70-215 and also thought it was a bit
silly that I could probably get a passing score and avoid a couple of weeks
of solid study, simply by familiarising myself with the questions. Then
Hi Satoko,
Can you tell us exactly what the error is? Please give as much information
as possible, including your Exchange versions.
Sakti
-Original Message-
From: Yamazaki, Satoko [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 3:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
I bought that book too. And I didn't return it, so I must have thought it
was useful! It's been a while since I looked at it but as I recall, it
covered many things that I couldn't find in other books. I'd say it's worth
keeping it.
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris
Message-
From: Sakti Chakravarty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 12:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: changing Outlook client mail profile
Hi folks,
We are installing an Exchange 5.5 server in an organisation with one other
Exchange 5.5 server and are going
Check the FAQ or the archives! We go through this sort of thing every week
or two ... :-)
Morgan, Joshua [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ls.swynk.com on 01/09/2002
06:07:35 AM
Please respond to Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL
Hi all,
We have a Remote site and a Hub site, both of which contain 5.5 and 2000
servers in the same AD forest. There is a Directory Replication Connector
(DRC) between the 2000 bridgehead on the Remote site and the 5.5 bridgehead
in the Hub site. We are moving to a 2000 bridgehead in the Hub
(sorry for the re-send, I was unable to find my message posted on the list)
Hi all,
We have a Remote site and a Hub site, both of which contain 5.5 and 2000
servers in the same AD forest. There is a Directory Replication Connector
(DRC) between the 2000 bridgehead on the Remote site and the
With a pen or a crayon?
Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ls.swynk.com on 01/03/2002 03:52:20 PM
Please respond to Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: RE: fix monitor
I was going to tell him to draw a
into is if anyone had any pointers in their PF
Favorites pointing to that old server.
- Original Message -
From: Sakti Chakravarty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 10:57 PM
Subject: repercussions of removing first Exchange 5.5 server from mixed
No such thing in X2K. You have to do it manually from within the System
Manager.
Your logs should ideally be on a separate physical drive. Your stores
should be on a larger drive (ie: not on the C: drive because it will run out
of the 4GB pretty fast).
For a single X2K database three drives
Ooops sorry ... you want to install X5.5
yes use the optimiser after partitioning the drives and installing exchange
-Original Message-
From: Sakti Chakravarty
Sent: Thursday, 30 August 2001 10:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: A good space for the Exchange server 5.5
Hi all,
Our organisation has a single site with two Exchange 5.5 servers and one
Exchange 2000 server. We're almost at the stage when we're about to remove
our first Exchange 5.5 server from the site. We have moved all users from
this 5.5 server onto 2000.
Our Outlook 2000 clients did not
Hi all,
Some of our Outlook clients have been getting the following error message:
The custom form could not be opened. Outlook will use an Outlook form
instead.
when trying to:
- open a meeting related message
- dismiss a reminder (in which case the error message is followed by Cannot
turn
Hi Duane,
Is this happening for a particular X5.5 mailbox only?
We didn't have the exact same error, but when X2K users could not send to
X5.5 users I solve the problem by moving the 5.5 user to 2K and then back.
Not exactly sure why that helped but I guess it was something to do with the
Yes you've found the problem. We use the same set up, but try to keep our
users in the dark about the fact that they could manually edit the resource
calendar as you described. Perhaps if your users are clueier than ours, the
best solution is a little user training to advise them of best
do a search on Deleted Item Retention Time
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 16 August 2001 3:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Is their away to recover a users exchange folders after
theydeletethem?
Tried that I dont see
35 matches
Mail list logo
