Good enough. Thank you all for the answers.
Jeremy
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 8:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recover deleted items after moving between storage
groups/servers
The dumpster for a user
Exchange 2k SP3
Windows 2k SP4
I moved a user from a server that we are retiring to a new server
yesterday. Now he wants to restore deleted items from the retention
folder, but it is empty when you bring it up. The new server has the
same deleted items retention setting as the old server (30
after moving between storage groups/servers
Exchange 2k SP3
Windows 2k SP4
I moved a user from a server that we are retiring to a new server yesterday.
Now he wants to restore deleted items from the retention folder, but it is
empty when you bring it up. The new server has the same deleted items
Subject: Recover deleted items after moving between storage groups/servers
Exchange 2k SP3
Windows 2k SP4
I moved a user from a server that we are retiring to a new server yesterday.
Now he wants to restore deleted items from the retention folder, but it is
empty when you bring it up. The new
. Shannon
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 1:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Recover deleted items after moving between storage groups/servers
Exchange 2k SP3
Windows 2k SP4
I moved a user from a server that we are retiring to a new server yesterday.
Now he wants to restore deleted items from
So sad.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 5:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recover deleted items after moving between storage
groups/servers
Too bad.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeremy I.
Shannon
Posted At: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 4:40 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: Recover deleted items after moving between storage
groups/servers
Subject: Recover deleted items after moving between storage
groups/servers
We want to split our users into two groups, and two Gals. How do you
make a particular GAL the default for a group of users?
Thanks
Walt Brannon
University of New Orleans
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;182902
-Original Message-
From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 9:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Two GAL's for two groups
We want to split our users into two groups, and two Gals. How
Permissions.
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 10:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Two GAL's for two groups
We want to split our users
That would be ACLs on the GAL?
Walt
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 9:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Two GAL's for two groups
Permissions.
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging
this on every server and there all fine now,
they are all working as I want them with my chosen setup :)
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 31 May 2003 08:59
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication Across Routing Groups
Have you
Discussions
Hi, to combat a problem I have been having, I have recreated the
configuration within Exchange, and used different routing groups for
different servers to accomplish the same setup as I had previously.
However, since putting the different servers in different routing groups,
public
Hi, to combat a problem I have been having, I have recreated the
configuration within Exchange, and used different routing groups for
different servers to accomplish the same setup as I had previously.
However, since putting the different servers in different routing
groups, public folders
Hello All,
I am nearing the 16 GB limit on my first and only storage group on an Exchange 2000
server (NOT Enterprise edition). Can I simply create another storage group on the same
server and move over half my users get the space limit down from 16 GIGS? Thanks for
your help.
Timothy J.
Exchange 2000 Standard only supports one storage group. You need Enterprise
to add more.
-Original Message-
From: Hooks, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 5:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Hello All,
I am nearing the 16 GB limit on my first and only storage
Tim,
I believe the Standard version of Exchange is limited to 1 Storage group
and 1 database.
Denny
-Original Message-
From: Hooks, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 8:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Number of Storage Groups?
Hello All,
I am
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Number of Storage Groups?
Hello All,
I am nearing the 16 GB limit on my first and only storage
group on an Exchange 2000 server (NOT Enterprise edition).
Can I simply create another storage group on the same server
and move over half my users get
Edition, which will allow you to
have expanded storage capability.
-Original Message-
From: Hooks, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 8:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Number of Storage Groups?
Hello All,
I am nearing the 16 GB limit on my first
Enterprise also supports saucer separation.
This feature is definitely worth the extra expense.
(That made me laugh so hard this morning. Thanks Martin!)
-Kevin
_
List posting FAQ:
XADM: Cannot Move Servers Between Administrative Groups in Exchange 2000 Server
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=261170
Is there any tricks or workaround to move an exchange server 2000 to a
different admin group ?
By mistake our ex2k server has been installed in the wrong admin
group
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jean-Francois
Bourdeau
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 8:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Cannot Move Servers Between Administrative Groups in Exchange
2000 Server
XADM: Cannot Move Servers Between Administrative Groups in Exchange 2000
I believe you've gained additional information for the 'things not to do in
Exchange' list. Sorry. :(
On 3/3/03 22:43, Jean-Francois Bourdeau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
XADM: Cannot Move Servers Between Administrative Groups in Exchange 2000
Server
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=261170
thanks Mcgiver
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:
It is probably possible by manipulating Active Directory via ADSI
-Original Message-
From: Chris Childers [mailto:chrischilders33;hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 1:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Admin Groups
Is there anyway to script the creation of Admin
] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov
Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 12:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Admin Groups
It is probably possible by manipulating Active Directory via ADSI
-Original Message-
From: Chris Childers [mailto:chrischilders33;hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October
/wss/wss/
_esdk_samples_createstore_navigating.asp
jeff e.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net]
Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 4:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Admin Groups
I would think it's more likely you'd have to use CDOEXM. But I don't
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Admin Groups
Is there anyway to script the creation of Admin and Routing Groups.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com
: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 10:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Users and Distribution Groups in same Address List
Hello Friends;
I am having a heck of a time with the Address Lists in E2K. I have setup a few
address lists for different domains that we are hosting on our system. On one domain
, 2002 5:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: FW: Users and Distribution Groups in same Address List
I never did get a response to this and I can't find any
information on this from the archives or Microsoft how
to's... Am I to assume that it can't be done in e2k like it
could be done
Hello Friends;
I am having a heck of a time with the Address Lists in E2K. I have setup a few
address lists for different domains that we are hosting on our system. On one domain
in particular they want a distribution group setup to send to everyone in the domain.
So far so good. I setup
Hi,
I have the following scenario.
Two Exchange 5.5 Server part of the same organization but in different
sites have been in-place upgraded to Exchange 2000. Now each is in it's
own Administrative Group.
How can they be put in one and the same Admin group? In a few month these
servers have to be
You cannot move servers between administrative groups. When your
Exchange organization is in native mode, you can build a new server in a
different administrative group and move mailboxes between them.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from
I'll use the famous Ed Crowley Exchange 2000 Move Server Method ;-)
thanX
Uso
From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 8:31 PM
Subject: RE: Merging Admin Groups
You cannot move servers between administrative groups. When
SMTP domains can span multiple routing groups.. your issues sound like they
could possibly be directory related. Can users see the entire GAL? Do they
receive NDRs? What do those NDRs say? Errors in the event viewer?
-Original Message-
From: Marko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
just because you have two exchange servers in 2 seperate routing groups that should
not prevent the 2 exchange servers from seeing each other or for the MTA's on each
server to be able to recognise which server the mailboxes are on and send them to the
appropriate server.
Are your routing
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Marko
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2002 11:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SEPARATE EXCHANGE ROUTING GROUPS FOR HOSTING SAME DOMAIN ON
SEPARATE EXCHANGE
i agree that is what i planned on but just wanted to get some confirmation
on my idea..
thanks!
Bob C.
- Original Message -
From: Missy Koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 4:16 PM
Subject: Re: Storage Groups and Databases
storage groups etc.
thanks for any input..
Bob C.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
3:58 PM
Subject: Storage Groups and Databases
Hello,
once again thanks for the help on an earlier question. i have one
more
we have about 1600 users (no more than 500 concurrent) and only one server
until next year sometime. the server is a dell 6600 with dual xeon 1.6Ghz
processors and 3
How big is the database and what is its anticipated growth rate?
-Original Message-
From: Bob Chyka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 2:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Storage Groups and Databases
Hello,
once again thanks for the help
Missy said so is a perfectly valid reason to leave it
the hell alone.
-tom
-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 03:17 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Storage Groups and Databases
Subject: Re
We are running into some issues with our E2K migration plan.
We are creating an empty root NATIVE AD domain.
We are upgrading our NT4 master user domain to MIXED mode AD.
Original plan was to configure a DL connection agreement to create DLs as
universal security groups in the native AD domain
I would say do whatever works best for you. 400 groups seems like a lot, but
then again, I do not know how you do things on the inside!
-Original Message-
From: Parrnelli GS11 Ben T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 12:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
good
practical solutions for situations when the groups are as small as what
you are need ing to do.
Thanks,
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: Parrnelli GS11 Ben T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 6:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Somewhat OT - Global Groups
into that group. Like my examples,
we have some people that need access to specific folders so we have to
create groups for those users. Then there's the base-wide groups for when
we need to get info to everyone. And on and on. We have about 400 groups
total.
I'm just curious if that's how it's done
server5
Regards
Leo
Sounds like RPC connectivity problems. Time to whip out RPC Ping and get to
work.
-Original Message-
From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 4:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Need help, Exchange 2000 admin groups
direction
Russell
-Original Message-
From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 8:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Need help, Exchange 2000 admin groups
Thanks for the reply.
I will try this between all servers. As I read the technet article Q272218
I can
in Exchange 5.5 admin
(no admingroups/sites or connectors).
When we forced CA replication once the E2k admin groups started to appear
in E5.5. as sites but they vanished shortly afterwards!!???
We have increased the logging of the ADC to minimum for all types and
checked the errors we are getting
Sounds like RPC connectivity problems. Time to whip out RPC Ping and get to
work.
-Original Message-
From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 4:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Need help, Exchange 2000 admin groups
We installed the ADC
PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 12:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Universal Distribution Groups vs. Universal Security Groups
Sensitivity: Confidential
Domain that contains MSX servers and users is mixed mode. Domain with
DLs (Universal
The security Group is still used for giving permissions and access
If you don't mail enable it it will not be used for email as it will not
appear in the GAL
You only use security group for mail distribution if all the users in it
have the same access and privileges to resources
A Distribution
The security Group is still used for giving permissions and access
If you don't mail enable it it will not be used for email as it will not
appear in the GAL
You only use security group for mail distribution if all the users in it
have the same access and privileges to resources
A Distribution
The security Group is still used for giving permissions and access
If you don't mail enable it it will not be used for email as it will not
appear in the GAL
You only use security group for mail distribution if all the users in it
have the same access and privileges to resources
A Distribution
The security Group is still used for giving permissions and access
If you don't mail enable it it will not be used for email as it will not
appear in the GAL
You only use security group for mail distribution if all the users in it
have the same access and privileges to resources
A Distribution
The security Group is still used for giving permissions and access
If you don't mail enable it it will not be used for email as it will not
appear in the GAL
You only use security group for mail distribution if all the users in it
have the same access and privileges to resources
A Distribution
The security Group is still used for giving permissions and access
If you don't mail enable it it will not be used for email as it will not
appear in the GAL
You only use security group for mail distribution if all the users in it
have the same access and privileges to resources
A Distribution
The security Group is still used for giving permissions and access
If you don't mail enable it it will not be used for email as it will not
appear in the GAL
You only use security group for mail distribution if all the users in it
have the same access and privileges to resources
A Distribution
The security Group is still used for giving permissions and access
If you don't mail enable it it will not be used for email as it will not
appear in the GAL
You only use security group for mail distribution if all the users in it
have the same access and privileges to resources
A Distribution
Subject: RE: ? about the number of storage groups per server and number
of stores
The theoretical 90 was scaled back to 20 for RTM and even at 20 I have
doubts about the long term stability of a system which has all of them
mounted due to memory fragmentation issues Perhaps when 64 bit windows
I'm testing our 5.5 - 2K migration plan in a test lab, and I've run into a
stumbling block. Q295922 says that ADC migrates 5.5 DLs to AD UDGs and that
the E2K store will convert these to USGs as needed. This is not what I'm
seeing, so obviously, I'm confused...
I have two AD domains: ADSTEST
10:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Universal Distribution Groups vs. Universal Security Groups
Sensitivity: Confidential
I'm testing our 5.5 - 2K migration plan in a test lab, and I've run
into a stumbling block. Q295922 says that ADC migrates 5.5 DLs to AD
UDGs and that the E2K store
Domain that contains MSX servers and users is mixed mode. Domain with DLs
(Universal Distribution Groups) is native. See second paragraph of my
original post.
I have found one Q article since my post that indicates I need a separate
RUS in the domain that the DLs are replicated to. Unfortunately
Can Global Security Groups be mail enabled and be used as Distribution
Groups?
Should every distribution group, also be a global security group?
Ron
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Yes. But not the preferred method as it is a additional security concern.
- Original Message -
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 10:54 AM
Subject: Distribution Groups Global Security Groups
Can Global
Subject: Re: Distribution Groups Global Security Groups
Yes. But not the preferred method as it is a additional security concern.
- Original Message -
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 10:54 AM
Subject
Correct not the same name. When setting up groups/lists it would be best to
read up on exactly what fits your domain setup best.
- Original Message -
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 11:06 AM
Subject: RE
Think of security groups being a subset of
distribution groups. Every security group is also a
distribution group. Not all distribution groups are
security groups.
It probably does not make sense to use all security
groups to send mail, but that is something you can
figure out on a case
The security Group is still used for giving permissions and access
If you don't mail enable it it will not be used for email as it will not
appear in the GAL
You only use security group for mail distribution if all the users in it
have the same access and privileges to resources
A Distribution
Can someone give me an explanation as to why the dist lists in ex.5.5 became
security groups in Ex.2000?
Do they need to be security groups? They are used for email distributions
as groups...
Ron
_
List posting FAQ: http
I thought you could create 15 storage groups and 6 stores per Exchange
2000 server.
I currently have 4 storage groups and a max of five stores per storage
groups. If I try to add another store Exchange complains saying the
Storage Group already contains the maximum number of stores allowed
Hi Ron,
I'm not using Ex2k yet but from Active directory training, security groups
can be used to provide access to resources (Shares and printers etc) and
also for distribution purposes (Exchange 2k), whereas distribution groups
can only be used for distribution purposes.
Like I said haven't
, May 22, 2002 1:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ? about the number of storage groups per server and number of
stores
I thought you could create 15 storage groups and 6 stores per Exchange
2000 server.
I currently have 4 storage groups and a max of five stores per storage
groups. If I
Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 1:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ? about the number of storage groups per server and number of
stores
I thought you could create 15 storage groups and 6 stores per Exchange
2000 server
Discussions
Sent: 5/22/2002 12:20 PM
Subject: ? about the number of storage groups per server and number of
stores
I thought you could create 15 storage groups and 6 stores per Exchange
2000 server.
I currently have 4 storage groups and a max of five stores per storage
groups. If I try to add
.
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 5/22/2002 12:20 PM
Subject: ? about the number of storage groups per server and number of
stores
I thought you could create 15 storage groups and 6 stores per Exchange
2000 server.
I currently have 4 storage
, 2002 1:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ? about the number of storage groups per server and number
of stores
Thank you very much John. You are AMAZING!
--Felicity
The underlying programming was built for 15 SG and 6 MDB's per SG,
however,
practical limitations kick in with 4. All
When I moved my exchange 5.5 info to the AD my distribution lists also
become distribution groups and security groups.
Do they need to be both? Or can I remove the security group from the AD?
Ron
_
List posting FAQ: http
Paul?
-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 7:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Distribution Lists vs Security Groups
When I moved my exchange 5.5 info to the AD my distribution
lists also become
Depends on what you want to use the DLs for. They don't have to be both.
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 8:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Distribution Lists vs Security Groups
When I moved my exchange
Yes.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups?
Thx.
Havent loaded up E2K yet...I'll assume by part of the thread that E2K could
do
he says he's on 5.5, the only way to create a different store there is by
installing other servers :)
-Original Message-
From: Bryon Barkley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 10:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups
Thx.
Havent loaded up E2K yet...I'll assume by part of the thread that E2K could
do this?
thx
bill
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups?
he
Oops, didn't see that!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 6:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups?
he says he's on 5.5, the only way to create
Sorry Bill, didn't read the whole question.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 6:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups?
Thx.
Havent loaded up E2K yet
in another store.
You can have 4 storage groups, each storage group having 5 stores.
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups?
Thx.
Havent loaded up E2K yet
a1. admin.exe /i
a2. ADSI
a3. Sure, what's our budget.
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups?
OK is there a tool out there that will let me
-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups?
a1. admin.exe /i
a2. ADSI
a3. Sure, what's our budget.
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups?
Umm sorry..
a1)...she not work for me
a2) unfamiliar with this...could you give me a clue on it
a3) Ummm this sound like
Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups?
a1. Works for me given the proper header fields and a few minutes in excel.
a2.
http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/techinfo/howitworks/activedirectory
a1.) Got it
thx!
bill
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups?
a1.) Ha. admin.exe extended switchesdoc/link on these?? pls?
a2.) Thx
create different mailbox stores for each group and then set the limits per
store.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 9:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups
I have 4 routing groups. 2 are pure 5.5 servers. 1 is mixed. 1 is pure
exch2k. Should I set routing group connectors up to all groups from the
pure exch2k group?
Thanks.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource
Check your DNS server address on the new server, it should point to
W2K's DNS server.
-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 1:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: AD built-in groups on other servers
]]
Posted At: Friday, April 05, 2002 12:19 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: AD built-in groups on other servers
Subject: AD built-in groups on other servers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have setup another server and can not see the built-in
groups
/disclaimers at the bottom.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 01 April 2002 15:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E2K Migration Groups
Thank you and yes I did create a CA for the public folders
and started the replication prior
Thank you and yes I did create a CA for the public folders and started the
replication prior the installation of the first Exchange 2000 server into
the same 5.5 site.
_
List posting FAQ:
I established the Native-Mode domain to host the Universal Group and
created a CA to replicate only distribution lists to it. I also installed
the first Exchange 2000 server into the same site as the Exchange 5.5. The
information store suppose to detect what distribution list being used to
assign
Did you follow Q296051?
Tom.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 4:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E2K Migration Groups
I established the Native-Mode domain to host the Universal Group and
created a CA
PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Groups and such
How do you experienced Exchange Admins feel about nesting
groups within Exchange 5.5?
Joshua Morgan
PROFITLAB
Network Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
One is glad to be of service
--Robin Williams (Bicentennial Man
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
