You can use a tool like LDIFDE to import group memberships, or you can
script it. Neither is trivial.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Hey Jazzy, where's the Fresh Prince?
_
John Bowles
Exchange Engineer
OIG/HHS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 12:30 PM
To:
Subject: RE: Active Directory
Hey Jazzy, where's the Fresh Prince?
_
John Bowles
Exchange Engineer
OIG/HHS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday
Can you be a little more specifc? What permissions didn't carry over?
Carry over from what? Your question is very vague.
Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Tuesday,
You're moving out with your Auntie and Uncle from Bel Air.
_
John Bowles
Exchange Engineer
OIG/HHS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09,
Some permission that didn't carry over was the Doman Administrators group,
helpdesk group, and workgroup managers group.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
, 2003 12:40 PM
Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
Conversation: Active Directory
Subject: RE: Active Directory
Some permission that didn't carry over was the Doman Administrators
group, helpdesk group, and workgroup managers group.
_
List
From where?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 12:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Active Directory
Some permission that didn't carry over was the Doman Administrators
group,
helpdesk group, and workgroup
Huh?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 12:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Active Directory
When we installed Active Directory, a lot of permission didn't carry over.
Has anyone had that problem.
Thank you
-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 3:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Active Directory
Huh?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 12:30
Is your other server (the one that didn't fail) also a GC? You'll have
all sorts of problems if you don't have a live GC anywhere on your
network.
JC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Timothy
Schilbach
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 1:00
Hi There,
Thank for the reply. Yes it is, but I think I found the answer and the
solution. Its documented here:
http://www.winnetmag.com/MicrosoftExchangeOutlook/Article/ArticleID/25332/MicrosoftExchangeOutlook_25332.html
This did the trick nicely by allowing me to increase the DS auery
Microsoft actually recommends it a best practice to run Exchange 2003
forestprep/domainprep before installing the Exch2003 ADC. SO your issue is
something else. We have done this exact scenario several times in our lab.
Actually the lab is one server running VMware GSX, all 6 servers used in the
PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 May 2002 16:14
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Active Directory Connectors
You could replace the single connector with a two-way one but
I'd just have separate connection agreements for each way.
It's not the most robust (ADC) piece of software in the world
-
From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 May 2002 08:30
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Active Directory Connectors
Mark,
I've seen the above document before .. and stuck with one-way
CA's after having problems with two-way connections where
processing/updating
Exchange--AD/Windows first in the two-way CA's and then back
again (i.e. default)... ?
Regards
Mylo
-Original Message-
From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 May 2002 09:43
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Active Directory Connectors
Fair point. We initially used ldap
.
-Original Message-
From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 May 2002 09:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Active Directory Connectors
Yeah.. true.. particular if you're dealing with large numbers
of CA's. Being able to map them out to individual OU's
Just a suggestion...
Set up one way connectors .. you'll likely save yourself a bit of pain in the process.
Perform the synch out of 5.5 into AD first and once happy with the results, create
another connection agreement back into the 5.5 environment.
-Original Message-
From: Pennell,
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Active Directory Connectors
Just a suggestion...
Set up one way connectors .. you'll likely save yourself a bit of pain in
the process. Perform the synch out of 5.5 into AD first and once happy with
the results, create another connection agreement back into the 5.5
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 May 2002 17:09
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Active Directory Connectors
OK, initial one-way from exchange to AD.. Then replace with a two way
agreement. This means that
all updates to exchange accounts must be done via the ex.5.5? Correct?
Ron
-Original
16:14
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Active Directory Connectors
You could replace the single connector with a two-way one but
I'd just have separate connection agreements for each way.
It's not the most robust (ADC) piece of software in the world
and does make troubleshooting
1) You'll need ESM installed on the second DC to view the Exchange
Attributes in ADUC.
2) prior to running the upgrade, could you see the 55 server in the
configuration naming context container in AD? A config connection agreement
will need to be running for this info to replicate into AD and an
Yes, you can remove everything, and there's a KB article to tell you
how. But I don't know what the number is.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to be HP)
All your base are belong to us.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Fred W.
Macondray Jr.
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 4:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Active Directory Lost Exchange Info!
I went to remove an email
Sorry for the alarm. I rebooted my Exchange server and the menu's are
back!
What could cause such strange behavior? I was fearing the worst!
Thanks,
Fred
-Original Message-
From: Fred W. Macondray Jr.
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 3:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Active
AHa you got it
strange behavior = Micosoft software
Rgds,
-ER
-Original Message-
From: Fred W. Macondray Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 3:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Active Directory Lost Exchange Info!
Sorry for the alarm. I
!
Perhaps it was a Halloween ghost :o
Thanks
Fred
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 3:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Active Directory Lost Exchange Info!
Not enough information for me to speculate.
-Original
strange behavior = Micosoft software = Reboot usually fixes everything
-Original Message-
From: Romero, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 3:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Active Directory Lost Exchange Info!
AHa you got it
strange
28 matches
Mail list logo
