I am running Exchange 5.5 SP4. If I compose a new mail and type in a Partial
name, I can click on the "Check Name" icon and Outlook tries to resolve the
name for me. If it can't resolve it, it comes up with a list of possible
matches.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Karl Wenger [mailto:[E
I don't remember how OWA 5.5 works, but if I go into OWA 2000, and type
"Tom" in the To: field, when I hit "SEND" it will display a list of all
of the people named Tom[1] in my organization. I can then choose which
one to send it to.
Also, as Tony pointed out, messageware puts out the Plus Pack
www.messageware.com
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 4:56 PM
Subject: OWA Address book
> In trying to find a secure solution for our external users, OWA with SSL
> seems like the best answer. The
" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2002 3:18 PM
Subject: RE: OWA Directories
> Try using the complete domain name, e.g domain.com\username. That is what
> we have to do, even though we have the default domain set.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL
Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Directories
Yea I do have the default domain set up. But since you mentioned it I
tried the \ logon. That didn't work either..I think
I'm about to put my foot through this server.
_Chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Jeff
Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2002 11:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Directories
Do you have the default domain set... if not, they need to authenticate
as \...
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2002 1:09 PM
To
Do you have the default domain set... if not, they need to authenticate
as \...
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2002 1:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Directories
Ok I checked and that one is still
connect to the server with POP just fine. Any idea what's going on?
-Chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Edgington, Jeff
Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2002 3:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Directories
exchweb comes to mi
exchweb comes to mind.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, August 10, 2002 11:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA Directories
What directories in IIS does OWA rely on? I'm pretty sure the public and
the exchange folders are
Technical issues, only.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 12:20
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Issues
Are you having some issues?
-Original Message-
From: Pennell
as a file that can be opened and read.
Any ideas, do I need to reinstall OWA? It's as if my images and asp pages
are gone.
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, Augus
What does your Exchange administrator say?
> -Original Message-
> From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 11:26 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: OWA Issues
>
> Why, yes I am.
>
> -Original
Feel free to share!
-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 9:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Issues
Why, yes I am.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday
Why, yes I am.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 12:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Issues
Are you having some issues?
-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
Are you having some issues?
-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 9:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA Issues
Running OWA 2000 version, Has anyone ran into problems with Macintosh
and/or PC clients connecting to t
This works great
How to Force SSL Encryption for an OWA 2000 Client Q279681
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q279681
Jeff Beckham
-Original Message-
From: Bob Chyka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Friday, August 02, 2002 11:00 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discuss
You just need to put the entire address, https://servername/exchange.
-Original Message-
From: Bob Chyka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 12:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA 2000 IIS5 redirect question
Hello all,
i have a exchange 2000 server set up
It has never been very fast over dial-up
-Original Message-
From: Anthony L. Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 7:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA 2000 SP3 Performance
Has anyone else noticed sluggish OWA performancd owa 2000 sp3?
It seems decent
MIME - Plain text - Western European; Advanced - RTF Format=Determined by individual
user
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 9:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA creates attachments?
ESM | Global Settings
ESM | Global Settings | Internet Message Format | Default | Message Encoding
= ?
> -Original Message-
> From: David Florea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 11:29 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: OWA creates attachments?
>
> Dptt
Dpttu, E2K SP2. IE5.5SP2 for OWA. Happens to at least two different lists, both
Lyris-driven.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 7:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA creates attachments?
Exchange version and SP
Exchange version and SP?
> -Original Message-
> From: David Florea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, July 28, 2002 6:55 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: OWA creates attachments?
>
> I can't reply to most of the lists using OWA - Lyris rejects them as
> having an attachme
Are you attaching a signature?
- Original Message -
From: "David Florea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 28, 2002 6:55 PM
Subject: OWA creates attachments?
I can't reply to most of the lists using OWA - Lyris rejects them as having
a
Exchange has killfiles?
-s-
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 8:40 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: OWA 2000
>
>
> Congratulations, you've just made my kill file.
>
>
Congratulations, you've just made my kill file.
*plonk*
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 7/25/2002 6:53 AM
Subject: RE: OWA 2000
In English, please.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf O
In English, please.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tom
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 23:13
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: OWA 2000
Hello Anthony,
how do u decommit ex5.5 or still there?
Best regards,
Tom
Hello Anthony,
how do u decommit ex5.5 or still there?
Best regards,
Tommailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ÐÇÆÚËÄ, 2002Äê7ÔÂ25ÈÕ, you wrote:
ALS> Does anyone know how to change the default exchange path, on the
ALS> Exchange Virtual Server properties box.
ALS> I have migr
wait to
rollout E2k within the next month. When my Users are happy, I am happy.
Geoff.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Rotman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 11:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA for Exchange 2000 Customizations
We've con
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 11:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA for Exchange 2000 Customizations
Thanks...
Ron
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 11:10
yes it does make my 55 nicer to look at...thanks guy's
to bad there was no incentive for the plus pack for 55
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 11:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA for Exchange
Message-
> From: Chris Scharff
> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 10:14 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: OWA for Exchange 2000 Customizations
>
> http://www.messageone.com/m1owa/
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek System
http://www.messageone.com/m1owa/
> -Original Message-
> From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 10:13 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: OWA for Exchange 2000 Customizations
>
>
: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA for Exchange 2000 Customizations
My developers have done some initial work on it as part of our plan to
release an E2K version of our free custom OWA screens, but it's on hold at
the moment.
> -Original Message-
> From: Pennell, Ron
I love my custom OWA screen!! Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 8:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA for Exchange 2000 Customizations
My developers have done some initial work on it as part of our
Thanks...
Ron
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 11:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA for Exchange 2000 Customizations
My developers have done some initial work on it as part of our plan to
release an E2K
My developers have done some initial work on it as part of our plan to
release an E2K version of our free custom OWA screens, but it's on hold at
the moment.
> -Original Message-
> From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 9:34 AM
> To: Exchange
I have looked hard for this myself months ago. Nothing available like in 5.5
But with E2K SP2 allows for segmentaion of OWA use. It can be set Global or
Individual. Individual settings override Global. There are also some 3rd
party stuff at www.messageware.com and www.spellchecker.com
-Origin
You don't get any Microsoft logo pages with OWA2000. All you get is a login
box for name/password/domain.
Geoff.
-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 10:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA for Exchange 2000 C
ly 22, 2002 7:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA File Attachments
The size of the pipe has nothing to do with the available bandwidth on same.
You've demonstrated that file uploading works from the internet, so sounds
like the user was killing the process too soon based on the i
ger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, July 20, 2002 1:14 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: OWA File Attachments
>
> While I am old enough to remember 1200 baud too, this user isn't, and is
> not willing to wait that long.
>
> I conducted a test
Any chance the file itself is corrupt?
-Original Message-
From: Ellis Hillinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2002 5:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA File Attachments
Since the file is coming from a local drive, this is unlikely. In tests
in my
Ok thanks for the input
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 8:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on XCH2000 SP2
Yes, but require SSL.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on XCH2000 SP2
What would be the best way to implement OWA, for remote users in a 50
person company? The OWA service would be available to the internet. Is
my best bet, to just install OWA on the exchange server, which is how
our 5.5
1. just create a default redirect page on the root pointing to
https://yourserver/exchange
2. It is possible but the FQDN names must be identical and so must the
IP addresses.
Yours,
Julian Stone
Exchange 2000 Consultant and Webmaster
This message sent from Exchange 2000 SP3 build 6249.1
but I want one!
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 9:26 AM
Subject: RE: OWA setup problems
> E2K OWA doesn't have a logon page.
>
>
Because internally OWA is using windows authentication, and your user is
logged into the domain, hence his authentication token is being passed to
the OWA server allowing him access to his mailbox. Now if he can access
other illegally then there is a problem. But remotely from home OWA relies
on
ssage -
From: "Allan Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 8:24 PM
Subject: RE: OWA setup problems
> perhaps you are thinking of 5.5 OWA alias login page? You were still
> required t
perhaps you are thinking of 5.5 OWA alias login page? You were still
required to enter Windows Auth unless you had NO Auth Required.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 12:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: OWA setup
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 4:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on XCH2000 SP2
Au contraire. When users travel to branch offices, using OWA across the
intranet is a perfect way for
Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 6:26 PM
Subject: RE: OWA setup problems
> E2K OWA doesn't have a logon page.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jerry Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:
Did 5.5 or prior? I know I had seen it before.. So I am stuck with the
Integrated windows authentication?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/se
E2K OWA doesn't have a logon page.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jerry Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:46 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: OWA setup problems
>
> Ok, what I have now done is to just set up IIS
://www.messageware.net
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: OWA setup problems
Ok, what I have now done is to just set up IIS and exchange with defaults
and some test users with mailboxes. I
Ok, what I have now done is to just set up IIS and exchange with defaults
and some test users with mailboxes. I fought with it then got more
frustrated and walked away and came back an hour later and voila, it
works.
Now I just need to figure out how to get it to let me bring up the webpage
and ju
That is how I have them set up. Domain is for instance domain.com and the
smtp address is [EMAIL PROTECTED] That part is copasetic.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://w
On your E2K server, use Explorer to look at the M: drive [1]. The
subdirectory there reflects your default recipient policy SMTP address. To
use OWA, a user MUST have an SMTP address corresponding to this address.
For example, if your default recipient policy has an SMTP address of
@telemanager.c
Nope. This is a fresh install of server and exchange on a test network and
domain. Trying to get it to work this way before I make it happen on the
business network. That will bring out a whole new list of problems.
_
List posting FA
Discussions
Cc: 'Michael A. Brown'; Stan Martin
Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on XCH2000 SP2
Thanks to all who replied!
Bottom line is we will be using just the OWA on the lone Exchange Server
on the LAN (not in the DMZ). I'm still a little uncomfortable all
Oh... was this box upgraded from 5.5 with OWA installed by chance?
> -Original Message-
> From: Jerry Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 9:20 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: OWA setup problems
>
> Yeah, tried that varia
Sounds like a permissions issue on the IIS virtual server perhaps.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jerry Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 9:20 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: OWA setup problems
>
> Yeah, tried that varia
To: Exchange Discussions
> Cc: 'Michael A. Brown'; Stan Martin
> Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on XCH2000 SP2
>
> Thanks to all who replied!
>
> Bottom line is we will be using just the OWA on the lone Exchange Server
> on the LAN (not in the DMZ).
Yeah, tried that variation to log in domain/username and domain\username.
And the AD domain is domain.com and the addresses are [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I know that all services are running. I can browse to \\servername and get
the normal IIS webpage just cant get the \\sername\exchange. This is a
test
Jerry first is replication. Depending on the size of your network and
your patience this can be a problem.
Have you tried domain/user or domain\user or [EMAIL PROTECTED] on the
login?
One thing I was not aware of is that for a mailbox to be displayed, the
user has to have an email address corre
Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on XCH2000 SP2
Just curious - isn't the fact that OWA is being used at all mean that
the box is exposed to the Internet, even if it's NAT'ed behind a
firewall? The idea is to use this via the Internet, not an Intranet
ROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Anthony L.
Sollars
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 2:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on XCH2000 SP2
I am designing this exact system, but my plan is to use a front end
exchange server on the intranet and a back-end OWA web se
ed Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Anthony L.
Sollars
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 11:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on XCH2000 SP2
I am designing this exact system, but my plan is to use a
: Anthony L. Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 1:29 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on XCH2000 SP2
>
> I am designing this exact system, but my plan is to use a front end
> exchange
> server on the
prise edition Exch2k to have my OWA on a separate
server?
-TOny
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on XCH2000 SP2
The advantage of deploying a front-end serv
U, why yes I did. *Cowers back to this corner and reads*
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA for Exchange 2k
Funny, this is being discussed in a couple of other threads. You
Funny, this is being discussed in a couple of other threads. You didn't
post your question without reading the transactions, did you?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROT
ECTED]] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Dubyn
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 2:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on XCH2000 SP2
Just curious - isn't the fact that OWA is being used at all mean that
the box is exposed to the Internet, even if it's NAT'ed beh
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 8:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on XCH2000 SP2
The fact that OWA is being used at all does not inherently mean that a
box is exposed to the internet.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeffrey Dubyn [mailto:
The fact that OWA is being used at all does not inherently mean that a box
is exposed to the internet.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeffrey Dubyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 4:24 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a di
2 9:59 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on XCH2000 SP2
>
> Thanks!
>
> Any idea if there is a good (security?) reason to use a front-end server
> in such a small environment (1 server w/45 users)?
>
> -Original Message
EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on XCH2000 SP2
I don't think there are any security benefits unless you're going to
expose it to the Internet.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet M
onday, July 15, 2002 7:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on XCH2000 SP2
Thanks!
Any idea if there is a good (security?) reason to use a front-end server
in such a small environment (1 server w/45 users)?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROT
Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on XCH2000 SP2
That is correct. Enterprise edition for the front-end.
Exchange 2000 Front-End and Back-End Topology
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/E2KFrontBack.
asp
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
I don't think there are any security benefits unless you're going to
expose it to the Internet.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Be
That is correct. Enterprise edition for the front-end.
Exchange 2000 Front-End and Back-End Topology
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/E2KFrontBack.
asp
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Dubyn
Sen
Any errors in the event viewer?
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Condron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 11:02 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: OWA timeout
>
> Yes both servers and still the same the only piece of network eq
Yes both servers and still the same the only piece of network equipment
between the two is a hub.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 July 2002 16:12
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA timeout
And you've tried accidentally rebootin
And you've tried accidentally rebooting the OWA server?
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Condron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 9:58 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: OWA timeout
>
> All,
>
> I have NT4.0 SP5 Proxy 2.0 and OWA sp 4 on one server and
The server specified in the OWA setup was a server to provide directory
information; it didn't represent the server(s) which OWA would service.
> -Original Message-
> From: Kuske, Barry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 1:54 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject:
are lope holes that gave hacker chance to hack in.
Any suggestion?
Thanks
Rgds
Fioon
-Original Message-
From: Byron Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 5:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA and IIS Security
1. What about using the iis lockdown too
Ronni
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony McCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 2:15 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: OWA and IIS Security
>
>
>
> Thanks for the info. I'll have a go at installing OWA on the
> w
m SP4? Any
other Exchange components required?
Regards
Tony
-Original Message-
From: Smith, Ronni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 9 July 2002 8:49 a.m.
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA and IIS Security
1) I think you can't really make anything bulletproof but
1. What about using the iis lockdown tool and url scan? Check technet for
how to get this to work nicely w/ owa.
2. yeah, but you'll still need to allow an rpc/mapi session between owa and
the mailbox server(s), so you'll need to have the dmz configured for the
necessary ports. So the idea here
1) I think you can't really make anything bulletproof but Microsoft has a
security tool that sets perms for an IIS server running OWA to minimize
risk. Search for the "IIS security tool" or something like that.
2) Yes you can run OWA on a different server. I do that. I have a cheapo
ex-desktop th
Have all your mailboxes been moved to E2K? If not, just bear in mind that
E2K OWA can't access E5.5 mailboxes, whereas E5.5 OWA can read E2K
mailboxes. But there's no reason you can't have both versions of OWA
running simultaneously (on different servers, naturally).
-Original Message-
You can, but while all users will be able to use the 5.5 OWA server, only
E2K users will be able to connect to the E2K OWA server.
-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B.
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 7/2/2002 1:19 PM
Subject: OWA 2k in mixed mode with ex.5.5 owa
Getting to the poin
Upgrade to win2k.. I remember it always looking in contacts for me"??
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kevan Dickinson
Sent:
2:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: OWA Issues No Public Folders Showing up
Try this.
http://support.microsoft.com/search/preview.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q313932
- Original Message -
From: "Avi Smith-Rapaport" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions"
Try this.
http://support.microsoft.com/search/preview.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q313932
- Original Message -
From: "Avi Smith-Rapaport" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 1:54 PM
Subject: RE: OWA Iss
: khopesh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 12:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Issues No Public Folders Showing up
What happens when you try to access the public folders directly,
http://machinename/public ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
What happens when you try to access the public folders directly,
http://machinename/public ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 11:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: OWA Issues No Public
t give you errors just
hide certain items in OWA.
- Original Message -
From: "Avi Smith-Rapaport" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 12:04 PM
Subject: RE: OWA Issues No Public Folders Showing up
Just an upgrade to sp2
can't remember if public folders showed up previously though.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 10:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: OWA Issues No Public Folders Showing up
Is this
Is this a new install. Did it ever work from the outside.
- Original Message -
From: "Avi Smith-Rapaport" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 7:57 AM
Subject: RE: OWA Issues No Public Fol
Did last night, same issues this morning..
Avi
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 3:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Issues No Public Folders Showing up
Reapply SP2.
> -Original Message-
> Fro
Reapply SP2.
> -Original Message-
> From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:46 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: OWA Issues No Public Folders Showing up
>
> Running SBS2k with exchange sp2 installed on it.
> When I try and access OWA I
601 - 700 of 1307 matches
Mail list logo
