, January 06, 2004 2:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 - Active Directory
When you go native, what are you going to need 5.5 OWA for?
Besides, you can dumb down 2000 OWA to make it feel like 5.5
OWA (that's
what Netscape browsers see when they connect to 2000 OWA
Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 3:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 - Active Directory
If you mean native mode Exchange, then yes, OWA 5.5 will
break. It will
still work for user IDs that were created BEFORE you
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miller, Robert
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 8:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 - Active Directory
That is a good question We are a Law Firm and we have several attorneys
that refuse
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 11:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 - Active Directory
OWA 200x dumbs down based on the version of the browser. However, it
doesn't look
When you go native, what are you going to need 5.5 OWA for?
Besides, you can dumb down 2000 OWA to make it feel like 5.5 OWA (that's
what Netscape browsers see when they connect to 2000 OWA)
-Original Message-
From: Miller, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06,
Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 - Active Directory
When you go native, what are you going to need 5.5 OWA for?
Besides, you can dumb down 2000 OWA to make it feel like 5.5 OWA (that's
what Netscape browsers see when they connect to 2000 OWA)
-Original Message-
From: Miller, Robert [mailto
, December 16, 2003 12:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5
Very true. The problem with this usually comes because of
separate domains
with trust issues.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
Yes, I finally got a test account on an Exch 5.5 server in another site and
it work fine. Thank you all
-Message d'origine-
De : Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : 17 décembre, 2003 07:42
À : Exchange Discussions
Objet : RE: OWA 5.5
Yea - we're single domain, two sites
I have one for our two sites here - there's no additional configuration
necessary - as long as the OWA box has connectivity to all sites.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original
Of Roger Seielstad
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 5:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5
I have one for our two sites here - there's no additional configuration
necessary - as long as the OWA box has connectivity to all sites
) and
Exch servers in the organisation.
-Message d'origine-
De : Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : 16 décembre, 2003 12:34
À : Exchange Discussions
Objet : RE: OWA 5.5
Very true. The problem with this usually comes because of separate domains
with trust issues.
Ed Crowley
I've seen something similar, more related to IE6
On the machine try this...Start-Run - regsvr32 urlmon.dll
-Original Message-
From: John Strongosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 16:01
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA 5.5 and Windows XP
Hey ya all,
I personally found I had to enable the additional languages in the browser
also..
bill
-Original Message-
From: Hans-Werner Franz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 4:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA 5.5
Hi,
today I set up OWA for our Exchange 5.5
I don't see 314532 listed.
Have a look at that one.
-Original Message-
From: Lentz, Wayne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 9:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA 5.5 generates blank emails
Hello list,
I'm having a problem with OWA 5.5 displaying emails
Sorry, some things I forgot. This happens to email currently residing in
the mailbox. After opening an email in OWA and clicking reply/forward, the
text of the message body then shows just fine. You can go on and type some
stuff then send the reply. Outlook2000 works fine using the same
Message-
From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 9:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 generates blank emails
I don't see 314532 listed.
Have a look at that one.
-Original Message-
From: Lentz, Wayne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
Most welcome.
-Original Message-
From: Lentz, Wayne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 10:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 generates blank emails
Candee, many thanks to you for that link. Just needed to give the users
change rights
URLScan settings?
-Original Message-
From: Lentz, Wayne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 10:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Sorry, some things I forgot. This happens to email currently
residing in
the mailbox. After opening an email in OWA and
Browser security should be medium only, perhaps Norton sets it to high or the
equivalent?
Harriet
-Original Message-
From: Walden H. Leverich III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 January 2003 16:55
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA 5.5 and Norton Internet Security
I had a user
Have them enter their full SMTP address at the first login screen.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Bob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 11:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA 5.5 soem users unable to login
Hi
We run OWA 5.5 on a windows 2000
Have you read and researched the rest of the articles referenced in the link
below?
-Original Message-
From: Bennett, Warren Mr 5 SIG CMD
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 11:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 and change password feature
It may also be a issue that 'hta' extensions are removed from IIS (MS
essentially gave up trying to protect that extension) or the global ASA has
been altered to not allow password changes.
-Original Message-
From: Bennett, Warren Mr 5 SIG CMD
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday,
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 7:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 and change password feature
It may also be a issue that 'hta' extensions are removed from IIS (MS
essentially gave up trying to protect that extension) or the global ASA has
been altered to not allow
Correct, that virtual web is not installed by default, you must do it
manually. Which I have done.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 11:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: OWA 5.5 and change
Nate's suggestion fixed it for me,
Harriet
See if Q196160 applies to your situation.
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
-Original Message-
From: Petschow, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 December 2002 20:01
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Owa (5.5) fails to get calendar
The only
See if Q196160 applies to your situation.
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
--
From: Wood, Harriet[CCS]
Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 6, 2002 07:40
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Owa (5.5) fails to get calendar
Exchange 5.5 sp4,
Nate,
You're a star!
(Why they would have set that I can't imagine)
Thank you
H
-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 December 2002 14:09
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Owa (5.5) fails to get calendar
See if Q196160 applies to your situation
You are quite welcome.
--
From: Wood, Harriet[CCS]
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: Friday, December 6, 2002 09:18
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Owa (5.5) fails to get calendar
Nate,
You're a star!
(Why they would have set
The only way I've been able to fix this is to do what you say. Export to pst
and recreate the mailbox.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Wood, Harriet [CCS] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 7:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Owa (5.5) fails to get
Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 4:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 E2K mailboxes
To what server is OWA's directory pointing in the registry?
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:Ken.Cornetet;kimball.com
You need to point it to something that has a directory on it. In AD/E2K, the
directory is on the GC's.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:Ken.Cornetet;kimball.com]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 6:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 E2K mailboxes
A *GC*? I
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 E2K mailboxes
If you change that to a GC does it help/hurt?
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:Ken.Cornetet;kimball.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 3:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
The first MSX5.5 server in site.
-Original
AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 E2K mailboxes
A *GC*? I would have thought the next step would be to point it to an E2K
server.
I'll try it today and see if it works helps.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com]
Sent
Ah - good point. IIRC, OWA 5.5 uses MAPI.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 7:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 E2K mailboxes
Originally that's what I thought to, but I can't remember what OWA
, but I'd like to retire the 5.5 mailbox servers before then.
-Original Message-
From: Leonard Lee [mailto:llee;binaryinc.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: OWA 5.5 E2K mailboxes
Is it possible to disclose the various reasons why you need
To what server is OWA's directory pointing in the registry?
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:Ken.Cornetet;kimball.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 2:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
We are hitting a stumbling block in our plans to retire our old MSX 5.5
servers. Due
The first MSX5.5 server in site.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 4:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 E2K mailboxes
To what server is OWA's directory pointing in the registry?
-Original
[mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 4:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 E2K mailboxes
To what server is OWA's directory pointing in the registry?
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:Ken.Cornetet;kimball.com]
Sent: Friday
Is it possible to disclose the various reasons why you need OWA 5.5
instead of latest one? Money? Licensing?
Regards,
Leonard
We are hitting a stumbling block in our plans to retire our old MSX 5.5
servers. Due to various reasons, we need to use OWA 5.5 to access E2K
mailboxes for the next 6
: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 5:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: owa 5.5
Switch to Exchange 2000. OWA is much better. Yes it handles contacts.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 3:24 PM
Subject: owa 5.5
find it I'll try and look on my box (I'll have the ref
somewhere)
bill
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 4:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: owa 5.5
We use Ex5.5 SP4 / Win2k SP2 / IIS 5 for our OWA box. I
Switch to Exchange 2000. OWA is much better. Yes it handles contacts.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 3:24 PM
Subject: owa 5.5
I read that OWA does not support contacts but that I can dowload
Question 1:
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=2016source=
-Original Message-
From: paragon400 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 1:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA 5.5 SP4 errors
Hello everyone!
I have a quick question. I am constantly
Thanks Andy, but in my case I am using Basic Auth and anonymous (over
SSL). So even with anonymous enabled I still get the errors :-(.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 1:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 SP4
Jason,
Did you search the FAQ's for this? See the link at the bottom. This sounds
like a problem discussed last week. If you are getting the 404-page not
found error, I believe it's because you need to create the virtual directory
iisadmpwd and populate the directory with the proper .htr
There's probably another users that has a similar alias like greene2 or
something. Just type greene in the To: field and do Alt+K. You'll probably
be prompted with a dialog that asks you which greene you want. The only
thing you can do is to either change the alias or have the user keep using
Ahh, good catch, just as you described it. Thanks for your help
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 3:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5
There's probably another users that has a similar alias like
I like using Ctrl+K
-Original Message-
From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 4:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5
Are there any other magical keystrokes like ALT+K?
I have always been frustrated that I dont have an option
How many NT domains do you have? Here we have multiple account domains and
the OWA servers are in a resource domain. I had that problem for one of
those account domains. As it turns out, the domain controller for the
account domain was flaking out. Rebooted the DC and the problem went away.
Simplifying Authentication
After a user enters his/her name on the logon page and clicks the link, they
have to re-enter their username and enter a password in a web browser
authentication window. This can be confusing for users because in the
authentication window they need to enter both their
It's done in the IIS Admin if that helps at all... I'm not in front of a
server at the moment, so can't give you the exact steps, but I thought it
was a button on the authentication tab.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
Sounds like you need to open port 443 to allow SSL to your IIS server
hosting your OWA pages.
- Original Message -
From: Murphy, Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 3:52 PM
Subject: OWA 5.5 and SSL
I have setup a test OWA
, November 13, 2001 2:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: OWA 5.5 and SSL
Sounds like you need to open port 443 to allow SSL to your IIS server
hosting your OWA pages.
- Original Message -
From: Murphy, Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday
or import this cert...
Andrew,
MCSE (NT W2K) + CCNA
-Original Message-
From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 1:23 PM
Posted To: NewsgroupDiscussion
Conversation: OWA 5.5 and SSL
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 and SSL
Yeah. 443 is open internally
All users will have IE 5.0 or higher installed. What is a good starting
point for learning how to create the policy?
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 3:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 and SSL
You can
What's your environment? W2k? NT4? Client OS?
Andrew,
MCSE (NT W2K) + CCNA
-Original Message-
From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 1:30 PM
Posted To: NewsgroupDiscussion
Conversation: OWA 5.5 and SSL
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 and SSL
All
Client OS is Win98. Server side is W2k SP2, Exc 5.5 SP4, OWA
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 3:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 and SSL
What's your environment? W2k? NT4? Client OS?
Andrew,
MCSE (NT
Message-
From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 1:42 PM
Posted To: NewsgroupDiscussion
Conversation: OWA 5.5 and SSL
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 and SSL
Also. If you choose to install the certificate manually. Where is it
installed from? The OWA webserver
domain set.
I can place a tutorial on the root site for them to look at first.
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 3:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 and SSL
It is installed from the web server. How many users do
Sounds like a plan...
Andrew,
MCSE (NT W2K) + CCNA
-Original Message-
From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 2:15 PM
Posted To: NewsgroupDiscussion
Conversation: OWA 5.5 and SSL
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 and SSL
I think I will just create
Double check the account
- Original Message -
From: Bare, Ronald A. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 4:17 PM
Subject: OWA 5.5 Access
Can someone explain why the following happens sometimes with OWA on 5.5?
For a new
Ambiguous aliases.
-Original Message-
From: Bare, Ronald A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 3:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA 5.5 Access
Can someone explain why the following happens sometimes with
OWA on 5.5?
For a new account OWA
Compaq Computer
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 2:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 Access
Ambiguous aliases
I guess you can just specify the name of the E2K server when you're
installing OWA 5.5. The question is: why on earth do you want to do this?
S.
-Original Message-
From: George Vijay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 1:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Er...iirc, that can NOT be done.
Andrew,
MCSE (NT W2K) + CCNA
-Original Message-
From: George Vijay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, November 08, 2001 10:41 PM
Posted To: NewsgroupDiscussion
Conversation: OWA 5.5
Subject: OWA 5.5
Dear All,
I wanted to have OWA5.5
Well, I think one could... But why?
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 1:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA
~ndi
OWA 5.5 can be used for 5.5 and 2K but OWA 2K can only do 2K and not 5.5.
did that make sense...?
PBB
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 November 2001 20:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5
Well, I think one could
09, 2001 2:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5
Er...iirc, that can NOT be done.
Andrew,
MCSE (NT W2K) + CCNA
-Original Message-
From: George Vijay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, November 08, 2001 10:41 PM
Posted To: NewsgroupDiscussion
Conversation
changed.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Paul Bouzan
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 2:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5
~ndi
OWA 5.5 can be used for 5.5 and 2K but OWA 2K can only do 2K and not 5.5.
did that make sense
To: NewsgroupDiscussion
Conversation: OWA 5.5
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5
Why not? OWA 5.5 is nothing but a MAPI client. You can login to E2K
using any MAPI client. MS actually stated in various MECs that this is
possible. You can't do it the other way around, though.
S.
-Original Message-
From: Andrew
Are you sure...?
-Original Message-
From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 November 2001 20:59
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5
It makes sense, but it's totally non-intuitive.
-- Drew
Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go
Yes.
-Original Message-
From: Stephens, Tara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 8:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA 5.5 on a W2K server
Maybe I'm missing something. Can you install OWA 5.5 on a Win2K server?
Tara Stephens
Can and have.
Are you experiencing any specific issues?
William
-Original Message-
From: Stephens, Tara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 5:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA 5.5 on a W2K server
Maybe I'm missing something. Can you install OWA
]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 8:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 on a W2K server
Yes.
-Original Message-
From: Stephens, Tara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 8:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA 5.5 on a W2K server
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 on a W2K server
I'm getting a message that I don't have the required NT fixes to
install. I can't find anything in the knowledgebase about it. Any
suggestions?
Tara Stephens
Messaging Administrator
Carters
770.233.2392
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Finally found the fix. Thanks.
Tara Stephens
Messaging Administrator
Carters
770.233.2392
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Stephens, Tara
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 8:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 on a W2K server
The exact message is Setup
Care to share the fix with us ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Stephens, Tara
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 21:35
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 on a W2K server
Finally found the fix. Thanks.
Tara Stephens
Carters
770.233.2392
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 9:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 on a W2K server
Care to share the fix with us ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
78 matches
Mail list logo
