RE: Win2k backup and Exchange

Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange As long as you have 2 of the 3 following items, you're 100% fine: -intact Database volume -intact log volume -intact copy of the last full Exchange aware

RE: Win2k backup and Exchange

Q195519. Neil -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 10 January 2002 14:19 Posted To: Exchange Mailing List Conversation: Win2k backup and Exchange Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange In trying to fully understand I have a question: You said if 2

RE: Win2k backup and Exchange

Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange I wonder if a single subscriber to this list has ever had an array controller take out all the disk drives and cause significant data loss. Certainly I've never heard of such a thing. Even if it has happened, the likelihood is so exceedingly rare

RE: Win2k backup and Exchange

is here. Did you run home with your ball when the other kids noticed you had highwaters? Tom. -Original Message- From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange As much as I appreciate

RE: Win2k backup and Exchange

, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange As much as I appreciate multiple links and sarcastic comments, I do not see

RE: Win2k backup and Exchange

NTBackup and you can do whatever you want. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange You're equating dead server and completely erased drives, which is an erroneous

RE: Win2k backup and Exchange

- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michel, David Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 7:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange Just one final note on all of this. I do appreciate the honest attempts to assist me and offer opinions

RE: Win2k backup and Exchange

David, First,I would read the paper disaster recovery. Second,I would ask the question why can you not do full (normal) backups every day unless of course your data outstrips your tape size on each server. I think you are reading into differentials too deeply. Personally I would recommend

RE: Win2k backup and Exchange

Use NT backup to dump to file, then use ArgServ to dump that file to tape. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Drive thru Admin, Would you like Fries with that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Michel, David Sent: Monday, January

RE: Win2k backup and Exchange

of crash time rather than the previous night. -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange David, First,I would read the paper disaster recovery. Second,I would

RE: Win2k backup and Exchange

- From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange I have read it and I want to reiterate that I do plan on doing a nightly full backup. However, since the Exchange server has it's own tape

RE: Win2k backup and Exchange

you've not accounted for the transaction logs. full nightly backups will take care of your needs. -Original Message- From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange I have read

RE: Win2k backup and Exchange

, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Drive thru Admin, Would you like Fries with that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange You've never heard

RE: Win2k backup and Exchange

Geee That's the second time in a week we've seen these links. I wonder why that is... ;o) D -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange READ IT. Learn

RE: Win2k backup and Exchange

Because they are the Shiznit. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange Geee That's the second time in a week we've seen these links. I wonder why

RE: Win2k backup and Exchange

]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange Geee That's the second time in a week we've seen these links. I wonder why that is... ;o) D -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent

RE: Win2k backup and Exchange

Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange Could it ... Because everyone should read then don? And the fact that I have them at the top of my links to email file. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Drive thru Admin, Would you like Fries with that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

RE: Win2k backup and Exchange

I keep a copy of it printed and on top of my recovery box. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange Could it ... Because everyone should read then don

RE: Win2k backup and Exchange

To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange Could it ... Because everyone should read then don? And the fact that I have them at the top of my links to email file. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Drive thru Admin, Would you like Fries with that? -Original

RE: Win2k backup and Exchange

Reading? What's that? Documents? Where am I? :) T. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange H. What a novel concept! Actually reading documents

RE: Win2k backup and Exchange

retract all sarcasm on my part and look forward to hearing how that process would work. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange READ IT. Learn it. Love it. Tell

RE: Win2k backup and Exchange

- From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 10:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange As much as I appreciate multiple links and sarcastic comments, I do not see anywhere in the whitepaper from either 5.5 or 2000 on how you can roll

RE: Win2k backup and Exchange

You simply put your log files on a separate physical disk from the store. -Original Message- From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange As much as I appreciate multiple links

RE: Win2k backup and Exchange

the right tools in place to accomplish the task at hand. D -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange You simply put your log files on a separate physical disk from

RE: Win2k backup and Exchange

In addition a separate raid controller may be necessary if indeed the raid controller is the single point of failure. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange I