Then our work is done here.
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: mail
yup i recieved the message
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
yup must be the guy web hosting our site or a user type error.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: mail
Then our work is done here.
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard
If you are using 2 EX 5.5 servers in one site and using MTA to transfer mail
from system to system in the same site,
can you configure just one server to SEND mail outbound, reguardless of what
home server the user is using?
Or does it depend on what mail system the user is using as their SMTP
Uh... yeah. Have just one IMS. The MTA does not send out SMTP mail.
- Original Message -
From: John Q [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 3:11 PM
Subject: Re: Mail relay w/ E 5.5
If you are using 2 EX 5.5 servers in one site
PROTECTED]
|
| cc:
|
| Subject: Re: Mail relay w/ E 5.5
Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail boxes and GAL
Hiding the accounts keeps them off the GAL. That's how you do it.
You can use Restricted Address Book Views and restrict
access to the GAL if you want.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
There are seldom good technological solutions
- Millville
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 12:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail boxes and GAL
In addition hiding them from the GAL doesn't prevent anyone from sending
messages to them. It just prevents people from addressing messages to them
via the GAL
Message-
From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 7:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail boxes and GAL
Yes, but all you do is add the allowed users to the
restrictions list for that mailbox on to what Ed said to do.
Cheers
Paul
Standards
Dear Raj,
How about hiding the mailboxes, then inform the select users what
the associated SMTP Address is.
Rob Garrish
Exchange Administrator
Wawa Inc.
610-558-8371
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December
Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail boxes and GAL
Hiding the accounts keeps them off the GAL. That's how you do it.
You can use Restricted Address Book Views and restrict access to the GAL if
you want.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
There are seldom good technological solutions
Hiding the accounts keeps them off the GAL. That's how you do it.
You can use Restricted Address Book Views and restrict access to the GAL if you want.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems.
-Original
MailMarshal is also easily capable of this.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 3:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mail Gateway antivirus for serveral domains (MX)
Hi
My customer need a antivirus
Hi
I am very new to Exchange and I have a question as to the flow of mail.
Problem:
One user is not receiving his mail from our ISP
What I know:
The POP 3 Connector is receiving the mail but it is lost somewhere
between there and the user's mailbox.
What I want to understand:
The flow of the
Talk to Trend. At my last company we looked into it. You essentially put a
DNS server on the relay box and then do some other goodies. It can be done
with Trend without a lot of headache.
Webshield will do it out of the box as well.
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau
Trend Micro's InterScan Virus Wall, if you let it use DNS as opposed to
telling it which server to forward mail too. We have some like 13 different
domain names, now.
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 4:26 PM
To:
I handle a couple hundred domains with one Norton Antivirus for Gateways
box. Point your mx records to that box, tell the box where to forward
each domain to, either by specific ip address and port, or by machine
DNS name.
Jeez, I'm starting to sound like a pitchman for a product I'm stuck with
You might want to check out Trend. It has a gateway product that works
well. By not having Antivirus on your Exchange machines you will open
yourself up to people who open mail from web mail accounts. Just beware.
Mark Glaman
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau
Thanks to all for your answers
JF Bourdeau
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Glaman, Mark
Sent: 11 décembre, 2001 16:28
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Gateway antivirus for serveral domains (MX)
You might want to check out
Sounds like someone is sending you a message that your content filter is
blocking. If you look at the message in the admin mail box what does it
show?
--
Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE CKST
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL
You filter text files?
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 8:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mail Loop?
. This
just started this morning and I've already received over 600 messages.
Since I sent my first email I have received an additional 56 messages.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 9:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
Subject: RE: Mail Loop? 638 messages from Antigen (so far).
You filter text files?
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 8
: RE: Mail Loop? 638 messages from Antigen (so far).
Strange thing is that I don't appear to be getting anything to the
postmaster distribution list related to this. I am logging smtp events and
this is what shows up.
Realtime scan found virus:
Folder = ANTIGEN_SERVER\Inbox
Message
: Monday, December 10, 2001 9:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Loop? 638 messages from Antigen (so far).
I filter all files. I have to because my users rename their
*.exe files and other stuff (change the extension) to try
and bypass my firewall.
(Admin Box)
All
, December 10, 2001 9:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Loop? 638 messages from Antigen (so far).
Strange thing is that I don't appear to be getting anything
to the postmaster distribution list related to this. I am
logging smtp events and this is what shows up.
Realtime
I filter all files. I have to because my users rename their
*.exe files and other stuff (change the extension) to try
and bypass my firewall.
Now that's just silly.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
Yeah.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 9:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Loop? 638 messages from Antigen (so far).
Did you stop and start the IMS?
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
I'm logging full on SMTP interface events.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 9:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Loop? 638 messages from Antigen (so far).
Turn up logging on your IMS? Can you disable
of
loop in antigen or a loop at their end.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 9:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Loop? 638 messages from Antigen (so far).
I'm logging full on SMTP interface events
:
|
| Subject: RE: Mail Loop? 638 messages from Antigen (so far).
|
---|
It's almost the equivalent
PROTECTED]
Dal-Tile International
7834 C F Hawn Freeway
Dallas, TX 75217
US
214.309.4829 214.309.4361
HTH,
Guy
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 11:04 AM
Subject: RE: Mail Loop
I'd check out the GC that it's using. It may be worth running dsadiag to
force the re-discovery of a GC/DC.
Mark H
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 November 2001 14:37
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mail Flow within same Storage Group
.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 11:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail not flowing in mixed site
Oops.. Missed it was single site. My mistake.
Is the SRS service running
-IS; (recipient number 3), and was to be
redirected to . [MTA DISP:RESULT 22 136] (12)
Kevin Fletcher
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 1:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail not flowing in mixed site
What events
Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 1:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail not flowing in mixed site
Sounds like there is a configuration error at one end of that x.400
connector.
My guess is that either the X.400 standards settings (version/year, two
Forum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 11:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail not flowing in mixed site
Roger,
Sorry if this seems like a stupid question...
When you have a mixed site (basically two servers within the
same site - 5.5
2000
What events are you seeing in the Ap log on both servers?
-Original Message-
From: MS Exchange Forum
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 11/12/01 12:20 PM
Subject: RE: Mail not flowing in mixed site
Chris,
No... It just sits in the x.400 queue when I try to send a message from
Exchange
Exchange Forum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 1:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail not flowing in mixed site
Chris,
No... It just sits in the x.400 queue when I try to send a
message from
Exchange 2000 to a mailbox on the 5.5 server.
Kevin
Does mail flow the other way?
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: MS Exchange Forum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 10:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mail
What do you have DNS pointing to? The Exchange server has to be
able to resolve outbound domains
Frank Buechler
Network Systems Administrator
Manning Napier Advisors, Inc.
716.325.6880 X7857
rm -rf /bin/Laden
-
From: Frank Buechler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 5:04 PM
Subject: RE: Mail sitting in queue
What do you have DNS pointing to? The Exchange server has to be
able to resolve outbound domains
Frank Buechler
Network
mailbox full? disabled?
-Original Message-
From: Saul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 26 October 2001 9:21 a.m.
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mail Enabled Public Folder
I have a Mail Enabled Public folder that was working until recently. I am
now receiving the following
We found the problem. Because we have people on two different segments we
have two NIC cards in the server. (Multi-Homing) What was happening was
the mail was connecting to the exchange server on one and trying to send
the message on the other. That doesn't work. When we shut down the second
NIC
How much detail do you need? Performance Monitor provides some basic
numbers otherwise the FAQ has a list of 3rd party vendors.
John
-Original Message-
From: sai rajesh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 1:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: mail count for
mail reporting utility. promodag have a good one.
mail filtering utility of which there are plenty around
-Original Message-
From: sai rajesh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 4 October 2001 8:21 a.m.
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: mail count for a domain in exchg 5.5
hi
It could be done with a protocol event sink I believe.
-Original Message-
From: SHAW,Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MAIL FROM RCPT TO Info
G'day,
Does anyone know if it's possible to have the IMC
And he will always have fish tacos!
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 2:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail list Archives??
Teach a man to fish and all that...
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq
Assuming a lot of facts not in evidence.. Option 2.
-Original Message-
From: Walbert, Bryan (Bryan) ** CTR ** [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 8:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mail Flow Configuration Question
We have an Exchange enterprise
Install an Internet mail connector in the local site and set it to inbound
only.
On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Walbert, Bryan (Bryan) ** CTR ** wrote:
We have an Exchange enterprise of about 10 000 mailboxes. We have a mixture
of clients ranging from Exchange clients to Outlook 2000 to Netscape IMAP
Sorry, the Seattle rain is getting to me. Meant to say set it to outbound.
Forward all of the messages from that remote IMS to your local bridgehead or whatever
mail router you have
set up for internal external routing.
On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Jennifer Baker wrote:
Install an Internet mail
-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 4:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Mail Flow Configuration Question
Install an Internet mail connector in the local site and set it to
inbound only.
On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Walbert, Bryan (Bryan
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail list Archives??
What? No Pocket Fisherman??
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 9:22
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail list Archives??
And a free set of knives
; it has a light side a dark side, and it holds
the universe together. -Carl Zwanzig
-
-Original Message-
From: Scharff, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 10:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 4:52 PM
Subject: RE: Mail list Archives??
A copy of the the archives through the most recent quarter can be optained
for a nominal fee as detailed in the FAQ. It's handy, and it's dandy
.
-
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 12:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail list Archives??
What? No Pocket Fisherman??
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Martin
201 - 255 of 255 matches
Mail list logo
