I'm running Exchange 5.5/4 with ScanMail 3.52. Is there a way to stop
e-mails from reaching a mailbox if they have been stripped because a virus
was detected or an attachment was blocked because of a rule? Thanks,
Scott.
_
List
Its on the trend site
http://www.trendmicro.com/download/product.asp?productid=8
http://www.trendmicro.com/download/product.asp?productid=8
From the Readme:
Trend Micro ScanMail(TM) 6.2 for Microsoft(TM) Exchange 2000 and 2003
Martin Blackstone
Director, Information Technologies
This is a little off topic. Running Scanmail 3.80 engine 6.510 pattern 587.
When a external user sends an infected message to lets say 30 users and only
one is on our Exchange, scanmail cleans that message but sends a
notification message back to all 30 users stating it cleaned it?
Man
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Off topic ScanMail Notifications to Sender.
This is a little off topic. Running Scanmail 3.80 engine 6.510 pattern 587.
When a external user sends an infected message to lets say 30 users and only
one is on our Exchange, scanmail cleans that message but sends
Yeah, but I am running in AVAPI mode and the scan engine and pattern file
are current. It's getting some Bugbears but not others.
Tim
Subject: Re: ScanMail missing tricks?
From: Ray Beckwith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 09:13:31 -0700
X-Message-Number: 17
We had
Definitely need to be zipped up. Especially since all scanmail versions
since 3.7 scan the headers of files so you can't even rename a file's
extension anymore. Also the AVAPI mode was known to miss files (not sure if
this was ever fixed since trend did switch the way they scan in 5.5
A user got an infected attachment right to her Inbox, which doesn't ever
happen here since we started using ScanMail. I have ScanMail 3.52 (Exch 5.5
SP4) blocking all the attachments on the List of Danger, and yet this
BUGBEAR.B file - QABACKUP.EXE.SCR - got through to the Inbox. A Manual scan
: ScanMail missing tricks?
A user got an infected attachment right to her Inbox, which doesn't ever
happen here since we started using ScanMail. I have ScanMail 3.52 (Exch 5.5
SP4) blocking all the attachments on the List of Danger, and yet this
BUGBEAR.B file - QABACKUP.EXE.SCR - got through
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Friday, June 06, 2003 7:25 AM
Posted To: Exchange
Conversation: ScanMail missing tricks?
Subject: ScanMail missing tricks?
A user got an infected attachment right to her Inbox, which
doesn't ever
happen here since we started using ScanMail. I have ScanMail
You might want to consider upgrading to Scanmail 3.81. I believe it
functions a LOT better.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Gowen [mailto:[EMAIL
7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 June 2003 15:46
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ScanMail missing tricks?
You might want to consider upgrading to Scanmail 3.81. I believe
Why would it need to?
-Original Message-
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 11:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ScanMail missing tricks?
No problems here with 3.81 - one thing I wish it did do was to scan
attachments blocked
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ScanMail missing tricks?
I don't know what the deal is with this latest version of BugBear, but
it's really a problem.
I started having issues with it on the 4th.
The remote access and key logger are the scary parts of this worm.
I have had it get past two A/V
We had this issue a while back when we first started using ScanMail. We
found out from Trend that when ScanMail runs in MAPI mode, it doesn't scan
the attachments until AFTER the message is in the inbox; which leaves the
possibility if the server is extremely busy scanning, the user could see
Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 5:06 PM
Subject: RE: ScanMail missing tricks?
Why would it need to?
-Original Message-
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 11:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ScanMail missing
06, 2003 11:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ScanMail missing tricks?
No problems here with 3.81 - one thing I wish it did do was
to scan attachments blocked by extention blocking - we've had
loads of bugbears quarantined for being .exe's , but it
doesn't seem to actually scan
, 2003 12:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: ScanMail missing tricks?
Sometimes users get sent legitimate executables, they get
blocked because of the extention, so I have to copy it to a
share for them to retrieve it - I'm then reliant on the AV on
my desktop, what I'd prefer
Have them 'zipped' up...
-Original Message-
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 12:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: ScanMail missing tricks?
Sometimes users get sent legitimate executables, they get blocked because of
the extention, so I
of the worst mistakes that can be made in his
subject, and how to avoid them.
--Werner Karl Heisenberg
-Original Message-
From: System Attendant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 11:55 AM
To: Ray Beckwith
Subject: ScanMail Message: To Sender
Scanmail 3.8 on Exchange 5.5SP4.
The Trend KB article 9030 deals with updating Scanmail when you change the
service account password, it talks of updating the password on the service,
then running a couple of Trend utils and entering the new password...
It's probably paranoia on my part
I am currently in the process of evaluating Trend ScanMail v6 for Exchange
2000 and have hit an interesting problem. Basically I am not receiving
any notification messages when I send a test virus. The email just sits
in the users outbox and the virus is stripped and replaced with a text
file
Haven't seen that behaviour before. The functionality definitely works
as we use it (mail to admin, sender and receiver). Maybe try
re-installing Scanmail. Your service packs up-to-date? No other problems
with mail going out, ie also getting stuck in the outbox?
Sander
-Original Message
Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 5:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Odd ScanMail behaviour
Haven't seen that behaviour before. The functionality definitely works
as we use it (mail to admin, sender and receiver). Maybe
:19 AM
To: 'Great Cthulhu Jones'
Subject: ScanMail Message: To Sender, sensitive content found and action
taken.
Trend SMEX Content Filter has detected sensitive content.
Place = Exchange Discussions; ; ; Exchange Discussions
Sender = Great Cthulhu Jones
Subject = RE: automated replies
Delivery
That's a lot of strikeouts.
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 12:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Scanmail price increase
They could charge 50K, I still
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Scanmail price increase
That's a lot of strikeouts.
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 12:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
Discussions
Subject: RE: Scanmail price increase
Trend (using all their products) has never struck out for me. That's why I
think it is so valuable.
An antivirus system that only works 99% of the time isn't good enough.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2002 8:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Scanmail price increase
Of course, some would argue that the best defense is deploying multiple
AV engines across the enterprise since each product has strengths
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2002 11:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Scanmail price increase
I would argue that the best defense would be disconnecting from the
Internet and searching and destroying all floppies
Of Great Cthulhu
Jones
Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2002 10:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Scanmail price increase
No. Best defense is to remove all mice, keyboards, monitors, and floppy
disk drives. Only allow CD-ROMS and set them to autoplay, so everyone
can listen to music CDs
I prefer they not erase, but retype the document entirely.
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2002 12:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Scanmail price increase
Also, move the platen
Don't block .zip, make them zip their .exe.
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 3:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Trend Scanmail Q: filt EXE but make exceptions
Can anyone using the Trend Scanmail product
For what it's worth you can do this in Antigen.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 13:09
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Trend Scanmail Q: filt EXE but make exceptions
Can anyone using the Trend Scanmail
Anyone else getting notified of a huge increase in maintanence cost for
Trend's Scanmail? Our cost is going from $4,000 to more than $7,000. If
anyone is looking to buy new licenses you better do it before Oct. 1 when
the new pricing goes into effect. Looks like it's time to start looking
I switched to Antigen after 3 years with ScanMail. Antigen is great and
they will even talk to you on the phone, weird! I have been using it for
4-5 months and we like it very much and the price was a lot lower.
-Original Message-
From: Petschow, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
They could charge 50K, I still wouldn't change.
-Original Message-
From: Petschow, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 11:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Scanmail price increase
Anyone else getting notified of a huge increase in maintanence cost
Services, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.summit-technical.com
Phone: 401-736-8323 x11
Fax: 401-738-9813
-Original Message-
From: Petschow, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 2:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Scanmail price increase
Anyone
Yep, almost 60% on some productsjohn
-Original Message-
From: Petschow, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 11:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Scanmail price increase
Anyone else getting notified of a huge increase in maintanence cost
: Thursday, September 26, 2002 2:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Scanmail price increase
Anyone else getting notified of a huge increase in maintanence cost for
Trend's Scanmail? Our cost is going from $4,000 to more than $7,000. If
anyone is looking to buy new licenses you better do it before
Just out of curiosity, how many users and years is that for?
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Petschow, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 11:57
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Scanmail price increase
Anyone else getting notified of a huge increase
Can anyone using the Trend Scanmail product on Exchange(55) answer the
following:
Q: Is it possible to set the scanmail to filter EXE attachments, and/but
Make exceptions for centain EXE's?
Here is the deal:
Ive got Exch55sp4 NT4sp6a...
Running GRPSHL 4.5sp1(stop laughing it works now
Discussions
Subject: Trend Scanmail Q: filt EXE but make exceptions
Can anyone using the Trend Scanmail product on Exchange(55) answer the
following:
Q: Is it possible to set the scanmail to filter EXE attachments, and/but
Make exceptions for centain EXE's?
Here is the deal:
Ive got Exch55sp4 NT4sp6a
Yea for the stockholder!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Strongosky
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 12:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Scanmail price increase
Yep, almost 60% on some productsjohn
2:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Scanmail price increase
Yep, almost 60% on some productsjohn
-Original Message-
From: Petschow, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 11:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Scanmail price
26, 2002 3:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Scanmail price increase
Just out of curiosity, how many users and years is that for?
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Petschow, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 11:57
To: Exchange
Senior Network Administrator
Raypak, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone - 805-278-5363
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 7:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using
Hello all,
Is anyone using Trend's eManager for Scanmail to stop/block SPAM?
If you are, thoughts - positive/negative?
Thanks - Brian
Brian Dugas
MIS Director
Summit Technical Services, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.summit-technical.com
Phone
Subject: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this
Hello all,
Is anyone using Trend's eManager for Scanmail to stop/block SPAM? If you
are, thoughts - positive/negative?
Thanks - Brian
Brian Dugas
MIS Director
Summit Technical Services, Inc
: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this
Hello all,
Is anyone using Trend's eManager for Scanmail to stop/block
SPAM? If you are, thoughts - positive/negative
: 401-736-8323 x11
Fax: 401-738-9813
-Original Message-
From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this
I'm using it at two clients sites. I think
What would you recommend?
I am using Trend Scanmail for AV protection on the server and it works
great.
Brian Dugas
MIS Director
Summit Technical Services, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.summit-technical.com
Phone: 401-736-8323 x11
Fax: 401
Antigen v6.5 by Sybari. Gold package coming out soon, which will have
additional features.
Geoff...
-Original Message-
From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail
: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this
What would you recommend?
I am using Trend Scanmail for AV protection on the server and
it works great.
Brian Dugas
Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this
What version are you using? ESE/API or MAPI/AVAPI?.
I am demoing the ESE/API version and the SPAM that is blocked actually
appears in the users mailboxes in preview mode and then when you click to
open the message, you see
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this
There's no access to the default rules, which can be a PITA. There's also no
complex lexical analysis. Depends entirely on what you're looking for... If
you want the basics, it's just fine. I'd hesitate to call
it 8 out of 10 against similar programs under $2000.
-Original Message-
From: Lynne July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this
I ran into that same problem - kind
your own).
-Original Message-
From: Lynne July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this
Oh, I forgot about that - you're talking about the anti-spam
rules which
for Scanmail - anyone using this
eManager on a gateway server is definitely the way to go, it would only cost
you a 2000 server license and an acceptable PC (processor memory etc). I
have mine running on a dual Pentium 200 with 512MB, leftover server.
The product works well and is relatively
Not the emanager component
-Original Message-
From: Trent Hancock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 7:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this
Is this included in their Neatsuite ? Similar to the gateway
yes
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 5:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Scanmail
Hi,
does scanmail works on SBS?
I believe SBS is built on NT4.0 and Exch5.5?
Kim
Can you configure Trendmicro Scanmail as a cluster application resource?
Thanks,
Eric Sabo
NT Administrator
Computing Services Center
California University of Pennsylvania
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource
Yes, just install it on the shared drive.
-Original Message-
From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 7:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Configuration of Trendmicro Scanmail as a cluster application
resource
Can you configure Trendmicro Scanmail
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 9:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Configuration of Trendmicro Scanmail as a cluster
application resource
Yes, just install it on the shared drive.
-Original Message-
From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 8:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Configuration of Trendmicro Scanmail as a
cluster application resource
Lori,
Are you saying this is an cluster aware application? I
am having some many problems with this on my
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 10:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Configuration of Trendmicro Scanmail as a cluster
application resource
You already have issues open with your hardware vendor and the software
vendor
]] On Behalf Of Sabo, Eric
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 7:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Configuration of Trendmicro Scanmail as a cluster
application resource
Chris,
The reason I am asking is trendmicro has been no help so far
with my issue. They cannot even read my cluster logs
Well, given the very limited information you posted (and you do know better
by now Eric!) I answered your question. Cluster aware? What does that
really mean?
I have a 5.5 sp4 active/passive cluster that I despise. Trend Scanmail is
installed on the hard drive partition that is shared
to another server
Eric Sabo
NT Administrator
Computing Services Center
California University of Pennsylvania
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 12:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Configuration of Trendmicro Scanmail
Services Center
California University of Pennsylvania
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 9:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trendmicro Scanmail in an active/active cluster
did u call trend they have good support and its
What version of Exchange, OS and ScanMail?
-Original Message-
From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Friday, May 17, 2002 10:01 AM
Posted To: MS Exchange Discussions
Conversation: Anyone using TrendMicro Scanmail in a cluster environment?
Subject: Anyone using TrendMicro
Exchange 2000 SP2 a 2 node active/active cluster. Scanmail version is 6.0
This product is causing the cluster not to failover.
What environment do you have?
Eric Sabo
NT Administrator
Computing Services Center
California University of Pennsylvania
-Original Message-
From: MS
PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 9:09 AM
Posted To: MS Exchange Discussions
Conversation: Anyone using TrendMicro Scanmail in a cluster environment?
Subject: RE: Anyone using TrendMicro Scanmail in a cluster environment?
Exchange 2000 SP2 a 2 node active/active cluster. Scanmail version
: 10061.
Eric Sabo
NT Administrator
Computing Services Center
California University of Pennsylvania
-Original Message-
From: MS Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 1:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Anyone using TrendMicro Scanmail
If so, are you experiencing any problems with this software not allowing the cluster
to failover.
Eric Sabo
NT Administrator
Computing Services Center
California University of Pennsylvania
_
List posting FAQ:
for it to function.
[1] blatantly stolen from kim :)
-Original Message-
From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 12:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Anyone using TrendMicro Scanmail in a cluster environment?
If so, are you experiencing any problems
say turn it off.
I guess this is what is happening to my cluster during a failover.
IS and SMTP resources fail an isalive check - from an unknown source [EXRESOCK], at
this point we are assuming that Trendmicro Scanmail will not let the resources go.
TrendMicro couldn't confirm how many clients
Hi,
does scanmail works on SBS?
I believe SBS is built on NT4.0 and Exch5.5?
Kim
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
What does www.trendmicro.com say?
- Original Message -
From: Kim Schotanus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 6:01 AM
Subject: Scanmail
Hi,
does scanmail works on SBS?
I believe SBS is built on NT4.0 and Exch5.5?
Kim
not much
-Original Message-
From: Matt Monteleone-Haught [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 April, 2002 12:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Scanmail
What does www.trendmicro.com say?
- Original Message -
From: Kim Schotanus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange
: Matt Monteleone-Haught [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 6:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Scanmail
That's odd when I go to Trend's site I can find the answer.
- Original Message -
From: Kim Schotanus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL
OfficeScan-SBS version 4.5 protects SBS 4.5 networks -- that's what I have here (it
includes ScanMail for MSX 5.5 server + OfficeScan for server/clients)
OfficeScan-SBS version 5 is for SBS-2000
You can find info on Trend Micro's site: http://www.antivirus.com/products/ossbs/
You should also
We suddenly have a problem where people running any Outlook version less
than 2002 CANNOT do the following:
- Hit Print Screen Key.
- E-mail it to yourself in an HTML format Outlook e-mail. (uses OLE)
Users are getting the following notice back: (without attachment)
Trend ScanMail has found
-Original Message-
From: Arnold, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 April 2002 16:50
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Trend Micro ScanMail for Exch 2000
Hello all,
We are considering ScanMail for spam management.
We currently own GroupShield for AV and attachment
Hello all,
We are considering ScanMail for spam management.
We currently own GroupShield for AV and attachment filtering.
My question is: do we need the entire ScanMail package? or just the eManager
plug-in? or is there a dependency there?
Getting rid of GroupShield is an option, but I don't
The eManager plug-in, plugs in to ScanMail... Unless you're using InterScan
VirusWall and then the InterScan eManager plugs into that.
-Original Message-
From: Arnold, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Trend
Discussions
Subject: OT: Trend Micro ScanMail for Exch 2000
Hello all,
We are considering ScanMail for spam management.
We currently own GroupShield for AV and attachment filtering.
My question is: do we need the entire ScanMail package? or just the eManager
plug-in? or is there a dependency
-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 11:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend Micro ScanMail for Exch 2000
If all you need is a content filtering package, then you may want to review
products designed specifically for that purpose instead
evening
good luck
bill
-Original Message-
From: Arnold, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 11:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend Micro ScanMail for Exch 2000
We block all outgoing traffic (POP3, SMTP, etc) except for a dozen known
ports and filter
.. extension blocking . message size 2mb . :=)
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 10:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend Micro ScanMail for Exch 2000
Amen...Yes I too am hated.
URL blocking
, April 02, 2002 8:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:OT: Trend Micro ScanMail for Exch 2000
Hello all,
We are considering ScanMail for spam management.
We currently own GroupShield for AV and attachment filtering.
My question is: do we need the entire ScanMail package? or just
If there is anyone out there running Scanmail for Exchange 2000 and knows
how to NOT send a notification to the end user that Scanmail deleted or
quarantined an email, please reply and let me know.
I have looked through all of the options, but are looking for a way to do
this. No matter if I set
Well Tener? What was the result?
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Exchange Administrator
Network Support
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Joyce, Louis
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 2:15 PM
To: 'Exchange Discussions'
Subject: RE: Scanmail for exchange 3.1
Service account
Does anyone know what user I give to Scanmail for exchange permissions so I
can block out viruses in public folders
Rich
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http
What?
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 6:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Scanmail for exchange 3.1
Does anyone know what user I give to Scanmail for exchange permissions so I
can block out viruses in public
Service account?
Regards
Louis Joyce
Exchange Admin
Network Support
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 March 2002 14:16
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Scanmail for exchange 3.1
Does anyone know what user I give to Scanmail for exchange
Did you actually understand what he just said?
-Original Message-
From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 6:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Scanmail for exchange 3.1
Service account?
Regards
Louis Joyce
Exchange Admin
Network Support
More of a stab in the dark.
Actually, sometimes i wish i could do just that.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 March 2002 14:19
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Scanmail for exchange 3.1
Did you actually understand what he just said
To scan the public folders, I had to grant the system attendant Editor
permissions. Maybe that's what he's talking about??
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 7:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Scanmail
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 9:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Scanmail for exchange 3.1
Does anyone know what user I give to Scanmail for exchange permissions so I
can block out viruses in public folders
Rich
Which is the best antivirus, content scanning disclaimer package ?
TIA
Paul
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:
1 - 100 of 227 matches
Mail list logo
