Hi
Many thanks for that.
Did all those steps on a test environment, apart from steps #19 and #20,
instead of which powered off the old server.
The clients are unable to connect to their mailboxes using Outlook 2000.
Any help.??
-
Raji
Hi
At what time the OnSave or OnSyncSave event will trigger.
When we delete an intem in folder the Ondelete event is triggering.
I want to know when the OnSave or OnSyncSave event will trigger.
What operation we have to perform in the item for triggering the above
event.
If any one knows about
I believe you need to leave the old server up in order for the clients to be
redirected to the new server.
cheers
Rachel
--
From: Raji Arulambalam[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 11 April 2002 07:29
To: Exchange Discussions
There's a Technet article specifically on this which relates to removing
certain attributes from the 55 objects - adc-global-names amongst a couple
of others to allow them to re-replicate. I'd search on that text string.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B.
I got this result on brain.net.pk. Relaying denied. IP name lookup failed.
For softhome my IP is in RSS list. I have requested them to remove my IP from that
list.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 4:09 PM
If we have two domains and two exchange orgs
NT4 domain with Exchange 5.5 Sp3
Win2k Domain with Exchange 2000 Sp2
we connect connect them via the ADC the Interorg tool so they are
effectively part of the same organisation, what would be the best tool
to migrate users mailbox data?
? The answer is in the text of step #20. the alternative is to go round
everyone's profile and update it manually (or via a login
script/modify-profile type utility)
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Raji Arulambalam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 April 2002 07:30
To: Exchange
Use the Migration Wizard provided with SP2 to move mailboxes between a 5.5
organization and Ex2K. I'd use that to create the user accounts in the Win2K
environment as well, rather than using the ADC.
Regards
Mylo
-Original Message-
From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 April
Is it acceptable to put Exchange 2000 information stores on a set of
mirrored 72 GB drives?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To
Yes you can place exchange databases on a separate set of drives.
Regards.
Irfan Malik
-Original Message-
From: wade robinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:Database and Drives size
Is it acceptable
Here is the scenario. I connect to my mailbox(on the e2k server)using
webmail. It comes up fine, I can see all my folders and such, but then it
asks for my username and password to the 5.5 OWA? I can't seem to find what
the root of my troubles are? Any idea?
-Original Message-
From: Volkan Günaydin (ATM/Network Grp. Bsk. Sistem
Mühendisi) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 April 2002 05:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How can I disable BCC feature on exchange server
This is the most powerful solution :-)
THANKS
No problem. Just mark it as Private . :0
Original message
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 13:45:13 +0100
From: Robert Moir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: How can I disable BCC feature on exchange
server
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Volkan
Hi there,
problem with IE in 5.5 as well as 6, when I click on a link and it has
to open in a new window, it doesn't react in that window...
any ideas?
Kim
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Im looking for a dependable car. Any thoughts?
Original message
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 15:19:10 +0200
From: Kim Schotanus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: IE5.5 SP2 / IE 6
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi there,
problem with IE in 5.5 as well as 6, when I click on a link
toyota?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 April, 2002 3:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IE5.5 SP2 / IE 6
Im looking for a dependable car. Any thoughts?
Original message
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 15:19:10 +0200
From: Kim
Volkswagen.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Analyst
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 April 2002 14:28
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IE5.5 SP2 / IE 6
toyota?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David
Try posting here: news://netscape.public.general
- Original Message -
From: Kim Schotanus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 8:19
Subject: IE5.5 SP2 / IE 6
Hi there,
problem with IE in 5.5 as well as 6, when I click on a link
Another Olds?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IE5.5 SP2 / IE 6
Im looking for a dependable car. Any thoughts?
Original message
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 15:19:10 +0200
Batmobile from the old TV show. Only car for you.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 April 2002 14:17
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IE5.5 SP2 / IE 6
Im looking for a dependable car. Any thoughts?
Original message
in IE 5.5, Tools menu select Internet Options..
go to the Advanced Tab
in the list you will see Reuse windows for launching shortcuts check that
box.
it will be the closest you can get to using one IE window.
Thanks,
Toby
If it's easy, it's probably wrong.
-Original Message-
Gasp!!
-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 11:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Prevent the forwarding of an email message.
Doesn't seem to be true.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
LOL.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steven A.
Christensen
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 8:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IE5.5 SP2 / IE 6
Try posting here: news://netscape.public.general
- Original Message -
in a thong.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 8:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IE5.5 SP2 / IE 6
I do like the idea of sliding down a pole.
Original message
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 14:31:36 +0100
From:
Hmmm, down a pole...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 8:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IE5.5 SP2 / IE 6
I do like the idea of sliding down a pole.
Original message
Date:
Will depend on your local environment. Possible - yes. Acceptable -
depends. I prefer a Raid set up, but again for 5 users IDE will do etc
etc.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: wade robinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 April 2002 01:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
There are many products and services out there called WebMail. Is this
the one you mean?
http://jwebmail.sourceforge.net/
It shouldn't be asking for an OWA password, as it seems to be merely a
pop3/imap4 client.
If by webmail you mean OWA, which is certainly NOT the same thing, I'd
guess you
Do you have local admin rights?
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Trecker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 5:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: IISADMIN on Windows 2000 Pro
I cannot get IISADMIN to work on 2000 professional.
Is there a
Hey, if the sender marked it as private, then the recipient should respect
that, right? After all, Outlook uses the HSSM (Honor System Security
Model).
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 11:55 PM
To:
You make sure that you have a reverse lookup zone with a PTR record for your
Exchange server.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
-Original Message-
From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 11:44 PM
To: Exchange
I don't know about dependable, but in this one - you wouldn't care :=)
http://autos.yahoo.com/newcars/details/lamborghini02murcielago/62/photo.html
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 8:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
I do like the idea of sliding down a pole.
Original message
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 14:31:36 +0100
From: Robert Moir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: IE5.5 SP2 / IE 6
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Batmobile from the old TV show. Only car for you.
-Original
And that you're authoritative for the entire reverse zone. If you have a
portion of a class C for example, your ISP may centralize the reverse zone
and handle the updates for all of its customers who share that block.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Well, you *can* do something similar with Notes... I know it prevents
printing and copying, not sure about fowarding. However, one can always
kinda change the design of the Notes item.
~
-K.Borndale
IT Manager
Sybari Software
631.630.8569 -direct
what happens when you need to go over a speedbump?
up here in Boston, all the ramps to dunkin donuts drive-thru would tear that
thing to pieces!
-Original Message-
From: Setmajer, Jerzy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 9:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
That was fixed in the Clinton SP2 hotfix.
Now if you attempt to forward a popup box asks you to
define honor.
Original message
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 09:53:42 -0400
From: Soysal, Serdar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Prevent the forwarding of an email message.
To: Exchange
See this as an example. This is brain.net.pk After, I will show you yours
and the difference.
Dig [EMAIL PROTECTED] (203.128.7.10) ...
Authoritative Answer
Recursive queries supported by this server
Query for brain.net.pk type=255 class=1
brain.net.pk MX (Mail Exchanger) Priority: 15
Does anyone know how the limit to the size of the information store is
determined in Exchange 2000?
Is it the size of the .edb file or the sum of the .edb and .stm files?
Thanks
_
List posting FAQ:
But that's irrelevant - that's not a Dunkin Donuts car, that's a Starbucks
car, sorry, Caa
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL
I applied the latest exchange security update(s) last night to our exchange
server including the IIS patch. Now I find the Global Address List is gone.
I followed Q246127 and the showInAddressBook is visible using ADSI Edit, and
the is a value for USNChanged, but the there not even a listing of
That's because the question has been asked numerous times in the past and
the answer is you can't. Pity or not, it's a reality. Now, if you'd like to
try and develop a solutions using group policies and whatever else you'd
like to throw at the problem call me when you think you've got the problem
How long is a piece of string?
-Original Message-
From: wade robinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Database and Drives size
Is it acceptable to put Exchange 2000 information stores on a
set of mirrored 72
Ouch! Did the same thing happen when you tested in your lab?
-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Recipient Update Service Broken?
I applied the latest exchange security
Sum.
-Original Message-
From: Davis,Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 9:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2000 Standard edition Store limits
Does anyone know how the limit to the size of the information
store is determined in
Reverse lookup is giving me fits for one of my sites - vitalms.com
(209.154.100.11). Although we have published the PTR record, it does not
resolve.
Our corporate site - vitalps.com (209.154.100.10) - does resolve properly.
We use the same name servers for both sites. What am I missing?
Twice as long as half a piece of string.
:)
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Analyst
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 April 2002 16:21
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Database and Drives size
How long is a
Question regarding both Exchange5.5 and Exchange 2000:
Is there a possibility, and if how, to prohibit sending messages from the
Internet to distribution lists?
thanks in advance
_
List posting FAQ:
in 5.5 - remove smtp address of the DL
-Original Message-
From: Robert Jan Duyverman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Prohibit Internet messages from Internet to DL's
Question regarding both Exchange5.5 and Exchange
Give them an e-mail address of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Isn't that in the FAQ
yet?
-Original Message-
From: Robert Jan Duyverman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Prohibit Internet messages from Internet to DL's
in both
set up an internal domain name (that's not on the net) and assign this
domain to e-mail addresses on the DL's (or anything that you do not want to
receive/send mail to the internet).
-Original Message-
From: Robert Jan Duyverman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April
All I know is that if you can't measure a piece of string you can't manage a
piece of string.
--
be - MOS
The sun never sets on those who ride into it.
-- RKO
-Original Message-
From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:34 AM
l-l-l-lab?
Original message
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 10:24:50 -0500
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Recipient Update Service Broken?
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ouch! Did the same thing happen when you tested in your lab?
-Original
Hey, I'm under 40[1] and I remember carbon paper
[1] OK, only just[2]
[2] Mutter
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 April 2002 18:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How can I disable BCC feature on exchange server
Those of us under 40
Exchange 5.5 sp2; clients are Outlook 2K
To put it simply:
Shelly has been replaced with Karen. Renamed Shelly's NT account and
mailbox to Karen. Now, whenever someone uses the meeting planner to invite
Karen to a meeting, Karen gets the request but the sender receives an NDR
saying it can't
Don't rename accounts, just delete them and create new ones.
-Original Message-
From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 8:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: delivery to non-existant mailbox
Exchange 5.5 sp2; clients are Outlook 2K
To put it
Doesn't anyone have any ideas on this? I would be forever grateful if
someone could provide some ideas ;)
Scott Brooks
-Original Message-
From: Scott Brooks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 10:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Changing Inet Mail Svc from
I don't see ANY reverse lookup records at ALL on any of your nameservers.
It also looks like the serial number is the same on both your name servers.
Perhaps try and increment the serial number by one on your primary name
server to force it to transfer the zone again.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Are you sure she doesnt have shelly as the delegate?
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Analyst
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 April 2002 16:51
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: delivery to non-existant mailbox
Check Outlook (Tools-Option-Delegates) to make sure no delegates are listed
that reference Shelly.
--jim
-Original Message-
From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: delivery to non-existant mailbox
No worries. You still have a lot of bounce.
Original message
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 16:50:10 +0100
From: Les Bessant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: How can I disable BCC feature on exchange
server
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey, I'm under 40[1] and I remember
Have your reverse zones been delegated to you by your Internet provider? It is
possible that the reverse zones aren't pointing to you, so it wouldn't matter if you
updated your names servers. Go to dnsstuff.com and do a reverse lookup on your mail
server's IP to see what name server
Is your DNS server authoritative for the reverse zone?
-Original Message-
From: Lynne July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DNS
Reverse lookup is giving me fits for one of my sites - vitalms.com
Bingo! That was it. Thanks a lot, Jim.
Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr
-Original Message-
From: O'Conner, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: delivery to non-existant mailbox
Check Outlook
Will do.
Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: delivery to non-existant mailbox
Don't rename accounts, just delete them and
Well, there's no rule that you have to use it with the standard equipment.
Imagine that baby with a nice off-road package.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IE5.5
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, at 11:44am, Scott Brooks wrote:
I've just inherited an exchange server at work. It is v5.5 Build 2448.8
SP2. We've finally gotten a DSL connection, so I want to change our
Internet Mail Service Connection to use it instead of dialing up our ISP
every few minutes to
What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and
Mailboxes in Exchange2k?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll
skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies.
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Why would you want to do that?
Anyway: Q262054
Original message
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 12:46:09 -0400
From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Full access
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to
all PFs and
That was answered this morning. Q258183
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Full access
What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and
Mailboxes
Andy says it is Q262054.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
That was answered this morning. Q258183
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael
Why is this a bad design?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll
skip the diatribe on what a
Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices.
1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled.
2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work.
3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean
that the rights should be
Chevy Suburban.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been
accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and
its punishment is but an urge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ouch! Did the same thing happen when you tested in your lab?
I don't have a lab. Small biotech no money for a lab. I did
find that the service actually started dying on the 8th. I
found
Ok, let me try this again. If I send a message marked private, when
the recipient opens it, he CANNOT modify anything in the message box. He CAN
hit reply or forward, but he CANNOT modify my message and he CANNOT copy any
of my message while composing the reply. I was looking at this only
Older one?
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IE5.5 SP2 / IE 6
Chevy Suburban.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 -
Server 5.5 SP4 NT 4.0 SP6a
Workstations W2K SP2 Outlook 2K
A user had a message that was sent but never received by someone within the
site (same server as well). I typically track these down as misaddressed,
deleted, delegated, or processed by a rule so it does not appear where it
would be
I'll use the same argument Doug used for the BCC question.
How did you prevent someone from taking a typed memo and making photocopies
of it?
-Original Message-
From: Bibel, Laura Y. [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Since you work for a bank, Im betting that you guys still
type out memos.
Original message
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 13:16:30 -0400
From: Schwartz, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Prevent the forwarding of an email message.
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll use the
why stop there... If it's private, you should not be able to print it, or
save it my suggestion - if it's that private - DONT SEND IT
Once I've heard of a tool that leaves no traces on recipients computer.
I think they called this a telephone or something like it.
Can anyone confirm
We have our secretaries do it. I can't be bothered to type as it interferes
with my golf game.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Prevent the forwarding of an email message.
But how am I supposed to monitor my boss's and all the C-level exec's
mailboxes then.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
Runs counter to several things I would
Mail Recall from Authentica. It can prevent forwarding, copying, printing
(even blocks most screen captures), change access permissions on the fly,
expiration of messages, etc. Even prevents others from seeing the content of
the messages that might have permission on the mailbox since it uses a
www.dice.com
-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access
But how am I supposed to monitor my boss's and all the C-level exec's
mailboxes then.
-Original Message-
ShavedSeielstad.exe?
Original message
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 10:38:20 -0700
From: Doug Hampshire [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Full access
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But how am I supposed to monitor my boss's and all the C-
level exec's
mailboxes then.
ShavedEskens.exe is more like it..
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:47 PM
To:
The talented and ever popular Mr. Seielstad is neither my boss, nor a
C-Level exec. And he has graduated beyond SSM status. He can actually get
dressed all by himself now each morning.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:47 AM
I have replicated the PFs over to exch2k. All folders show up. I can click
on one and it will have all the contents. I come back say 10 minutes later
and the items are not there anymore. At least I can't see them. If I right
click and check the size, it shows that there are items in the
My clothes don't match, but I dress myself.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002
I am here to tell you that there is no e in Citi. Every frigging thing is
on paper. They won't even use Remedy - they use a fax machine!
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Prevent
You ever have to give a deposition Michael? Because you may want to brush
up on the logistics of that. You are totally setting yourself up for a
world of hurt.
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM
To: Exchange
Resource Mailboxes that hang on corrupt meeting requests, OOO, Executives
who forget a lot, misc. I don't understand what the big deal is about
giving select few full access?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:26 PM
To:
Serdar,
If I read the FAQ and corresponding Q article correctly, this only applies
to mailbox permissions, correct?
=
3.46Q: I added/changed/renamed the primary NT account of a mailbox but
it still doesn't work?
3.58 Q: When I change permissions/accounts/owners on a mailbox
Look for the *.oab files.
Original message
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 13:41:53 -0500
From: Greatlakes, Reebdnes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Offline Address Book filename
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can anyone tell me the default name of the file used to
store the
Whoopie, I have one. Me. I support 6 sites (soon to drop to 4) with about
5K mailboxes.
I'm not saying don't ever do it, just don't make it a default. Make it so
that the admin has to manually add his NT account to the box each and every
time. Make your server update the directory perms
Just make sure the forgetful Exec's give you permission in writing. As you
point out, they won't remember they did. Then ponder what they'll think if
a sensitive message from their sent ends up in the wrong hands...THEY know
they couldn't have misclicked the recipient.
And so forth...
Make your ExchangeAdmin NT group the owner of all resources.
Execs should be shot, and they will be the first one to take you to court.
OOO? Who gives a rats ass
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:31 PM
To:
Can you think of another way to make the sent folder message count be
greater than the number of actually-sent messages. So can I.
-Original Message-
From: Mood, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Sent Item not
Fax machines are still considered Mission Critical eh?
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Prevent the forwarding of an email message.
I am here to tell you that there
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
