Nate's suggestion fixed it for me,
Harriet
See if Q196160 applies to your situation.
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
-Original Message-
From: Petschow, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 December 2002 20:01
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Owa (5.5) fails to get calendar
The only
Presumably you are going through a firewall when you access OWA from home,
and directly when you tried the laptop at work? What happens if you take
the laptop home?
Perhaps the firewall is using some sort of filter that isn't accepting your
reply request?
Mark
-Original Message-
From:
I had a similar problem with my home machine, even after disabling the pop-up stopper.
My problem was with Zone Labs software firewall, I had the privacy settings too high.
If you don't have anything like this running, then try going through your Internet
Explorer options and resetting your
We are Running the IBM Shark very successfully on Novell, Linux, Unix and
Microsoft versions. Our Exchange box has been running beautifully without
any hardware related issues. We use flash copy to enable complete backup of
the database system without it being down for extended periods of time. We
Exchange 2K SP3
I received a warning from AntiGen stating that attachments in 3 messages in a users
mailbox are corrupt. I tried to have the user delete the messages in question but the
messages are locked and she can't delete them. I'm fairly new to Exchange and can't
find resources on this
Have you tried deleting the mails with shift+delete, usually that does the
trick. If it still doesn't delete them try stopping the antigen services
while you try and delete them.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 9. joulukuuta 2002 16:55
To:
Thank you,
Yes, that did the trick (Shift-DEL). Sometimes it's the simplest thing.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Johansson Patrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 9:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Deleting locked message
Have you
I have a BIG Exchange 2000 customer that is thinking Aelita EDR and Event
Admin are going to be required to manage AD/EX2K and such.
Anyone have experience with this stuff to share?
tia
Charles
_
List posting FAQ:
We use Legato here for backing up pretty much everything. It can be
infuriating when it doesn't work and their tech support is lousy. On the
other hand, if Legato says something is backed up, you can rest assured
you can recover it if need be.
Their BSM (business suite modules) for Exchange seem
Reasonably on topic I think. For larger shops 3rd party provisioning
solutions are often a requirement due to the highly distributed nature of
data and administration. They provide an excellent way to enforce business
logic into the process. While I don't have any actual implementation
experience
We are in this boat as well.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 1:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: the IBM Shark
I'm looking at a SAN for the sole purpose of eliminating the one-to-one
relationship between disk
Good feedback, thank you.
Mostly it's a disk cost issue, that's the larger driving issue. Its going
to happen, I don't really have a big say there. What I do have a say in is
what should go to san and what shouldn't. Sounds like maybe exchange
shouldn't.
-Original Message-
From: MS
Then is it like more like Tivoli? I have used CA, Veritas, HP SureStore, and
Palindrome (Seagate). I have touched Tivoli but just doing restore/recovery
for Exchange. Tivoli has so much to it than the other it seems.
- Original Message -
From: Ken Cornetet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, at 9:58am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Best piece of experience I can share is to spend as much time as possible
understanding the customer requirements and business processes ... the
cost savings of doing the work right the first time can be tremendous,
even if it does seem
We have recently installed a second Exchange 2000 Server. Any mailbox
created or moved to this server does not receive any mail. Sending seems
to work fine.
The non delivery reports reflect the following message
A configuration error in the e-mail system caused the message to bounce
I need to create a report with a list of all mailboxes that have an event
script/agent associated with them.
Is there some simple way to do this? I am running in a Ex2K/5.5 mixed
mode environment, and all the mailboxes I am concerned with are on my 5.5
server.
thanks!
Jason Grimme
If I recall correctly, you should be able to forward the messages from
within exch admin.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of James Liddil
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 8:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Departed Employee
We have a remote site which is a sub-domain of our network and has its own
exchange server. However, we want all our sites to have a common email
address style, so we have the remote users set up on our Exchange box with
mail addresses in the common style but with alternate recipient set to their
All,
I have a question for everyone. I've retired 5.5 servers from our
Organization by following a MS Q article that shows you how to
accomplish this. Now, when I look in ESM on E2K. It still shows the
Exch 5.5 servers listed in there. Granted they are ghosted out. But
how do I get rid of
By 'ghosted out' do you mean just a white icon? If so, that's how they
normally look.
The process for removing them that I perform is to use the 5.5 admin
program on the E2k server, connecting to the server running SRS. You
then delete the 5.5 server from the site as you'd normally do. Is
Yes, I've done that procedure. But they still show up in the E2K (white
Icon) in the site. Also, I'm getting warning RPC messages that is shown
below on all my E2K servers. It seems they're still trying to send
directory updates to these servers.
Event Type: Warning
Event Source:
Use an x.400 connector or (probably even better) an SMTP for directory
replication (if this is 5.5).
-Original Message-
From: Owen Parry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 7:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
We have a remote site which is a sub-domain of our
IIRC, it takes time to replicate the change through to AD. So, it may
be a problem with your Config CA.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 09 December 2002 17:02
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers
Are these 8216 events or some other Event ID? What connectros do you have
setup? What about trusts between the domains?
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
-Original Message-
From: Santosh Naidoo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 9:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
I found some KBs on support.microsoft.com for Event 9318
MSExchangeMTA.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bowles, John
L.
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 12:02
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers
Yes, I've
Yea, it's been well over a month. And they are still resident in the
ESM.
__
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
I've found some as well. But I haven't found anything on how to get
them out of ESM.
Thanks,
__
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL
So you've ruled out a problem with the Config CA, then?
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 09 December 2002 17:13
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers
Subject: RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers
Yea,
I wouldn't say I entirely ruled that out. I would say that I'm looking
at other things that could be the problem. I just don't understand why
It doesn't move it out of ESM. I've done replication on the Config_CA
to see if it pushed the changes to the E2K servers. Still nothing.
Events 1205,1022 etc . SMTP connector on one and Fax gateway on the
other. Single Domain
Santosh
JJ Fast Food Distribution Limited
-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 December 2002 17:06
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Loop
Are these 8216
This is probably a simple question to most of you, but the answer eludes me.
I am the exchange server administrator (that means that I don't necessarily
know how to fix it, but I get all the inbound failure mail). We have a few
accounts that were deleted due to employees leaving, getting fired,
Greetings All,
Exchange 2000 SP3 (Enterprise).
Is there a way to figure out how many emails came thru' our gateway for
a certain period of time? Say for the last 7 days. Thanks for any ideas.
Raj
**
This e-mail message,
Just create a DL with no members in it, and assign the relevant SMTP
addresses to the DL. Messages sent to those SMTP addresses are
black-holed; no NDR, no messages to you, nothing!
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Doug Kassay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 09 December 2002 17:37
Setup a DL with no one in it. Assign it the SMTP addresses for the people who
are no longer with you. End of story. :o)
-Original Message-
From: Doug Kassay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 9:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Retired Exchange 5.5
The information is contained in the tracking logs. You could write a script
to pull the information from them (sample scripts just might be found at
www.swinc.com) or you could use a 3rd party tool like.. oh, MessageView to
collect that information among other things.
-Original Message-
Thank you, Chris.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 11:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Inbound emails.
The information is contained in the tracking logs. You could write a
script
to pull the information from
Tony,
Have you tried Netbackup from Veritas? (I assume by Veritas you were
referring to there BE product).
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 December 2002 16:23
To:
Check out Q articles:
Q260782
Q309113
Q326018
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
--
From: Santosh Naidoo
Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 9, 2002 11:29
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Mail Loop
Events 1205,1022 etc .
We have a Shark here and found that it is CRAP when it comes to I/O
intensive Win32 applications. Someone here got the bright idea to have
an enterprise-wide SAN solution, instead of looking at it from the
perspective of how each platform actually works the Shark works
great for legacy (i.e.
Take a look at the event log next time you stop and start the exchange event
service - I believe it logs all those with scripts.
-Original Message-
From: Jason Grimme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 December 2002 15:12
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Discover mailboxes w/ event
Great feedback, thanks!
I think we in the end will probably go for the Hitachi 9970 or 9980.
-Original Message-
From: Exchange (Swynk) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 11:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: the IBM Shark
We have a Shark here and found
Does anyone know of a way to remove these retired Exchange 5.5 servers
from the ESM?
Thank you,
__
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL
I thought you could only do that from 5.5 Manager.
- Original Message -
From: Bowles, John L. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 2:50 PM
Subject: RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers
Does anyone know of a way to remove these
When you removed the Exchange 5.5 servers did you use or have you tried
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;259158
- Original Message -
From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 3:03 PM
Subject:
I did, I connected with the 5.5 admin program on E2K while connected to
the SRS server and removed the old Exchange 5.5 servers. But when I go
into ESM I can still see the old servers (whited out) and it looks as if
all the servers are still trying to do directory updates with these
servers. Is
OK, stupid question time. I feel stupid for not finding the answer but I
need to ask...
My internal organisation is multiple Exchange 5.5 SP4 sites using X.400
connector. Each site use a different smtp dns domain name for it's users
and mail flow without problem. Typing a user smtp address
We're running e2k on a shark, but we don't have many users on it. I'm
forseeing I/o issues just from the design. If you can, fight for your own
disk pack so that you don't suffer the pains of the shark for all
design. I lost the battle, here, so I'm sure we'll have slowness and it
will be all
so we're getting 1018 errors Here's the details:
single-server single site (ASP stuff with multiple address book views)
nt4.0 sp6a exchange 5.5 with sp4 and post fixes - Antigen 7.0 as the virus
scanner, but previously version 6.5.
We run nightly full backups. We have been receiving 1018
I've had it happen and reloaded nt4.0 6a and it seemed that they went
away
___
\\ - - //
(--@-@--)
+-oOOo-(_)-oOOo--+
|\\_|_//
|
|John M. Strongosky,
|San Diego Community
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, at 1:01pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We were going to go with the Hitachi, but a slick salesman knew the key to
our manager's heart (mets tickets) ...
Ah, yes. I love it when IT purchases are based on solid, objective
criteria and unbiased, informed decisions.
--
Ben
Running OWA 5.5 sp4 on a stand alone server along with Exchange 5.5 in the
corp domain. Those in another domain cannot check their email which we host.
I've created the local group here and added their global group of OWA users.
For some reason they can't authenticate to their domain, even though
Received a strange NDR today. On an e-mail sent to someone outside the
organization and the delivery failed. On the NDR it said
Your message
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Your telemanager.net e-report is ready
did not reach the following recipient(s):
hidden by jjones 12/6/02
Hi,
We have just recently migrated from Exchange 5.5 SP4 to Exchange 2000 SP3. Our OWA
2000 server is a front-end server with the same level of service pack. Users are
finding when they try to attach files (Primarily Word and Excel files) to their
emails, they are getting this error message:
TSIA
Name yer favorite list server for Exchange that supports (preferably)
moderated discussion, freeform discussion, announce-only, etc, lists.
Thanks in advance. Used ReddFish so far -- contemplating switching if
there's something better.
-Yanek.
I just figured out my own problem. If you install Office SR-1a and SP3 and then you
can attach anything you want. Weird.
Sorry for wasting space.
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Edwards, Aaron
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 1:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA Action
If you type in the SMTP address in question and hit Alt-K, what does it
resolve to?
-Original Message-
From: Jerry J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 3:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Received a strange NDR today. On an e-mail sent to someone
outside
If you are talking about outlook I type it in and Alt-k and it keeps it
the same, just underlines it. It is a good mailbox for the server as he
has been getting e-mails all day. I have left him a voicemail asking him
to send me an e-mail to confirm that address is not mistyped at all.
Ok, here is the situation. I'm assigned to a project regarding Internet
Security and I've been pushed into a corner and need some help.
How are most people deploying ISA Server within their company? Are they
adding it as a member of their AD domain or making it stand alone?
Let me explain why
You mean you type hidden by jjones in the TO: box and it underlines it?
Then it is a recipient on the server assumedly created, and hidden, by
jjones.
-Original Message-
From: Jerry J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 4:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
I was curious as to how hard it is to set up Exchange for Sending and
Receiving faxes. Is it worthwhile? Would a standalone fax machine be
better? Are there a lot of headaches involved?
Thanks
-Chris
_
List posting FAQ:
Don't ever put ISA on a DC. (unless you create a separate forest)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Howard Griffith
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 3:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ISA Server implementation for Exchange
Ok, here
There is some info on the how-tos at
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/itsolutions/howto/isahow.asp
They may help you decide on your course of action.
- Original Message -
From: Charles Marriott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What's the downfall to doing so. I know it comes installed by default on
SBS. I'm not using it at the moment and I have no plans to but is there
any harm that might happen?
-Chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Charles
Marriott
Sent:
If you use a FAX ISP, then all you need is to be connected to the net.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 3:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Faxing via Exchange
I was curious as to how hard it is to set up
Hi there - I am having an issue with my exchange 5.5 SP4 (W2K) machine where
internet mail is not being delivered to us. The sender receives no bounced
message
I believe that the messages are being delayed or something. The only error
out of the event logs is:
Event Type: Information
Event
Has someone unwelcome hacked into your network and used your account to
do odd things at all. It does look odd.
Might be worth turning up Logging on the IMS to high, switching on
Auditing for yourself then watching the Event Log carefully for a little
while. I may be wrong, but one never knows
It's not a big deal - if you are comfortable with telephony systems as well as with
Exchange connectors. Setting up and the systems correctly is the trick, but shouldn't
be too difficult. If you've set them up correctly, administration is quite simple.
If it's worthwhile will vary depending
Read RFC 821 and 822 and their successors 2821 and 2822 to learn how you
can telnet into your SMTP server using port 25 to test inbound mail.
Edgar J. Crowley Jr.
Technical Consultant
Windows Messaging Platforms Practice
hp Services
*510-612-3365
*[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original
If you can't solve it any other way, I suggest you follow FAQ Appendix A
and move everything to a new server.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Technical Consultant
hp Services
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do you have directory replication connectors?
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Technical Consultant
hp Services
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bourque Daniel
Sent: Monday,
As you have been told, you have a problem with your Config CA. When you
properly delete these from your Exchange 5.5 site, the Config CA should
replicate this to AD, and then they should drop out of your Exchange
2000 display. But since that is not happening, either (1) something is
wrong with
You could use logging to see if the user is sending such mails. Anyway it
will tell you if such mails are send from your network or at least via your
server.
Make sure your server is not an open relay.
If it was up to me I would check the queue's too. Spammers usually don't
send just one
At 15:06 09-12-2002 -0800, you wrote:
I was curious as to how hard it is to set up Exchange for Sending and
Receiving faxes. Is it worthwhile? Would a standalone fax machine be
better? Are there a lot of headaches involved?
Been there done that.
Installed ZetaFAX. It integrates nicely with
73 matches
Mail list logo
