OWA

Hi folks. My network is an nt domain but I hope to migrate to windows 2000 soon. I run exchange 5.5 on an NT4 box with OWA installed on our intranet server. This server is a windows 2000 box. To access mailbox via OWA users have to do three things. 1 Open a dial up connection to any ISP 2 run

RE: Group Wise 6.0

Good for you. You go, girl! When you post at 10PM Eastern, you may not get a response right away. Give it more than 50 minutes before getting frustrated and repeating your post. Having said that, there are a few resources available at http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/default.asp that may

Problem Accessing OMA in Exchange 2003 Beta 2

Hi, I don't know if anyone else is getting this issue, but any pointers to a resolution would be gratefully received. Environment: Single Windows 2003 RC2 Server Exchange 2003 Beta 2 Sony Ericsson T68i Mobile phone IE6 SP1 OWA works fine, and I can access OMA via IE6 no problem (Although I get

Re: OWA

Install and SSL certificate. Map port 443 on the external firewall interface to the internal IP address of the intranet server. Assign a DNS name to the external IP address if one doesn't already exist for it. Connect to https://dns_name/exchange On 2/28/03 6:14, Eve Jimah [EMAIL PROTECTED]

programm. read the PF Permission Roles ?

Is there any way to read programmatically the permissions set on public folders on EX5.5/NT4 ? Not the client permissions, those set on the Permissions page from exchange administrator. Directory export doesn't seem to have any working field for that info (at least I tried every field offered by

Removing an Exchange 2000 server

I am in the process of removing an Exchange 2000 server from my site. This server was used to during a swing method upgrade to temporarily hold users while we upgraded the production servers to 2000. It hasn't had a user's mailbox on it for several weeks and currently only has 3 mailboxes that

RE: Removing an Exchange 2000 server

Nevermind, I found an account that had an orphaned mailbox on that server. Pardon the interruption, -Matt Matthew Bailey LAN Engineer CSK Auto, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (602) 631-7486 Fax: (602) 294-7486 Chaos reigns within. Reflect, repent, and

RE: Failed delivery

We've also had problems with incoming messages from mailing lists generated by Mailman etc. The logs of the sending server show them being delivered to our ES 5.5 server, and message tracking indicates that they have been delivered to the correct mailboxes. They then appear in some mailboxes

**OFF TOPIC**: Active Directory

Does anyone know an AD mailing list as good as this one is for Exchange? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:

RE: **OFF TOPIC**: Active Directory

List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 8:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: **OFF TOPIC**: Active Directory

Send on behalf of

Good afternoon, Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 SP 4.0 I am setting up a mailbox that people will need to add to their folder list. They will need to then reply from that mailbox. I have set these people as delegates to the new mailbox and granted them Editor permissions to all folders. When these

RE: Send on behalf of

You need to give them Send As permissions from Exch Admin -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 9:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Good afternoon, Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 SP 4.0 I am setting up a mailbox that people will need

RE: Send on behalf of

Send as permissions are not the same as send on behalf of. Dennis -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 12:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Send on behalf of You need to give them Send As permissions

RE: Free/Busy Problems

Outlook populates free/busy data into a shared public folder. Therefore, users won't have any free/busy data until they've logged into their mailboxes using Outlook (or OWA). Search TechNet with the exact wording of the message you're getting, because there are very well may be things you have to

RE: Send on behalf of

I don't think that this is true. Delegate permission is sufficient for send as rights. (You don't even need to give them any specific permissions, in fact you could give them none permissions on all folders, and by virtue of their name being present in the Delegates window they will be able to

RE: Send on behalf of

Martin, How do you do that? Thanks, Mike -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 12:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Send on behalf of You need to give them Send As permissions from Exch Admin -Original

RE: Send on behalf of

Dennis... Please explain your statement. Thanks... -Original Message- From: Depp, Dennis M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 12:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Send on behalf of Send as permissions are not the same as send on behalf of. Dennis

Re: Send on behalf of

The phrasing of the question and terms used based on the question as asked are ambiguous. Delegate permissions is sufficient for 'send on behalf of' rights, if that checkbox is marked. Send As permissions are another set of permissions and can only be granted via the Exchange admin. On 2/28/03

RE: Send on behalf of

When I use Send As, the message looks like it came from the sender. When I open the message, it still looks like it came from the sender. When I use send on behalf of, in my inbox, the message looks like it came from the person I have send on behalf of permission. When I open the message it will

RE: Send on behalf of

Here is what I did... What did I do wrong? I have a Help Desk mailbox. I created a distribution list called AIS HELP DESK. I added AIS HELP DESK as a delegate to HELP DESK mailbox. The on behalf shows up on the delivery options tab of the Help Desk mailbox. I think I did everything right,

RE: Group Wise 6.0

http://www.wingra.com/solutions/groupwisetoexchange.html -Original Message- From: Guy Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 10:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Group Wise 6.0 I need to move 10 group wise ( version 6.0) user over to an exchnage 5.5

RE: Group Wise 6.0

http://www.streiff-is.com/GWMigrator/default.htm -Original Message- From: Guy Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 10:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Group Wise 6.0 I need to move 10 group wise ( version 6.0) user over to an exchnage 5.5 server.

RE: Group Wise 6.0

http://www.openone.com/software/Direct-TO-1/index.htm -Original Message- From: Guy Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 10:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Group Wise 6.0 I need to move 10 group wise ( version 6.0) user over to an exchnage 5.5

RE: Group Wise 6.0

http://www.mcpmag.com/Features/article.asp?EditorialsID=329 -Original Message- From: Guy Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 10:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Group Wise 6.0 I need to move 10 group wise ( version 6.0) user over to an exchnage 5.5

Wanting to get off Outlook 98

Good afternoon. Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 NT 4.0 SP4 Yes the time has come and management has decided that they want to get off of Outlook 98. What would be the best Outlook/Exchange to go to now? We are probably 3 years away from going to Active Directory. We have windows 2000 available. Please

RE: Wanting to get off Outlook 98

If you're really three years away from AD then Exchange 5.5+SP4+various patches is the only choice. Exchange 2000 and beyond *require* AD. Outlook XP will still talk to Exchange 5.5. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003

RE: Wanting to get off Outlook 98

That's what I'd do - get the newest technology that your systems can handle. I assume you already have Exchange 5.5 -- Get Office XP, which comes with OL 2002. Drew Nicholson Technical Writer Network Engineer LAN Manager RapidApp 312-372-7188 (work) 312-543-0008 (cell) Born To Edit

RE: Send on behalf of

I'd never noticed before that making someone a delegate puts their name in the Exchange Admin delivery options screen. However, if that's how it gives the delegate send on behalf of rights, then maybe it's subject to the standard Exchange Admin two hour delay. -Peter -Original

RE: Option to send OoO to the internet

You might try turning it on for everybody, then disabling it for the groups you don't want to have it using distribution groups. Just a thought. Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com

RE: Option to send OoO to the internet

Ben, It is not enabled (check box---unchecked) by default for all groups. If OOO is enabled globally,it over-rides all other parameters and is effective for all. Thanks Raj -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 1:47 PM To:

Missing Mailbox Store

I have a situation where I have two E2K systems, front-end, back-end. The (default) mailbox store was placed on a remote NAS, that is now gone. There was only one mailbox on it, that was used only for testing. Now I need to add users to this E2K system. But the Exchnage Mailbox Store/Public Store

Odd SMTP failure

Environment is Exchange 5.5sp4 We have a distribution list that also has an SMTP address. I send a message from outside the network to the SMTP address it reaches all recipients. If I connect directly to our bridgehead server and send a message to the SMTP address, it reaches all recipients.

RE: Missing Mailbox Store

Uninstall Exchange. Install Exchange. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of The Geek Q Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 12:09 PM To:

RE: Option to send OoO to the internet

SOL -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Option to send OoO to the internet Exchange 2000 Enterprise with SP3) Hi guys, I am trying to enable the Out..office option to the internet for

RE: Free/Busy Problems

something is screwed up about the Free/Busy system folder... When you are moving the users to Exchange 2000, are they staying in the same Admin group? or are they going to a new Admin group that you may have created? If they are going to the new Admin group, their Legacy Exchange DN is still

admpack.exe and Exchange 5.5

Has anyone put these two together? I work with some developers that are tired of seeing the will you allow dialog box and want to put a .dll in their app to get around it. In reading the docs I don't see any reference to the version of Exchange server they run it on and wanted to see if anyone

Re: admpack.exe and Exchange 5.5

What does an Outlook Object Model Guard security prompt have to do with the admpack.exe and Exchange 5.5? .. Confused.. In any event... Tell your developers to use Redemption and be done with it. On 2/28/03 15:31, MSX dude [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has anyone put these two together? I work

RE: admpack.exe and Exchange 5.5

OK. I was wondering the same thing but decided not to open my mouth and blow it. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 2:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions What does an Outlook Object Model Guard security prompt have to do with

Help With LDAP Query

I have a query that looks like this for use with RBDL: LDAP://mtvex00/o=TestOrg;(((objectClass=organizationalPerson))(postalAddress=OverThere)(!givenName=CR*));cn,adspath;subtree Now then, this works fine to add people to a DL. However, if I go in and manually add an organizationalPerson who's

RE: admpack.exe and Exchange 5.5

You can get around the security prompt if you make the COM addin trusted within the form in the public folder. I take it you haven't done this then... http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/esecup/admin.htm _ List posting FAQ:

RE: Option to send OoO to the internet

I believe that OoO responses are an 'All or Nothing' proposition. I don't think you can define some folks to be able to send them and others to *not* be able to send them. In my opinion, OoO responses are bad form as it is and should *never* be sent to the Internet. Mike Strock [EMAIL

Re: admpack.exe and Exchange 5.5

On 2/28/03 17:40, MSX dude [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You can get around the security prompt if you make the COM addin trusted within the form in the public folder. I take it you haven't done this then... http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/esecup/admin.htm I'm aware of the

Limiting Amount Of Distribution List Members

Hi, I have found the information for the registry edit specific to limiting the max amount of recipients for Distribution Lists however is there not a setting in Exchange 2k? If so, where is it? I cannot find it at all. Thanks, Erik Vesneski Sr. Systems Specialist ISO Intel Systems Phone:

RE: admpack.exe and Exchange 5.5

Thanks that is what I needed to know. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 4:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: admpack.exe and Exchange 5.5 On 2/28/03 17:40, MSX dude [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You can get around

RE: Limiting Amount Of Distribution List Members

Erik: I don't have a knowledge of that specific setting, but if it exists, I doubt that it is a registry setting, but rather an Active Directory setting since E2K uses AD groups for mail distribution. Wish I could give you a more specific answer, but maybe it will help just pointing you

Re: Help With LDAP Query

On 2/28/03 17:38, Adam Berns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a query that looks like this for use with RBDL: LDAP://mtvex00/o=TestOrg;(((objectClass=organizationalPerson))(postalAddre ss =OverThere)(!givenName=CR*));cn,adspath;subtree Now then, this works fine to add people to a DL.